Loading…
From outcome prediction to action selection: developmental change in the role of action-effect bindings
Ideomotor theory considers bidirectional action–effect associations to be the fundamental building blocks for intentional action. The present study employed a novel pupillometric and oculomotor paradigm to study developmental changes in the role of action‐effects in the acquisition of voluntary acti...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Developmental science 2013-11, Vol.16 (6), p.801-814 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4175-981efd94649886ef3e9292a95180d071824442ee12d8b9b203a62fed3293c1ba3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4175-981efd94649886ef3e9292a95180d071824442ee12d8b9b203a62fed3293c1ba3 |
| container_end_page | 814 |
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 801 |
| container_title | Developmental science |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Verschoor, Stephan A. Spapé, Michiel Biro, Szilvia Hommel, Bernhard |
| description | Ideomotor theory considers bidirectional action–effect associations to be the fundamental building blocks for intentional action. The present study employed a novel pupillometric and oculomotor paradigm to study developmental changes in the role of action‐effects in the acquisition of voluntary action. Our findings suggest that both 7‐ and 12‐month‐olds (and adults) can use acquired action–effect bindings to predict action outcomes but only 12‐month‐olds (and adults) showed evidence for employing action‐effects to select actions. This dissociation supports the idea that infants acquire action–effect knowledge before they have developed the cognitive machinery necessary to make use of that knowledge to perform intentional actions.
Ideomotor theory considers bidirectional action–effect associations to be the fundamental building blocks for intentional action. The present study employed a novel pupillometric and oculomotor paradigm to study developmental changes in the role of action‐effects in the acquisition of voluntary action. Our findings suggest that both 7‐ and 12‐month‐olds (and adults) can use acquired action–effect bindings to predict action outcomes but only 12‐month‐olds (and adults) showed evidence for employing action‐effects to select actions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/desc.12085 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443391167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1026029</ericid><sourcerecordid>3096117071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4175-981efd94649886ef3e9292a95180d071824442ee12d8b9b203a62fed3293c1ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9v0zAUxy0EYlvhwh1kicuElOFnO4m9G5R2BQ04MAQ3y01eOo8kLnYC7L_HXboeOOCLv9L7fN-PLyHPgJ1Beq9rjNUZcKbyB-QYZFFmZaHKh0mLQmRlnn8_Iicx3jDGpGDwmBxxCaBKpo7JZhl8R_04VL5Dug1Yu2pwvqeDp3ZSEVu8U-e0xl_Y-m2H_WBbWl3bfoPUJfgaafAtUt_sXRk2TXLRtetr12_iE_KosW3Ep_t_Rr4uF1fzVXb5-eL9_M1lVkko80wrwKbWspBaqQIbgZprbnUOitWsBMWllBwReK3Wes2ZsAVvsBZciwrWVszI6dR3G_zPEeNgOhcrbFvbox-jASmF0ABFmdCX_6A3fgx92m5HgUjRJnhGXk1UFXyMARuzDa6z4dYAM7v4zS5-cxd_gl_sW47rDusDep93Ap5PAAZXHcqLD8B4wdINMwJT_bdr8fY_o8y7xZf5_dBs8rg44J-Dx4YfJl1Z5ubbpwvzdrX6eKXnyizFX9Ndp10</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1441311144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From outcome prediction to action selection: developmental change in the role of action-effect bindings</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Verschoor, Stephan A. ; Spapé, Michiel ; Biro, Szilvia ; Hommel, Bernhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Verschoor, Stephan A. ; Spapé, Michiel ; Biro, Szilvia ; Hommel, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><description>Ideomotor theory considers bidirectional action–effect associations to be the fundamental building blocks for intentional action. The present study employed a novel pupillometric and oculomotor paradigm to study developmental changes in the role of action‐effects in the acquisition of voluntary action. Our findings suggest that both 7‐ and 12‐month‐olds (and adults) can use acquired action–effect bindings to predict action outcomes but only 12‐month‐olds (and adults) showed evidence for employing action‐effects to select actions. This dissociation supports the idea that infants acquire action–effect knowledge before they have developed the cognitive machinery necessary to make use of that knowledge to perform intentional actions.
