Loading…

Pragmatics in Carnap and Morris and the Bipartite Metatheory Conception

This paper concerns the issue of whether the so-called left wing of the Vienna Circle (Carnap, Neurath, Frank) can be understood as having provided the blueprint for a bipartite metatheory with a formal-logical part (the "logic of science") supporting and being supported by a naturalistic-...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Erkenntnis 2013-06, Vol.78 (3), p.523-546
Main Author:	Uebel, Thomas
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Subjects:	Education Empiricism Epistemology Ethics Logic Logical empiricism Metatheories Ontology Original Paper Philosophical logics. Philosophy of language Philosophy Philosophy of science Pragmatics Pragmatism Semantics Semiotic signs Social semiotics Syntax
Citations:	Items that this one cites Items that cite this one
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-f51bc43d5d71c8e92291f6a37575e861d0b50ebb69a13b3d0f5ea038d4f7774d3
cites	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-f51bc43d5d71c8e92291f6a37575e861d0b50ebb69a13b3d0f5ea038d4f7774d3
container_end_page	546
container_issue	3
container_start_page	523
container_title	Erkenntnis
container_volume	78
creator	Uebel, Thomas
description	This paper concerns the issue of whether the so-called left wing of the Vienna Circle (Carnap, Neurath, Frank) can be understood as having provided the blueprint for a bipartite metatheory with a formal-logical part (the "logic of science") supporting and being supported by a naturalistic-empirical part (the "behavioristics of science"). A claim to this effect was recently met by a counterclaim that there was indeed an attempt made to broaden Carnap's formalist conception of philosophy by the pragmatist Morris, but that this initiative failed and that Carnap showed no interest in it. To defend the original claim this paper provides an analysis of Carnap and Morris on the subject matter of pragmatics in order to show that and how Carnap adopted Morris's proposals in so far as they agreed with bipartite metatheory conception.
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s10670-011-9352-5
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1449084318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42001445</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42001445</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-f51bc43d5d71c8e92291f6a37575e861d0b50ebb69a13b3d0f5ea038d4f7774d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9LJDEQxcOisKPuB9iD0CCCl9aqzr_uow6uK8zgHvQc0um0ZujptEnm4LffaIuIB08pUr_3qHpFyG-EcwSQFxFBSCgBsWwor0r-gyyQy6qsWQV7ZAEoeO6C-EkOYtxA1jCJC3LzL-jHrU7OxMKNxVKHUU-FHrti7UNw8a1MT7a4cpMOySVbrG3S-ceHl2LpR2On5Px4RPZ7PUT76_09JA9_ru-Xf8vV3c3t8nJVGgaYyp5jaxjteCfR1LapqgZ7oankkttaYActB9u2otFIW9pBz60GWnesl1Kyjh6Ss9l3Cv55Z2NSWxeNHQY9Wr-LChlroGYU64yefEE3fpfXGzJFmaCSiUpmCmfKBB9jsL2agtvq8KIQ1Gu0ao5W5WjVa7SKZ83pu7OORg990KNx8UNYSSFRvE1QzVzMrfHRhk8TfGN-PIs2MfnwYZrPCHk5Tv8DY7qQdQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1346374627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pragmatics in Carnap and Morris and the Bipartite Metatheory Conception</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</source><creator>Uebel, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Uebel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>This paper concerns the issue of whether the so-called left wing of the Vienna Circle (Carnap, Neurath, Frank) can be understood as having provided the blueprint for a bipartite metatheory with a formal-logical part (the "logic of science") supporting and being supported by a naturalistic-empirical part (the "behavioristics of science"). A claim to this effect was recently met by a counterclaim that there was indeed an attempt made to broaden Carnap's formalist conception of philosophy by the pragmatist Morris, but that this initiative failed and that Carnap showed no interest in it. To defend the original claim this paper provides an analysis of Carnap and Morris on the subject matter of pragmatics in order to show that and how Carnap adopted Morris's proposals in so far as they agreed with bipartite metatheory conception.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8420</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10670-011-9352-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERKEDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Education ; Empiricism ; Epistemology ; Ethics ; Logic ; Logical empiricism ; Metatheories ; Ontology ; Original Paper ; Philosophical logics. Philosophy of language ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of science ; Pragmatics ; Pragmatism ; Semantics ; Semiotic signs ; Social semiotics ; Syntax</subject><ispartof>Erkenntnis, 2013-06, Vol.78 (3), p.523-546</ispartof><rights>2013 Springer Science+Business Media</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-f51bc43d5d71c8e92291f6a37575e861d0b50ebb69a13b3d0f5ea038d4f7774d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-f51bc43d5d71c8e92291f6a37575e861d0b50ebb69a13b3d0f5ea038d4f7774d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1346374627/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1346374627?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12841,27903,27904,31249,34754,34755,44179,58217,58450,74475</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27671618$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uebel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Pragmatics in Carnap and Morris and the Bipartite Metatheory Conception</title><title>Erkenntnis</title><addtitle>Erkenn</addtitle><description>This paper concerns the issue of whether the so-called left wing of the Vienna Circle (Carnap, Neurath, Frank) can be understood as having provided the blueprint for a bipartite metatheory with a formal-logical part (the "logic of science") supporting and being supported by a naturalistic-empirical part (the "behavioristics of science"). A claim to this effect was recently met by a counterclaim that there was indeed an attempt made to broaden Carnap's formalist conception of philosophy by the pragmatist Morris, but that this initiative failed and that Carnap showed no interest in it. To defend the original claim this paper provides an analysis of Carnap and Morris on the subject matter of pragmatics in order to show that and how Carnap adopted Morris's proposals in so far as they agreed with bipartite metatheory conception.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Empiricism</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Logical empiricism</subject><subject>Metatheories</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Philosophical logics. Philosophy of language</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of science</subject><subject>Pragmatics</subject><subject>Pragmatism</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Semiotic signs</subject><subject>Social semiotics</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><issn>0165-0106</issn><issn>1572-8420</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9LJDEQxcOisKPuB9iD0CCCl9aqzr_uow6uK8zgHvQc0um0ZujptEnm4LffaIuIB08pUr_3qHpFyG-EcwSQFxFBSCgBsWwor0r-gyyQy6qsWQV7ZAEoeO6C-EkOYtxA1jCJC3LzL-jHrU7OxMKNxVKHUU-FHrti7UNw8a1MT7a4cpMOySVbrG3S-ceHl2LpR2On5Px4RPZ7PUT76_09JA9_ru-Xf8vV3c3t8nJVGgaYyp5jaxjteCfR1LapqgZ7oankkttaYActB9u2otFIW9pBz60GWnesl1Kyjh6Ss9l3Cv55Z2NSWxeNHQY9Wr-LChlroGYU64yefEE3fpfXGzJFmaCSiUpmCmfKBB9jsL2agtvq8KIQ1Gu0ao5W5WjVa7SKZ83pu7OORg990KNx8UNYSSFRvE1QzVzMrfHRhk8TfGN-PIs2MfnwYZrPCHk5Tv8DY7qQdQ</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Uebel, Thomas</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Pragmatics in Carnap and Morris and the Bipartite Metatheory Conception</title><author>Uebel, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-f51bc43d5d71c8e92291f6a37575e861d0b50ebb69a13b3d0f5ea038d4f7774d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Empiricism</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Logical empiricism</topic><topic>Metatheories</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Philosophical logics. Philosophy of language</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of science</topic><topic>Pragmatics</topic><topic>Pragmatism</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Semiotic signs</topic><topic>Social semiotics</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uebel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Erkenntnis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uebel, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pragmatics in Carnap and Morris and the Bipartite Metatheory Conception</atitle><jtitle>Erkenntnis</jtitle><stitle>Erkenn</stitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>523</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>523-546</pages><issn>0165-0106</issn><eissn>1572-8420</eissn><coden>ERKEDQ</coden><abstract>This paper concerns the issue of whether the so-called left wing of the Vienna Circle (Carnap, Neurath, Frank) can be understood as having provided the blueprint for a bipartite metatheory with a formal-logical part (the "logic of science") supporting and being supported by a naturalistic-empirical part (the "behavioristics of science"). A claim to this effect was recently met by a counterclaim that there was indeed an attempt made to broaden Carnap's formalist conception of philosophy by the pragmatist Morris, but that this initiative failed and that Carnap showed no interest in it. To defend the original claim this paper provides an analysis of Carnap and Morris on the subject matter of pragmatics in order to show that and how Carnap adopted Morris's proposals in so far as they agreed with bipartite metatheory conception.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10670-011-9352-5</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0165-0106
ispartof	Erkenntnis, 2013-06, Vol.78 (3), p.523-546
issn	0165-0106 1572-8420
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1449084318
source	JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Art, Design & Architecture Collection
subjects	Education Empiricism Epistemology Ethics Logic Logical empiricism Metatheories Ontology Original Paper Philosophical logics. Philosophy of language Philosophy Philosophy of science Pragmatics Pragmatism Semantics Semiotic signs Social semiotics Syntax
title	Pragmatics in Carnap and Morris and the Bipartite Metatheory Conception
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A19%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pragmatics%20in%20Carnap%20and%20Morris%20and%20the%20Bipartite%20Metatheory%20Conception&rft.jtitle=Erkenntnis&rft.au=Uebel,%20Thomas&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=523&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=523-546&rft.issn=0165-0106&rft.eissn=1572-8420&rft.coden=ERKEDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10670-011-9352-5&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42001445%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-f51bc43d5d71c8e92291f6a37575e861d0b50ebb69a13b3d0f5ea038d4f7774d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1346374627&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42001445&rfr_iscdi=true