Loading…
Economics of employing pheromones for mating disruption of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella
The costs of using mating disruption versus traditional insecticide applications for controling the codling moth in Washington apple orchards were examined. Successful mating disruption prevents the codling moth from ovipositing and consequently there are no larvae to damage apples. The spray record...
Saved in:
Published in: | Crop protection 1996-08, Vol.15 (5), p.473-477 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-f7f7cebf95e7a9eef3e0ec98287bbf9eaa294fd376936067520e569bf8ff5f203 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-f7f7cebf95e7a9eef3e0ec98287bbf9eaa294fd376936067520e569bf8ff5f203 |
container_end_page | 477 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 473 |
container_title | Crop protection |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Williamson, E.R. Folwell, R.J. Knight, A. Howell, J.F. |
description | The costs of using mating disruption versus traditional insecticide applications for controling the codling moth in Washington apple orchards were examined. Successful mating disruption prevents the codling moth from ovipositing and consequently there are no larvae to damage apples. The spray records of central Washington apple producers and research orchards were analyzed. Analysis of these budgets revealed that on average mating disruption is more expensive by $188.22 per hectare. Mating disruption was more economical under low codling moth population pressure. The years 1991 and 1992 were considered low and high codling moth population years, respectively. On the average, it was $97.46 more expensive per hectare to use mating disruption in 1992 than in 1991. A risk analysis or price/cost sensitivity analysis confirmed that changes in pheromone prices, cover spray use and cullage could alter the outcome of the economic analysis to where pheromone control would be the economically desirable control method. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0261-2194(96)00013-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14416418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0261219496000130</els_id><sourcerecordid>14416418</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-f7f7cebf95e7a9eef3e0ec98287bbf9eaa294fd376936067520e569bf8ff5f203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw85iYLVfLRpcxFkWT9gwYueQzaduJG2iUlX2H9v44pHT8PMPO_LzIvQOSU3lFBxS5igBaOyvJTiihBCeUEO0Iw2NS-EJOUhmv0hx-gkpY8JYpyzGdJL4wffO5Owtxj60PmdG95x2ED0vR8gYesj7vWYp61LcRtG54dMjxvAxrdd3vR-3FzjhY7BGx2SxuFH3XX6FB1Z3SU4-61z9PawfF08FauXx-fF_aownFdjYWtbG1hbWUGtJYDlQMDIhjX1epqC1kyWtuW1kFwQUVeMQCXk2jbWVpYRPkcXe98Q_ecW0qh6l0y-YAC_TYqWJRUlbSaw3IMm-pQiWBWi63XcKUpUzlPlsFQOS8mpyXmq7H-3l8H0xJeDqJJxMBhoXQQzqta7_w2-AduyfnI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14416418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economics of employing pheromones for mating disruption of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Williamson, E.R. ; Folwell, R.J. ; Knight, A. ; Howell, J.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Williamson, E.R. ; Folwell, R.J. ; Knight, A. ; Howell, J.F.</creatorcontrib><description>The costs of using mating disruption versus traditional insecticide applications for controling the codling moth in Washington apple orchards were examined. Successful mating disruption prevents the codling moth from ovipositing and consequently there are no larvae to damage apples. The spray records of central Washington apple producers and research orchards were analyzed. Analysis of these budgets revealed that on average mating disruption is more expensive by $188.22 per hectare. Mating disruption was more economical under low codling moth population pressure. The years 1991 and 1992 were considered low and high codling moth population years, respectively. On the average, it was $97.46 more expensive per hectare to use mating disruption in 1992 than in 1991. A risk analysis or price/cost sensitivity analysis confirmed that changes in pheromone prices, cover spray use and cullage could alter the outcome of the economic analysis to where pheromone control would be the economically desirable control method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-2194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6904</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0261-2194(96)00013-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>codling moth ; mating disruption ; pheromones</subject><ispartof>Crop protection, 1996-08, Vol.15 (5), p.473-477</ispartof><rights>1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-f7f7cebf95e7a9eef3e0ec98287bbf9eaa294fd376936067520e569bf8ff5f203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-f7f7cebf95e7a9eef3e0ec98287bbf9eaa294fd376936067520e569bf8ff5f203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Williamson, E.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folwell, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, J.F.