Loading…
Some issues in predicting patient recruitment in multi-centre clinical trials
A key paper in modelling patient recruitment in multi‐centre clinical trials is that of Anisimov and Fedorov. They assume that the distribution of the number of patients in a given centre in a completed trial follows a Poisson distribution. In a second stage, the unknown parameter is assumed to come...
Saved in:
Published in: | Statistics in medicine 2013-12, Vol.32 (30), p.5458-5468 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-5aeb107991c69fb84185a8a2a7764e441e39230d2afe89159fc6cb48924413b43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-5aeb107991c69fb84185a8a2a7764e441e39230d2afe89159fc6cb48924413b43 |
container_end_page | 5468 |
container_issue | 30 |
container_start_page | 5458 |
container_title | Statistics in medicine |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Bakhshi, Andisheh Senn, Stephen Phillips, Alan |
description | A key paper in modelling patient recruitment in multi‐centre clinical trials is that of Anisimov and Fedorov. They assume that the distribution of the number of patients in a given centre in a completed trial follows a Poisson distribution. In a second stage, the unknown parameter is assumed to come from a Gamma distribution. As is well known, the overall Gamma‐Poisson mixture is a negative binomial. For forecasting time to completion, however, it is not the frequency domain that is important, but the time domain and that of Anisimov and Fedorov have also illustrated clearly the links between the two and the way in which a negative binomial in one corresponds to a type VI Pearson distribution in the other. They have also shown how one may use this to forecast time to completion in a trial in progress. However, it is not just necessary to forecast time to completion for trials in progress but also for trials that have yet to start. This suggests that what would be useful would be to add a higher level of the hierarchy: over all trials. We present one possible approach to doing this using an orthogonal parameterization of the Gamma distribution with parameters on the real line. The two parameters are modelled separately. This is illustrated using data from 18 trials. We make suggestions as to how this method could be applied in practice. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sim.5979 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1465183564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1465183564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-5aeb107991c69fb84185a8a2a7764e441e39230d2afe89159fc6cb48924413b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LHDEUhoNUdLWCv6AM9MabWXMyySS5LEvVxVUL9uMyZLJnSrbzsU1mUP-9GVwVCr0653AeHl5eQk6BzoFSdh59Oxda6j0yA6plTplQH8iMMinzUoI4JEcxbigFEEwekEPGgQqlYUZu7vsWMx_jiDHzXbYNuPZu8N3vbGsHj92QBXRh9EM77Ylox2bwuUtXwMw1vvPONtkQvG3iR7Jfp4Enu3lMflx8_b64yld3l8vFl1XuCiV1LixWQKXW4EpdV4qDElZZZqUsOXIOWGhW0DWzNaaUQteudBVXmqVfUfHimJy9eLeh_5uSD6b10WHT2A77MRrgpQBViHJCP_-DbvoxdCndRKUMHEr5LnShjzFgbbbBtzY8GaBmqtikis1UcUI_7YRj1eL6DXztNAH5C_DgG3z6r8jcL292wh3v44CPb7wNf0xKJoX5dXtp1M9vsGIrbq6LZ1ZJku8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1467994167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some issues in predicting patient recruitment in multi-centre clinical trials</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Bakhshi, Andisheh ; Senn, Stephen ; Phillips, Alan</creator><creatorcontrib>Bakhshi, Andisheh ; Senn, Stephen ; Phillips, Alan</creatorcontrib><description>A key paper in modelling patient recruitment in multi‐centre clinical trials is that of Anisimov and Fedorov. They assume that the distribution of the number of patients in a given centre in a completed trial follows a Poisson distribution. In a second stage, the unknown parameter is assumed to come from a Gamma distribution. As is well known, the overall Gamma‐Poisson mixture is a negative binomial. For forecasting time to completion, however, it is not the frequency domain that is important, but the time domain and that of Anisimov and Fedorov have also illustrated clearly the links between the two and the way in which a negative binomial in one corresponds to a type VI Pearson distribution in the other. They have also shown how one may use this to forecast time to completion in a trial in progress. However, it is not just necessary to forecast time to completion for trials in progress but also for trials that have yet to start. This suggests that what would be useful would be to add a higher level of the hierarchy: over all trials. We present one possible approach to doing this using an orthogonal parameterization of the Gamma distribution with parameters on the real line. The two parameters are modelled separately. This is illustrated using data from 18 trials. We make suggestions as to how this method could be applied in practice. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-6715</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sim.5979</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24105891</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SMEDDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bayes Theorem ; Binomial Distribution ; Clinical trials ; Clinical Trials as Topic - methods ; Dyspepsia - epidemiology ; empirical Bayes ; Gamma distribution ; Humans ; Models, Statistical ; Multicenter Studies as Topic - methods ; negative binomial distribution ; Patient Selection ; Patients ; Poisson distribution ; Predictions</subject><ispartof>Statistics in medicine, 2013-12, Vol.32 (30), p.5458-5468</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Dec 30, 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-5aeb107991c69fb84185a8a2a7764e441e39230d2afe89159fc6cb48924413b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-5aeb107991c69fb84185a8a2a7764e441e39230d2afe89159fc6cb48924413b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24105891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bakhshi, Andisheh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senn, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Alan</creatorcontrib><title>Some issues in predicting patient recruitment in multi-centre clinical trials</title><title>Statistics in medicine</title><addtitle>Statist. Med</addtitle><description>A key paper in modelling patient recruitment in multi‐centre clinical trials is that of Anisimov and Fedorov. They assume that the distribution of the number of patients in a given centre in a completed trial follows a Poisson distribution. In a second stage, the unknown parameter is assumed to come from a Gamma distribution. As is well known, the overall Gamma‐Poisson mixture is a negative binomial. For forecasting time to completion, however, it is not the frequency domain that is important, but the time domain and that of Anisimov and Fedorov have also illustrated clearly the links between the two and the way in which a negative binomial in one corresponds to a type VI Pearson distribution in the other. They have also shown how one may use this to forecast time to completion in a trial in progress. However, it is not just necessary to forecast time to completion for trials in progress but also for trials that have yet to start. This suggests that what would be useful would be to add a higher level of the hierarchy: over all trials. We present one possible approach to doing this using an orthogonal parameterization of the Gamma distribution with parameters on the real line. The two parameters are modelled separately. This is illustrated using data from 18 trials. We make suggestions as to how this method could be applied in practice. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Binomial Distribution</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Dyspepsia - epidemiology</subject><subject>empirical Bayes</subject><subject>Gamma distribution</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic - methods</subject><subject>negative binomial distribution</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Poisson distribution</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><issn>0277-6715</issn><issn>1097-0258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LHDEUhoNUdLWCv6AM9MabWXMyySS5LEvVxVUL9uMyZLJnSrbzsU1mUP-9GVwVCr0653AeHl5eQk6BzoFSdh59Oxda6j0yA6plTplQH8iMMinzUoI4JEcxbigFEEwekEPGgQqlYUZu7vsWMx_jiDHzXbYNuPZu8N3vbGsHj92QBXRh9EM77Ylox2bwuUtXwMw1vvPONtkQvG3iR7Jfp4Enu3lMflx8_b64yld3l8vFl1XuCiV1LixWQKXW4EpdV4qDElZZZqUsOXIOWGhW0DWzNaaUQteudBVXmqVfUfHimJy9eLeh_5uSD6b10WHT2A77MRrgpQBViHJCP_-DbvoxdCndRKUMHEr5LnShjzFgbbbBtzY8GaBmqtikis1UcUI_7YRj1eL6DXztNAH5C_DgG3z6r8jcL292wh3v44CPb7wNf0xKJoX5dXtp1M9vsGIrbq6LZ1ZJku8</recordid><startdate>20131230</startdate><enddate>20131230</enddate><creator>Bakhshi, Andisheh</creator><creator>Senn, Stephen</creator><creator>Phillips, Alan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131230</creationdate><title>Some issues in predicting patient recruitment in multi-centre clinical trials</title><author>Bakhshi, Andisheh ; Senn, Stephen ; Phillips, Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-5aeb107991c69fb84185a8a2a7764e441e39230d2afe89159fc6cb48924413b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Binomial Distribution</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Dyspepsia - epidemiology</topic><topic>empirical Bayes</topic><topic>Gamma distribution</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic - methods</topic><topic>negative binomial distribution</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Poisson distribution</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bakhshi, Andisheh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senn, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Alan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Statistics in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bakhshi, Andisheh</au><au>Senn, Stephen</au><au>Phillips, Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some issues in predicting patient recruitment in multi-centre clinical trials</atitle><jtitle>Statistics in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Statist. Med</addtitle><date>2013-12-30</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>30</issue><spage>5458</spage><epage>5468</epage><pages>5458-5468</pages><issn>0277-6715</issn><eissn>1097-0258</eissn><coden>SMEDDA</coden><abstract>A key paper in modelling patient recruitment in multi‐centre clinical trials is that of Anisimov and Fedorov. They assume that the distribution of the number of patients in a given centre in a completed trial follows a Poisson distribution. In a second stage, the unknown parameter is assumed to come from a Gamma distribution. As is well known, the overall Gamma‐Poisson mixture is a negative binomial. For forecasting time to completion, however, it is not the frequency domain that is important, but the time domain and that of Anisimov and Fedorov have also illustrated clearly the links between the two and the way in which a negative binomial in one corresponds to a type VI Pearson distribution in the other. They have also shown how one may use this to forecast time to completion in a trial in progress. However, it is not just necessary to forecast time to completion for trials in progress but also for trials that have yet to start. This suggests that what would be useful would be to add a higher level of the hierarchy: over all trials. We present one possible approach to doing this using an orthogonal parameterization of the Gamma distribution with parameters on the real line. The two parameters are modelled separately. This is illustrated using data from 18 trials. We make suggestions as to how this method could be applied in practice. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24105891</pmid><doi>10.1002/sim.5979</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-6715 |
ispartof | Statistics in medicine, 2013-12, Vol.32 (30), p.5458-5468 |
issn | 0277-6715 1097-0258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1465183564 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Bayes Theorem Binomial Distribution Clinical trials Clinical Trials as Topic - methods Dyspepsia - epidemiology empirical Bayes Gamma distribution Humans Models, Statistical Multicenter Studies as Topic - methods negative binomial distribution Patient Selection Patients Poisson distribution Predictions |
title | Some issues in predicting patient recruitment in multi-centre clinical trials |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A55%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20issues%20in%20predicting%20patient%20recruitment%20in%20multi-centre%20clinical%20trials&rft.jtitle=Statistics%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Bakhshi,%20Andisheh&rft.date=2013-12-30&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=30&rft.spage=5458&rft.epage=5468&rft.pages=5458-5468&rft.issn=0277-6715&rft.eissn=1097-0258&rft.coden=SMEDDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sim.5979&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1465183564%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-5aeb107991c69fb84185a8a2a7764e441e39230d2afe89159fc6cb48924413b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1467994167&rft_id=info:pmid/24105891&rfr_iscdi=true |