Energy intensity and investment ownership across Chinese provinces

• Published in: Energy economics 2013-03, Vol.36, p.286-298
• Main Authors: Herrerias, M.J., Cuadros, A., Orts, V.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accounting; Applied sciences; China; China (People's Republic); Chinese provinces; Economic data; Electric power; Energy; Energy consumption; Energy economics; Energy intensity; Energy resources; Error; Errors; Exact sciences and technology; FDI; Foreign direct investment; Foreign investments; General, economic and professional studies; Innovation diffusion; Investment ownership; Investments; Technology; Technology diffusion
• ISSN: 0140-9883; 1873-6181
• DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.043

The main objective of this paper is to investigate whether openness and investment ownership are key factors in explaining the diffusion of energy-saving technologies in China. Compared with previous studies, the novel aspect of this work is the use of a rich dataset at provincial level, which allows the high level of regional heterogeneity to be taken into consideration. The unbalanced regional growth has been translated into differences in the need for energy resources across the vast territory of China. A detailed analysis of these issues may provide new insights into the energy situation in this country. The analysis is also disaggregated by type of energy: coal, electricity and petroleum. We estimate the models by panel-corrected standard errors, developed by Beck and Katz (1995), over the period 1985–2008. Results obtained confirm the hypothesis that both foreign and non-state investments play a leading role in the decline of energy intensity across Chinese regions, whereas there is no evidence of a positive contribution of state investment. The findings also reveal differences in energy intensity across regions, thus confirming the importance of accounting for the regional dimension when analyzing energy consumption in China. ► We investigate the factors that can affect energy intensity. ► We use provincial level data in the case of China. ► Results suggest that foreign and non-state investment play a leading role in the decline of energy intensity. ► However, the positive evidence on state investment is mixed.