What a Difference a Day Makes? The Effects of Repetitive and Competitive News Framing Over Time

Based on a “classic” framing experiment (N = 1,324), this study empirically mimics the dynamic nature of framing effects over time. We integrate (a) multiple frame exposures as well as (b) various tests for duration of framing effects into our study design. Our results show that exposure to repetiti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Communication research 2013-04, Vol.40 (2), p.147-175
Main Authors: Lecheler, Sophie, de Vreese, Claes H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Communication research
Experiments
Knowledge
Mass Media Effects
News media
Politics
Public opinion
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Based on a “classic” framing experiment (N = 1,324), this study empirically mimics the dynamic nature of framing effects over time. We integrate (a) multiple frame exposures as well as (b) various tests for duration of framing effects into our study design. Our results show that exposure to repetitive frames does not systematically strengthen effects on opinion formation. However, effects can get stronger when the delay between two exposures is short. Competitive news framing is characterized by recency effects; that is, the latest frame has the strongest impact on opinion formation. Political knowledge functions as a moderator for both effect mechanisms. Participants with higher levels of political knowledge are less prone to recency effects, but show stronger signs of a cumulative framing effect. The results of this study have important methodological and substantive ramifications for framing effects research, as well as for our understanding of the real-life impact of framed media messages on opinions.
ISSN:0093-6502
1552-3810
DOI:10.1177/0093650212470688