Loading…
Optimization of Scan Parameters for T1-FLAIR Imaging at 1.5 and 3T using Computer Simulation
Purpose: We attempted to optimize scan parameters for T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T1-FLAIR) sequence at 3 and 1.5 tesla (T) using computer simulation. Methods: We measured the T1 and T2 relaxation time values (T1v and T2v) of gray (GM) and white matter (WM) at 3 and 1.5T, genera...
Saved in:
Published in: | Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences 2013, Vol.12(3), pp.183-191 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5304-480790d048f421928737699a37bf03ae782d8fe16e5466e2fa7e8e6a9d1ba6463 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5304-480790d048f421928737699a37bf03ae782d8fe16e5466e2fa7e8e6a9d1ba6463 |
container_end_page | 191 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 183 |
container_title | Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | ODA, Shogo MIKI, Hitoshi KIKUCHI, Keiichi HIRATSUKA, Yoshiyasu MURASE, Kenya MOCHIZUKI, Teruhito |
description | Purpose: We attempted to optimize scan parameters for T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T1-FLAIR) sequence at 3 and 1.5 tesla (T) using computer simulation. Methods: We measured the T1 and T2 relaxation time values (T1v and T2v) of gray (GM) and white matter (WM) at 3 and 1.5T, generated computer-simulated T1-FLAIR (CS-T1-FLAIR) images using those values, and compared the simulated and actual T1-FLAIR images to verify the contrast reliability of our computer simulation. We mathematically and visually evaluated CS-T1-FLAIR images at various repetition times (TR) and echo times (TE). Results: At 3T, the measured relaxation values for GM were T1v, 1524 ms, and T2v, 85 ms, and for WM, T1v, 750 ms, and T2v, 65 ms. At 1.5T, the measured relaxation values for GM were T1v, 1251 ms, and T2v, 99 ms, and for WM, T1v, 623 ms, and T2v, 75 ms. Contrast of CS-T1-FLAIR and actual T1-FLAIR images was identical. An optimal TR of 3140 ms was determined for T1-FLAIR at 3T and 2440 ms at 1.5T based on mathematical evaluation. The optimal TR ranges were 2400 to 3900 ms at 3T and 1800 to 3200 ms at 1.5T based on visual assessment of CS-T1-FLAIR. A shorter TE provided better T1 contrast. Conclusion: We optimized T1-FLAIR by focusing on its most important scan parameters using computer simulations and determined that a longer TR was suitable at 3T than at 1.5T. Our computer simulation was useful for determining the optimal scan parameters. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2463/mrms.2012-0094 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1438575089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1438575089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5304-480790d048f421928737699a37bf03ae782d8fe16e5466e2fa7e8e6a9d1ba6463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1P4zAQhi0EAha4ckSWuHBJ8Vdi54gKLJUqgaDckKxpMimp4qTYyWH59etQ6IGLx_I888jzEnLO2USoTF4778JEMC4SxnK1R465MSwRgmX78S6VTiQ34oj8CWHNmDSxfUiOhDSp5ml6TN4eN33t6k_o666lXUVfCmjpE3hw2KMPtOo8XfDkfn4ze6YzB6u6XVHoKZ-kFNqSygUdwvg27dxmiCP0pXZD8-U7JQcVNAHPvusJeb2_W0wfkvnj39n0Zp4UqWQqUYbpnJVMmUoJngujpc7yHKReVkwCaiNKUyHPMFVZhqICjQYzyEu-hCymcEKutt6N7z4GDL11dSiwaaDFbgiWq3HflJk8ope_0HU3-Db-LlLaMJMKPgonW6rwXQgeK7vxtQP_z3Jmx9ztmLsdc7dj7nHg4ls7LB2WO_wn6AjcboF16GGFOwB8XxcNbn3RJsdj5921i3fwFlv5Hwomk0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1478085216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of Scan Parameters for T1-FLAIR Imaging at 1.5 and 3T using Computer Simulation</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>ODA, Shogo ; MIKI, Hitoshi ; KIKUCHI, Keiichi ; HIRATSUKA, Yoshiyasu ; MURASE, Kenya ; MOCHIZUKI, Teruhito</creator><creatorcontrib>ODA, Shogo ; MIKI, Hitoshi ; KIKUCHI, Keiichi ; HIRATSUKA, Yoshiyasu ; MURASE, Kenya ; MOCHIZUKI, Teruhito</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: We attempted to optimize scan parameters for T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T1-FLAIR) sequence at 3 and 1.5 tesla (T) using computer simulation. Methods: We measured the T1 and T2 relaxation time values (T1v and T2v) of gray (GM) and white matter (WM) at 3 and 1.5T, generated computer-simulated T1-FLAIR (CS-T1-FLAIR) images using those values, and compared the simulated and actual T1-FLAIR images to verify the contrast reliability of our computer simulation. We mathematically and visually evaluated CS-T1-FLAIR images at various repetition times (TR) and echo times (TE). Results: At 3T, the measured relaxation values for GM were T1v, 1524 ms, and T2v, 85 ms, and for WM, T1v, 750 ms, and T2v, 65 ms. At 1.5T, the measured relaxation values for GM were T1v, 1251 ms, and T2v, 99 ms, and for WM, T1v, 623 ms, and T2v, 75 ms. Contrast of CS-T1-FLAIR and actual T1-FLAIR images was identical. An optimal TR of 3140 ms was determined for T1-FLAIR at 3T and 2440 ms at 1.5T based on mathematical evaluation. The optimal TR ranges were 2400 to 3900 ms at 3T and 1800 to 3200 ms at 1.5T based on visual assessment of CS-T1-FLAIR. A shorter TE provided better T1 contrast. Conclusion: We optimized T1-FLAIR by focusing on its most important scan parameters using computer simulations and determined that a longer TR was suitable at 3T than at 1.5T. Our computer simulation was useful for determining the optimal scan parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1347-3182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1880-2206</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2463/mrms.2012-0094</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23857155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</publisher><subject>3T MRI ; Algorithms ; Brain - anatomy & histology ; Computer Simulation ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Models, Neurological ; optimal scan parameters ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; T1 FLAIR</subject><ispartof>Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences, 2013, Vol.12(3), pp.183-191</ispartof><rights>2013 by Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency 2013</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5304-480790d048f421928737699a37bf03ae782d8fe16e5466e2fa7e8e6a9d1ba6463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5304-480790d048f421928737699a37bf03ae782d8fe16e5466e2fa7e8e6a9d1ba6463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23857155$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ODA, Shogo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIKI, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIKUCHI, Keiichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIRATSUKA, Yoshiyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURASE, Kenya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOCHIZUKI, Teruhito</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of Scan Parameters for T1-FLAIR Imaging at 1.5 and 3T using Computer Simulation</title><title>Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences</title><addtitle>MRMS</addtitle><description>Purpose: We attempted to optimize scan parameters for T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T1-FLAIR) sequence at 3 and 1.5 tesla (T) using computer simulation. Methods: We measured the T1 and T2 relaxation time values (T1v and T2v) of gray (GM) and white matter (WM) at 3 and 1.5T, generated computer-simulated T1-FLAIR (CS-T1-FLAIR) images using those values, and compared the simulated and actual T1-FLAIR images to verify the contrast reliability of our computer simulation. We mathematically and visually evaluated CS-T1-FLAIR images at various repetition times (TR) and echo times (TE). Results: At 3T, the measured relaxation values for GM were T1v, 1524 ms, and T2v, 85 ms, and for WM, T1v, 750 ms, and T2v, 65 ms. At 1.5T, the measured relaxation values for GM were T1v, 1251 ms, and T2v, 99 ms, and for WM, T1v, 623 ms, and T2v, 75 ms. Contrast of CS-T1-FLAIR and actual T1-FLAIR images was identical. An optimal TR of 3140 ms was determined for T1-FLAIR at 3T and 2440 ms at 1.5T based on mathematical evaluation. The optimal TR ranges were 2400 to 3900 ms at 3T and 1800 to 3200 ms at 1.5T based on visual assessment of CS-T1-FLAIR. A shorter TE provided better T1 contrast. Conclusion: We optimized T1-FLAIR by focusing on its most important scan parameters using computer simulations and determined that a longer TR was suitable at 3T than at 1.5T. Our computer simulation was useful for determining the optimal scan parameters.</description><subject>3T MRI</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Brain - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>optimal scan parameters</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>T1 FLAIR</subject><issn>1347-3182</issn><issn>1880-2206</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1P4zAQhi0EAha4ckSWuHBJ8Vdi54gKLJUqgaDckKxpMimp4qTYyWH59etQ6IGLx_I888jzEnLO2USoTF4778JEMC4SxnK1R465MSwRgmX78S6VTiQ34oj8CWHNmDSxfUiOhDSp5ml6TN4eN33t6k_o666lXUVfCmjpE3hw2KMPtOo8XfDkfn4ze6YzB6u6XVHoKZ-kFNqSygUdwvg27dxmiCP0pXZD8-U7JQcVNAHPvusJeb2_W0wfkvnj39n0Zp4UqWQqUYbpnJVMmUoJngujpc7yHKReVkwCaiNKUyHPMFVZhqICjQYzyEu-hCymcEKutt6N7z4GDL11dSiwaaDFbgiWq3HflJk8ope_0HU3-Db-LlLaMJMKPgonW6rwXQgeK7vxtQP_z3Jmx9ztmLsdc7dj7nHg4ls7LB2WO_wn6AjcboF16GGFOwB8XxcNbn3RJsdj5921i3fwFlv5Hwomk0w</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>ODA, Shogo</creator><creator>MIKI, Hitoshi</creator><creator>KIKUCHI, Keiichi</creator><creator>HIRATSUKA, Yoshiyasu</creator><creator>MURASE, Kenya</creator><creator>MOCHIZUKI, Teruhito</creator><general>Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</general><general>Japan