Loading…
Spatial heterogeneity in habitat selection: Nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens
Ecological relationships of animals and their environments are known to vary spatially and temporally across scales. However, common approaches for evaluating resource selection by animals assume that the processes of habitat selection are stationary across space. The assumption that habitat selecti...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of wildlife management 2013-05, Vol.77 (4), p.791-801 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-c634068a63d8e4752e150590c3e6830f0b412d9e44e7c0124f4bedf28f3fc23e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-c634068a63d8e4752e150590c3e6830f0b412d9e44e7c0124f4bedf28f3fc23e3 |
container_end_page | 801 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 791 |
container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Mcnew, Lance B. Gregory, Andrew J. Sandercock, Brett K. |
description | Ecological relationships of animals and their environments are known to vary spatially and temporally across scales. However, common approaches for evaluating resource selection by animals assume that the processes of habitat selection are stationary across space. The assumption that habitat selection is spatially homogeneous may lead to biased inference and ineffective management. We present the first application of geographically weighted logistic regression to habitat selection by a wildlife species. As a case study, we examined nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens at 3 sites with different ecological conditions in Kansas to assess whether the relative importance of habitat features varied across space. We found that 1) nest sites were associated with habitat conditions at multiple spatial scales, 2) habitat associations across spatial scales were correlated, and 3) the influence of habitat conditions on nest site selection was spatially explicit. Post hoc analyses revealed that much of the spatial variability in habitat selection processes was explained at a regional scale. Moreover, habitat features at local spatial scales were more strongly associated with nest site selection in unfragmented grasslands managed intensively for cattle production than they were in fragmented grasslands within a matrix of farmland. Female prairie-chickens exhibited spatial variability in nest site selection at multiple spatial scales, suggesting plasticity in habitat selection behavior. Our results highlight the importance of accounting for spatial heterogeneity when evaluating the ecological effects of habitat components. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jwmg.493 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1434035399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23470726</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23470726</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-c634068a63d8e4752e150590c3e6830f0b412d9e44e7c0124f4bedf28f3fc23e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFqGzEQhkVJoE5S6AsUFkogl3UkjXal7a2Y1ElwHEpbYtqDkOVZW85615VkEr99FBxiCOQkRvPNN8NPyGdG-4xSfr58WM37ooIPpMcqkDlXTB6QXmrxvBBs8pEchbCkFBhTZY_8-7U20ZkmW2BE382xRRe3mWuzhZm6aGIWsEEbXdd-y8YYUu0i7j-z6TabezRpOFt747zD3C6cvcc2nJDD2jQBP728x-TPj4vfg8t8dDu8Gnwf5VYoDrktQdBSmRJmCoUsOLKCFhW1gKUCWtOpYHxWoRAoLWVc1GKKs5qrGmrLAeGYnO28a9_936Qb9coFi01jWuw2QTORFkABVZXQr2_QZbfxbbouUZxyVQla7YXWdyF4rPXau5XxW82ofk5ZP6esU8oJPX0RmmBNU3vTWhdeeS65KmUhEpfvuAfX4PZdn76-uxnuvF92_DLEzu99ICSVvNz7XIj4-No3_l6XEmSh78ZDza_HP2EyofovPAGJaqPd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1420289409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial heterogeneity in habitat selection: Nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Mcnew, Lance B. ; Gregory, Andrew J. ; Sandercock, Brett K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mcnew, Lance B. ; Gregory, Andrew J. ; Sandercock, Brett K.</creatorcontrib><description>Ecological relationships of animals and their environments are known to vary spatially and temporally across scales. However, common approaches for evaluating resource selection by animals assume that the processes of habitat selection are stationary across space. The assumption that habitat selection is spatially homogeneous may lead to biased inference and ineffective management. We present the first application of geographically weighted logistic regression to habitat selection by a wildlife species. As a case study, we examined nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens at 3 sites with different ecological conditions in Kansas to assess whether the relative importance of habitat features varied across space. We found that 1) nest sites were associated with habitat conditions at multiple spatial scales, 2) habitat associations across spatial scales were correlated, and 3) the influence of habitat conditions on nest site selection was spatially explicit. Post hoc analyses revealed that much of the spatial variability in habitat selection processes was explained at a regional scale. Moreover, habitat features at local spatial scales were more strongly associated with nest site selection in unfragmented grasslands managed intensively for cattle production than they were in fragmented grasslands within a matrix of farmland. Female prairie-chickens exhibited spatial variability in nest site selection at multiple spatial scales, suggesting plasticity in habitat selection behavior. Our results highlight the importance of accounting for spatial heterogeneity when evaluating the ecological effects of habitat components.