</creatorcontrib><title>Economics of employing pheromones for mating disruption of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella</title><title>Crop protection</title><description>The costs of using mating disruption versus traditional insecticide applications for controling the codling moth in Washington apple orchards were examined. Successful mating disruption prevents the codling moth from ovipositing and consequently there are no larvae to damage apples. The spray records of central Washington apple producers and research orchards were analyzed. Analysis of these budgets revealed that on average mating disruption is more expensive by $188.22 per hectare. Mating disruption was more economical under low codling moth population pressure. The years 1991 and 1992 were considered low and high codling moth population years, respectively. On the average, it was $97.46 more expensive per hectare to use mating disruption in 1992 than in 1991. A risk analysis or price/cost sensitivity analysis confirmed that changes in pheromone prices, cover spray use and cullage could alter the outcome of the economic analysis to where pheromone control would be the economically desirable control method.</description><subject>codling moth</subject><subject>mating disruption</subject><subject>pheromones</subject><issn>0261-2194</issn><issn>1873-6904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw85iYLVfLRpcxFkWT9gwYueQzaduJG2iUlX2H9v44pHT8PMPO_LzIvQOSU3lFBxS5igBaOyvJTiihBCeUEO0Iw2NS-EJOUhmv0hx-gkpY8JYpyzGdJL4wffO5Owtxj60PmdG95x2ED0vR8gYesj7vWYp61LcRtG54dMjxvAxrdd3vR-3FzjhY7BGx2SxuFH3XX6FB1Z3SU4-61z9PawfF08FauXx-fF_aownFdjYWtbG1hbWUGtJYDlQMDIhjX1epqC1kyWtuW1kFwQUVeMQCXk2jbWVpYRPkcXe98Q_ecW0qh6l0y-YAC_TYqWJRUlbSaw3IMm-pQiWBWi63XcKUpUzlPlsFQOS8mpyXmq7H-3l8H0xJeDqJJxMBhoXQQzqta7_w2-AduyfnI</recordid><startdate>19960801</startdate><enddate>19960801</enddate><creator>Williamson, E.R.</creator><creator>Folwell, R.J.</creator><creator>Knight, A.</creator><creator>Howell, J.F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960801</creationdate><title>Economics of employing pheromones for mating disruption of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella</title><author>Williamson, E.R. ; Folwell, R.J. ; Knight, A. ; Howell, J.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-f7f7cebf95e7a9eef3e0ec98287bbf9eaa294fd376936067520e569bf8ff5f203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>codling moth</topic><topic>mating disruption</topic><topic>pheromones</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Williamson, E.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folwell, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, J.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Williamson, E.R.</au><au>Folwell, R.J.</au><au>Knight, A.</au><au>Howell, J.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economics of employing pheromones for mating disruption of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella</atitle><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle><date>1996-08-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>473</spage><epage>477</epage><pages>473-477</pages><issn>0261-2194</issn><eissn>1873-6904</eissn><abstract>The costs of using mating disruption versus traditional insecticide applications for controling the codling moth in Washington apple orchards were examined. Successful mating disruption prevents the codling moth from ovipositing and consequently there are no larvae to damage apples. The spray records of central Washington apple producers and research orchards were analyzed. Analysis of these budgets revealed that on average mating disruption is more expensive by $188.22 per hectare. Mating disruption was more economical under low codling moth population pressure. The years 1991 and 1992 were considered low and high codling moth population years, respectively. On the average, it was $97.46 more expensive per hectare to use mating disruption in 1992 than in 1991. A risk analysis or price/cost sensitivity analysis confirmed that changes in pheromone prices, cover spray use and cullage could alter the outcome of the economic analysis to where pheromone control would be the economically desirable control method.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0261-2194(96)00013-0</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0261-2194 |
ispartof | Crop protection, 1996-08, Vol.15 (5), p.473-477 |
issn | 0261-2194 1873-6904 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14416418 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | codling moth mating disruption pheromones |
title | Economics of employing pheromones for mating disruption of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A11%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economics%20of%20employing%20pheromones%20for%20mating%20disruption%20of%20the%20codling%20moth,%20Carpocapsa%20pomonella&rft.jtitle=Crop%20protection&rft.au=Williamson,%20E.R.&rft.date=1996-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=473&rft.epage=477&rft.pages=473-477&rft.issn=0261-2194&rft.eissn=1873-6904&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0261-2194(96)00013-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14416418%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-f7f7cebf95e7a9eef3e0ec98287bbf9eaa294fd376936067520e569bf8ff5f203%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14416418&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |