Loading…

Performance evaluation of canine-associated Bacteroidales assays in a multi-laboratory comparison study

The contribution of fecal pollution from dogs in urbanized areas can be significant and is an often underestimated problem. Microbial source tracking methods (MST) utilizing quantitative PCR of dog-associated gene sequences encoding 16S rRNA of Bacteroidales are a useful tool to estimate these contr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water research (Oxford) 2013-11, Vol.47 (18), p.6909-6920
Main Authors: Schriewer, Alexander, Goodwin, Kelly D., Sinigalliano, Christopher D., Cox, Annie M., Wanless, David, Bartkowiak, Jakob, Ebentier, Darcy L., Hanley, Kaitlyn T., Ervin, Jared, Deering, Louise A., Shanks, Orin C., Peed, Lindsay A., Meijer, Wim G., Griffith, John F., SantoDomingo, Jorge, Jay, Jennifer A., Holden, Patricia A., Wuertz, Stefan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-7b1719c5a4bf66e08ec3da55dcc257de33b8bb8f64bb448c40dc3979a276ffa3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-7b1719c5a4bf66e08ec3da55dcc257de33b8bb8f64bb448c40dc3979a276ffa3
container_end_page 6920
container_issue 18
container_start_page 6909
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 47
creator Schriewer, Alexander
Goodwin, Kelly D.
Sinigalliano, Christopher D.
Cox, Annie M.
Wanless, David
Bartkowiak, Jakob
Ebentier, Darcy L.
Hanley, Kaitlyn T.
Ervin, Jared
Deering, Louise A.
Shanks, Orin C.
Peed, Lindsay A.
Meijer, Wim G.
Griffith, John F.
SantoDomingo, Jorge
Jay, Jennifer A.
Holden, Patricia A.
Wuertz, Stefan
description The contribution of fecal pollution from dogs in urbanized areas can be significant and is an often underestimated problem. Microbial source tracking methods (MST) utilizing quantitative PCR of dog-associated gene sequences encoding 16S rRNA of Bacteroidales are a useful tool to estimate these contributions. However, data about the performance of available assays are scarce. The results of a multi-laboratory study testing two assays for the determination of dog-associated Bacteroidales (DogBact and BacCan-UCD) on 64 single and mixed fecal source samples created from pooled fecal samples collected in California are presented here. Standardization of qPCR data treatment lowered inter-laboratory variability of sensitivity and specificity results. Both assays exhibited 100% sensitivity. Normalization methods are presented that eliminated random and confirmed non-target responses. The combination of standardized qPCR data treatment, use of normalization via a non-target specific Bacteroidales assay (GenBac3), and application of threshold criteria improved the calculated specificity significantly for both assays. Such measures would reasonably improve MST data interpretation not only for canine-associated assays, but for all qPCR assays used in identifying and monitoring fecal pollution in the environment. [Display omitted] •Evaluation of two dog-associated MST assays on created single & mixed fecal source samples.•Classification and treatment method of qPCR data influenced performance assessment.•Normalization methods significantly influenced the evaluation of assay performance.•Methods presented to eliminate random and confirmed non-target assay responses.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2013.03.062
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1450197071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135413005472</els_id><sourcerecordid>1450197071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-7b1719c5a4bf66e08ec3da55dcc257de33b8bb8f64bb448c40dc3979a276ffa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFuFSEUhonR2NvqGxidpZu5wsDAzMbENlZNmmhiXZMDHBpuZoYrMDX37aVOdWlyAgu-8x_4IOQVo3tGmXx32P-CkjDvO8r4ntaS3ROyY4Ma206I4SnZUSp4y3gvzsh5zgdKadfx8Tk5qyuTirEdufuGycc0w2KxwXuYVighLk30jYUlLNhCztEGKOiaS7AFUwwOJsxNPYBTbsLSQDOvUwntBCYmKDGdGhvnI6SQa1Quqzu9IM88TBlfPu4X5Pb64-3V5_bm66cvVx9uWssHWVplmGKj7UEYLyXSAS130PfO2q5XDjk3gzGDl8KY-kYrqLN8VCN0SnoP_IK83WKPKf5cMRc9h2xxmmDBuGbNRE_ZqKhiFRUbalPMOaHXxxRmSCfNqH4wrA96M6wfDGtaS3a17fXjhNXM6P41_VVagTcb4CFquKsO9I_vNaGv-uk4_iHebwRWEfcBk842YP0AFxLaol0M_7_Db_nQmpo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1450197071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance evaluation of canine-associated Bacteroidales assays in a multi-laboratory comparison study</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Schriewer, Alexander ; Goodwin, Kelly D. ; Sinigalliano, Christopher D. ; Cox, Annie M. ; Wanless, David ; Bartkowiak, Jakob ; Ebentier, Darcy L. ; Hanley, Kaitlyn T. ; Ervin, Jared ; Deering, Louise A. ; Shanks, Orin C. ; Peed, Lindsay A. ; Meijer, Wim G. ; Griffith, John F. ; SantoDomingo, Jorge ; Jay, Jennifer A. ; Holden, Patricia A. ; Wuertz, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Schriewer, Alexander ; Goodwin, Kelly D. ; Sinigalliano, Christopher D. ; Cox, Annie M. ; Wanless, David ; Bartkowiak, Jakob ; Ebentier, Darcy L. ; Hanley, Kaitlyn T. ; Ervin, Jared ; Deering, Louise A. ; Shanks, Orin C. ; Peed, Lindsay A. ; Meijer, Wim G. ; Griffith, John F. ; SantoDomingo, Jorge ; Jay, Jennifer A. ; Holden, Patricia A. ; Wuertz, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>The contribution of fecal pollution from dogs in urbanized areas can be significant and is an often underestimated problem. Microbial source tracking methods (MST) utilizing quantitative PCR of dog-associated gene sequences encoding 16S rRNA of Bacteroidales are a useful tool to estimate these contributions. However, data about the performance of available assays are scarce. The results of a multi-laboratory study testing two assays for the determination of dog-associated Bacteroidales (DogBact and BacCan-UCD) on 64 single and mixed fecal source samples created from pooled fecal samples collected in California are presented here. Standardization of qPCR data treatment lowered inter-laboratory variability of sensitivity and specificity results. Both assays exhibited 100% sensitivity. Normalization methods are presented that eliminated random and confirmed non-target responses. The combination of standardized qPCR data treatment, use of normalization via a non-target specific Bacteroidales assay (GenBac3), and application of threshold criteria improved the calculated specificity significantly for both assays. Such measures would reasonably improve MST data interpretation not only for canine-associated assays, but for all qPCR assays used in identifying and monitoring fecal pollution in the environment. [Display omitted] •Evaluation of two dog-associated MST assays on created single &amp; mixed fecal source samples.•Classification and treatment method of qPCR data influenced performance assessment.•Normalization methods significantly influenced the evaluation of assay performance.•Methods presented to eliminate random and confirmed non-target assay responses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.03.062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23916711</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacteroidales ; Bacteroidetes - classification ; Bacteroidetes - genetics ; Bacteroidetes - isolation &amp; purification ; Bacteroidetes - metabolism ; California ; Canine fecal pollution ; DNA, Bacterial - classification ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; DNA, Bacterial - metabolism ; dogs ; Dogs - microbiology ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Feces ; Microbial source tracking ; monitoring ; nucleotide sequences ; pollution ; Quantitative PCR ; quantitative polymerase chain reaction ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; ribosomal RNA ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - classification ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - metabolism ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Single-Blind Method ; urbanization ; Water Microbiology ; Water Pollution - analysis</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2013-11, Vol.47 (18), p.6909-6920</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-7b1719c5a4bf66e08ec3da55dcc257de33b8bb8f64bb448c40dc3979a276ffa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-7b1719c5a4bf66e08ec3da55dcc257de33b8bb8f64bb448c40dc3979a276ffa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23916711$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schriewer, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Kelly D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinigalliano, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Annie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanless, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartkowiak, Jakob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebentier, Darcy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanley, Kaitlyn T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ervin, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deering, Louise A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanks, Orin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peed, Lindsay A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Wim G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffith, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SantoDomingo, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jay, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holden, Patricia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wuertz, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Performance evaluation of canine-associated Bacteroidales assays in a multi-laboratory comparison study</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>The contribution of fecal pollution from dogs in urbanized areas can be significant and is an often underestimated problem. Microbial source tracking methods (MST) utilizing quantitative PCR of dog-associated gene sequences encoding 16S rRNA of Bacteroidales are a useful tool to estimate these contributions. However, data about the performance of available assays are scarce. The results of a multi-laboratory study testing two assays for the determination of dog-associated Bacteroidales (DogBact and BacCan-UCD) on 64 single and mixed fecal source samples created from pooled fecal samples collected in California are presented here. Standardization of qPCR data treatment lowered inter-laboratory variability of sensitivity and specificity results. Both assays exhibited 100% sensitivity. Normalization methods are presented that eliminated random and confirmed non-target responses. The combination of standardized qPCR data treatment, use of normalization via a non-target specific Bacteroidales assay (GenBac3), and application of threshold criteria improved the calculated specificity significantly for both assays. Such measures would reasonably improve MST data interpretation not only for canine-associated assays, but for all qPCR assays used in identifying and monitoring fecal pollution in the environment. [Display omitted] •Evaluation of two dog-associated MST assays on created single &amp; mixed fecal source samples.