Loading…

Some issues in predicting patient recruitment in multi-centre clinical trials

A key paper in modelling patient recruitment in multi‐centre clinical trials is that of Anisimov and Fedorov. They assume that the distribution of the number of patients in a given centre in a completed trial follows a Poisson distribution. In a second stage, the unknown parameter is assumed to come...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Statistics in medicine 2013-12, Vol.32 (30), p.5458-5468
Main Authors: Bakhshi, Andisheh, Senn, Stephen, Phillips, Alan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-5aeb107991c69fb84185a8a2a7764e441e39230d2afe89159fc6cb48924413b43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-5aeb107991c69fb84185a8a2a7764e441e39230d2afe89159fc6cb48924413b43
container_end_page 5468
container_issue 30
container_start_page 5458
container_title Statistics in medicine
container_volume 32
creator Bakhshi, Andisheh
Senn, Stephen
Phillips, Alan
description A key paper in modelling patient recruitment in multi‐centre clinical trials is that of Anisimov and Fedorov. They assume that the distribution of the number of patients in a given centre in a completed trial follows a Poisson distribution. In a second stage, the unknown parameter is assumed to come from a Gamma distribution. As is well known, the overall Gamma‐Poisson mixture is a negative binomial. For forecasting time to completion, however, it is not the frequency domain that is important, but the time domain and that of Anisimov and Fedorov have also illustrated clearly the links between the two and the way in which a negative binomial in one corresponds to a type VI Pearson distribution in the other. They have also shown how one may use this to forecast time to completion in a trial in progress. However, it is not just necessary to forecast time to completion for trials in progress but also for trials that have yet to start. This suggests that what would be useful would be to add a higher level of the hierarchy: over all trials. We present one possible approach to doing this using an orthogonal parameterization of the Gamma distribution with parameters on the real line. The two parameters are modelled separately. This is illustrated using data from 18 trials. We make suggestions as to how this method could be applied in practice. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/sim.5979
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1465183564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1465183564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-5aeb107991c69fb84185a8a2a7764e441e39230d2afe89159fc6cb48924413b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LHDEUhoNUdLWCv6AM9MabWXMyySS5LEvVxVUL9uMyZLJnSrbzsU1mUP-9GVwVCr0653AeHl5eQk6BzoFSdh59Oxda6j0yA6plTplQH8iMMinzUoI4JEcxbigFEEwekEPGgQqlYUZu7vsWMx_jiDHzXbYNuPZu8N3vbGsHj92QBXRh9EM77Ylox2bwuUtXwMw1vvPONtkQvG3iR7Jfp4Enu3lMflx8_b64yld3l8vFl1XuCiV1LixWQKXW4EpdV4qDElZZZqUsOXIOWGhW0DWzNaaUQteudBVXmqVfUfHimJy9eLeh_5uSD6b10WHT2A77MRrgpQBViHJCP_-DbvoxdCndRKUMHEr5LnShjzFgbbbBtzY8GaBmqtikis1UcUI_7YRj1eL6DXztNAH5C_DgG3z6r8jcL292wh3v44CPb7wNf0xKJoX5dXtp1M9vsGIrbq6LZ1ZJku8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1467994167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some issues in predicting patient recruitment in multi-centre clinical trials</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Bakhshi, Andisheh ; Senn, Stephen ; Phillips, Alan</creator><creatorcontrib>Bakhshi, Andisheh ; Senn, Stephen ; Phillips, Alan</creatorcontrib><description>A key paper in modelling patient recruitment in multi‐centre clinical trials is that of Anisimov and Fedorov. They assume that the distribution of the number of patients in a given centre in a completed trial follows a Poisson distribution. In a second stage, the unknown parameter is assumed to come from a Gamma distribution. As is well known, the overall Gamma‐Poisson mixture is a negative binomial. For forecasting time to completion, however, it is not the frequency domain that is important, but the time domain and that of Anisimov and Fedorov have also illustrated clearly the links between the two and the way in which a negative binomial in one corresponds to a type VI Pearson distribution in the other. They have also shown how one may use this to forecast time to completion in a trial in progress. However, it is not just necessary to forecast time to completion for trials in progress but also for trials that have yet to start. This suggests that what would be useful would be to add a higher level of the hierarchy: over all trials. We present one possible approach to doing this using an orthogonal parameterization of the Gamma distribution with parameters on the real line. The two parameters are modelled separately. This is illustrated using data from 18 trials. We make suggestions as to how this method could be applied in practice. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-6715</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sim.5979</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24105891</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SMEDDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bayes Theorem ; Binomial Distribution ; Clinical trials ; Clinical Trials as Topic - methods ; Dyspepsia - epidemiology ; empirical Bayes ; Gamma distribution ; Humans ; Models, Statistical ; Multicenter Studies as Topic - methods ; negative binomial distribution ; Patient Selection ; Patients ; Poisson distribution ; Predictions</subject><ispartof>Statistics in medicine, 2013-12, Vol.32 (30), p.5458-5468</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Dec 30, 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-5aeb107991c69fb84185a8a2a7764e441e39230d2afe89159fc6cb48924413b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-5aeb107991c69fb84185a8a2a7764e441e39230d2afe89159fc6cb48924413b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24105891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bakhshi, Andisheh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senn, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Alan</creatorcontrib><title>Some issues in predicting patient recruitment in multi-centre clinical trials</title><title>Statistics in medicine</title><addtitle>Statist. Med</addtitle><description>A key paper in modelling patient recruitment in multi‐centre clinical trials is that of Anisimov and Fedorov. They assume that the distribution of the number of patients in a given centre in a completed trial follows a Poisson distribution. In a second stage, the unknown parameter is assumed to come from a Gamma distribution. As