Loading…
Diver and Underwater Television Observations of Fish Behavior in a Great Lakes Commercial Trap Net
Behavior of lake whitefish ( Coregonus clupeaformis) and lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush) in commercial trap-net pots was observed by scuba divers and by a low-light sensitive, underwater television (UTV) system. During the day, lake whitefish schooled and swam in circular patterns within the pot,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Great Lakes research 1983, Vol.9 (3), p.359-364 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9d2a7b47c05e01abd00715239e4011ebcacd1b5ff6ad68dd5c45d1bb44aeb58e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9d2a7b47c05e01abd00715239e4011ebcacd1b5ff6ad68dd5c45d1bb44aeb58e3 |
container_end_page | 364 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 359 |
container_title | Journal of Great Lakes research |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Rutecki, Thomas L. Schneeberger, Philip J. Jude, David J. |
description | Behavior of lake whitefish (
Coregonus clupeaformis) and lake trout (
Salvelinus namaycush) in commercial trap-net pots was observed by scuba divers and by a low-light sensitive, underwater television (UTV) system. During the day, lake whitefish schooled and swam in circular patterns within the pot, keeping at least 1 m off the lake bottom. Occasionally, lake whitefish that were outside the net were observed swimming in concert with fish inside the pot. Whitefish schools disbanded at dawn and dusk, presumably because of reduced visual acuity during periods of low light. Lake trout were most often in groups of two or three individuals which were generally segregated from whitefish schools. Aggressive, escapement, and feeding behavior were not observed for either species. As nets were lifted, fish became very excited and darted about wildly. Net leads may have elicited schooling responses from fish, causing them to enter the pot. Fish stayed 3 to 5 m away from divers, making observations of behavior difficult. However, divers were able to make some observations which were not possible with UTV. Physical presence of UTV equipment did not alter fish behavior as did diver presence. Compared with divers, UTV could be deployed longer and at lower light levels. UTV also provided a permanent record (video cassette) that could subsequently be reviewed. An integration of UTV and diver observations gave the best understanding offish behavior in trap-net pots. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0380-1330(83)71907-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14362264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0380133083719076</els_id><sourcerecordid>14362264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9d2a7b47c05e01abd00715239e4011ebcacd1b5ff6ad68dd5c45d1bb44aeb58e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhH0AiVJ4BCSfEBwCduz8nRAUWpAqeqA9Wxt7oxqSuNhpEG9P2iKunHZ3NDPSfoRccHbDGU9v35jIWcSFYFe5uM54wbIoPSKjP_mEnIbwzpiQRZaMSPloe_QUWkNXrUH_Bd1wLrHG3gbrWrooA_oeumEP1FV0asOaPuAaeus8tS0FOvMIHZ3DBwY6cU2DXluo6dLDhr5id0aOK6gDnv_OMVlNn5aT52i-mL1M7ueRFiLvosLEkJUy0yxBxqE0jGU8iUWBknGOpQZteJlUVQomzY1JtEwGoZQSsExyFGNyeejdePe5xdCpxgaNdQ0tum1QXIo0jlM5GJODUXsXgsdKbbxtwH8rztSOotpTVDtcKhdqT1GlQ-7ukMPhi96iV0FbbDUa61F3yjj7T8MPBTp8pg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14362264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diver and Underwater Television Observations of Fish Behavior in a Great Lakes Commercial Trap Net</title><source>Backfile Package - Environmental Science (Legacy) [YES]</source><creator>Rutecki, Thomas L. ; Schneeberger, Philip J. ; Jude, David J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rutecki, Thomas L. ; Schneeberger, Philip J. ; Jude, David J.</creatorcontrib><description>Behavior of lake whitefish (
Coregonus clupeaformis) and lake trout (
