Loading…

Salivary hexosaminidase in smoking alcoholics with bad periodontal and dental states

Abstract Background A sensitive alcohol marker, β-hexosaminidase (HEX), in the saliva of alcoholics, is investigated for the first time. Methods The activity, specific-activity and output of total HEX and its isoenzymes HEX A and HEX B were measured in the saliva of healthy controls (C), alcohol-dep...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Drug and alcohol dependence 2013-04, Vol.129 (1), p.33-40
Main Authors: Waszkiewicz, Napoleon, Chojnowska, Sylwia, Zalewska, Anna, Zwierz, Krzysztof, Szulc, Agata, Szajda, Sławomir Dariusz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background A sensitive alcohol marker, β-hexosaminidase (HEX), in the saliva of alcoholics, is investigated for the first time. Methods The activity, specific-activity and output of total HEX and its isoenzymes HEX A and HEX B were measured in the saliva of healthy controls (C), alcohol-dependent non-smokers (ANS), and alcohol-dependent smokers (AS). Results We observed a significantly increased activity/specific-activity and output of HEX A in the ANS and AS groups, due to the inflammatory state of the oral-cavity/salivary-glands. Significantly increased activity of HEX A contributed to an increase in the salivary activity of the total HEX in the ANS group. A significant decrease in the activity/specific-activity of HEX B in AS seemed to be due to HEX B inactivation by cigarette smoke. We noticed a tendency for deteriorated dental state (lower decayed-missing-filled-teeth index – DMFT), worse periodontal state (higher gingival index – GI and papilla-bleeding index – PBI) in AS, and worse periodontal state (higher GI) in ANS, as compared to the controls. We found no differences in the salivary protein concentrations between all groups and decreased salivary flow in both alcoholic groups as compared to the controls. In alcoholics, the area under the curve (AUC) for HEX A activity/specific-activity was significantly greater than for HEX and HEX B. The salivary HEX A activity/specific-activity had good/excellent sensitivity and specificity in smoking and non-smoking alcoholics, whereas salivary HEX and HEX B had poor/fair sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions Salivary HEX A may be helpful in the diagnosis of chronic alcohol intoxication, even in smokers.
ISSN:0376-8716
1879-0046
DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.09.008