is well known, the overall Gamma‐Poisson mixture is a negative binomial. For forecasting time to completion, however, it is not the frequency domain that is important, but the time domain and that of Anisimov and Fedorov have also illustrated clearly the links between the two and the way in which a negative binomial in one corresponds to a type VI Pearson distribution in the other. They have also shown how one may use this to forecast time to completion in a trial in progress. However, it is not just necessary to forecast time to completion for trials in progress but also for trials that have yet to start. This suggests that what would be useful would be to add a higher level of the hierarchy: over all trials. We present one possible approach to doing this using an orthogonal parameterization of the Gamma distribution with parameters on the real line. The two parameters are modelled separately. This is illustrated using data from 18 trials. We make suggestions as to how this method could be applied in practice. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Binomial Distribution</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Dyspepsia - epidemiology</subject><subject>empirical Bayes</subject><subject>Gamma distribution</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic - methods</subject><subject>negative binomial distribution</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Poisson distribution</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><issn>0277-6715</issn><issn>1097-0258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LHDEUhoNUdLWCv6AM9MabWXMyySS5LEvVxVUL9uMyZLJnSrbzsU1mUP-9GVwVCr0653AeHl5eQk6BzoFSdh59Oxda6j0yA6plTplQH8iMMinzUoI4JEcxbigFEEwekEPGgQqlYUZu7vsWMx_jiDHzXbYNuPZu8N3vbGsHj92QBXRh9EM77Ylox2bwuUtXwMw1vvPONtkQvG3iR7Jfp4Enu3lMflx8_b64yld3l8vFl1XuCiV1LixWQKXW4EpdV4qDElZZZqUsOXIOWGhW0DWzNaaUQteudBVXmqVfUfHimJy9eLeh_5uSD6b10WHT2A77MRrgpQBViHJCP_-DbvoxdCndRKUMHEr5LnShjzFgbbbBtzY8GaBmqtikis1UcUI_7YRj1eL6DXztNAH5C_DgG3z6r8jcL292wh3v44CPb7wNf0xKJoX5dXtp1M9vsGIrbq6LZ1ZJku8</recordid><startdate>20131230</startdate><enddate>20131230</enddate><creator>Bakhshi, Andisheh</creator><creator>Senn, Stephen</creator><creator>Phillips, Alan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131230</creationdate><title>Some issues in predicting patient recruitment in multi-centre clinical trials</title><author>Bakhshi, Andisheh ; Senn, Stephen ; Phillips, Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-5aeb107991c69fb84185a8a2a7764e441e39230d2afe89159fc6cb48924413b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Binomial Distribution</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Dyspepsia - epidemiology</topic><topic>empirical Bayes</topic><topic>Gamma distribution</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic - methods</topic><topic>negative binomial distribution</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Poisson distribution</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bakhshi, Andisheh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senn, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Alan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Statistics in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bakhshi, Andisheh</au><au>Senn, Stephen</au><au>Phillips, Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some issues in predicting patient recruitment in multi-centre clinical trials</atitle><jtitle>Statistics in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Statist. Med</addtitle><date>2013-12-30</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>30</issue><spage>5458</spage><epage>5468</epage><pages>5458-5468</pages><issn>0277-6715</issn><eissn>1097-0258</eissn><coden>SMEDDA</coden><abstract>A key paper in modelling patient recruitment in multi‐centre clinical trials is that of Anisimov and Fedorov. They assume that the distribution of the number of patients in a given centre in a completed trial follows a Poisson distribution. In a second stage, the unknown parameter is assumed to come from a Gamma distribution. As is well known, the overall Gamma‐Poisson mixture is a negative binomial. For forecasting time to completion, however, it is not the frequency domain that is important, but the time domain and that of Anisimov and Fedorov have also illustrated clearly the links between the two and the way in which a negative binomial in one corresponds to a type VI Pearson distribution in the other. They have also shown how one may use this to forecast time to completion in a trial in progress. However, it is not just necessary to forecast time to completion for trials in progress but also for trials that have yet to start. This suggests that what would be useful would be to add a higher level of the hierarchy: over all trials. We present one possible approach to doing this using an orthogonal parameterization of the Gamma distribution with parameters on the real line. The two parameters are modelled separately. This is illustrated using data from 18 trials. We make suggestions as to how this method could be applied in practice. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24105891</pmid><doi>10.1002/sim.5979</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-6715
ispartof Statistics in medicine, 2013-12, Vol.32 (30), p.5458-5468
issn 0277-6715
1097-0258
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1465183564
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Bayes Theorem
Binomial Distribution
Clinical trials
Clinical Trials as Topic - methods
Dyspepsia - epidemiology
empirical Bayes
Gamma distribution
Humans
Models, Statistical
Multicenter Studies as Topic - methods
negative binomial distribution
Patient Selection
Patients
Poisson distribution
Predictions
title Some issues in predicting patient recruitment in multi-centre clinical trials
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A55%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20issues%20in%20predicting%20patient%20recruitment%20in%20multi-centre%20clinical%20trials&rft.jtitle=Statistics%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Bakhshi,%20Andisheh&rft.date=2013-12-30&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=30&rft.spage=5458&rft.epage=5468&rft.pages=5458-5468&rft.issn=0277-6715&rft.eissn=1097-0258&rft.coden=SMEDDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sim.5979&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1465183564%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-5aeb107991c69fb84185a8a2a7764e441e39230d2afe89159fc6cb48924413b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1467994167&rft_id=info:pmid/24105891&rfr_iscdi=true