Loading…
Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment
We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considera...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Ecology letters 2013-11, Vol.16 (11), p.1415-e6 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-476be61d2ad6d7c4eeaf39aa513da79fe3404c93d6afa55dd0eeaa099b85ac9a3 |
| container_end_page | e6 |
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 1415 |
| container_title | Ecology letters |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Leung, Brian Roura‐Pascual, Nuria Bacher, Sven Heikkilä, Jaakko Brotons, Lluis Burgman, Mark A Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Essl, Franz Hulme, Philip E Richardson, David M Sol, Daniel Vil , Montserrat Rejmanek, Marcel |
| description | We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ele.12172 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1458543085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1443998881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-476be61d2ad6d7c4eeaf39aa513da79fe3404c93d6afa55dd0eeaa099b85ac9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0stu1DAUBuAIgegFFrwAWGJTFml9jZPlUE1vGkDQVnRnnYmPizu5TO1MS98ed9LOAgkJb-zFd37Z-p1l7xjdZ2kdYIP7jDPNX2TbTBYsp1yWLzdncbWV7cR4QynjlWavsy0uqZBKl9vZ94m1AWP03TUBUgc_-NsVkt6R4ReSi-nk_JS4AC3e92FBXB-I7-4g-jskcYm1x0iCjwsCMaaUFrvhTfbKQRPx7dO-m10eTS8OT_LZt-PTw8ksr6UUPJe6mGPBLAdbWF1LRHCiAlBMWNCVQyGprCthC3CglLU0CaBVNS8V1BWI3WxvzF2GPl05Dqb1scamgQ77VTRMqlJJQUv1H1SKqirLkiX68S96069Clx6yVlwXah34aVR16GMM6Mwy-BbCg2HUPFZiUiVmXUmy758SV_MW7UY-d5DAwQjufYMP_04y09n0OTIfJ3wc8PdmAsLCFFpoZX5-PTYn4urLj89nwsjkP4zeQW_gOhVmLs85ZTL9CKEE1eIPOu6s2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443276585</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Leung, Brian ; Roura‐Pascual, Nuria ; Bacher, Sven ; Heikkilä, Jaakko ; Brotons, Lluis ; Burgman, Mark A ; Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina ; Essl, Franz ; Hulme, Philip E ; Richardson, David M ; Sol, Daniel ; Vil , Montserrat ; Rejmanek, Marcel</creator><contributor>Rejmanek, Marcel ; Rejmanek, Marcel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Leung, Brian ; Roura‐Pascual, Nuria ; Bacher, Sven ; Heikkilä, Jaakko ; Brotons, Lluis ; Burgman, Mark A ; Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina ; Essl, Franz ; Hulme, Philip E ; Richardson, David M ; Sol, Daniel ; Vil , Montserrat ; Rejmanek, Marcel ; Rejmanek, Marcel ; Rejmanek, Marcel</creatorcontrib><description>We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-023X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-0248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ele.12172</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24034578</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Science</publisher><subject>Animals ; Best practice ; Colonisation ; Conservation biology ; exotic ; habitat suitability ; habitats ; Introduced Species - statistics & numerical data ; invasive species ; life history trait ; Models, Biological ; non-indigenous ; Nonnative species ; policy ; propagule pressure ; risk analysis ; risk assessment ; species distribution ; species diversity ; uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Ecology letters, 2013-11, Vol.16 (11), p.1415-e6</ispartof><rights>2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS</rights><rights>2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-476be61d2ad6d7c4eeaf39aa513da79fe3404c93d6afa55dd0eeaa099b85ac9a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24034578$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Rejmanek, Marcel</contributor><contributor>Rejmanek, Marcel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Leung, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roura‐Pascual, Nuria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacher, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heikkilä, Jaakko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brotons, Lluis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgman, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Essl, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Philip E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sol, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vil , Montserrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rejmanek, Marcel</creatorcontrib><title>Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment</title><title>Ecology letters</title><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><description>We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Colonisation</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>exotic</subject><subject>habitat suitability</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>Introduced Species - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>invasive species</subject><subject>life history trait</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>non-indigenous</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>policy</subject><subject>propagule pressure</subject><subject>risk analysis</subject><subject>risk