Loading…

Advances in farming systems analysis and intervention

In this paper, we recognize two key components of farming systems, namely the bio-physical ‘Production System’ of crops, pastures, animals, soil and climate, together with certain physical inputs and outputs, and the ‘Management System’, made up of people, values, goals, knowledge, resources, monito...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agricultural systems 2001-11, Vol.70 (2), p.555-579
Main Authors: Keating, B.A, McCown, R.L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f5d039a2fb7a2206198b5a7c25f94e04edc52f9e0a43807d17763866d6901cb23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f5d039a2fb7a2206198b5a7c25f94e04edc52f9e0a43807d17763866d6901cb23
container_end_page 579
container_issue 2
container_start_page 555
container_title Agricultural systems
container_volume 70
creator Keating, B.A
McCown, R.L
description In this paper, we recognize two key components of farming systems, namely the bio-physical ‘Production System’ of crops, pastures, animals, soil and climate, together with certain physical inputs and outputs, and the ‘Management System’, made up of people, values, goals, knowledge, resources, monitoring opportunities, and decision making. Utilising upon these constructs, we review six types of farming systems analysis and intervention that have evolved over the last 40 years, namely: (1) economic decision analysis based on production functions, (2) dynamic simulation of production processes, (3) economic decision analysis linked to biophysical simulation, (4) decision support systems, (5) expert systems, and (6) simulation-aided discussions about management in an action research paradigm. Biophysical simulation modelling features prominently in this list of approaches and considerable progress has been made in both the scope and predictive power of the modelling tools. We illustrate some more recent advances in increasing model comprehensiveness in simulating farm production systems via reference to our own group's work with the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM). Two case studies are discussed, one with broad-scale commercial agriculture in north-eastern Australia and the other with resource poor smallholder farmers in Africa. We conclude by considering future directions for systems analysis efforts directed at farming systems. We see the major challenges and opportunities lying at the interface of ‘hard’, scientific approaches to the analysis of biophysical systems and ‘soft’, approaches to intervention in social management systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00059-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14593476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0308521X01000592</els_id><sourcerecordid>14593476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f5d039a2fb7a2206198b5a7c25f94e04edc52f9e0a43807d17763866d6901cb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BGFWoovqTdI0zUpEfMGACxXcXTLp7RiZtmNSC_PvTR2ZrYv7gHvOSfgYO-VwyYEXVy8gocyU4O_nwC8AQJlM7LEJL7XMhCj0PpvsJIfsKMbPJDIcyglTN9VgW0dx5ttZbUPj2-UsbmJPTZzZ1q420Y9Lle49hYHa3nftMTuo7SrSyd-csrf7u9fbx2z-_PB0ezPPXA66z2pVgTRW1AtthYCCm3KhrHZC1SYnyKlyStSGwOayBF1xrQtZFkVVGOBuIeSUnW1z16H7-qbYY-Ojo9XKttR9R-S5MjJPpilTW6ELXYyBalwH39iwQQ44QsJfSDgSQOD4CwnHB-ZbX6A1uZ2JiOzSJww4oLQaUtukEpCs0vpxRZn6OpVSCpU2-NE3Ke56G0cJyuApYHSeEt7KB3I9Vp3_50M_zC2HvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14593476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advances in farming systems analysis and intervention</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Keating, B.A ; McCown, R.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Keating, B.A ; McCown, R.L</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we recognize two key components of farming systems, namely the bio-physical ‘Production System’ of crops, pastures, animals, soil and climate, together with certain physical inputs and outputs, and the ‘Management System’, made up of people, values, goals, knowledge, resources, monitoring opportunities, and decision making. Utilising upon these constructs, we review six types of farming systems analysis and intervention that have evolved over the last 40 years, namely: (1) economic decision analysis based on production functions, (2) dynamic simulation of production processes, (3) economic decision analysis linked to biophysical simulation, (4) decision support systems, (5) expert systems, and (6) simulation-aided discussions about management in an action research paradigm. Biophysical simulation modelling features prominently in this list of approaches and considerable progress has been made in both the scope and predictive power of the modelling tools. We illustrate some more recent advances in increasing model comprehensiveness in simulating farm production systems via reference to our own group's work with the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM). Two case studies are discussed, one with broad-scale commercial agriculture in north-eastern Australia and the other with resource poor smallholder farmers in Africa. We conclude by considering future directions for systems analysis efforts directed at farming systems. We see the major challenges and opportunities lying at the interface of ‘hard’, scientific approaches to the analysis of biophysical systems and ‘soft’, approaches to intervention in social management systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-521X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00059-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>APSIM ; Decision support ; DSS ; Farming systems ; FARMSCAPE ; Modelling</subject><ispartof>Agricultural systems, 2001-11, Vol.70 (2), p.555-579</ispartof><rights>2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f5d039a2fb7a2206198b5a7c25f94e04edc52f9e0a43807d17763866d6901cb23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f5d039a2fb7a2206198b5a7c25f94e04edc52f9e0a43807d17763866d6901cb23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeagisys/v_3a70_3ay_3a2001_3ai_3a2-3_3ap_3a555-579.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keating, B.