Loading…

Comparison of causality analysis on simultaneously measured fMRI and NIRS signals during motor tasks

Brain activity can be measured using different modalities. Since most of the modalities tend to complement each other, it seems promising to measure them simultaneously. In to be presented research, the data recorded from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Near Infrared Spectroscopy (N...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anwar, Abdul Rauf, Muthalib, Makii, Perrey, Stephane, Galka, Andreas, Granert, Oliver, Wolff, Stephan, Deuschl, Guenther, Raethjen, Jan, Heute, Ulrich, Muthuraman, Muthuraman
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-99b99cfadac176cce78e5fdf7a6f90500783455ecc93838f8ccd13adc5cb63b43
cites
container_end_page 2631
container_issue
container_start_page 2628
container_title
container_volume 2013
creator Anwar, Abdul Rauf
Muthalib, Makii
Perrey, Stephane
Galka, Andreas
Granert, Oliver
Wolff, Stephan
Deuschl, Guenther
Raethjen, Jan
Heute, Ulrich
Muthuraman, Muthuraman
description Brain activity can be measured using different modalities. Since most of the modalities tend to complement each other, it seems promising to measure them simultaneously. In to be presented research, the data recorded from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS), simultaneously, are subjected to causality analysis using time-resolved partial directed coherence (tPDC). Time-resolved partial directed coherence uses the principle of state space modelling to estimate Multivariate Autoregressive (MVAR) coefficients. This method is useful to visualize both frequency and time dynamics of causality between the time series. Afterwards, causality results from different modalities are compared by estimating the Spearman correlation. In to be presented study, we used directionality vectors to analyze correlation, rather than actual signal vectors. Results show that causality analysis of the fMRI correlates more closely to causality results of oxy-NIRS as compared to deoxy-NIRS in case of a finger sequencing task. However, in case of simple finger tapping, no clear difference between oxy-fMRI and deoxy-fMRI correlation is identified.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610079
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443391889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6610079</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1443391889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-99b99cfadac176cce78e5fdf7a6f90500783455ecc93838f8ccd13adc5cb63b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtPwzAQhA0C0VL6AxAXH7mk2PEj9hGiApVakApI3CLXj8qQxCVODvn3WGpPu9J8O5pZAG4xWmCM5MNy81QucoTJgnOMUCHPwDWmrChQjrk8B1PMmMgox-wi7UjSjIviewLmMf4ghHDBOcnJFZjkNPnlnE-BKUNzUJ2PoYXBQa2GqGrfj1C1qh6jjzAJ0TdD3avWhiHWI2ysikNnDXSb7SqBBr6tth-J2qebCM3Q-XYPm9CHDvYq_sYbcOmSYuenOQNfz8vP8jVbv7-sysd1pgmVfSblTkrtlFE6RdXaFsIyZ1yhuJOIpcKCUMas1pIIIpzQ2mCijGZ6x8mOkhm4P_oeuvA32NhXjY_a1vUxeoUpJURiIWRC746ot9ZWh843qhur01vJP-deaYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>1443391889</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparison of causality analysis on simultaneously measured fMRI and NIRS signals during motor tasks</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Anwar, Abdul Rauf ; Muthalib, Makii ; Perrey, Stephane ; Galka, Andreas ; Granert, Oliver ; Wolff, Stephan ; Deuschl, Guenther ; Raethjen, Jan ; Heute, Ulrich ; Muthuraman, Muthuraman</creator><creatorcontrib>Anwar, Abdul Rauf ; Muthalib, Makii ; Perrey, Stephane ; Galka, Andreas ; Granert, Oliver ; Wolff, Stephan ; Deuschl, Guenther ; Raethjen, Jan ; Heute, Ulrich ; Muthuraman, Muthuraman</creatorcontrib><description>Brain activity can be measured using different modalities. Since most of the modalities tend to complement each other, it seems promising to measure them simultaneously. In to be presented research, the data recorded from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS), simultaneously, are subjected to causality analysis using time-resolved partial directed coherence (tPDC). Time-resolved partial directed coherence uses the principle of state space modelling to estimate Multivariate Autoregressive (MVAR) coefficients. This method is useful to visualize both frequency and time dynamics of causality between the time series. Afterwards, causality results from different modalities are compared by estimating the Spearman correlation. In to be presented study, we used directionality vectors to analyze correlation, rather than actual signal vectors. Results show that causality analysis of the fMRI correlates more closely to causality results