Loading…

Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Different Lateral Plate Constructs for Distal Fibula Fractures

Background: Displaced lateral malleolar fractures are often treated with reduction and surgical stabilization. However, there has not been a comprehensive laboratory comparison to determine the most appropriate device for treating these patients. This study subjected a range of contemporary lateral...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Foot & ankle international 2013-11, Vol.34 (11), p.1588-1595
Main Authors: Eckel, Tobin T., Glisson, Richard R., Anand, Prashanth, Parekh, Selene G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e9cb379eb1abe0aff5b0bf4b9747e60f56ece5cbd45e92103c74afb8bfbd577f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e9cb379eb1abe0aff5b0bf4b9747e60f56ece5cbd45e92103c74afb8bfbd577f3
container_end_page 1595
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1588
container_title Foot & ankle international
container_volume 34
creator Eckel, Tobin T.
Glisson, Richard R.
Anand, Prashanth
Parekh, Selene G.
description Background: Displaced lateral malleolar fractures are often treated with reduction and surgical stabilization. However, there has not been a comprehensive laboratory comparison to determine the most appropriate device for treating these patients. This study subjected a range of contemporary lateral fibular plates to a series of mechanical tests designed to reveal performance differences. Methods: Forty fresh frozen lower extremities were divided into 4 groups. A Weber B distal fibula fracture was simulated with an osteotomy and stabilized using 1 of 4 plate systems: a standard Synthes one-third tubular plate with interfragmentary lag screw, a Synthes LCP locking plate with lag screw, an Orthohelix MaxLock Extreme low-profile locking plate with lag screw, or a TriMed Sidewinder nonlocking plate. Controlled monotonic bending and cyclic torsional loading were applied and bending stiffness, torsional stiffness, and fracture site motion were quantified. Resistance to cyclic torsional loading was determined by quantifying the number of loads withstood before excessive rotation occurred. Correlation between bone mineral density and each of the mechanical measures was determined. Results: There was no difference in angulation or bending stiffness between plates. All plates except the LCP showed greater lateral deflection than in the other bending directions. Bending stiffness was lowest in lateral distal fragment deflection for all 4 plates. There was a positive correlation between bone mineral density and bending stiffness for all plate types. There was no difference in fracture site rotation between plate types in internal or external torsion, but internal rotation of the distal fragment consistently exceeded external rotation. Torsional stiffness in external rotation exceeded stiffness in internal rotation in nearly all specimens. LCP plates performed relatively poorly under cyclic torsion. Conclusions: Significant differences in plate performance were not demonstrated. The effects of bone quality variability and differences in interfragmentary screw purchase resulted in data dispersion that confounded absolute ranking of plate performance. Clinical Relevance: Identification of an optimal lateral fibular plating system has the potential to improve the clinical outcome of malleolar fracture fixation, particularly when patient conditions are unfavorable.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1071100713496223
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448208668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1071100713496223</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1448208668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e9cb379eb1abe0aff5b0bf4b9747e60f56ece5cbd45e92103c74afb8bfbd577f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EolDYmZBHloAdO3E8QqGAVAkG2JAi2z1DqiQu_hj473HVwoDEcnfS-70n3UPojJJLSoW4okRQSvJgXNZlyfbQEZWcF6IR9X6-s1Js9Ak6DmFFCBWMykM0KVlDG16TI_R207kBzIcaO6N6PHPDWvkuuBE7izm-7awFD2PECxXBZ-K5z0fmxhB9MjFg63zGQszavNOpV3julYnJQzhBB1b1AU53e4pe53cvs4di8XT_OLteFIYxEQuQRjMhQVOlgShrK0205VoKLqAmtqrBQGX0klcgS0qYEVxZ3Wirl5UQlk3RxTZ37d1nghDboQsG-l6N4FJoKedNSZq6bjJKtqjxLgQPtl37blD-q6Wk3XTa_u00W8536UkPsPw1_JSYgWILBPUO7colP-Zv_w_8Bouuf20</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1448208668</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Different Lateral Plate Constructs for Distal Fibula Fractures</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Eckel, Tobin T. ; Glisson, Richard R. ; Anand, Prashanth ; Parekh, Selene G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eckel, Tobin T. ; Glisson, Richard R. ; Anand, Prashanth ; Parekh, Selene G.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Displaced lateral malleolar fractures are often treated with reduction and surgical stabilization. However, there has not been a comprehensive laboratory comparison to determine the most appropriate device for treating these patients. This study subjected a range of contemporary lateral fibular plates to a series of mechanical tests designed to reveal performance differences. Methods: Forty fresh frozen lower extremities were divided into 4 groups. A Weber B distal fibula fracture was simulated with an osteotomy and stabilized using 1 of 4 plate systems: a standard Synthes one-third tubular plate with interfragmentary lag screw, a Synthes LCP locking plate with lag screw, an Orthohelix MaxLock Extreme low-profile locking plate with lag screw, or a TriMed Sidewinder nonlocking plate. Controlled monotonic bending and cyclic torsional loading were applied and bending stiffness, torsional stiffness, and fracture site motion were quantified. Resistance to cyclic torsional loading was determined by