•Classification and treatment method of qPCR data influenced performance assessment.•Normalization methods significantly influenced the evaluation of assay performance.•Methods presented to eliminate random and confirmed non-target assay responses.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteroidales</subject><subject>Bacteroidetes - classification</subject><subject>Bacteroidetes - genetics</subject><subject>Bacteroidetes - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Bacteroidetes - metabolism</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Canine fecal pollution</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - classification</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - metabolism</subject><subject>dogs</subject><subject>Dogs - microbiology</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Microbial source tracking</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>nucleotide sequences</subject><subject>pollution</subject><subject>Quantitative PCR</subject><subject>quantitative polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>ribosomal RNA</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - classification</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - metabolism</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>urbanization</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><subject>Water Pollution - analysis</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFuFSEUhonR2NvqGxidpZu5wsDAzMbENlZNmmhiXZMDHBpuZoYrMDX37aVOdWlyAgu-8x_4IOQVo3tGmXx32P-CkjDvO8r4ntaS3ROyY4Ma206I4SnZUSp4y3gvzsh5zgdKadfx8Tk5qyuTirEdufuGycc0w2KxwXuYVighLk30jYUlLNhCztEGKOiaS7AFUwwOJsxNPYBTbsLSQDOvUwntBCYmKDGdGhvnI6SQa1Quqzu9IM88TBlfPu4X5Pb64-3V5_bm66cvVx9uWssHWVplmGKj7UEYLyXSAS130PfO2q5XDjk3gzGDl8KY-kYrqLN8VCN0SnoP_IK83WKPKf5cMRc9h2xxmmDBuGbNRE_ZqKhiFRUbalPMOaHXxxRmSCfNqH4wrA96M6wfDGtaS3a17fXjhNXM6P41_VVagTcb4CFquKsO9I_vNaGv-uk4_iHebwRWEfcBk842YP0AFxLaol0M_7_Db_nQmpo</recordid><startdate>20131115</startdate><enddate>20131115</enddate><creator>Schriewer, Alexander</creator><creator>Goodwin, Kelly D.</creator><creator>Sinigalliano, Christopher D.</creator><creator>Cox, Annie M.</creator><creator>Wanless, David</creator><creator>Bartkowiak, Jakob</creator><creator>Ebentier, Darcy L.</creator><creator>Hanley, Kaitlyn T.</creator><creator>Ervin, Jared</creator><creator>Deering, Louise A.</creator><creator>Shanks, Orin C.</creator><creator>Peed, Lindsay A.</creator><creator>Meijer, Wim G.</creator><creator>Griffith, John F.</creator><creator>SantoDomingo, Jorge</creator><creator>Jay, Jennifer A.</creator><creator>Holden, Patricia A.</creator><creator>Wuertz, Stefan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131115</creationdate><title>Performance evaluation of canine-associated Bacteroidales assays in a multi-laboratory comparison study</title><author>Schriewer, Alexander ; Goodwin, Kelly D. ; Sinigalliano, Christopher D. ; Cox, Annie M. ; Wanless, David ; Bartkowiak, Jakob ; Ebentier, Darcy L. ; Hanley, Kaitlyn T. ; Ervin, Jared ; Deering, Louise A. ; Shanks, Orin C. ; Peed, Lindsay A. ; Meijer, Wim G. ; Griffith, John F. ; SantoDomingo, Jorge ; Jay, Jennifer A. ; Holden, Patricia A. ; Wuertz, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-7b1719c5a4bf66e08ec3da55dcc257de33b8bb8f64bb448c40dc3979a276ffa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteroidales</topic><topic>Bacteroidetes - classification</topic><topic>Bacteroidetes - genetics</topic><topic>Bacteroidetes - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Bacteroidetes - metabolism</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Canine fecal pollution</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - classification</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - metabolism</topic><topic>dogs</topic><topic>Dogs - microbiology</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Microbial source tracking</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>nucleotide sequences</topic><topic>pollution</topic><topic>Quantitative PCR</topic><topic>quantitative polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>ribosomal RNA</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - classification</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - metabolism</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>urbanization</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><topic>Water Pollution - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schriewer, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Kelly D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinigalliano, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Annie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanless, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartkowiak, Jakob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebentier, Darcy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanley, Kaitlyn