Salvelinus namaycush) in commercial trap-net pots was observed by scuba divers and by a low-light sensitive, underwater television (UTV) system. During the day, lake whitefish schooled and swam in circular patterns within the pot, keeping at least 1 m off the lake bottom. Occasionally, lake whitefish that were outside the net were observed swimming in concert with fish inside the pot. Whitefish schools disbanded at dawn and dusk, presumably because of reduced visual acuity during periods of low light. Lake trout were most often in groups of two or three individuals which were generally segregated from whitefish schools. Aggressive, escapement, and feeding behavior were not observed for either species. As nets were lifted, fish became very excited and darted about wildly. Net leads may have elicited schooling responses from fish, causing them to enter the pot. Fish stayed 3 to 5 m away from divers, making observations of behavior difficult. However, divers were able to make some observations which were not possible with UTV. Physical presence of UTV equipment did not alter fish behavior as did diver presence. Compared with divers, UTV could be deployed longer and at lower light levels. UTV also provided a permanent record (video cassette) that could subsequently be reviewed. An integration of UTV and diver observations gave the best understanding offish behavior in trap-net pots.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0380-1330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0380-1330(83)71907-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Coregonus clupeaformis ; fish harvest ; Freshwater ; Lake Huron ; lake trout ; Lake whitefish ; Salvelinus namaycush ; scuba diving</subject><ispartof>Journal of Great Lakes research, 1983, Vol.9 (3), p.359-364</ispartof><rights>1983 International Association for Great Lakes Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9d2a7b47c05e01abd00715239e4011ebcacd1b5ff6ad68dd5c45d1bb44aeb58e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9d2a7b47c05e01abd00715239e4011ebcacd1b5ff6ad68dd5c45d1bb44aeb58e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133083719076$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3482,4024,27923,27924,27925,45993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rutecki, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneeberger, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jude, David J.</creatorcontrib><title>Diver and Underwater Television Observations of Fish Behavior in a Great Lakes Commercial Trap Net</title><title>Journal of Great Lakes research</title><description>Behavior of lake whitefish (
Coregonus clupeaformis) and lake trout (
Salvelinus namaycush) in commercial trap-net pots was observed by scuba divers and by a low-light sensitive, underwater television (UTV) system. During the day, lake whitefish schooled and swam in circular patterns within the pot, keeping at least 1 m off the lake bottom. Occasionally, lake whitefish that were outside the net were observed swimming in concert with fish inside the pot. Whitefish schools disbanded at dawn and dusk, presumably because of reduced visual acuity during periods of low light. Lake trout were most often in groups of two or three individuals which were generally segregated from whitefish schools. Aggressive, escapement, and feeding behavior were not observed for either species. As nets were lifted, fish became very excited and darted about wildly. Net leads may have elicited schooling responses from fish, causing them to enter the pot. Fish stayed 3 to 5 m away from divers, making observations of behavior difficult. However, divers were able to make some observations which were not possible with UTV. Physical presence of UTV equipment did not alter fish behavior as did diver presence. Compared with divers, UTV could be deployed longer and at lower light levels. UTV also provided a permanent record (video cassette) that could subsequently be reviewed. An integration of UTV and diver observations gave the best understanding offish behavior in trap-net pots.</description><subject>Coregonus clupeaformis</subject><subject>fish harvest</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Lake Huron</subject><subject>lake trout</subject><subject>Lake whitefish</subject><subject>Salvelinus namaycush</subject><subject>scuba diving</subject><issn>0380-1330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhH0AiVJ4BCSfEBwCduz8nRAUWpAqeqA9Wxt7oxqSuNhpEG9P2iKunHZ3NDPSfoRccHbDGU9v35jIWcSFYFe5uM54wbIoPSKjP_mEnIbwzpiQRZaMSPloe_QUWkNXrUH_Bd1wLrHG3gbrWrooA_oeumEP1FV0asOaPuAaeus8tS0FOvMIHZ3DBwY6cU2DXluo6dLDhr5id0aOK6gDnv_OMVlNn5aT52i-mL1M7ueRFiLvosLEkJUy0yxBxqE0jGU8iUWBknGOpQZteJlUVQomzY1JtEwGoZQSsExyFGNyeejdePe5xdCpxgaNdQ0tum1QXIo0jlM5GJODUXsXgsdKbbxtwH8rztSOotpTVDtcKhdqT1GlQ-7ukMPhi96iV0FbbDUa61F3yjj7T8MPBTp8pg</recordid><startdate>1983</startdate><enddate>1983</enddate><creator>Rutecki, Thomas L.