Gypsy law

How do the members of societies that can't use government or simple ostracism produce social order? To investigate this question I use economics to analyze Gypsy law. Gypsy law leverages superstition to enforce desirable conduct in Gypsy societies where government is unavailable and simple ostr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public choice 2013-06, Vol.155 (3/4), p.273-292
Main Author: Leeson, Peter T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anarchy
Beliefs
Boycotts
Communication
Communities
Cooperation
Economics
Economics and Finance
Environmental pollution
Estimates
Government
Gypsies
Human Body
Larceny
Law
Ostracism
Political Science
Public choice
Public Finance
Religion
Ritual pollution
Rituals
Romani people
Social Control
Social cooperation
Social interaction
Social Order
Society
Superstition
Superstitions
Taboos
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-676b2015b6c4f468622e53fcafe5bb08175a57da8b73854da5726c2c3bc037ca3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-676b2015b6c4f468622e53fcafe5bb08175a57da8b73854da5726c2c3bc037ca3
container_end_page 292
container_issue 3/4
container_start_page 273
container_title Public choice
container_volume 155
creator Leeson, Peter T.
description How do the members of societies that can't use government or simple ostracism produce social order? To investigate this question I use economics to analyze Gypsy law. Gypsy law leverages superstition to enforce desirable conduct in Gypsy societies where government is unavailable and simple ostracism is ineffective. According to Gypsy law, unguarded contact with the lower half of the human body is ritually polluting, ritual defilement is physically contagious, and non-Gypsies are in an extreme state of such defilement. These superstitions repair holes in simple ostracism among Gypsies, enabling them to secure social cooperation without government. Gypsies' belief system is an efficient institutional response to the constraints they face on their choice of mechanisms of social control.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11127-012-0048-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448772613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42003101</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42003101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-676b2015b6c4f468622e53fcafe5bb08175a57da8b73854da5726c2c3bc037ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFKAzEQhoMouFYfwIMgePGyOpNkkuxRilah4EXPIZtmpWXbrUmL9O3NuiLiQXoKE75_ZpiPsXOEGwTQtwkRuS4BeQkgTSkPWIGkRakR8JAVX59keHXMTlJaAIBQhgpWTHbrtLts3ccpO2pcm8LZ9ztirw_3L-PHcvo8eRrfTUtPQm5KpVXNAalWXjZSGcV5INF41wSqazCoyZGeOVNrYUjOcsGV517UHoT2TozY9dB3Hbv3bUgbu5wnH9rWrUK3TRalNDpnUOyDKq4q0mYPNG-jAGgPVJDgBlH1C1z9QRfdNq7yeXpKVboSnDKFA-Vjl1IMjV3H-dLFnUWwvR072LHZju1FWJkzfMikzK7eQvzV-Z_QxRBapE0Xf6ZInm1mzeITNAyVyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1356979325</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gypsy law</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Leeson, Peter T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Leeson, Peter T.</creatorcontrib><description>How do the members of societies that can't use government or simple ostracism produce social order? To investigate this question I use economics to analyze Gypsy law. Gypsy law leverages superstition to enforce desirable conduct in Gypsy societies where government is unavailable and simple ostracism is ineffective. According to Gypsy law, unguarded contact with the lower half of the human body is ritually polluting, ritual defilement is physically contagious, and non-Gypsies are in an extreme state of such defilement. These superstitions repair holes in simple ostracism among Gypsies, enabling them to secure social cooperation without government. Gypsies' belief system is an efficient institutional response to the constraints they face on their choice of mechanisms of social control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11127-012-0048-4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PUCHBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer</publisher><subject>Anarchy ; Beliefs ; Boycotts ; Communication ; Communities ; Cooperation ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Environmental pollution ; Estimates ; Government ; Gypsies ; Human Body ; Larceny ; Law ; Ostracism ; Political Science ; Public choice ; Public Finance ; Religion ; Ritual pollution ; Rituals ; Romani people ; Social Control ; Social cooperation ; Social interaction ; Social Order ; Society ; Superstition ; Superstitions ; Taboos</subject><ispartof>Public choice, 2013-06, Vol.155 (3/4), p.273-292</ispartof><rights>2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-676b2015b6c4f468622e53fcafe5bb08175a57da8b73854da5726c2c3bc037ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-676b2015b6c4f468622e53fcafe5bb08175a57da8b73854da5726c2c3bc037ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1356979325/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1356979325?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,11885,12824,12826,21366,21373,21374,27842,27901,27902,33200,33201,33588,33589,33962,33963,34507,34508,36027,36028,36037,36038,43709,43924,44091,44337,44339,58213,58446,73964,74211,74382,74636,74638</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leeson, Peter T.</creatorcontrib><title>Gypsy law</title><title>Public choice</title><addtitle>Public Choice</addtitle><description>How do the members of societies that can't use government or simple ostracism produce social order? To investigate this question I use economics to analyze Gypsy law. Gypsy law leverages superstition to enforce desirable conduct in Gypsy societies where government is unavailable and simple ostracism is ineffective. According to Gypsy law, unguarded contact with the lower half of the human body is ritually polluting, ritual defilement is physically contagious, and non-Gypsies are in an extreme state of such defilement. These superstitions repair holes in simple ostracism among Gypsies, enabling them to secure social cooperation without government. Gypsies' belief system is an efficient institutional response to the constraints they face on their choice of mechanisms of social control.</description><subject>Anarchy</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Boycotts</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Environmental pollution</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Gypsies</subject><subject>Human Body</subject><subject>Larceny</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Ostracism</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Public choice</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Ritual pollution</subject><subject>Rituals</subject><subject>Romani people</subject><subject>Social Control</subject><subject>Social cooperation</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social Order</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Superstition</subject><subject>Superstitions</subject><subject>Taboos</subject><issn>0048-5829</issn><issn>1573-7101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFKAzEQhoMouFYfwIMgePGyOpNkkuxRilah4EXPIZtmpWXbrUmL9O3NuiLiQXoKE75_ZpiPsXOEGwTQtwkRuS4BeQkgTSkPWIGkRakR8JAVX59keHXMTlJaAIBQhgpWTHbrtLts3ccpO2pcm8LZ9ztirw_3L-PHcvo8eRrfTUtPQm5KpVXNAalWXjZSGcV5INF41wSqazCoyZGeOVNrYUjOcsGV517UHoT2TozY9dB3Hbv3bUgbu5wnH9rWrUK3TRalNDpnUOyDKq4q0mYPNG-jAGgPVJDgBlH1C1z9QRfdNq7yeXpKVboSnDKFA-Vjl1IMjV3H-dLFnUWwvR072LHZju1FWJkzfMikzK7eQvzV-Z_QxRBapE0Xf6ZInm1mzeITNAyVyw</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Leeson, Peter T.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Gypsy law</title><author>Leeson, Peter T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-676b2015b6c4f468622e53fcafe5bb08175a57da8b73854da5726c2c3bc037ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Anarchy</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Boycotts</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Environmental pollution</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Gypsies</topic><topic>Human Body</topic><topic>Larceny</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Ostracism</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Public choice</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Ritual pollution</topic><topic>Rituals</topic><topic>Romani people</topic><topic>Social Control</topic><topic>Social cooperation</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social Order</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Superstition</topic><topic>Superstitions</topic><topic>Taboos</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leeson, Peter T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Public choice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leeson, Peter T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gypsy law</atitle><jtitle>Public choice</jtitle><stitle>Public Choice</stitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>155</volume><issue>3/4</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>292</epage><pages>273-292</pages><issn>0048-5829</issn><eissn>1573-7101</eissn><coden>PUCHBX</coden><abstract>How do the members of societies that can't use government or simple ostracism produce social order? To investigate this question I use economics to analyze Gypsy law. Gypsy law leverages superstition to enforce desirable conduct in Gypsy societies where government is unavailable and simple ostracism is ineffective. According to Gypsy law, unguarded contact with the lower half of the human body is ritually polluting, ritual defilement is physically contagious, and non-Gypsies are in an extreme state of such defilement. These superstitions repair holes in simple ostracism among Gypsies, enabling them to secure social cooperation without government. Gypsies' belief system is an efficient institutional response to the constraints they face on their choice of mechanisms of social control.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11127-012-0048-4</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-5829
ispartof Public choice, 2013-06, Vol.155 (3/4), p.273-292
issn 0048-5829
1573-7101
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448772613
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; Springer Nature; Sociology Collection; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Anarchy
Beliefs
Boycotts
Communication
Communities
Cooperation
Economics
Economics and Finance
Environmental pollution
Estimates
Government
Gypsies
Human Body
Larceny
Law
Ostracism
Political Science
Public choice
Public Finance
Religion
Ritual pollution
Rituals
Romani people
Social Control
Social cooperation
Social interaction
Social Order
Society
Superstition
Superstitions
Taboos
title Gypsy law
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T01%3A19%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gypsy%20law&rft.jtitle=Public%20choice&rft.au=Leeson,%20Peter%20T.&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=155&rft.issue=3/4&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=292&rft.pages=273-292&rft.issn=0048-5829&rft.eissn=1573-7101&rft.coden=PUCHBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11127-012-0048-4&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42003101%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-676b2015b6c4f468622e53fcafe5bb08175a57da8b73854da5726c2c3bc037ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1356979325&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42003101&rfr_iscdi=true