of oxy-NIRS as compared to deoxy-NIRS in case of a finger sequencing task. However, in case of simple finger tapping, no clear difference between oxy-fMRI and deoxy-fMRI correlation is identified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-687X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-4615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2694-0604</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1457702169</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781457702167</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24110266</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Coherence ; Correlation ; Educational institutions ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Time series analysis ; Time-frequency analysis ; Vectors</subject><ispartof>2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2013, Vol.2013, p.2628-2631</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-99b99cfadac176cce78e5fdf7a6f90500783455ecc93838f8ccd13adc5cb63b43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6610079$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,2058,27924,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6610079$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anwar, Abdul Rauf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muthalib, Makii</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrey, Stephane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galka, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granert, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deuschl, Guenther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raethjen, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heute, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muthuraman, Muthuraman</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of causality analysis on simultaneously measured fMRI and NIRS signals during motor tasks</title><title>2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)</title><addtitle>EMBC</addtitle><description>Brain activity can be measured using different modalities. Since most of the modalities tend to complement each other, it seems promising to measure them simultaneously. In to be presented research, the data recorded from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS), simultaneously, are subjected to causality analysis using time-resolved partial directed coherence (tPDC). Time-resolved partial directed coherence uses the principle of state space modelling to estimate Multivariate Autoregressive (MVAR) coefficients. This method is useful to visualize both frequency and time dynamics of causality between the time series. Afterwards, causality results from different modalities are compared by estimating the Spearman correlation. In to be presented study, we used directionality vectors to analyze correlation, rather than actual signal vectors. Results show that causality analysis of the fMRI correlates more closely to causality results of oxy-NIRS as compared to deoxy-NIRS in case of a finger sequencing task. However, in case of simple finger tapping, no clear difference between oxy-fMRI and deoxy-fMRI correlation is identified.</description><subject>Coherence</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Educational institutions</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Time series analysis</subject><subject>Time-frequency analysis</subject><subject>Vectors</subject><issn>1094-687X</issn><issn>1558-4615</issn><issn>2694-0604</issn><isbn>1457702169</isbn><isbn>9781457702167</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEtPwzAQhA0C0VL6AxAXH7mk2PEj9hGiApVakApI3CLXj8qQxCVODvn3WGpPu9J8O5pZAG4xWmCM5MNy81QucoTJgnOMUCHPwDWmrChQjrk8B1PMmMgox-wi7UjSjIviewLmMf4ghHDBOcnJFZjkNPnlnE-BKUNzUJ2PoYXBQa2GqGrfj1C1qh6jjzAJ0TdD3avWhiHWI2ysikNnDXSb7SqBBr6tth-J2qebCM3Q-XYPm9CHDvYq_sYbcOmSYuenOQNfz8vP8jVbv7-sysd1pgmVfSblTkrtlFE6RdXaFsIyZ1yhuJOIpcKCUMas1pIIIpzQ2mCijGZ6x8mOkhm4P_oeuvA32NhXjY_a1vUxeoUpJURiIWRC746ot9ZWh843qhur01vJP-deaYA</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Anwar, Abdul Rauf</creator><creator>Muthalib, Makii</creator><creator>Perrey, Stephane</creator><creator>Galka, Andreas</creator><creator>Granert, Oliver</creator><creator>Wolff, Stephan</creator><creator>Deuschl, Guenther</creator><creator>Raethjen, Jan</creator><creator>Heute, Ulrich</creator><creator>Muthuraman, Muthuraman</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Comparison of causality analysis on simultaneously measured fMRI and NIRS signals during motor tasks</title><author>Anwar, Abdul Rauf ; Muthalib, Makii ; Perrey, Stephane ; Galka, Andreas ; Granert, Oliver ; Wolff, Stephan ; Deuschl, Guenther ; Raethjen, Jan ; Heute, Ulrich ; Muthuraman, Muthuraman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-99b99cfadac176cce78e5fdf7a6f90500783455ecc93838f8ccd13adc5cb63b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Coherence</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Educational institutions</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Time series analysis</topic><topic>Time-frequency analysis</topic><topic>Vectors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anwar, Abdul Rauf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muthalib, Makii</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrey, Stephane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galka, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granert, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deuschl, Guenther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raethjen, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heute, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muthuraman, Muthuraman</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anwar, Abdul Rauf</au><au>Muthalib, Makii</au><au>Perrey, Stephane</au><au>Galka, Andreas</au><au>Granert, Oliver</au><au>Wolff, Stephan</au><au>Deuschl, Guenther</au><au>Raethjen, Jan</au><au>Heute, Ulrich</au><au>Muthuraman, Muthuraman</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparison of causality analysis on simultaneously measured fMRI and NIRS signals during motor tasks</atitle><btitle>2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)</btitle><stitle>EMBC</stitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>2013</volume><spage>2628</spage><epage>2631</epage><pages>2628-2631</pages><issn>1094-687X</issn><eissn>1558-4615</eissn><eissn>2694-0604</eissn><eisbn>1457702169</eisbn><eisbn>9781457702167</eisbn><abstract>Brain activity can be measured using different modalities. Since most of the modalities tend to complement each other, it seems promising to measure them simultaneously. In to be presented research, the data recorded from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS), simultaneously, are subjected to causality analysis using time-resolved partial directed coherence (tPDC). Time-resolved partial directed coherence uses the principle of state space modelling to estimate Multivariate Autoregressive (MVAR) coefficients. This method is useful to visualize both frequency and time dynamics of causality between the time series. Afterwards, causality results from different modalities are compared by estimating the Spearman correlation. In to be presented study, we used directionality vectors to analyze correlation, rather than actual signal vectors. Results show that causality analysis of the fMRI correlates more closely to causality results of oxy-NIRS as compared to deoxy-NIRS in case of a finger sequencing task. However, in case of simple finger tapping, no clear difference between oxy-fMRI and deoxy-fMRI correlation is identified.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>24110266</pmid><doi>10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610079</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1094-687X
ispartof 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2013, Vol.2013, p.2628-2631
issn 1094-687X
1558-4615
2694-0604
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443391889
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Coherence
Correlation
Educational institutions
Magnetic resonance imaging
Time series analysis
Time-frequency analysis
Vectors
title Comparison of causality analysis on simultaneously measured fMRI and NIRS signals during motor tasks
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A00%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20causality%20analysis%20on%20simultaneously%20measured%20fMRI%20and%20NIRS%20signals%20during%20motor%20tasks&rft.btitle=2013%2035th%20Annual%20International%20Conference%20of%20the%20IEEE%20Engineering%20in%20Medicine%20and%20Biology%20Society%20(EMBC)&rft.au=Anwar,%20Abdul%20Rauf&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=2013&rft.spage=2628&rft.epage=2631&rft.pages=2628-2631&rft.issn=1094-687X&rft.eissn=1558-4615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610079&rft.eisbn=1457702169&rft.eisbn_list=9781457702167&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_6IE%3E1443391889%3C/proquest_6IE%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-99b99cfadac176cce78e5fdf7a6f90500783455ecc93838f8ccd13adc5cb63b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443391889&rft_id=info:pmid/24110266&rft_ieee_id=6610079&rfr_iscdi=true