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.493</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Animal behavior ; Animal nesting ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle production ; Chickens ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Ecological conditions ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Female animals ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; geographically weighted regression (GWR) ; Grasses ; Grassland management ; Grasslands ; greater prairie-chicken ; Habitat conservation ; Habitat Relations ; Habitat selection ; Habitats ; Heterogeneity ; Multiscale modeling ; nest site selection ; Nesting sites ; resource selection function (RSF) ; Site selection ; Spatial models ; Tympanuchus cupido ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; Wildfowl ; Wildlife ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2013-05, Vol.77 (4), p.791-801</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 2013 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright © The Wildlife Society, 2013</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-c634068a63d8e4752e150590c3e6830f0b412d9e44e7c0124f4bedf28f3fc23e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-c634068a63d8e4752e150590c3e6830f0b412d9e44e7c0124f4bedf28f3fc23e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23470726$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23470726$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27286754$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mcnew, Lance B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandercock, Brett K.</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial heterogeneity in habitat selection: Nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><addtitle>The Journal of Wildlife Management</addtitle><description>Ecological relationships of animals and their environments are known to vary spatially and temporally across scales. However, common approaches for evaluating resource selection by animals assume that the processes of habitat selection are stationary across space. The assumption that habitat selection is spatially homogeneous may lead to biased inference and ineffective management. We present the first application of geographically weighted logistic regression to habitat selection by a wildlife species. As a case study, we examined nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens at 3 sites with different ecological conditions in Kansas to assess whether the relative importance of habitat features varied across space. We found that 1) nest sites were associated with habitat conditions at multiple spatial scales, 2) habitat associations across spatial scales were correlated, and 3) the influence of habitat conditions on nest site selection was spatially explicit. Post hoc analyses revealed that much of the spatial variability in habitat selection processes was explained at a regional scale. Moreover, habitat features at local spatial scales were more strongly associated with nest site selection in unfragmented grasslands managed intensively for cattle production than they were in fragmented grasslands within a matrix of farmland. Female prairie-chickens exhibited spatial variability in nest site selection at multiple spatial scales, suggesting plasticity in habitat selection behavior. Our results highlight the importance of accounting for spatial heterogeneity when evaluating the ecological effects of habitat components.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle production</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Ecological conditions</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>geographically weighted regression (GWR)</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grassland management</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>greater prairie-chicken</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitat Relations</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Multiscale modeling</subject><subject>nest site selection</subject><subject>Nesting sites</subject><subject>resource selection function (RSF)</subject><subject>Site selection</subject><subject>Spatial models</subject><subject>Tympanuchus cupido</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFqGzEQhkVJoE5S6AsUFkogl3UkjXal7a2Y1ElwHEpbYtqDkOVZW85615VkEr99FBxiCOQkRvPNN8NPyGdG-4xSfr58WM37ooIPpMcqkDlXTB6QXmrxvBBs8pEchbCkFBhTZY_8-7U20ZkmW2BE382xRRe3mWuzhZm6aGIWsEEbXdd-y8YYUu0i7j-z6TabezRpOFt747zD3C6cvcc2nJDD2jQBP728x-TPj4vfg8t8dDu8Gnwf5VYoDrktQdBSmRJmCoUsOLKCFhW1gKUCWtOpYHxWoRAoLWVc1GKKs5qrGmrLAeGYnO28a9_936Qb9coFi01jWuw2QTORFkABVZXQr2_QZbfxbbouUZxyVQla7YXWdyF4rPXau5XxW82ofk5ZP6esU8oJPX0RmmBNU3vTWhdeeS65KmUhEpfvuAfX4PZdn76-uxnuvF92_DLEzu99ICSVvNz7XIj4-No3_l6XEmSh78ZDza_HP2EyofovPAGJaqPd</recordid><startdate>201305</startdate><enddate>201305</enddate><creator>Mcnew, Lance B.</creator><creator>Gregory, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Sandercock, Brett K.