Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems

Objective The aim of this study was to compare imaging properties of 20 intraoral digital systems objectively. Study Design Using a direct current x-ray source and a radiographic phantom, a series of radiographs was made from the lowest exposure time until the sensor saturated. Images were captured...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology, 2013-12, Vol.116 (6), p.774-783
Main Authors: Udupa, Hema, BDS, MS, Mah, Peter, DMD, MS, Dove, Stephen B., DDS, MS, McDavid, William D., PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Dentistry
Equipment Design
Humans
Phantoms, Imaging
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Radiography, Dental, Digital - instrumentation
Radiography, Dental, Digital - standards
Surgery
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective The aim of this study was to compare imaging properties of 20 intraoral digital systems objectively. Study Design Using a direct current x-ray source and a radiographic phantom, a series of radiographs was made from the lowest exposure time until the sensor saturated. Images were captured and stored. Incident exposures were measured using a radiation meter. Gray scale, spatial resolution, and contrast/detail detectability were evaluated. Presence of 7 distinct steps spanning the gray levels from 0 to 255 was used to define the exposure latitude. An “optimal” exposure, the lowest exposure where maximum spatial resolution and contrast/detail detectability were achieved, was determined. Results The systems varied greatly in latitude, “optimal” exposure, and image quality. This may not be readily apparent to the naked eye or when clinical images are compared. Conclusions Objective assessment of image quality with a quality assurance tool makes it possible to evaluate and compare the various intraoral digital systems.
ISSN:2212-4403
2212-4411
DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2013.08.019