quantifying the number of loads withstood before excessive rotation occurred. Correlation between bone mineral density and each of the mechanical measures was determined. Results: There was no difference in angulation or bending stiffness between plates. All plates except the LCP showed greater lateral deflection than in the other bending directions. Bending stiffness was lowest in lateral distal fragment deflection for all 4 plates. There was a positive correlation between bone mineral density and bending stiffness for all plate types. There was no difference in fracture site rotation between plate types in internal or external torsion, but internal rotation of the distal fragment consistently exceeded external rotation. Torsional stiffness in external rotation exceeded stiffness in internal rotation in nearly all specimens. LCP plates performed relatively poorly under cyclic torsion. Conclusions: Significant differences in plate performance were not demonstrated. The effects of bone quality variability and differences in interfragmentary screw purchase resulted in data dispersion that confounded absolute ranking of plate performance. Clinical Relevance: Identification of an optimal lateral fibular plating system has the potential to improve the clinical outcome of malleolar fracture fixation, particularly when patient conditions are unfavorable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7876</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1071100713496223</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23818460</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Density - physiology ; Bone Plates ; Female ; Fibula - injuries ; Fibula - physiology ; Fibula - surgery ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation ; Fractures, Bone - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Materials Testing ; Middle Aged ; Prosthesis Design ; Rotation ; Torsion, Mechanical ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Foot &amp; ankle international, 2013-11, Vol.34 (11), p.1588-1595</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e9cb379eb1abe0aff5b0bf4b9747e60f56ece5cbd45e92103c74afb8bfbd577f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e9cb379eb1abe0aff5b0bf4b9747e60f56ece5cbd45e92103c74afb8bfbd577f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,79135</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23818460$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eckel, Tobin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glisson, Richard R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Prashanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parekh, Selene G.</creatorcontrib><title>Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Different Lateral Plate Constructs for Distal Fibula Fractures</title><title>Foot &amp; ankle international</title><addtitle>Foot Ankle Int</addtitle><description>Background: Displaced lateral malleolar fractures are often treated with reduction and surgical stabilization. However, there has not been a comprehensive laboratory comparison to determine the most appropriate device for treating these patients. This study subjected a range of contemporary lateral fibular plates to a series of mechanical tests designed to reveal performance differences. Methods: Forty fresh frozen lower extremities were divided into 4 groups. A Weber B distal fibula fracture was simulated with an osteotomy and stabilized using 1 of 4 plate systems: a standard Synthes one-third tubular plate with interfragmentary lag screw, a Synthes LCP locking plate with lag screw, an Orthohelix MaxLock Extreme low-profile locking plate with lag screw, or a TriMed Sidewinder nonlocking plate. Controlled monotonic bending and cyclic torsional loading were applied and bending stiffness, torsional stiffness, and fracture site motion were quantified. Resistance to cyclic torsional loading was determined by quantifying the number of loads withstood before excessive rotation occurred. Correlation between bone mineral density and each of the mechanical measures was determined. Results: There was no difference in angulation or bending stiffness between plates. All plates except the LCP showed greater lateral deflection than in the other bending directions. Bending stiffness was lowest in lateral distal fragment deflection for all 4 plates. There was a positive correlation between bone mineral density and bending stiffness for all plate types. There was no difference in fracture site rotation between plate types in internal or external torsion, but internal rotation of the distal fragment consistently exceeded external rotation. Torsional stiffness in external rotation exceeded stiffness in internal rotation in nearly all specimens. LCP plates performed relatively poorly under cyclic torsion. Conclusions: Significant differences in plate performance were not demonstrated. The effects of bone quality variability and differences in interfragmentary screw purchase resulted in data dispersion that confounded absolute ranking of plate performance. Clinical Relevance: Identification of an optimal lateral fibular plating system has the potential to improve the clinical outcome of malleolar fracture fixation, particularly when patient conditions are unfavorable.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibula - injuries</subject><subject>Fibula - physiology</subject><subject>Fibula - surgery</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Torsion, Mechanical</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1071-1007</issn><issn>1944-7876</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EolDYmZBHloAdO3E8QqGAVAkG2JAi2z1DqiQu_hj473HVwoDEcnfS-70n3UPojJJLSoW4okRQSvJgXNZlyfbQEZWcF6IR9X6-s1Js9Ak6DmFFCBWMykM0KVlDG16TI_R207kBzIcaO6N6PHPDWvkuuBE7izm-7awFD2PECxXBZ-K5z0fmxhB9MjFg63zGQszavNOpV3julYnJQzhBB1b1AU53e4pe53cvs4di8XT_OLteFIYxEQuQRjMhQVOlgShrK0205VoKLqAmtqrBQGX0klcgS0qYEVxZ3Wirl5UQlk3RxTZ37d1nghDboQsG-l6N4FJoKedNSZq6bjJKtqjxLgQPtl37blD-q6Wk3XTa_u00W8536UkPsPw1_JSYgWILBPUO7colP-Zv_w_8Bouuf20</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Eckel, Tobin T.