</creator><creator>Schneeberger, Philip J.</creator><creator>Jude, David J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1983</creationdate><title>Diver and Underwater Television Observations of Fish Behavior in a Great Lakes Commercial Trap Net</title><author>Rutecki, Thomas L. ; Schneeberger, Philip J. ; Jude, David J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9d2a7b47c05e01abd00715239e4011ebcacd1b5ff6ad68dd5c45d1bb44aeb58e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Coregonus clupeaformis</topic><topic>fish harvest</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Lake Huron</topic><topic>lake trout</topic><topic>Lake whitefish</topic><topic>Salvelinus namaycush</topic><topic>scuba diving</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rutecki, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneeberger, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jude, David J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of Great Lakes research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rutecki, Thomas L.</au><au>Schneeberger, Philip J.</au><au>Jude, David J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diver and Underwater Television Observations of Fish Behavior in a Great Lakes Commercial Trap Net</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Great Lakes research</jtitle><date>1983</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>359</spage><epage>364</epage><pages>359-364</pages><issn>0380-1330</issn><abstract>Behavior of lake whitefish (
Coregonus clupeaformis) and lake trout (
Salvelinus namaycush) in commercial trap-net pots was observed by scuba divers and by a low-light sensitive, underwater television (UTV) system. During the day, lake whitefish schooled and swam in circular patterns within the pot, keeping at least 1 m off the lake bottom. Occasionally, lake whitefish that were outside the net were observed swimming in concert with fish inside the pot. Whitefish schools disbanded at dawn and dusk, presumably because of reduced visual acuity during periods of low light. Lake trout were most often in groups of two or three individuals which were generally segregated from whitefish schools. Aggressive, escapement, and feeding behavior were not observed for either species. As nets were lifted, fish became very excited and darted about wildly. Net leads may have elicited schooling responses from fish, causing them to enter the pot. Fish stayed 3 to 5 m away from divers, making observations of behavior difficult. However, divers were able to make some observations which were not possible with UTV. Physical presence of UTV equipment did not alter fish behavior as did diver presence. Compared with divers, UTV could be deployed longer and at lower light levels. UTV also provided a permanent record (video cassette) that could subsequently be reviewed. An integration of UTV and diver observations gave the best understanding offish behavior in trap-net pots.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0380-1330(83)71907-6</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0380-1330 |
ispartof | Journal of Great Lakes research, 1983, Vol.9 (3), p.359-364 |
issn | 0380-1330 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14362264 |
source | Backfile Package - Environmental Science (Legacy) [YES] |
subjects | Coregonus clupeaformis fish harvest Freshwater Lake Huron lake trout Lake whitefish Salvelinus namaycush scuba diving |
title | Diver and Underwater Television Observations of Fish Behavior in a Great Lakes Commercial Trap Net |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A04%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diver%20and%20Underwater%20Television%20Observations%20of%20Fish%20Behavior%20in%20a%20Great%20Lakes%20Commercial%20Trap%20Net&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Great%20Lakes%20research&rft.au=Rutecki,%20Thomas%20L.&rft.date=1983&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=359&rft.epage=364&rft.pages=359-364&rft.issn=0380-1330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0380-1330(83)71907-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14362264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9d2a7b47c05e01abd00715239e4011ebcacd1b5ff6ad68dd5c45d1bb44aeb58e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14362264&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |