Loading…

Economics of employing pheromones for mating disruption of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella

The costs of using mating disruption versus traditional insecticide applications for controling the codling moth in Washington apple orchards were examined. Successful mating disruption prevents the codling moth from ovipositing and consequently there are no larvae to damage apples. The spray record...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Crop protection 1996-08, Vol.15 (5), p.473-477
Main Authors: Williamson, E.R., Folwell, R.J., Knight, A., Howell, J.F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-f7f7cebf95e7a9eef3e0ec98287bbf9eaa294fd376936067520e569bf8ff5f203
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-f7f7cebf95e7a9eef3e0ec98287bbf9eaa294fd376936067520e569bf8ff5f203
container_end_page 477
container_issue 5
container_start_page 473
container_title Crop protection
container_volume 15
creator Williamson, E.R.
Folwell, R.J.
Knight, A.
Howell, J.F.
description The costs of using mating disruption versus traditional insecticide applications for controling the codling moth in Washington apple orchards were examined. Successful mating disruption prevents the codling moth from ovipositing and consequently there are no larvae to damage apples. The spray records of central Washington apple producers and research orchards were analyzed. Analysis of these budgets revealed that on average mating disruption is more expensive by $188.22 per hectare. Mating disruption was more economical under low codling moth population pressure. The years 1991 and 1992 were considered low and high codling moth population years, respectively. On the average, it was $97.46 more expensive per hectare to use mating disruption in 1992 than in 1991. A risk analysis or price/cost sensitivity analysis confirmed that changes in pheromone prices, cover spray use and cullage could alter the outcome of the economic analysis to where pheromone control would be the economically desirable control method.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0261-2194(96)00013-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14416418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0261219496000130</els_id><sourcerecordid>14416418</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-f7f7cebf95e7a9eef3e0ec98287bbf9eaa294fd376936067520e569bf8ff5f203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw85iYLVfLRpcxFkWT9gwYueQzaduJG2iUlX2H9v44pHT8PMPO_LzIvQOSU3lFBxS5igBaOyvJTiihBCeUEO0Iw2NS-EJOUhmv0hx-gkpY8JYpyzGdJL4wffO5Owtxj60PmdG95x2ED0vR8gYesj7vWYp61LcRtG54dMjxvAxrdd3vR-3FzjhY7BGx2SxuFH3XX6FB1Z3SU4-61z9PawfF08FauXx-fF_aownFdjYWtbG1hbWUGtJYDlQMDIhjX1epqC1kyWtuW1kFwQUVeMQCXk2jbWVpYRPkcXe98Q_ecW0qh6l0y-YAC_TYqWJRUlbSaw3IMm-pQiWBWi63XcKUpUzlPlsFQOS8mpyXmq7H-3l8H0xJeDqJJxMBhoXQQzqta7_w2-AduyfnI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14416418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economics of employing pheromones for mating disruption of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Williamson, E.R. ; Folwell, R.J. ; Knight, A. ; Howell, J.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Williamson, E.R. ; Folwell, R.J. ; Knight, A. ; Howell, J.F.</creatorcontrib><description>The costs of using mating disruption versus traditional insecticide applications for controling the codling moth in Washington apple orchards were examined. Successful mating disruption prevents the codling moth from ovipositing and consequently there are no larvae to damage apples. The spray records of central Washington apple producers and research orchards were analyzed. Analysis of these budgets revealed that on average mating disruption is more expensive by $188.22 per hectare. Mating disruption was more economical under low codling moth population pressure. The years 1991 and 1992 were considered low and high codling moth population years, respectively. On the average, it was $97.46 more expensive per hectare to use mating disruption in 1992 than in 1991. A risk analysis or price/cost sensitivity analysis confirmed that changes in pheromone prices, cover spray use and cullage could alter the outcome of the economic analysis to where pheromone control would be the economically desirable control method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-2194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6904</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0261-2194(96)00013-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>codling moth ; mating disruption ; pheromones</subject><ispartof>Crop protection, 1996-08, Vol.15 (5), p.473-477</ispartof><rights>1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-f7f7cebf95e7a9eef3e0ec98287bbf9eaa294fd376936067520e569bf8ff5f203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-f7f7cebf95e7a9eef3e0ec98287bbf9eaa294fd376936067520e569bf8ff5f203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Williamson, E.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folwell, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, J.F.</creatorcontrib><title>Economics of employing pheromones for mating disruption of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella</title><title>Crop protection</title><description>The costs of using mating disruption versus traditional insecticide applications for controling the codling moth in Washington apple orchards were examined. Successful mating disruption prevents the codling moth from ovipositing and consequently there are no larvae to damage apples. The spray records of central Washington apple producers and research orchards were analyzed. Analysis of these budgets revealed that on average mating disruption is more expensive by $188.22 per hectare. Mating disruption was more economical under low codling moth population pressure. The years 1991 and 1992 were considered low and high codling moth population years, respectively. On the average, it was $97.46 more expensive per hectare to use mating disruption in 1992 than in 1991. A risk analysis or price/cost sensitivity analysis confirmed that changes in pheromone prices, cover spray use and cullage could alter the outcome of the economic analysis to where pheromone control would be the economically desirable control method.</description><subject>codling moth</subject><subject>mating disruption</subject><subject>pheromones</subject><issn>0261-2194</issn><issn>1873-6904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw85iYLVfLRpcxFkWT9gwYueQzaduJG2iUlX2H9v44pHT8PMPO_LzIvQOSU3lFBxS5igBaOyvJTiihBCeUEO0Iw2NS-EJOUhmv0hx-gkpY8JYpyzGdJL4wffO5Owtxj60PmdG95x2ED0vR8gYesj7vWYp61LcRtG54dMjxvAxrdd3vR-3FzjhY7BGx2SxuFH3XX6FB1Z3SU4-61z9PawfF08FauXx-fF_aownFdjYWtbG1hbWUGtJYDlQMDIhjX1epqC1kyWtuW1kFwQUVeMQCXk2jbWVpYRPkcXe98Q_ecW0qh6l0y-YAC_TYqWJRUlbSaw3IMm-pQiWBWi63XcKUpUzlPlsFQOS8mpyXmq7H-3l8H0xJeDqJJxMBhoXQQzqta7_w2-AduyfnI</recordid><startdate>19960801</startdate><enddate>19960801</enddate><creator>Williamson, E.R.</creator><creator>Folwell, R.J.</creator><creator>Knight, A.</creator><creator>Howell, J.F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960801</creationdate><title>Economics of employing pheromones for mating disruption of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella</title><author>Williamson, E.R. ; Folwell, R.J. ; Knight, A. ; Howell, J.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-f7f7cebf95e7a9eef3e0ec98287bbf9eaa294fd376936067520e569bf8ff5f203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>codling moth</topic><topic>mating disruption</topic><topic>pheromones</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Williamson, E.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folwell, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, J.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Williamson, E.R.</au><au>Folwell, R.J.</au><au>Knight, A.</au><au>Howell, J.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economics of employing pheromones for mating disruption of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella</atitle><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle><date>1996-08-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>473</spage><epage>477</epage><pages>473-477</pages><issn>0261-2194</issn><eissn>1873-6904</eissn><abstract>The costs of using mating disruption versus traditional insecticide applications for controling the codling moth in Washington apple orchards were examined. Successful mating disruption prevents the codling moth from ovipositing and consequently there are no larvae to damage apples. The spray records of central Washington apple producers and research orchards were analyzed. Analysis of these budgets revealed that on average mating disruption is more expensive by $188.22 per hectare. Mating disruption was more economical under low codling moth population pressure. The years 1991 and 1992 were considered low and high codling moth population years, respectively. On the average, it was $97.46 more expensive per hectare to use mating disruption in 1992 than in 1991. A risk analysis or price/cost sensitivity analysis confirmed that changes in pheromone prices, cover spray use and cullage could alter the outcome of the economic analysis to where pheromone control would be the economically desirable control method.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0261-2194(96)00013-0</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-2194
ispartof Crop protection, 1996-08, Vol.15 (5), p.473-477
issn 0261-2194
1873-6904
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14416418
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects codling moth
mating disruption
pheromones
title Economics of employing pheromones for mating disruption of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A11%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economics%20of%20employing%20pheromones%20for%20mating%20disruption%20of%20the%20codling%20moth,%20Carpocapsa%20pomonella&rft.jtitle=Crop%20protection&rft.au=Williamson,%20E.R.&rft.date=1996-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=473&rft.epage=477&rft.pages=473-477&rft.issn=0261-2194&rft.eissn=1873-6904&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0261-2194(96)00013-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14416418%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-f7f7cebf95e7a9eef3e0ec98287bbf9eaa294fd376936067520e569bf8ff5f203%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14416418&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true