Loading…

Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetala ecotypes: relative response to competitors

A competition experiment was performed to determine the relative competitive abilities of fellfield and snowbed ecotypes of Dryas octopetala L. under conditions of high nutrients, high light, and high water availability. Pots were designed to allow the effects of root competition and shoot competiti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The New phytologist 1985-06, Vol.100 (2), p.233-241
Main Author: McGraw, J.B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-9f2f940ac6c02a9c6287aa2f7267e46160660862a9b3c415623b5ebe443de86c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-9f2f940ac6c02a9c6287aa2f7267e46160660862a9b3c415623b5ebe443de86c3
container_end_page 241
container_issue 2
container_start_page 233
container_title The New phytologist
container_volume 100
creator McGraw, J.B
description A competition experiment was performed to determine the relative competitive abilities of fellfield and snowbed ecotypes of Dryas octopetala L. under conditions of high nutrients, high light, and high water availability. Pots were designed to allow the effects of root competition and shoot competition to be assessed separately. The large-leaved snowbed ecotype responded positively to shoot competition, producing larger leaves and higher biomass than in control pots (no competition). Root competition resulted in a decrease in leaf size and an increase in root: shoot ratio, but no significant effect on shoot number or biomass accumulation. In contrast, the fellfield ecotype responded to shoot competition with an increase in root: shoot ratio, with no effect on biomass or shoot numbers. However, root competition caused a reduction in plant growth. Under growth chamber conditions of high resource availability, the snowbed ecotype is the superior competitor, probably due to ecotypic differences in both root and shoot characteristics.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1985.tb02775.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14529071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2432447</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2432447</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-9f2f940ac6c02a9c6287aa2f7267e46160660862a9b3c415623b5ebe443de86c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_QLCIeNearyatF4LM-QGiwhx4F7J4Kh1dU5NO139vSsfuTS5y4H3znHNehM4JTkg4V8uEcJHHGWEyIXmWJu0CUynTZLOHRjtpH40wplksuPg4REfeLzHGeSroCM2mmwZcuYK61VUExlb2q4tsEd25TvvImtY2ECTda23XgL-OHFS6LX8gFL6xtYeotZGxq2AsW-v8MToodOXhZPuO0fx--j55jJ9fH54mt8-x4ZlkcV7QIudYG2Ew1bkRNJNa00JSIYELIrAQOBNBWjDDSRiXLVJYAOfsEzJh2BhdDtzG2e81-FatSm-gqnQNdu0V4SnNsSTBeD0YjbPeOyhUE1bWrlMEqz5HtVR9WKoPS_U5qm2OahM-X2y7aG90VThdm9LvCBnHTIY7RjeD7besoPtHA_Xy9kgZC4DTAbD0IcQdgHJGOe_5Z4NcaKv0lwsjzGcUE4apSClLCfsDIr-a6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14529071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetala ecotypes: relative response to competitors</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>McGraw, J.B</creator><creatorcontrib>McGraw, J.B</creatorcontrib><description>A competition experiment was performed to determine the relative competitive abilities of fellfield and snowbed ecotypes of Dryas octopetala L. under conditions of high nutrients, high light, and high water availability. Pots were designed to allow the effects of root competition and shoot competition to be assessed separately. The large-leaved snowbed ecotype responded positively to shoot competition, producing larger leaves and higher biomass than in control pots (no competition). Root competition resulted in a decrease in leaf size and an increase in root: shoot ratio, but no significant effect on shoot number or biomass accumulation. In contrast, the fellfield ecotype responded to shoot competition with an increase in root: shoot ratio, with no effect on biomass or shoot numbers. However, root competition caused a reduction in plant growth. Under growth chamber conditions of high resource availability, the snowbed ecotype is the superior competitor, probably due to ecotypic differences in both root and shoot characteristics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-646X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1985.tb02775.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NEPHAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Academic Press</publisher><subject>Agroecology ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Competition ; Demecology ; Dryas octopetala ; Ecological competition ; ecotypes ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Leaves ; Phytotrons ; Plant competition ; Plant growth ; Plant roots ; Plants ; Plants and fungi ; root competition ; Rosaceae ; shoot competition</subject><ispartof>The New phytologist, 1985-06, Vol.100 (2), p.233-241</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1985 The New Phytologist</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-9f2f940ac6c02a9c6287aa2f7267e46160660862a9b3c415623b5ebe443de86c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-9f2f940ac6c02a9c6287aa2f7267e46160660862a9b3c415623b5ebe443de86c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2432447$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2432447$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8403737$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGraw, J.B</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetala ecotypes: relative response to competitors</title><title>The New phytologist</title><description>A competition experiment was performed to determine the relative competitive abilities of fellfield and snowbed ecotypes of Dryas octopetala L. under conditions of high nutrients, high light, and high water availability. Pots were designed to allow the effects of root competition and shoot competition to be assessed separately. The large-leaved snowbed ecotype responded positively to shoot competition, producing larger leaves and higher biomass than in control pots (no competition). Root competition resulted in a decrease in leaf size and an increase in root: shoot ratio, but no significant effect on shoot number or biomass accumulation. In contrast, the fellfield ecotype responded to shoot competition with an increase in root: shoot ratio, with no effect on biomass or shoot numbers. However, root competition caused a reduction in plant growth. Under growth chamber conditions of high resource availability, the snowbed ecotype is the superior competitor, probably due to ecotypic differences in both root and shoot characteristics.