T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ervin, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deering, Louise A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanks, Orin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peed, Lindsay A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Wim G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffith, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SantoDomingo, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jay, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holden, Patricia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wuertz, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schriewer, Alexander</au><au>Goodwin, Kelly D.</au><au>Sinigalliano, Christopher D.</au><au>Cox, Annie M.</au><au>Wanless, David</au><au>Bartkowiak, Jakob</au><au>Ebentier, Darcy L.</au><au>Hanley, Kaitlyn T.</au><au>Ervin, Jared</au><au>Deering, Louise A.</au><au>Shanks, Orin C.</au><au>Peed, Lindsay A.</au><au>Meijer, Wim G.</au><au>Griffith, John F.</au><au>SantoDomingo, Jorge</au><au>Jay, Jennifer A.</au><au>Holden, Patricia A.</au><au>Wuertz, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance evaluation of canine-associated Bacteroidales assays in a multi-laboratory comparison study</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2013-11-15</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>6909</spage><epage>6920</epage><pages>6909-6920</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><abstract>The contribution of fecal pollution from dogs in urbanized areas can be significant and is an often underestimated problem. Microbial source tracking methods (MST) utilizing quantitative PCR of dog-associated gene sequences encoding 16S rRNA of Bacteroidales are a useful tool to estimate these contributions. However, data about the performance of available assays are scarce. The results of a multi-laboratory study testing two assays for the determination of dog-associated Bacteroidales (DogBact and BacCan-UCD) on 64 single and mixed fecal source samples created from pooled fecal samples collected in California are presented here. Standardization of qPCR data treatment lowered inter-laboratory variability of sensitivity and specificity results. Both assays exhibited 100% sensitivity. Normalization methods are presented that eliminated random and confirmed non-target responses. The combination of standardized qPCR data treatment, use of normalization via a non-target specific Bacteroidales assay (GenBac3), and application of threshold criteria improved the calculated specificity significantly for both assays. Such measures would reasonably improve MST data interpretation not only for canine-associated assays, but for all qPCR assays used in identifying and monitoring fecal pollution in the environment. [Display omitted] •Evaluation of two dog-associated MST assays on created single &amp; mixed fecal source samples.•Classification and treatment method of qPCR data influenced performance assessment.•Normalization methods significantly influenced the evaluation of assay performance.•Methods presented to eliminate random and confirmed non-target assay responses.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23916711</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2013.03.062</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2013-11, Vol.47 (18), p.6909-6920
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1450197071
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Animals
Bacteroidales
Bacteroidetes - classification
Bacteroidetes - genetics
Bacteroidetes - isolation & purification
Bacteroidetes - metabolism
California
Canine fecal pollution
DNA, Bacterial - classification
DNA, Bacterial - genetics
DNA, Bacterial - metabolism
dogs
Dogs - microbiology
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Feces
Microbial source tracking
monitoring
nucleotide sequences
pollution
Quantitative PCR
quantitative polymerase chain reaction
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
ribosomal RNA
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - classification
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - metabolism
Sensitivity and Specificity
Single-Blind Method
urbanization
Water Microbiology
Water Pollution - analysis
title Performance evaluation of canine-associated Bacteroidales assays in a multi-laboratory comparison study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A45%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20evaluation%20of%20canine-associated%20Bacteroidales%20assays%20in%20a%20multi-laboratory%20comparison%20study&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Schriewer,%20Alexander&rft.date=2013-11-15&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=6909&rft.epage=6920&rft.pages=6909-6920&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2013.03.062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1450197071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-7b1719c5a4bf66e08ec3da55dcc257de33b8bb8f64bb448c40dc3979a276ffa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1450197071&rft_id=info:pmid/23916711&rfr_iscdi=true