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCown, R.L</creatorcontrib><title>Advances in farming systems analysis and intervention</title><title>Agricultural systems</title><description>In this paper, we recognize two key components of farming systems, namely the bio-physical ‘Production System’ of crops, pastures, animals, soil and climate, together with certain physical inputs and outputs, and the ‘Management System’, made up of people, values, goals, knowledge, resources, monitoring opportunities, and decision making. Utilising upon these constructs, we review six types of farming systems analysis and intervention that have evolved over the last 40 years, namely: (1) economic decision analysis based on production functions, (2) dynamic simulation of production processes, (3) economic decision analysis linked to biophysical simulation, (4) decision support systems, (5) expert systems, and (6) simulation-aided discussions about management in an action research paradigm. Biophysical simulation modelling features prominently in this list of approaches and considerable progress has been made in both the scope and predictive power of the modelling tools. We illustrate some more recent advances in increasing model comprehensiveness in simulating farm production systems via reference to our own group's work with the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM). Two case studies are discussed, one with broad-scale commercial agriculture in north-eastern Australia and the other with resource poor smallholder farmers in Africa. We conclude by considering future directions for systems analysis efforts directed at farming systems. We see the major challenges and opportunities lying at the interface of ‘hard’, scientific approaches to the analysis of biophysical systems and ‘soft’, approaches to intervention in social management systems.</description><subject>APSIM</subject><subject>Decision support</subject><subject>DSS</subject><subject>Farming systems</subject><subject>FARMSCAPE</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><issn>0308-521X</issn><issn>1873-2267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BGFWoovqTdI0zUpEfMGACxXcXTLp7RiZtmNSC_PvTR2ZrYv7gHvOSfgYO-VwyYEXVy8gocyU4O_nwC8AQJlM7LEJL7XMhCj0PpvsJIfsKMbPJDIcyglTN9VgW0dx5ttZbUPj2-UsbmJPTZzZ1q420Y9Lle49hYHa3nftMTuo7SrSyd-csrf7u9fbx2z-_PB0ezPPXA66z2pVgTRW1AtthYCCm3KhrHZC1SYnyKlyStSGwOayBF1xrQtZFkVVGOBuIeSUnW1z16H7-qbYY-Ojo9XKttR9R-S5MjJPpilTW6ELXYyBalwH39iwQQ44QsJfSDgSQOD4CwnHB-ZbX6A1uZ2JiOzSJww4oLQaUtukEpCs0vpxRZn6OpVSCpU2-NE3Ke56G0cJyuApYHSeEt7KB3I9Vp3_50M_zC2HvA</recordid><startdate>20011101</startdate><enddate>20011101</enddate><creator>Keating, B.A</creator><creator>McCown, R.L</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011101</creationdate><title>Advances in farming systems analysis and intervention</title><author>Keating, B.A ; McCown, R.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f5d039a2fb7a2206198b5a7c25f94e04edc52f9e0a43807d17763866d6901cb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>APSIM</topic><topic>Decision support</topic><topic>DSS</topic><topic>Farming systems</topic><topic>FARMSCAPE</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keating, B.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCown, R.L</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agricultural systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keating, B.A</au><au>McCown, R.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advances in farming systems analysis and intervention</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural systems</jtitle><date>2001-11-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>555</spage><epage>579</epage><pages>555-579</pages><issn>0308-521X</issn><eissn>1873-2267</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we recognize two key components of farming systems, namely the bio-physical ‘Production System’ of crops, pastures, animals, soil and climate, together with certain physical inputs and outputs, and the ‘Management System’, made up of people, values, goals, knowledge, resources, monitoring opportunities, and decision making. Utilising upon these constructs, we review six types of farming systems analysis and intervention that have evolved over the last 40 years, namely: (1) economic decision analysis based on production functions, (2) dynamic simulation of production processes, (3) economic decision analysis linked to biophysical simulation, (4) decision support systems, (5) expert systems, and (6) simulation-aided discussions about management in an action research paradigm. Biophysical simulation modelling features prominently in this list of approaches and considerable progress has been made in both the scope and predictive power of the modelling tools. We illustrate some more recent advances in increasing model comprehensiveness in simulating farm production systems via reference to our own group's work with the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM). Two case studies are discussed, one with broad-scale commercial agriculture in north-eastern Australia and the other with resource poor smallholder farmers in Africa. We conclude by considering future directions for systems analysis efforts directed at farming systems. We see the major challenges and opportunities lying at the interface of ‘hard’, scientific approaches to the analysis of biophysical systems and ‘soft’, approaches to intervention in social management systems.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00059-2</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-521X
ispartof Agricultural systems, 2001-11, Vol.70 (2), p.555-579
issn 0308-521X
1873-2267
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14593476
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects APSIM
Decision support
DSS
Farming systems
FARMSCAPE
Modelling
title Advances in farming systems analysis and intervention
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A04%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advances%20in%20farming%20systems%20analysis%20and%20intervention&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20systems&rft.au=Keating,%20B.A&rft.date=2001-11-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=555&rft.epage=579&rft.pages=555-579&rft.issn=0308-521X&rft.eissn=1873-2267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00059-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14593476%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f5d039a2fb7a2206198b5a7c25f94e04edc52f9e0a43807d17763866d6901cb23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14593476&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true