Loading…

Relation of yield of corn (Zea mays L.) to nitrogen in shoot and soil during the early-season following manure application to field plots

We investigated corn grain yield responses to early-season soil mineral N and plant N content following application of a variety of manures in Eastern Canada. Liquid cattle, liquid swine, straw-bedded poultry, wood-bedded poultry, and solid cattle manures were each applied at 100, 200, and 300 kg N...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian journal of soil science 2004-11, Vol.84 (4), p.481-490
Main Authors: McGonigle, T.P, Beauchamp, E.G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-feda951215da7c849e522a960b03487debbfeffd2689b3b32abcfb4ab40a21843
cites
container_end_page 490
container_issue 4
container_start_page 481
container_title Canadian journal of soil science
container_volume 84
creator McGonigle, T.P
Beauchamp, E.G
description We investigated corn grain yield responses to early-season soil mineral N and plant N content following application of a variety of manures in Eastern Canada. Liquid cattle, liquid swine, straw-bedded poultry, wood-bedded poultry, and solid cattle manures were each applied at 100, 200, and 300 kg N ha -1 prior to planting corn in a field experiment repeated 3 consecutive years. Additional treatments were urea applied at 50, 100, and 150 kg N ha -1 , and liquid cattle and solid cattle manures at 200 kg N ha -1 with bedding amendments added to the field before manure spreading. Control plots received no manure, no urea, and no bedding amendment. Part of the ammonium-N applied in manures and a portion of that added as urea was volatilized or immobilized shortly after application and was not recovered as soil mineral N at planting. Across all treatments, soil mineral N in the top 30 cm on Jun. 10 in each year gave a better relationship to corn grain yield than soil mineral N measured at planting or on Jul. 10. Inclusion of data for plant N content on Jun. 10 or Jul. 10 did not improve the regressions. With remarkable consistency across all manure types, across manure rates, and over the three years, similar values for soil mineral N on Jun. 10 in plots given manure at planting had yields typically 0.5-1.0 t ha -1 greater than those in plots given urea at planting. This result indicates that mineralization of N from manure after the time of sidedress N and undetected as soil mineral N on Jun. 10 can contribute to yield increases of corn. Recent manure history should be considered when using soil tests for mineral N that are taken 3-4 wk after planting to calculate sidedress N fertilization. Key words: Sidedress, soil test, slurry, solid, cattle, swine, poultry
doi_str_mv 10.4141/S03-062
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14721076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14721076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-feda951215da7c849e522a960b03487debbfeffd2689b3b32abcfb4ab40a21843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtOwzAQRS0EEqUgPgGveCxSbMfNY4kqXlIlJEo3bKxJMi5Gjh3sVKifwF-TElYzozm6VzqEnHM2k1zy2xVLE5aJAzLhJS8SXkh-SCaMsSKRIufH5CTGz-HMJS8n5OcVLfTGO-o13Rm0zX6pfXD0-h2BtrCLdDm7ob2nzvTBb9BR42j88L6n4BoavbG02QbjNrT_QIoQ7C6JCHEI1d5a_71_teC2ASl0nTX12DhE6r_Gzvo-npIjDTbi2f-ckvXD_dviKVm-PD4v7pZJLQrWJxobKOdc8HkDeV3IEudCQJmxiqWyyBusKo1aNyIryiqtUgFVrSsJlWQgBhnplFyOuV3wX1uMvWpNrNFacOi3UXGZC87ybACvRrAOPsaAWnXBtBB2ijO1V60G1WpQPZAXI6nBK9gEE9V6JRhPGSvzPCuL9Beh_Xu2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14721076</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relation of yield of corn (Zea mays L.) to nitrogen in shoot and soil during the early-season following manure application to field plots</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><creator>McGonigle, T.P ; Beauchamp, E.G</creator><creatorcontrib>McGonigle, T.P ; Beauchamp, E.G</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated corn grain yield responses to early-season soil mineral N and plant N content following application of a variety of manures in Eastern Canada. Liquid cattle, liquid swine, straw-bedded poultry, wood-bedded poultry, and solid cattle manures were each applied at 100, 200, and 300 kg N ha -1 prior to planting corn in a field experiment repeated 3 consecutive years. Additional treatments were urea applied at 50, 100, and 150 kg N ha -1 , and liquid cattle and solid cattle manures at 200 kg N ha -1 with bedding amendments added to the field before manure spreading. Control plots received no manure, no urea, and no bedding amendment. