Loading…
Why do pollination generalist and specialist plant species show similar reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation?
1. Although reproductive success of pollination specialist plants has been predicted to be more sensitive to habitat fragmentation than that of generalist plants, recent results indicate that effects do not differ between plants with different degrees of specialization. 2. We provide an explanation...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of ecology 2004-08, Vol.92 (4), p.717-719 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5590-1be965432ba15f0e9dc43a4d21f81dc443c14949f88e248e3309c4eb8965c50d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5590-1be965432ba15f0e9dc43a4d21f81dc443c14949f88e248e3309c4eb8965c50d3 |
container_end_page | 719 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 717 |
container_title | The Journal of ecology |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Ashworth, L Aguilar, R Galetto, L Aizen, M.A |
description | 1. Although reproductive success of pollination specialist plants has been predicted to be more sensitive to habitat fragmentation than that of generalist plants, recent results indicate that effects do not differ between plants with different degrees of specialization. 2. We provide an explanation for such unexpected results by linking evidence that specialization of plant-pollinator interactions is asymmetric to observations that generalist pollinators are less affected by habitat fragmentation. 3. Plant specialization cannot therefore be considered in isolation from the degree of specialization of the mutualist partners. Evaluation of both sides of the mutualistic interaction will yield insights into the mechanisms behind species' responses to habitat fragmentation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00910.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14719489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3599731</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3599731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5590-1be965432ba15f0e9dc43a4d21f81dc443c14949f88e248e3309c4eb8965c50d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUVGL1DAQLqLgevoPBIOgb12TJmkTEESWu1M58EEPH0Oaprsp2aYmqXf74H93ej1O8Mm8ZCbzfd9MvikKRPCWwHk3bDGuqhKzptlWGDNIJdRuHxUbQmteVg3jj4vNA-hp8SylAWNcNxxvit8_DifUBTQF792oswsj2tvRRu1dykiPHUqTNW5NJ6_HvD7YhNIh3KDkjs7riKKdYuhmk90vi9KcjJ2ya513-YRyQAfduqwz6qPeH-2Y7zp9eF486bVP9sX9fVZcX5x_330qr75eft59vCoN5xKXpLWy5oxWrSa8x1Z2hlHNuor0gkDMqCFMMtkLYSsmLKVYGmZbASzDcUfPirerLsz4c7Ypq6ODCT18x4Y5KcIaIpmQAHz9D3AIcxxhNlVhISQD2wAkVpCJIaVoezVFd9TxpAhWy1LUoBa_1eK3Wpai7paiboH65l5fJ6M9uDEal_7yuaxJ0ywt3q-4G-ft6b_11ZfzHQRAf7nSh5RDfKBTLmVDCZRfreVeB6X3ESa4_lZhQkGG8ZpR-gdCBrQG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208894067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why do pollination generalist and specialist plant species show similar reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation?</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Ashworth, L ; Aguilar, R ; Galetto, L ; Aizen, M.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Ashworth, L ; Aguilar, R ; Galetto, L ; Aizen, M.A</creatorcontrib><description>1. Although reproductive success of pollination specialist plants has been predicted to be more sensitive to habitat fragmentation than that of generalist plants, recent results indicate that effects do not differ between plants with different degrees of specialization. 2. We provide an explanation for such unexpected results by linking evidence that specialization of plant-pollinator interactions is asymmetric to observations that generalist pollinators are less affected by habitat fragmentation. 3. Plant specialization cannot therefore be considered in isolation from the degree of specialization of the mutualist partners. Evaluation of both sides of the mutualistic interaction will yield insights into the mechanisms behind species' responses to habitat fragmentation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00910.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: British Ecological Society</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Asymmetric interactions ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Ecology ; extinction risk ; Forum ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Habitat fragmentation ; Human ecology ; Mutualism ; mutualism disruption ; niche breadth ; Plant ecology ; Plant reproduction ; plant reproductive success ; Plant taxonomy ; plant-insect relations ; Plants ; plant–animal mutualism ; Pollinating insects ; Pollination ; pollination specialization ; Pollinators ; Reproductive success ; reproductive susceptibility</subject><ispartof>The Journal of ecology, 2004-08, Vol.92 (4), p.717-719</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Science Ltd. Aug 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5590-1be965432ba15f0e9dc43a4d21f81dc443c14949f88e248e3309c4eb8965c50d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5590-1be965432ba15f0e9dc43a4d21f81dc443c14949f88e248e3309c4eb8965c50d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3599731$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3599731$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15961777$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ashworth, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galetto, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aizen, M.A</creatorcontrib><title>Why do pollination generalist and specialist plant species show similar reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation?</title><title>The Journal of ecology</title><description>1. Although reproductive success of pollination specialist plants has been predicted to be more sensitive to habitat fragmentation than that of generalist plants, recent results indicate that effects do not differ between plants with different degrees of specialization. 2. We provide an explanation for such unexpected results by linking evidence that specialization of plant-pollinator interactions is asymmetric to observations that generalist pollinators are less affected by habitat fragmentation. 