Science and Technology Agency</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Optimization of Scan Parameters for T1-FLAIR Imaging at 1.5 and 3T using Computer Simulation</title><author>ODA, Shogo ; MIKI, Hitoshi ; KIKUCHI, Keiichi ; HIRATSUKA, Yoshiyasu ; MURASE, Kenya ; MOCHIZUKI, Teruhito</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5304-480790d048f421928737699a37bf03ae782d8fe16e5466e2fa7e8e6a9d1ba6463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>3T MRI</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Brain - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>optimal scan parameters</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>T1 FLAIR</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ODA, Shogo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIKI, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIKUCHI, Keiichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIRATSUKA, Yoshiyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURASE, Kenya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOCHIZUKI, Teruhito</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ODA, Shogo</au><au>MIKI, Hitoshi</au><au>KIKUCHI, Keiichi</au><au>HIRATSUKA, Yoshiyasu</au><au>MURASE, Kenya</au><au>MOCHIZUKI, Teruhito</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of Scan Parameters for T1-FLAIR Imaging at 1.5 and 3T using Computer Simulation</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences</jtitle><addtitle>MRMS</addtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>183</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>183-191</pages><issn>1347-3182</issn><eissn>1880-2206</eissn><abstract>Purpose: We attempted to optimize scan parameters for T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T1-FLAIR) sequence at 3 and 1.5 tesla (T) using computer simulation. Methods: We measured the T1 and T2 relaxation time values (T1v and T2v) of gray (GM) and white matter (WM) at 3 and 1.5T, generated computer-simulated T1-FLAIR (CS-T1-FLAIR) images using those values, and compared the simulated and actual T1-FLAIR images to verify the contrast reliability of our computer simulation. We mathematically and visually evaluated CS-T1-FLAIR images at various repetition times (TR) and echo times (TE). Results: At 3T, the measured relaxation values for GM were T1v, 1524 ms, and T2v, 85 ms, and for WM, T1v, 750 ms, and T2v, 65 ms. At 1.5T, the measured relaxation values for GM were T1v, 1251 ms, and T2v, 99 ms, and for WM, T1v, 623 ms, and T2v, 75 ms. Contrast of CS-T1-FLAIR and actual T1-FLAIR images was identical. An optimal TR of 3140 ms was determined for T1-FLAIR at 3T and 2440 ms at 1.5T based on mathematical evaluation. The optimal TR ranges were 2400 to 3900 ms at 3T and 1800 to 3200 ms at 1.5T based on visual assessment of CS-T1-FLAIR. A shorter TE provided better T1 contrast. Conclusion: We optimized T1-FLAIR by focusing on its most important scan parameters using computer simulations and determined that a longer TR was suitable at 3T than at 1.5T. Our computer simulation was useful for determining the optimal scan parameters.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</pub><pmid>23857155</pmid><doi>10.2463/mrms.2012-0094</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1347-3182 |
ispartof | Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences, 2013, Vol.12(3), pp.183-191 |
issn | 1347-3182 1880-2206 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1438575089 |
source | EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | 3T MRI Algorithms Brain - anatomy & histology Computer Simulation Humans Image Enhancement - methods Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Models, Neurological optimal scan parameters Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity T1 FLAIR |
title | Optimization of Scan Parameters for T1-FLAIR Imaging at 1.5 and 3T using Computer Simulation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A52%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20Scan%20Parameters%20for%20T1-FLAIR%20Imaging%20at%201.5%20and%203T%20using%20Computer%20Simulation&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20Resonance%20in%20Medical%20Sciences&rft.au=ODA,%20Shogo&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=183-191&rft.issn=1347-3182&rft.eissn=1880-2206&rft_id=info:doi/10.2463/mrms.2012-0094&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1438575089%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5304-480790d048f421928737699a37bf03ae782d8fe16e5466e2fa7e8e6a9d1ba6463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1478085216&rft_id=info:pmid/23857155&rfr_iscdi=true |