assessment</subject><subject>species distribution</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>uncertainty</subject><issn>1461-023X</issn><issn>1461-0248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0stu1DAUBuAIgegFFrwAWGJTFml9jZPlUE1vGkDQVnRnnYmPizu5TO1MS98ed9LOAgkJb-zFd37Z-p1l7xjdZ2kdYIP7jDPNX2TbTBYsp1yWLzdncbWV7cR4QynjlWavsy0uqZBKl9vZ94m1AWP03TUBUgc_-NsVkt6R4ReSi-nk_JS4AC3e92FBXB-I7-4g-jskcYm1x0iCjwsCMaaUFrvhTfbKQRPx7dO-m10eTS8OT_LZt-PTw8ksr6UUPJe6mGPBLAdbWF1LRHCiAlBMWNCVQyGprCthC3CglLU0CaBVNS8V1BWI3WxvzF2GPl05Dqb1scamgQ77VTRMqlJJQUv1H1SKqirLkiX68S96069Clx6yVlwXah34aVR16GMM6Mwy-BbCg2HUPFZiUiVmXUmy758SV_MW7UY-d5DAwQjufYMP_04y09n0OTIfJ3wc8PdmAsLCFFpoZX5-PTYn4urLj89nwsjkP4zeQW_gOhVmLs85ZTL9CKEE1eIPOu6s2Q</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Leung, Brian</creator><creator>Roura‐Pascual, Nuria</creator><creator>Bacher, Sven</creator><creator>Heikkilä, Jaakko</creator><creator>Brotons, Lluis</creator><creator>Burgman, Mark A</creator><creator>Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina</creator><creator>Essl, Franz</creator><creator>Hulme, Philip E</creator><creator>Richardson, David M</creator><creator>Sol, Daniel</creator><creator>Vil , Montserrat</creator><creator>Rejmanek, Marcel</creator><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment</title><author>Leung, Brian ; Roura‐Pascual, Nuria ; Bacher, Sven ; Heikkilä, Jaakko ; Brotons, Lluis ; Burgman, Mark A ; Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina ; Essl, Franz ; Hulme, Philip E ; Richardson, David M ; Sol, Daniel ; Vil , Montserrat ; Rejmanek, Marcel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-476be61d2ad6d7c4eeaf39aa513da79fe3404c93d6afa55dd0eeaa099b85ac9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Colonisation</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>exotic</topic><topic>habitat suitability</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>Introduced Species - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>invasive species</topic><topic>life history trait</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>non-indigenous</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>policy</topic><topic>propagule pressure</topic><topic>risk analysis</topic><topic>risk assessment</topic><topic>species distribution</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leung, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roura‐Pascual, Nuria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacher, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heikkilä, Jaakko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brotons, Lluis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgman, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Essl, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Philip E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sol, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vil , Montserrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rejmanek, Marcel</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leung, Brian</au><au>Roura‐Pascual, Nuria</au><au>Bacher, Sven</au><au>Heikkilä, Jaakko</au><au>Brotons, Lluis</au><au>Burgman, Mark A</au><au>Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina</au><au>Essl, Franz</au><au>Hulme, Philip E</au><au>Richardson, David M</au><au>Sol, Daniel</au><au>Vil , Montserrat</au><au>Rejmanek, Marcel</au><au>Rejmanek, Marcel</au><au>Rejmanek, Marcel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment</atitle><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1415</spage><epage>e6</epage><pages>1415-e6</pages><issn>1461-023X</issn><eissn>1461-0248</eissn><abstract>We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Science</pub><pmid>24034578</pmid><doi>10.1111/ele.12172</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1461-023X |
| ispartof | Ecology letters, 2013-11, Vol.16 (11), p.1415-e6 |
| issn | 1461-023X 1461-0248 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1458543085 |
| source | Wiley |
| subjects | Animals Best practice Colonisation Conservation biology exotic habitat suitability habitats Introduced Species - statistics & numerical data invasive species life history trait Models, Biological non-indigenous Nonnative species policy propagule pressure risk analysis risk assessment species distribution species diversity uncertainty |
| title | Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A20%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Addressing%20a%20critique%20of%20the%20TEASI%20framework%20for%20invasive%20species%20risk%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20letters&rft.au=Leung,%20Brian&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1415&rft.epage=e6&rft.pages=1415-e6&rft.issn=1461-023X&rft.eissn=1461-0248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ele.12172&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1443998881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-476be61d2ad6d7c4eeaf39aa513da79fe3404c93d6afa55dd0eeaa099b85ac9a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443276585&rft_id=info:pmid/24034578&rfr_iscdi=true |