3. Plant specialization cannot therefore be considered in isolation from the degree of specialization of the mutualist partners. Evaluation of both sides of the mutualistic interaction will yield insights into the mechanisms behind species' responses to habitat fragmentation.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Asymmetric interactions</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>extinction risk</subject><subject>Forum</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Mutualism</subject><subject>mutualism disruption</subject><subject>niche breadth</subject><subject>Plant ecology</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>plant reproductive success</subject><subject>Plant taxonomy</subject><subject>plant-insect relations</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>plant–animal mutualism</subject><subject>Pollinating insects</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>pollination specialization</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Reproductive success</subject><subject>reproductive susceptibility</subject><issn>0022-0477</issn><issn>1365-2745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUVGL1DAQLqLgevoPBIOgb12TJmkTEESWu1M58EEPH0Oaprsp2aYmqXf74H93ej1O8Mm8ZCbzfd9MvikKRPCWwHk3bDGuqhKzptlWGDNIJdRuHxUbQmteVg3jj4vNA-hp8SylAWNcNxxvit8_DifUBTQF792oswsj2tvRRu1dykiPHUqTNW5NJ6_HvD7YhNIh3KDkjs7riKKdYuhmk90vi9KcjJ2ya513-YRyQAfduqwz6qPeH-2Y7zp9eF486bVP9sX9fVZcX5x_330qr75eft59vCoN5xKXpLWy5oxWrSa8x1Z2hlHNuor0gkDMqCFMMtkLYSsmLKVYGmZbASzDcUfPirerLsz4c7Ypq6ODCT18x4Y5KcIaIpmQAHz9D3AIcxxhNlVhISQD2wAkVpCJIaVoezVFd9TxpAhWy1LUoBa_1eK3Wpai7paiboH65l5fJ6M9uDEal_7yuaxJ0ywt3q-4G-ft6b_11ZfzHQRAf7nSh5RDfKBTLmVDCZRfreVeB6X3ESa4_lZhQkGG8ZpR-gdCBrQG</recordid><startdate>200408</startdate><enddate>200408</enddate><creator>Ashworth, L</creator><creator>Aguilar, R</creator><creator>Galetto, L</creator><creator>Aizen, M.A</creator><general>British Ecological Society</general><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200408</creationdate><title>Why do pollination generalist and specialist plant species show similar reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation?</title><author>Ashworth, L ; Aguilar, R ; Galetto, L ; Aizen, M.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5590-1be965432ba15f0e9dc43a4d21f81dc443c14949f88e248e3309c4eb8965c50d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Asymmetric interactions</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>extinction risk</topic><topic>Forum</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Mutualism</topic><topic>mutualism disruption</topic><topic>niche breadth</topic><topic>Plant ecology</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>plant reproductive success</topic><topic>Plant taxonomy</topic><topic>plant-insect relations</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>plant–animal mutualism</topic><topic>Pollinating insects</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>pollination specialization</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Reproductive success</topic><topic>reproductive susceptibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashworth, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galetto, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aizen, M.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashworth, L</au><au>Aguilar, R</au><au>Galetto, L</au><au>Aizen, M.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why do pollination generalist and specialist plant species show similar reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle><date>2004-08</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>717</spage><epage>719</epage><pages>717-719</pages><issn>0022-0477</issn><eissn>1365-2745</eissn><coden>JECOAB</coden><abstract>1. Although reproductive success of pollination specialist plants has been predicted to be more sensitive to habitat fragmentation than that of generalist plants, recent results indicate that effects do not differ between plants with different degrees of specialization. 2. We provide an explanation for such unexpected results by linking evidence that specialization of plant-pollinator interactions is asymmetric to observations that generalist pollinators are less affected by habitat fragmentation. 3. Plant specialization cannot therefore be considered in isolation from the degree of specialization of the mutualist partners. Evaluation of both sides of the mutualistic interaction will yield insights into the mechanisms behind species' responses to habitat fragmentation.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>British Ecological Society</pub><doi>10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00910.x</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0477 |
ispartof | The Journal of ecology, 2004-08, Vol.92 (4), p.717-719 |
issn | 0022-0477 1365-2745 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14719489 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Asymmetric interactions Biodiversity Biological and medical sciences Ecology extinction risk Forum Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Habitat fragmentation Human ecology Mutualism mutualism disruption niche breadth Plant ecology Plant reproduction plant reproductive success Plant taxonomy plant-insect relations Plants plant–animal mutualism Pollinating insects Pollination pollination specialization Pollinators Reproductive success reproductive susceptibility |
title | Why do pollination generalist and specialist plant species show similar reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A40%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20do%20pollination%20generalist%20and%20specialist%20plant%20species%20show%20similar%20reproductive%20susceptibility%20to%20habitat%20fragmentation?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20ecology&rft.au=Ashworth,%20L&rft.date=2004-08&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=717&rft.epage=719&rft.pages=717-719&rft.issn=0022-0477&rft.eissn=1365-2745&rft.coden=JECOAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00910.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3599731%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5590-1be965432ba15f0e9dc43a4d21f81dc443c14949f88e248e3309c4eb8965c50d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208894067&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3599731&rfr_iscdi=true |