Loading…
Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetala ecotypes: relative response to competitors
A competition experiment was performed to determine the relative competitive abilities of fellfield and snowbed ecotypes of Dryas octopetala L. under conditions of high nutrients, high light, and high water availability. Pots were designed to allow the effects of root competition and shoot competiti...
Saved in:
Published in: | The New phytologist 1985-06, Vol.100 (2), p.233-241 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-9f2f940ac6c02a9c6287aa2f7267e46160660862a9b3c415623b5ebe443de86c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-9f2f940ac6c02a9c6287aa2f7267e46160660862a9b3c415623b5ebe443de86c3 |
container_end_page | 241 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 233 |
container_title | The New phytologist |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | McGraw, J.B |
description | A competition experiment was performed to determine the relative competitive abilities of fellfield and snowbed ecotypes of Dryas octopetala L. under conditions of high nutrients, high light, and high water availability. Pots were designed to allow the effects of root competition and shoot competition to be assessed separately. The large-leaved snowbed ecotype responded positively to shoot competition, producing larger leaves and higher biomass than in control pots (no competition). Root competition resulted in a decrease in leaf size and an increase in root: shoot ratio, but no significant effect on shoot number or biomass accumulation. In contrast, the fellfield ecotype responded to shoot competition with an increase in root: shoot ratio, with no effect on biomass or shoot numbers. However, root competition caused a reduction in plant growth. Under growth chamber conditions of high resource availability, the snowbed ecotype is the superior competitor, probably due to ecotypic differences in both root and shoot characteristics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1985.tb02775.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14529071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2432447</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2432447</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-9f2f940ac6c02a9c6287aa2f7267e46160660862a9b3c415623b5ebe443de86c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_QLCIeNearyatF4LM-QGiwhx4F7J4Kh1dU5NO139vSsfuTS5y4H3znHNehM4JTkg4V8uEcJHHGWEyIXmWJu0CUynTZLOHRjtpH40wplksuPg4REfeLzHGeSroCM2mmwZcuYK61VUExlb2q4tsEd25TvvImtY2ECTda23XgL-OHFS6LX8gFL6xtYeotZGxq2AsW-v8MToodOXhZPuO0fx--j55jJ9fH54mt8-x4ZlkcV7QIudYG2Ew1bkRNJNa00JSIYELIrAQOBNBWjDDSRiXLVJYAOfsEzJh2BhdDtzG2e81-FatSm-gqnQNdu0V4SnNsSTBeD0YjbPeOyhUE1bWrlMEqz5HtVR9WKoPS_U5qm2OahM-X2y7aG90VThdm9LvCBnHTIY7RjeD7besoPtHA_Xy9kgZC4DTAbD0IcQdgHJGOe_5Z4NcaKv0lwsjzGcUE4apSClLCfsDIr-a6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14529071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetala ecotypes: relative response to competitors</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>McGraw, J.B</creator><creatorcontrib>McGraw, J.B</creatorcontrib><description>A competition experiment was performed to determine the relative competitive abilities of fellfield and snowbed ecotypes of Dryas octopetala L. under conditions of high nutrients, high light, and high water availability. Pots were designed to allow the effects of root competition and shoot competition to be assessed separately. The large-leaved snowbed ecotype responded positively to shoot competition, producing larger leaves and higher biomass than in control pots (no competition). Root competition resulted in a decrease in leaf size and an increase in root: shoot ratio, but no significant effect on shoot number or biomass accumulation. In contrast, the fellfield ecotype responded to shoot competition with an increase in root: shoot ratio, with no effect on biomass or shoot numbers. However, root competition caused a reduction in plant growth. Under growth chamber conditions of high resource availability, the snowbed ecotype is the superior competitor, probably due to ecotypic differences in both root and shoot characteristics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-646X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1985.tb02775.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NEPHAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Academic Press</publisher><subject>Agroecology ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Competition ; Demecology ; Dryas octopetala ; Ecological competition ; ecotypes ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Leaves ; Phytotrons ; Plant competition ; Plant growth ; Plant roots ; Plants ; Plants and fungi ; root competition ; Rosaceae ; shoot competition</subject><ispartof>The New phytologist, 1985-06, Vol.100 (2), p.233-241</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1985 The New Phytologist</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-9f2f940ac6c02a9c6287aa2f7267e46160660862a9b3c415623b5ebe443de86c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-9f2f940ac6c02a9c6287aa2f7267e46160660862a9b3c415623b5ebe443de86c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2432447$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2432447$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8403737$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGraw, J.B</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetala ecotypes: relative response to competitors</title><title>The New phytologist</title><description>A competition experiment was performed to determine the relative competitive abilities of fellfield and snowbed ecotypes of Dryas octopetala L. under conditions of high nutrients, high light, and high water availability. Pots were designed to allow the effects of root competition and shoot competition to be assessed separately. The large-leaved snowbed ecotype responded positively to shoot competition, producing larger leaves and higher biomass than in control pots (no competition). Root competition resulted in a decrease in leaf size and an increase in root: shoot ratio, but no significant effect on shoot number or biomass accumulation. In contrast, the fellfield ecotype responded to shoot competition with an increase in root: shoot ratio, with no effect on biomass or shoot numbers. However, root competition caused a reduction in plant growth. Under growth chamber conditions of high resource availability, the snowbed ecotype is the superior competitor, probably due to ecotypic differences in both root and shoot characteristics.