Loading…
Society of Toxicologic Pathology Position Paper on Best Practices on Recovery Studies: The Role of the Anatomic Pathologist
This article reviews the regulatory guidelines that provide for the inclusion of recovery groups in toxicology studies, presents the challenges in the design and interpretation of nonclinical recovery studies, and summarizes the best practices for the role of an anatomic pathologist regarding toxico...
Saved in:
Published in: | Toxicologic pathology 2013-12, Vol.41 (8), p.1159-1169 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-9706f09bbfbe597e57272d1ab99445210c96ae2dc02ce0a1bfbe41411b3261703 |
container_end_page | 1169 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1159 |
container_title | Toxicologic pathology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Perry, Rick Farris, Georgia Bienvenu, Jean-Guy Dean, Charles Foley, George Mahrt, Chuck Short, Brian |
description | This article reviews the regulatory guidelines that provide for the inclusion of recovery groups in toxicology studies, presents the challenges in the design and interpretation of nonclinical recovery studies, and summarizes the best practices for the role of an anatomic pathologist regarding toxicology studies with recovery groups. Evaluating the potential recovery of histopathologic findings induced by a biopharmaceutical requires the active participation of one or more anatomic pathologists. Their expertise is critical in risk assessment regarding the potential for recovery as well as providing scientific guidance in the design and evaluation of studies with recovery groups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0192623313481513 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464504228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0192623313481513</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1450186181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-9706f09bbfbe597e57272d1ab99445210c96ae2dc02ce0a1bfbe41411b3261703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLw0AQgBdRbH3cPUkugpfozj6S5qjFFxQstj2HzXZSt6TdupuI-fduaFUQBE8zzHzz4CPkDOgVQJpeU8hYwjgHLgYgge-RPkjOY0go7JN-1467fo8ceb-kFAYg6CHpMS45pBnvk9nEaoN1G9kymtoPo21lF0ZHY1W_dmkbja03tbHrUNqgi0Jyi76Oxk7p2mj0XeUFtX1H10aTupkb9CfkoFSVx9NdPCaz-7vp8DEePT88DW9GsQ4P1HGW0qSkWVGUBcosRZmylM1BFVkmhGRAdZYoZHNNmUaqoOMECICCswRSyo_J5Xbvxtm3JryVr4zXWFVqjbbxOYhESCoYG_wDlUFPEgwFlG5R7az3Dst848xKuTYHmnfe89_ew8j5bntTrHD-PfAlOgAXO0B5rarSqbU2_ocbUAYskYGLt5xXC8yXtnHrIPDvw5_AsJWT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1450186181</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Society of Toxicologic Pathology Position Paper on Best Practices on Recovery Studies: The Role of the Anatomic Pathologist</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><creator>Perry, Rick ; Farris, Georgia ; Bienvenu, Jean-Guy ; Dean, Charles ; Foley, George ; Mahrt, Chuck ; Short, Brian</creator><creatorcontrib>Perry, Rick ; Farris, Georgia ; Bienvenu, Jean-Guy ; Dean, Charles ; Foley, George ; Mahrt, Chuck ; Short, Brian ; Society of Toxicologic Pathology</creatorcontrib><description>This article reviews the regulatory guidelines that provide for the inclusion of recovery groups in toxicology studies, presents the challenges in the design and interpretation of nonclinical recovery studies, and summarizes the best practices for the role of an anatomic pathologist regarding toxicology studies with recovery groups. Evaluating the potential recovery of histopathologic findings induced by a biopharmaceutical requires the active participation of one or more anatomic pathologists. Their expertise is critical in risk assessment regarding the potential for recovery as well as providing scientific guidance in the design and evaluation of studies with recovery groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-6233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-1601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0192623313481513</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23531793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopharmaceutics - standards ; Guidelines as Topic ; Medical sciences ; Pathology - methods ; Pathology - standards ; Research Design ; Toxicity Tests - methods ; Toxicity Tests - standards ; Toxicology ; Toxicology - methods ; Toxicology - standards</subject><ispartof>Toxicologic pathology, 2013-12, Vol.41 (8), p.1159-1169</ispartof><rights>2013 by The Author(s)</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-9706f09bbfbe597e57272d1ab99445210c96ae2dc02ce0a1bfbe41411b3261703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28021265$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23531793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perry, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farris, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bienvenu, Jean-Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahrt, Chuck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Short, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Society of Toxicologic Pathology</creatorcontrib><title>Society of Toxicologic Pathology Position Paper on Best Practices on Recovery Studies: The Role of the Anatomic Pathologist</title><title>Toxicologic pathology</title><addtitle>Toxicol Pathol</addtitle><description>This article reviews the regulatory guidelines that provide for the inclusion of recovery groups in toxicology studies, presents the challenges in the design and interpretation of nonclinical recovery studies, and summarizes the best practices for the role of an anatomic pathologist regarding toxicology studies with recovery groups. Evaluating the potential recovery of histopathologic findings induced by a biopharmaceutical requires the active participation of one or more anatomic pathologists. Their expertise is critical in risk assessment regarding the potential for recovery as well as providing scientific guidance in the design and evaluation of studies with recovery groups.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopharmaceutics - standards</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pathology - methods</subject><subject>Pathology - standards</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests - standards</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Toxicology - methods</subject><subject>Toxicology - standards</subject><issn>0192-6233</issn><issn>1533-1601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtLw0AQgBdRbH3cPUkugpfozj6S5qjFFxQstj2HzXZSt6TdupuI-fduaFUQBE8zzHzz4CPkDOgVQJpeU8hYwjgHLgYgge-RPkjOY0go7JN-1467fo8ceb-kFAYg6CHpMS45pBnvk9nEaoN1G9kymtoPo21lF0ZHY1W_dmkbja03tbHrUNqgi0Jyi76Oxk7p2mj0XeUFtX1H10aTupkb9CfkoFSVx9NdPCaz-7vp8DEePT88DW9GsQ4P1HGW0qSkWVGUBcosRZmylM1BFVkmhGRAdZYoZHNNmUaqoOMECICCswRSyo_J5Xbvxtm3JryVr4zXWFVqjbbxOYhESCoYG_wDlUFPEgwFlG5R7az3Dst848xKuTYHmnfe89_ew8j5bntTrHD-PfAlOgAXO0B5rarSqbU2_ocbUAYskYGLt5xXC8yXtnHrIPDvw5_AsJWT</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Perry, Rick</creator><creator>Farris, Georgia</creator><creator>Bienvenu, Jean-Guy</creator><creator>Dean, Charles</creator><creator>Foley, George</creator><creator>Mahrt, Chuck</creator><creator>Short, Brian</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Society of Toxicologic Pathology Position Paper on Best Practices on Recovery Studies</title><author>Perry, Rick ; Farris, Georgia ; Bienvenu, Jean-Guy ; Dean, Charles ; Foley, George ; Mahrt, Chuck ; Short, Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-9706f09bbfbe597e57272d1ab99445210c96ae2dc02ce0a1bfbe41411b3261703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopharmaceutics - standards</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pathology - methods</topic><topic>Pathology - standards</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests - standards</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Toxicology - methods</topic><topic>Toxicology - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perry, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farris, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bienvenu, Jean-Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahrt, Chuck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Short, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Society of Toxicologic Pathology</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Toxicologic pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perry, Rick</au><au>Farris, Georgia</au><au>Bienvenu, Jean-Guy</au><au>Dean, Charles</au><au>Foley, George</au><au>Mahrt, Chuck</au><au>Short, Brian</au><aucorp>Society of Toxicologic Pathology</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Society of Toxicologic Pathology Position Paper on Best Practices on Recovery Studies: The Role of the Anatomic Pathologist</atitle><jtitle>Toxicologic pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol Pathol</addtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1159</spage><epage>1169</epage><pages>1159-1169</pages><issn>0192-6233</issn><eissn>1533-1601</eissn><abstract>This article reviews the regulatory guidelines that provide for the inclusion of recovery groups in toxicology studies, presents the challenges in the design and interpretation of nonclinical recovery studies, and summarizes the best practices for the role of an anatomic pathologist regarding toxicology studies with recovery groups. Evaluating the potential recovery of histopathologic findings induced by a biopharmaceutical requires the active participation of one or more anatomic pathologists. Their expertise is critical in risk assessment regarding the potential for recovery as well as providing scientific guidance in the design and evaluation of studies with recovery groups.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23531793</pmid><doi>10.1177/0192623313481513</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0192-6233 |
ispartof | Toxicologic pathology, 2013-12, Vol.41 (8), p.1159-1169 |
issn | 0192-6233 1533-1601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464504228 |
source | SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list) |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Biopharmaceutics - standards Guidelines as Topic Medical sciences Pathology - methods Pathology - standards Research Design Toxicity Tests - methods Toxicity Tests - standards Toxicology Toxicology - methods Toxicology - standards |
title | Society of Toxicologic Pathology Position Paper on Best Practices on Recovery Studies: The Role of the Anatomic Pathologist |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A32%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Society%20of%20Toxicologic%20Pathology%20Position%20Paper%20on%20Best%20Practices%20on%20Recovery%20Studies:%20The%20Role%20of%20the%20Anatomic%20Pathologist&rft.jtitle=Toxicologic%20pathology&rft.au=Perry,%20Rick&rft.aucorp=Society%20of%20Toxicologic%20Pathology&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1159&rft.epage=1169&rft.pages=1159-1169&rft.issn=0192-6233&rft.eissn=1533-1601&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0192623313481513&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1450186181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-9706f09bbfbe597e57272d1ab99445210c96ae2dc02ce0a1bfbe41411b3261703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1450186181&rft_id=info:pmid/23531793&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0192623313481513&rfr_iscdi=true |