Loading…

Spatial heterogeneity in habitat selection: Nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens

Ecological relationships of animals and their environments are known to vary spatially and temporally across scales. However, common approaches for evaluating resource selection by animals assume that the processes of habitat selection are stationary across space. The assumption that habitat selecti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of wildlife management 2013-05, Vol.77 (4), p.791-801
Main Authors: Mcnew, Lance B., Gregory, Andrew J., Sandercock, Brett K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-c634068a63d8e4752e150590c3e6830f0b412d9e44e7c0124f4bedf28f3fc23e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-c634068a63d8e4752e150590c3e6830f0b412d9e44e7c0124f4bedf28f3fc23e3
container_end_page 801
container_issue 4
container_start_page 791
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 77
creator Mcnew, Lance B.
Gregory, Andrew J.
Sandercock, Brett K.
description Ecological relationships of animals and their environments are known to vary spatially and temporally across scales. However, common approaches for evaluating resource selection by animals assume that the processes of habitat selection are stationary across space. The assumption that habitat selection is spatially homogeneous may lead to biased inference and ineffective management. We present the first application of geographically weighted logistic regression to habitat selection by a wildlife species. As a case study, we examined nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens at 3 sites with different ecological conditions in Kansas to assess whether the relative importance of habitat features varied across space. We found that 1) nest sites were associated with habitat conditions at multiple spatial scales, 2) habitat associations across spatial scales were correlated, and 3) the influence of habitat conditions on nest site selection was spatially explicit. Post hoc analyses revealed that much of the spatial variability in habitat selection processes was explained at a regional scale. Moreover, habitat features at local spatial scales were more strongly associated with nest site selection in unfragmented grasslands managed intensively for cattle production than they were in fragmented grasslands within a matrix of farmland. Female prairie-chickens exhibited spatial variability in nest site selection at multiple spatial scales, suggesting plasticity in habitat selection behavior. Our results highlight the importance of accounting for spatial heterogeneity when evaluating the ecological effects of habitat components.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jwmg.493
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1434035399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23470726</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23470726</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-c634068a63d8e4752e150590c3e6830f0b412d9e44e7c0124f4bedf28f3fc23e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFqGzEQhkVJoE5S6AsUFkogl3UkjXal7a2Y1ElwHEpbYtqDkOVZW85615VkEr99FBxiCOQkRvPNN8NPyGdG-4xSfr58WM37ooIPpMcqkDlXTB6QXmrxvBBs8pEchbCkFBhTZY_8-7U20ZkmW2BE382xRRe3mWuzhZm6aGIWsEEbXdd-y8YYUu0i7j-z6TabezRpOFt747zD3C6cvcc2nJDD2jQBP728x-TPj4vfg8t8dDu8Gnwf5VYoDrktQdBSmRJmCoUsOLKCFhW1gKUCWtOpYHxWoRAoLWVc1GKKs5qrGmrLAeGYnO28a9_936Qb9coFi01jWuw2QTORFkABVZXQr2_QZbfxbbouUZxyVQla7YXWdyF4rPXau5XxW82ofk5ZP6esU8oJPX0RmmBNU3vTWhdeeS65KmUhEpfvuAfX4PZdn76-uxnuvF92_DLEzu99ICSVvNz7XIj4-No3_l6XEmSh78ZDza_HP2EyofovPAGJaqPd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1420289409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial heterogeneity in habitat selection: Nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Mcnew, Lance B. ; Gregory, Andrew J. ; Sandercock, Brett K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mcnew, Lance B. ; Gregory, Andrew J. ; Sandercock, Brett K.</creatorcontrib><description>Ecological relationships of animals and their environments are known to vary spatially and temporally across scales. However, common approaches for evaluating resource selection by animals assume that the processes of habitat selection are stationary across space. The assumption that habitat selection is spatially homogeneous may lead to biased inference and ineffective management. We present the first application of geographically weighted logistic regression to habitat selection by a wildlife species. As a case study, we examined nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens at 3 sites with different ecological conditions in Kansas to assess whether the relative importance of habitat features varied across space. We found that 1) nest sites were associated with habitat conditions at multiple spatial scales, 2) habitat associations across spatial scales were correlated, and 3) the influence of habitat conditions on nest site selection was spatially explicit. Post hoc analyses revealed that much of the spatial variability in habitat selection processes was explained at a regional scale. Moreover, habitat features at local spatial scales were more strongly associated with nest site selection in unfragmented grasslands managed intensively for cattle production than they were in fragmented grasslands within a matrix of farmland. Female prairie-chickens exhibited spatial variability in nest site selection at multiple spatial scales, suggesting plasticity in habitat selection behavior. Our results highlight the importance of accounting for spatial heterogeneity when evaluating the ecological effects of habitat components.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.493</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Animal behavior ; Animal nesting ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle production ; Chickens ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Ecological conditions ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Female animals ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; geographically weighted regression (GWR) ; Grasses ; Grassland management ; Grasslands ; greater prairie-chicken ; Habitat conservation ; Habitat Relations ; Habitat selection ; Habitats ; Heterogeneity ; Multiscale modeling ; nest site selection ; Nesting sites ; resource selection function (RSF) ; Site selection ; Spatial models ; Tympanuchus cupido ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; Wildfowl ; Wildlife ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2013-05, Vol.77 (4), p.791-801</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 2013 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright © The Wildlife Society, 2013</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-c634068a63d8e4752e150590c3e6830f0b412d9e44e7c0124f4bedf28f3fc23e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-c634068a63d8e4752e150590c3e6830f0b412d9e44e7c0124f4bedf28f3fc23e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23470726$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23470726$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27286754$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mcnew, Lance B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandercock, Brett K.</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial heterogeneity in habitat selection: Nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><addtitle>The Journal of Wildlife Management</addtitle><description>Ecological relationships of animals and their environments are known to vary spatially and temporally across scales. However, common approaches for evaluating resource selection by animals assume that the processes of habitat selection are stationary across space. The assumption that habitat selection is spatially homogeneous may lead to biased inference and ineffective management. We present the first application of geographically weighted logistic regression to habitat selection by a wildlife species. As a case study, we examined nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens at 3 sites with different ecological conditions in Kansas to assess whether the relative importance of habitat features varied across space. We found that 1) nest sites were associated with habitat conditions at multiple spatial scales, 2) habitat associations across spatial scales were correlated, and 3) the influence of habitat conditions on nest site selection was spatially explicit. Post hoc analyses revealed that much of the spatial variability in habitat selection processes was explained at a regional scale. Moreover, habitat features at local spatial scales were more strongly associated with nest site selection in unfragmented grasslands managed intensively for cattle production than they were in fragmented grasslands within a matrix of farmland. Female prairie-chickens exhibited spatial variability in nest site selection at multiple spatial scales, suggesting plasticity in habitat selection behavior. Our results highlight the importance of accounting for spatial heterogeneity when evaluating the ecological effects of habitat components.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle production</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Ecological conditions</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>geographically weighted regression (GWR)</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grassland management</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>greater prairie-chicken</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitat Relations</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Multiscale modeling</subject><subject>nest site selection</subject><subject>Nesting sites</subject><subject>resource selection function (RSF)</subject><subject>Site selection</subject><subject>Spatial models</subject><subject>Tympanuchus cupido</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFqGzEQhkVJoE5S6AsUFkogl3UkjXal7a2Y1ElwHEpbYtqDkOVZW85615VkEr99FBxiCOQkRvPNN8NPyGdG-4xSfr58WM37ooIPpMcqkDlXTB6QXmrxvBBs8pEchbCkFBhTZY_8-7U20ZkmW2BE382xRRe3mWuzhZm6aGIWsEEbXdd-y8YYUu0i7j-z6TabezRpOFt747zD3C6cvcc2nJDD2jQBP728x-TPj4vfg8t8dDu8Gnwf5VYoDrktQdBSmRJmCoUsOLKCFhW1gKUCWtOpYHxWoRAoLWVc1GKKs5qrGmrLAeGYnO28a9_936Qb9coFi01jWuw2QTORFkABVZXQr2_QZbfxbbouUZxyVQla7YXWdyF4rPXau5XxW82ofk5ZP6esU8oJPX0RmmBNU3vTWhdeeS65KmUhEpfvuAfX4PZdn76-uxnuvF92_DLEzu99ICSVvNz7XIj4-No3_l6XEmSh78ZDza_HP2EyofovPAGJaqPd</recordid><startdate>201305</startdate><enddate>201305</enddate><creator>Mcnew, Lance B.