Loading…

Society of Toxicologic Pathology Position Paper on Best Practices on Recovery Studies: The Role of the Anatomic Pathologist

This article reviews the regulatory guidelines that provide for the inclusion of recovery groups in toxicology studies, presents the challenges in the design and interpretation of nonclinical recovery studies, and summarizes the best practices for the role of an anatomic pathologist regarding toxico...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Toxicologic pathology 2013-12, Vol.41 (8), p.1159-1169
Main Authors: Perry, Rick, Farris, Georgia, Bienvenu, Jean-Guy, Dean, Charles, Foley, George, Mahrt, Chuck, Short, Brian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-9706f09bbfbe597e57272d1ab99445210c96ae2dc02ce0a1bfbe41411b3261703
container_end_page 1169
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1159
container_title Toxicologic pathology
container_volume 41
creator Perry, Rick
Farris, Georgia
Bienvenu, Jean-Guy
Dean, Charles
Foley, George
Mahrt, Chuck
Short, Brian
description This article reviews the regulatory guidelines that provide for the inclusion of recovery groups in toxicology studies, presents the challenges in the design and interpretation of nonclinical recovery studies, and summarizes the best practices for the role of an anatomic pathologist regarding toxicology studies with recovery groups. Evaluating the potential recovery of histopathologic findings induced by a biopharmaceutical requires the active participation of one or more anatomic pathologists. Their expertise is critical in risk assessment regarding the potential for recovery as well as providing scientific guidance in the design and evaluation of studies with recovery groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0192623313481513
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464504228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0192623313481513</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1450186181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-9706f09bbfbe597e57272d1ab99445210c96ae2dc02ce0a1bfbe41411b3261703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLw0AQgBdRbH3cPUkugpfozj6S5qjFFxQstj2HzXZSt6TdupuI-fduaFUQBE8zzHzz4CPkDOgVQJpeU8hYwjgHLgYgge-RPkjOY0go7JN-1467fo8ceb-kFAYg6CHpMS45pBnvk9nEaoN1G9kymtoPo21lF0ZHY1W_dmkbja03tbHrUNqgi0Jyi76Oxk7p2mj0XeUFtX1H10aTupkb9CfkoFSVx9NdPCaz-7vp8DEePT88DW9GsQ4P1HGW0qSkWVGUBcosRZmylM1BFVkmhGRAdZYoZHNNmUaqoOMECICCswRSyo_J5Xbvxtm3JryVr4zXWFVqjbbxOYhESCoYG_wDlUFPEgwFlG5R7az3Dst848xKuTYHmnfe89_ew8j5bntTrHD-PfAlOgAXO0B5rarSqbU2_ocbUAYskYGLt5xXC8yXtnHrIPDvw5_AsJWT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1450186181</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Society of Toxicologic Pathology Position Paper on Best Practices on Recovery Studies: The Role of the Anatomic Pathologist</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><creator>Perry, Rick ; Farris, Georgia ; Bienvenu, Jean-Guy ; Dean, Charles ; Foley, George ; Mahrt, Chuck ; Short, Brian</creator><creatorcontrib>Perry, Rick ; Farris, Georgia ; Bienvenu, Jean-Guy ; Dean, Charles ; Foley, George ; Mahrt, Chuck ; Short, Brian ; Society of Toxicologic Pathology</creatorcontrib><description>This article reviews the regulatory guidelines that provide for the inclusion of recovery groups in toxicology studies, presents the challenges in the design and interpretation of nonclinical recovery studies, and summarizes the best practices for the role of an anatomic pathologist regarding toxicology studies with recovery groups. Evaluating the potential recovery of histopathologic findings induced by a biopharmaceutical requires the active participation of one or more anatomic pathologists. Their expertise is critical in risk assessment regarding the potential for recovery as well as providing scientific guidance in the design and evaluation of studies with recovery groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-6233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-1601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0192623313481513</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23531793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopharmaceutics - standards ; Guidelines as Topic ; Medical sciences ; Pathology - methods ; Pathology - standards ; Research Design ; Toxicity Tests - methods ; Toxicity Tests - standards ; Toxicology ; Toxicology - methods ; Toxicology - standards</subject><ispartof>Toxicologic pathology, 2013-12, Vol.41 (8), p.1159-1169</ispartof><rights>2013 by The Author(s)</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-9706f09bbfbe597e57272d1ab99445210c96ae2dc02ce0a1bfbe41411b3261703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28021265$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23531793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perry, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farris, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bienvenu, Jean-Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahrt, Chuck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Short, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Society of Toxicologic Pathology</creatorcontrib><title>Society of Toxicologic Pathology Position Paper on Best Practices on Recovery Studies: The Role of the Anatomic Pathologist</title><title>Toxicologic pathology</title><addtitle>Toxicol Pathol</addtitle><description>This article reviews the regulatory guidelines that provide for the inclusion of recovery groups in toxicology studies, presents the challenges in the design and interpretation of nonclinical recovery studies, and summarizes the best practices for the role of an anatomic pathologist regarding toxicology studies with recovery groups. Evaluating the potential recovery of histopathologic findings induced by a biopharmaceutical requires the active participation of one or more anatomic pathologists. Their expertise is critical in risk assessment regarding the potential for recovery as well as providing scientific guidance in the design and evaluation of studies with recovery groups.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopharmaceutics - standards</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pathology - methods</subject><subject>Pathology - standards</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests - standards</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Toxicology - methods</subject><subject>Toxicology - standards</subject><issn>0192-6233</issn><issn>1533-1601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtLw0AQgBdRbH3cPUkugpfozj6S5qjFFxQstj2HzXZSt6TdupuI-fduaFUQBE8zzHzz4CPkDOgVQJpeU8hYwjgHLgYgge-RPkjOY0go7JN-1467fo8ceb-kFAYg6CHpMS45pBnvk9nEaoN1G9kymtoPo21lF0ZHY1W_dmkbja03tbHrUNqgi0Jyi76Oxk7p2mj0XeUFtX1H10aTupkb9CfkoFSVx9NdPCaz-7vp8DEePT88DW9GsQ4P1HGW0qSkWVGUBcosRZmylM1BFVkmhGRAdZYoZHNNmUaqoOMECICCswRSyo_J5Xbvxtm3JryVr4zXWFVqjbbxOYhESCoYG_wDlUFPEgwFlG5R7az3Dst848xKuTYHmnfe89_ew8j5bntTrHD-PfAlOgAXO0B5rarSqbU2_ocbUAYskYGLt5xXC8yXtnHrIPDvw5_AsJWT</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Perry, Rick</creator><creator>Farris, Georgia</creator><creator>Bienvenu, Jean-Guy</creator><creator>Dean, Charles</creator><creator>Foley, George</creator><creator>Mahrt, Chuck</creator><creator>Short, Brian</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Society of Toxicologic Pathology Position Paper on Best Practices on Recovery Studies</title><author>Perry, Rick ; Farris, Georgia ; Bienvenu, Jean-Guy ; Dean, Charles ; Foley, George ; Mahrt, Chuck ; Short, Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-9706f09bbfbe597e57272d1ab99445210c96ae2dc02ce0a1bfbe41411b3261703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopharmaceutics - standards</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pathology - methods</topic><topic>Pathology - standards</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests - standards</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Toxicology - methods</topic><topic>Toxicology - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perry, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farris, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bienvenu, Jean-Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahrt, Chuck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Short, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Society of Toxicologic Pathology</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Toxicologic pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perry, Rick</au><au>Farris, Georgia</au><au>Bienvenu, Jean-Guy</au><au>Dean, Charles</au><au>Foley, George</au><au>Mahrt, Chuck</au><au>Short, Brian</au><aucorp>Society of Toxicologic Pathology</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Society of Toxicologic Pathology Position Paper on Best Practices on Recovery Studies: The Role of the Anatomic Pathologist</atitle><jtitle>Toxicologic pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol Pathol</addtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1159</spage><epage>1169</epage><pages>1159-1169</pages><issn>0192-6233</issn><eissn>1533-1601</eissn><abstract>This article reviews the regulatory guidelines that provide for the inclusion of recovery groups in toxicology studies, presents the challenges in the design and interpretation of nonclinical recovery studies, and summarizes the best practices for the role of an anatomic pathologist regarding toxicology studies with recovery groups. Evaluating the potential recovery of histopathologic findings induced by a biopharmaceutical requires the active participation of one or more anatomic pathologists. Their expertise is critical in risk assessment regarding the potential for recovery as well as providing scientific guidance in the design and evaluation of studies with recovery groups.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23531793</pmid><doi>10.1177/0192623313481513</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0192-6233
ispartof Toxicologic pathology, 2013-12, Vol.41 (8), p.1159-1169
issn 0192-6233
1533-1601
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464504228
source SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Biopharmaceutics - standards
Guidelines as Topic
Medical sciences
Pathology - methods
Pathology - standards
Research Design
Toxicity Tests - methods
Toxicity Tests - standards
Toxicology
Toxicology - methods
Toxicology - standards
title Society of Toxicologic Pathology Position Paper on Best Practices on Recovery Studies: The Role of the Anatomic Pathologist
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A32%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Society%20of%20Toxicologic%20Pathology%20Position%20Paper%20on%20Best%20Practices%20on%20Recovery%20Studies:%20The%20Role%20of%20the%20Anatomic%20Pathologist&rft.jtitle=Toxicologic%20pathology&rft.au=Perry,%20Rick&rft.aucorp=Society%20of%20Toxicologic%20Pathology&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1159&rft.epage=1169&rft.pages=1159-1169&rft.issn=0192-6233&rft.eissn=1533-1601&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0192623313481513&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1450186181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-9706f09bbfbe597e57272d1ab99445210c96ae2dc02ce0a1bfbe41411b3261703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1450186181&rft_id=info:pmid/23531793&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0192623313481513&rfr_iscdi=true