</creator><creator>Glisson, Richard R.</creator><creator>Anand, Prashanth</creator><creator>Parekh, Selene G.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Different Lateral Plate Constructs for Distal Fibula Fractures</title><author>Eckel, Tobin T. ; Glisson, Richard R. ; Anand, Prashanth ; Parekh, Selene G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e9cb379eb1abe0aff5b0bf4b9747e60f56ece5cbd45e92103c74afb8bfbd577f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibula - injuries</topic><topic>Fibula - physiology</topic><topic>Fibula - surgery</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Torsion, Mechanical</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eckel, Tobin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glisson, Richard R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Prashanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parekh, Selene G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Foot &amp; ankle international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eckel, Tobin T.</au><au>Glisson, Richard R.</au><au>Anand, Prashanth</au><au>Parekh, Selene G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Different Lateral Plate Constructs for Distal Fibula Fractures</atitle><jtitle>Foot &amp; ankle international</jtitle><addtitle>Foot Ankle Int</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1588</spage><epage>1595</epage><pages>1588-1595</pages><issn>1071-1007</issn><eissn>1944-7876</eissn><abstract>Background: Displaced lateral malleolar fractures are often treated with reduction and surgical stabilization. However, there has not been a comprehensive laboratory comparison to determine the most appropriate device for treating these patients. This study subjected a range of contemporary lateral fibular plates to a series of mechanical tests designed to reveal performance differences. Methods: Forty fresh frozen lower extremities were divided into 4 groups. A Weber B distal fibula fracture was simulated with an osteotomy and stabilized using 1 of 4 plate systems: a standard Synthes one-third tubular plate with interfragmentary lag screw, a Synthes LCP locking plate with lag screw, an Orthohelix MaxLock Extreme low-profile locking plate with lag screw, or a TriMed Sidewinder nonlocking plate. Controlled monotonic bending and cyclic torsional loading were applied and bending stiffness, torsional stiffness, and fracture site motion were quantified. Resistance to cyclic torsional loading was determined by quantifying the number of loads withstood before excessive rotation occurred. Correlation between bone mineral density and each of the mechanical measures was determined. Results: There was no difference in angulation or bending stiffness between plates. All plates except the LCP showed greater lateral deflection than in the other bending directions. Bending stiffness was lowest in lateral distal fragment deflection for all 4 plates. There was a positive correlation between bone mineral density and bending stiffness for all plate types. There was no difference in fracture site rotation between plate types in internal or external torsion, but internal rotation of the distal fragment consistently exceeded external rotation. Torsional stiffness in external rotation exceeded stiffness in internal rotation in nearly all specimens. LCP plates performed relatively poorly under cyclic torsion. Conclusions: Significant differences in plate performance were not demonstrated. The effects of bone quality variability and differences in interfragmentary screw purchase resulted in data dispersion that confounded absolute ranking of plate performance. Clinical Relevance: Identification of an optimal lateral fibular plating system has the potential to improve the clinical outcome of malleolar fracture fixation, particularly when patient conditions are unfavorable.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23818460</pmid><doi>10.1177/1071100713496223</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1071-1007
ispartof Foot & ankle international, 2013-11, Vol.34 (11), p.1588-1595
issn 1071-1007
1944-7876
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448208668
source Sage Journals Online
subjects Adult
Aged
Biomechanical Phenomena
Bone Density - physiology
Bone Plates
Female
Fibula - injuries
Fibula - physiology
Fibula - surgery
Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation
Fractures, Bone - surgery
Humans
Male
Materials Testing
Middle Aged
Prosthesis Design
Rotation
Torsion, Mechanical
Young Adult
title Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Different Lateral Plate Constructs for Distal Fibula Fractures
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T15%3A06%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomechanical%20Comparison%20of%204%20Different%20Lateral%20Plate%20Constructs%20for%20Distal%20Fibula%20Fractures&rft.jtitle=Foot%20&%20ankle%20international&rft.au=Eckel,%20Tobin%20T.&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1588&rft.epage=1595&rft.pages=1588-1595&rft.issn=1071-1007&rft.eissn=1944-7876&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1071100713496223&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1448208668%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e9cb379eb1abe0aff5b0bf4b9747e60f56ece5cbd45e92103c74afb8bfbd577f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1448208668&rft_id=info:pmid/23818460&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1071100713496223&rfr_iscdi=true