Ideomotor theory considers bidirectional action–effect associations to be the fundamental building blocks for intentional action. The present study employed a novel pupillometric and oculomotor paradigm to study developmental changes in the role of action‐effects in the acquisition of voluntary action. Our findings suggest that both 7‐ and 12‐month‐olds (and adults) can use acquired action–effect bindings to predict action outcomes but only 12‐month‐olds (and adults) showed evidence for employing action‐effects to select actions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1363-755X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-7687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/desc.12085</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24118708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Association Learning - physiology ; Awareness ; Brain - growth & development ; Child Development ; Cognition - physiology ; Cognitive Processes ; Developmental biology ; Developmental Stages ; Eye Movements ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant Behavior ; Infants ; Intention ; Male ; Motor ability ; Motor Reactions ; Prediction ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Pupil - physiology ; Reaction Time ; Role ; Theories ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Developmental science, 2013-11, Vol.16 (6), p.801-814</ispartof><rights>2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Nov 2013</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4175-981efd94649886ef3e9292a95180d071824442ee12d8b9b203a62fed3293c1ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4175-981efd94649886ef3e9292a95180d071824442ee12d8b9b203a62fed3293c1ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1026029$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24118708$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Verschoor, Stephan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spapé, Michiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biro, Szilvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hommel, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><title>From outcome prediction to action selection: developmental change in the role of action-effect bindings</title><title>Developmental science</title><addtitle>Dev Sci</addtitle><description>Ideomotor theory considers bidirectional action–effect associations to be the fundamental building blocks for intentional action. The present study employed a novel pupillometric and oculomotor paradigm to study developmental changes in the role of action‐effects in the acquisition of voluntary action. Our findings suggest that both 7‐ and 12‐month‐olds (and adults) can use acquired action–effect bindings to predict action outcomes but only 12‐month‐olds (and adults) showed evidence for employing action‐effects to select actions. This dissociation supports the idea that infants acquire action–effect knowledge before they have developed the cognitive machinery necessary to make use of that knowledge to perform intentional actions.
Ideomotor theory considers bidirectional action–effect associations to be the fundamental building blocks for intentional action. The present study employed a novel pupillometric and oculomotor paradigm to study developmental changes in the role of action‐effects in the acquisition of voluntary action. Our findings suggest that both 7‐ and 12‐month‐olds (and adults) can use acquired action–effect bindings to predict action outcomes but only 12‐month‐olds (and adults) showed evidence for employing action‐effects to select actions.</description><subject>Association Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Awareness</subject><subject>Brain - growth & development</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Developmental biology</subject><subject>Developmental Stages</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant Behavior</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor ability</subject><subject>Motor Reactions</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Pupil - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Theories</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1363-755X</issn><issn>1467-7687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9v0zAUxy0EYlvhwh1kicuElOFnO4m9G5R2BQ04MAQ3y01eOo8kLnYC7L_HXboeOOCLv9L7fN-PLyHPgJ1Beq9rjNUZcKbyB-QYZFFmZaHKh0mLQmRlnn8_Iicx3jDGpGDwmBxxCaBKpo7JZhl8R_04VL5Dug1Yu2pwvqeDp3ZSEVu8U-e0xl_Y-m2H_WBbWl3bfoPUJfgaafAtUt_sXRk2TXLRtetr12_iE_KosW3Ep_t_Rr4uF1fzVXb5-eL9_M1lVkko80wrwKbWspBaqQIbgZprbnUOitWsBMWllBwReK3Wes2ZsAVvsBZciwrWVszI6dR3G_zPEeNgOhcrbFvbox-jASmF0ABFmdCX_6A3fgx92m5HgUjRJnhGXk1UFXyMARuzDa6z4dYAM7v4zS5-cxd_gl_sW47rDusDep93Ap5PAAZXHcqLD8B4wdINMwJT_bdr8fY_o8y7xZf5_dBs8rg44J-Dx4YfJl1Z5ubbpwvzdrX6eKXnyizFX9Ndp10</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Verschoor, Stephan A.</creator><creator>Spapé, Michiel</creator><creator>Biro, Szilvia</creator><creator>Hommel, Bernhard</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>From outcome prediction to action selection: developmental change in the role of action-effect bindings</title><author>Verschoor, Stephan A. ; Spapé, Michiel ; Biro, Szilvia ; Hommel, Bernhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4175-981efd94649886ef3e9292a95180d071824442ee12d8b9b203a62fed3293c1ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Association Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Awareness</topic><topic>Brain - growth & development</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Developmental biology</topic><topic>Developmental Stages</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant Behavior</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor ability</topic><topic>Motor Reactions</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Pupil - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Theories</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Verschoor, Stephan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spapé, Michiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biro, Szilvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hommel, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Developmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Verschoor, Stephan A.</au><au>Spapé, Michiel</au><au>Biro, Szilvia</au><au>Hommel, Bernhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1026029</ericid><atitle>From outcome prediction to action selection: developmental change in the role of action-effect bindings</atitle><jtitle>Developmental science</jtitle><addtitle>Dev Sci</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>801</spage><epage>814</epage><pages>801-814</pages><issn>1363-755X</issn><eissn>1467-7687</eissn><abstract>Ideomotor theory considers bidirectional action–effect associations to be the fundamental building blocks for intentional action. The present study employed a novel pupillometric and oculomotor paradigm to study developmental changes in the role of action‐effects in the acquisition of voluntary action. Our findings suggest that both 7‐ and 12‐month‐olds (and adults) can use acquired action–effect bindings to predict action outcomes but only 12‐month‐olds (and adults) showed evidence for employing action‐effects to select actions. This dissociation supports the idea that infants acquire action–effect knowledge before they have developed the cognitive machinery necessary to make use of that knowledge to perform intentional actions.
Ideomotor theory considers bidirectional action–effect associations to be the fundamental building blocks for intentional action. The present study employed a novel pupillometric and oculomotor paradigm to study developmental changes in the role of action‐effects in the acquisition of voluntary action. Our findings suggest that both 7‐ and 12‐month‐olds (and adults) can use acquired action–effect bindings to predict action outcomes but only 12‐month‐olds (and adults) showed evidence for employing action‐effects to select actions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24118708</pmid><doi>10.1111/desc.12085</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1363-755X |
| ispartof | Developmental science, 2013-11, Vol.16 (6), p.801-814 |
| issn | 1363-755X 1467-7687 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443391167 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC |
| subjects | Association Learning - physiology Awareness Brain - growth & development Child Development Cognition - physiology Cognitive Processes Developmental biology Developmental Stages Eye Movements Female Humans Infant Infant Behavior Infants Intention Male Motor ability Motor Reactions Prediction Psychomotor Performance - physiology Pupil - physiology Reaction Time Role Theories Young Adult |
| title | From outcome prediction to action selection: developmental change in the role of action-effect bindings |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T23%3A30%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20outcome%20prediction%20to%20action%20selection:%20developmental%20change%20in%20the%20role%20of%20action-effect%20bindings&rft.jtitle=Developmental%20science&rft.au=Verschoor,%20Stephan%20A.&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=801&rft.epage=814&rft.pages=801-814&rft.issn=1363-755X&rft.eissn=1467-7687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/desc.12085&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3096117071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4175-981efd94649886ef3e9292a95180d071824442ee12d8b9b203a62fed3293c1ba3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1441311144&rft_id=info:pmid/24118708&rft_ericid=EJ1026029&rfr_iscdi=true |