Memory as discrimination: What distraction reveals

• Published in: Memory & cognition 2013-11, Vol.41 (8), p.1238-1251
• Main Authors: Beaman, C. Philip, Hanczakowski, Maciej, Hodgetts, Helen M., Marsh, John E., Jones, Dylan M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Activity levels. Psychomotricity; Adult; Attention - physiology; Behavioral Science and Psychology; Biological and medical sciences; Cognitive Psychology; Discrimination; Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology; Experiments; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Human; Humans; Information retrieval; Learning. Memory; Memory; Mental Recall - physiology; Psycholinguistics - methods; Psychology; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Recall; Semantics; Studies; Vigilance. Attention. Sleep; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0090-502X; 1532-5946
• DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0327-4

Recalling information involves the process of discriminating between relevant and irrelevant information stored in memory. Not infrequently, the relevant information needs to be selected from among a series of related possibilities. This is likely to be particularly problematic when the irrelevant possibilities not only are temporally or contextually appropriate, but also overlap semantically with the target or targets. Here, we investigate the extent to which purely perceptual features that discriminate between irrelevant and target material can be used to overcome the negative impact of contextual and semantic relatedness. Adopting a distraction paradigm, it is demonstrated that when distractors are interleaved with targets presented either visually (Experiment 1 ) or auditorily (Experiment 2 ), a within-modality semantic distraction effect occurs; semantically related distractors impact upon recall more than do unrelated distractors. In the semantically related condition, the number of intrusions in recall is reduced, while the number of correctly recalled targets is simultaneously increased by the presence of perceptual cues to relevance (color features in Experiment 1 or speaker’s gender in Experiment 2 ). However, as is demonstrated in Experiment 3 , even presenting semantically related distractors in a language and a sensory modality (spoken Welsh) distinct from that of the targets (visual English) is insufficient to eliminate false recalls completely or to restore correct recall to levels seen with unrelated distractors . Together, the study shows how semantic and nonsemantic discriminability shape patterns of both erroneous and correct recall.