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201305</creationdate><title>Spatial heterogeneity in habitat selection: Nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens</title><author>Mcnew, Lance B. ; Gregory, Andrew J. ; Sandercock, Brett K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-c634068a63d8e4752e150590c3e6830f0b412d9e44e7c0124f4bedf28f3fc23e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle production</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Ecological conditions</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>geographically weighted regression (GWR)</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grassland management</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>greater prairie-chicken</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitat Relations</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Multiscale modeling</topic><topic>nest site selection</topic><topic>Nesting sites</topic><topic>resource selection function (RSF)</topic><topic>Site selection</topic><topic>Spatial models</topic><topic>Tympanuchus cupido</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mcnew, Lance B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandercock, Brett K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mcnew, Lance B.</au><au>Gregory, Andrew J.</au><au>Sandercock, Brett K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial heterogeneity in habitat selection: Nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><addtitle>The Journal of Wildlife Management</addtitle><date>2013-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>791</spage><epage>801</epage><pages>791-801</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>Ecological relationships of animals and their environments are known to vary spatially and temporally across scales. However, common approaches for evaluating resource selection by animals assume that the processes of habitat selection are stationary across space. The assumption that habitat selection is spatially homogeneous may lead to biased inference and ineffective management. We present the first application of geographically weighted logistic regression to habitat selection by a wildlife species. As a case study, we examined nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens at 3 sites with different ecological conditions in Kansas to assess whether the relative importance of habitat features varied across space. We found that 1) nest sites were associated with habitat conditions at multiple spatial scales, 2) habitat associations across spatial scales were correlated, and 3) the influence of habitat conditions on nest site selection was spatially explicit. Post hoc analyses revealed that much of the spatial variability in habitat selection processes was explained at a regional scale. Moreover, habitat features at local spatial scales were more strongly associated with nest site selection in unfragmented grasslands managed intensively for cattle production than they were in fragmented grasslands within a matrix of farmland. Female prairie-chickens exhibited spatial variability in nest site selection at multiple spatial scales, suggesting plasticity in habitat selection behavior. Our results highlight the importance of accounting for spatial heterogeneity when evaluating the ecological effects of habitat components.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.493</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 2013-05, Vol.77 (4), p.791-801 |
issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1434035399 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Agricultural land Animal behavior Animal nesting Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Aves Biological and medical sciences Cattle production Chickens Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Ecological conditions Ecological effects Ecology Female animals Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects geographically weighted regression (GWR) Grasses Grassland management Grasslands greater prairie-chicken Habitat conservation Habitat Relations Habitat selection Habitats Heterogeneity Multiscale modeling nest site selection Nesting sites resource selection function (RSF) Site selection Spatial models Tympanuchus cupido Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution Wildfowl Wildlife Wildlife management |
title | Spatial heterogeneity in habitat selection: Nest site selection by greater prairie-chickens |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T17%3A21%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20heterogeneity%20in%20habitat%20selection:%20Nest%20site%20selection%20by%20greater%20prairie-chickens&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Mcnew,%20Lance%20B.&rft.date=2013-05&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=791&rft.epage=801&rft.pages=791-801&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.493&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23470726%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-c634068a63d8e4752e150590c3e6830f0b412d9e44e7c0124f4bedf28f3fc23e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1420289409&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23470726&rfr_iscdi=true |