</description><subject>Agroecology</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Dryas octopetala</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>ecotypes</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Phytotrons</subject><subject>Plant competition</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant roots</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants and fungi</subject><subject>root competition</subject><subject>Rosaceae</subject><subject>shoot competition</subject><issn>0028-646X</issn><issn>1469-8137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_QLCIeNearyatF4LM-QGiwhx4F7J4Kh1dU5NO139vSsfuTS5y4H3znHNehM4JTkg4V8uEcJHHGWEyIXmWJu0CUynTZLOHRjtpH40wplksuPg4REfeLzHGeSroCM2mmwZcuYK61VUExlb2q4tsEd25TvvImtY2ECTda23XgL-OHFS6LX8gFL6xtYeotZGxq2AsW-v8MToodOXhZPuO0fx--j55jJ9fH54mt8-x4ZlkcV7QIudYG2Ew1bkRNJNa00JSIYELIrAQOBNBWjDDSRiXLVJYAOfsEzJh2BhdDtzG2e81-FatSm-gqnQNdu0V4SnNsSTBeD0YjbPeOyhUE1bWrlMEqz5HtVR9WKoPS_U5qm2OahM-X2y7aG90VThdm9LvCBnHTIY7RjeD7besoPtHA_Xy9kgZC4DTAbD0IcQdgHJGOe_5Z4NcaKv0lwsjzGcUE4apSClLCfsDIr-a6Q</recordid><startdate>198506</startdate><enddate>198506</enddate><creator>McGraw, J.B</creator><general>Academic Press</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198506</creationdate><title>Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetala ecotypes: relative response to competitors</title><author>McGraw, J.B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-9f2f940ac6c02a9c6287aa2f7267e46160660862a9b3c415623b5ebe443de86c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Agroecology</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Dryas octopetala</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>ecotypes</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Phytotrons</topic><topic>Plant competition</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant roots</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants and fungi</topic><topic>root competition</topic><topic>Rosaceae</topic><topic>shoot competition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGraw, J.B</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGraw, J.B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetala ecotypes: relative response to competitors</atitle><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle><date>1985-06</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>233</spage><epage>241</epage><pages>233-241</pages><issn>0028-646X</issn><eissn>1469-8137</eissn><coden>NEPHAV</coden><abstract>A competition experiment was performed to determine the relative competitive abilities of fellfield and snowbed ecotypes of Dryas octopetala L. under conditions of high nutrients, high light, and high water availability. Pots were designed to allow the effects of root competition and shoot competition to be assessed separately. The large-leaved snowbed ecotype responded positively to shoot competition, producing larger leaves and higher biomass than in control pots (no competition). Root competition resulted in a decrease in leaf size and an increase in root: shoot ratio, but no significant effect on shoot number or biomass accumulation. In contrast, the fellfield ecotype responded to shoot competition with an increase in root: shoot ratio, with no effect on biomass or shoot numbers. However, root competition caused a reduction in plant growth. Under growth chamber conditions of high resource availability, the snowbed ecotype is the superior competitor, probably due to ecotypic differences in both root and shoot characteristics.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Academic Press</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1469-8137.1985.tb02775.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-646X |
ispartof | The New phytologist, 1985-06, Vol.100 (2), p.233-241 |
issn | 0028-646X 1469-8137 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14529071 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Agroecology Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Biomass Competition Demecology Dryas octopetala Ecological competition ecotypes Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Leaves Phytotrons Plant competition Plant growth Plant roots Plants Plants and fungi root competition Rosaceae shoot competition |
title | Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetala ecotypes: relative response to competitors |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T02%3A44%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20ecology%20of%20Dryas%20octopetala%20ecotypes:%20relative%20response%20to%20competitors&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20phytologist&rft.au=McGraw,%20J.B&rft.date=1985-06&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=233&rft.epage=241&rft.pages=233-241&rft.issn=0028-646X&rft.eissn=1469-8137&rft.coden=NEPHAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1985.tb02775.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2432447%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-9f2f940ac6c02a9c6287aa2f7267e46160660862a9b3c415623b5ebe443de86c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14529071&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2432447&rfr_iscdi=true |