The nationalization of electoral cycles in the United States: a wavelet analysis

We take a new look at electoral sectionalism and dynamic nationalization in presidential elections. We treat this problem as one of synchronism of electoral cycles, which we estimate by using wavelets. After providing a self-contained introduction to wavelet analysis, we use it to assess the degree...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public choice 2013-09, Vol.156 (3/4), p.387-408
Main Authors: Aguiar-Conraria, Luís, Magalhães, Pedro C., Soares, Maria Joana
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
20th century
Cluster analysis
Congressional elections
Convergence
Economic models
Economic statistics
Economic theory
Economics
Economics and Finance
Election returns
Elections
Electoral College
Electoral reform
Electoral systems
Nationalization
Political economy
Political elections
Political parties
Political partisanship
Political Science
Politics
Presidential elections
Presidents
Public Finance
Social sciences
Southern States
Studies
Time series
Trends
U.S.A
United States of America
Voting
Wavelet analysis
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We take a new look at electoral sectionalism and dynamic nationalization in presidential elections. We treat this problem as one of synchronism of electoral cycles, which we estimate by using wavelets. After providing a self-contained introduction to wavelet analysis, we use it to assess the degree and the dynamics of electoral synchronization in the United States. We determine clusters of states where electoral swings have been more and less in sync with each other and with the national cycle. Then, we analyze how the degree of synchronism of electoral cycles has changed through time, answering questions as to when, to what extent, and where has a tendency towards a "universality of political trends" in presidential elections been more strongly felt. We present evidence strongly in favor of an increase in the dynamic nationalization of presidential elections taking place since the 1950s, largely associated with a convergence in most (but not all) Southern states.
ISSN:0048-5829
1573-7101
DOI:10.1007/s11127-012-0052-8