</description><subject>Agroecology</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Dryas octopetala</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>ecotypes</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Phytotrons</subject><subject>Plant competition</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant roots</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants and fungi</subject><subject>root competition</subject><subject>Rosaceae</subject><subject>shoot competition</subject><issn>0028-646X</issn><issn>1469-8137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_QLCIeNearyatF4LM-QGiwhx4F7J4Kh1dU5NO139vSsfuTS5y4H3znHNehM4JTkg4V8uEcJHHGWEyIXmWJu0CUynTZLOHRjtpH40wplksuPg4REfeLzHGeSroCM2mmwZcuYK61VUExlb2q4tsEd25TvvImtY2ECTda23XgL-OHFS6LX8gFL6xtYeotZGxq2AsW-v8MToodOXhZPuO0fx--j55jJ9fH54mt8-x4ZlkcV7QIudYG2Ew1bkRNJNa00JSIYELIrAQOBNBWjDDSRiXLVJYAOfsEzJh2BhdDtzG2e81-FatSm-gqnQNdu0V4SnNsSTBeD0YjbPeOyhUE1bWrlMEqz5HtVR9WKoPS_U5qm2OahM-X2y7aG90VThdm9LvCBnHTIY7RjeD7besoPtHA_Xy9kgZC4DTAbD0IcQdgHJGOe_5Z4NcaKv0lwsjzGcUE4apSClLCfsDIr-a6Q</recordid><startdate>198506</startdate><enddate>198506</enddate><creator>McGraw, J.B</creator><general>Academic Press</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198506</creationdate><title>Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetala ecotypes: relative response to competitors</title><author>McGraw, J.B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-9f2f940ac6c02a9c6287aa2f7267e46160660862a9b3c415623b5ebe443de86c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Agroecology</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Dryas octopetala</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>ecotypes</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Phytotrons</topic><topic>Plant competition</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant roots</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants and fungi</topic><topic>root competition</topic><topic>Rosaceae</topic><topic>shoot competition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGraw, J.B</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGraw, J.B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetala ecotypes: relative response to competitors</atitle><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle><date>1985-06</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>233</spage><epage>241</epage><pages>233-241</pages><issn>0028-646X</issn><eissn>1469-8137</eissn><coden>NEPHAV</coden><abstract>A competition experiment was performed to determine the relative competitive abilities of fellfield and snowbed ecotypes of Dryas octopetala L. under conditions of high nutrients, high light, and high water availability. Pots were designed to allow the effects of root competition and shoot competition to be assessed separately. The large-leaved snowbed ecotype responded positively to shoot competition, producing larger leaves and higher biomass than in control pots (no competition). Root competition resulted in a decrease in leaf size and an increase in root: shoot ratio, but no significant effect on shoot number or biomass accumulation. In contrast, the fellfield ecotype responded to shoot competition with an increase in root: shoot ratio, with no effect on biomass or shoot numbers. However, root competition caused a reduction in plant growth. Under growth chamber conditions of high resource availability, the snowbed ecotype is the superior competitor, probably due to ecotypic differences in both root and shoot characteristics.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Academic Press</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1469-8137.1985.tb02775.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-646X
ispartof The New phytologist, 1985-06, Vol.100 (2), p.233-241
issn 0028-646X
1469-8137
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14529071
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Agroecology
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Biomass
Competition
Demecology
Dryas octopetala
Ecological competition
ecotypes
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Leaves
Phytotrons
Plant competition
Plant growth
Plant roots
Plants
Plants and fungi
root competition
Rosaceae
shoot competition
title Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetala ecotypes: relative response to competitors
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T02%3A44%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20ecology%20of%20Dryas%20octopetala%20ecotypes:%20relative%20response%20to%20competitors&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20phytologist&rft.au=McGraw,%20J.B&rft.date=1985-06&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=233&rft.epage=241&rft.pages=233-241&rft.issn=0028-646X&rft.eissn=1469-8137&rft.coden=NEPHAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1985.tb02775.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2432447%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-9f2f940ac6c02a9c6287aa2f7267e46160660862a9b3c415623b5ebe443de86c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14529071&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2432447&rfr_iscdi=true