</creator><creator>Gregory, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Sandercock, Brett K.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201305</creationdate><title>Spatial heterogeneity in habitat selection: Nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens</title><author>Mcnew, Lance B. ; Gregory, Andrew J. ; Sandercock, Brett K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-c634068a63d8e4752e150590c3e6830f0b412d9e44e7c0124f4bedf28f3fc23e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle production</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Ecological conditions</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>geographically weighted regression (GWR)</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grassland management</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>greater prairie-chicken</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitat Relations</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Multiscale modeling</topic><topic>nest site selection</topic><topic>Nesting sites</topic><topic>resource selection function (RSF)</topic><topic>Site selection</topic><topic>Spatial models</topic><topic>Tympanuchus cupido</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mcnew, Lance B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandercock, Brett K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mcnew, Lance B.</au><au>Gregory, Andrew J.</au><au>Sandercock, Brett K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial heterogeneity in habitat selection: Nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><addtitle>The Journal of Wildlife Management</addtitle><date>2013-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>791</spage><epage>801</epage><pages>791-801</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>Ecological relationships of animals and their environments are known to vary spatially and temporally across scales. However, common approaches for evaluating resource selection by animals assume that the processes of habitat selection are stationary across space. The assumption that habitat selection is spatially homogeneous may lead to biased inference and ineffective management. We present the first application of geographically weighted logistic regression to habitat selection by a wildlife species. As a case study, we examined nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens at 3 sites with different ecological conditions in Kansas to assess whether the relative importance of habitat features varied across space. We found that 1) nest sites were associated with habitat conditions at multiple spatial scales, 2) habitat associations across spatial scales were correlated, and 3) the influence of habitat conditions on nest site selection was spatially explicit. Post hoc analyses revealed that much of the spatial variability in habitat selection processes was explained at a regional scale. Moreover, habitat features at local spatial scales were more strongly associated with nest site selection in unfragmented grasslands managed intensively for cattle production than they were in fragmented grasslands within a matrix of farmland. Female prairie-chickens exhibited spatial variability in nest site selection at multiple spatial scales, suggesting plasticity in habitat selection behavior. Our results highlight the importance of accounting for spatial heterogeneity when evaluating the ecological effects of habitat components.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.493</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2013-05, Vol.77 (4), p.791-801
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1434035399
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Agricultural land
Animal behavior
Animal nesting
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Cattle production
Chickens
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Ecological conditions
Ecological effects
Ecology
Female animals
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
geographically weighted regression (GWR)
Grasses
Grassland management
Grasslands
greater prairie-chicken
Habitat conservation
Habitat Relations
Habitat selection
Habitats
Heterogeneity
Multiscale modeling
nest site selection
Nesting sites
resource selection function (RSF)
Site selection
Spatial models
Tympanuchus cupido
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
Wildfowl
Wildlife
Wildlife management
title Spatial heterogeneity in habitat selection: Nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T17%3A21%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20heterogeneity%20in%20habitat%20selection:%20Nest%20site%20selection%20by%20greater%20prairie-chickens&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Mcnew,%20Lance%20B.&rft.date=2013-05&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=791&rft.epage=801&rft.pages=791-801&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.493&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23470726%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-c634068a63d8e4752e150590c3e6830f0b412d9e44e7c0124f4bedf28f3fc23e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1420289409&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23470726&rfr_iscdi=true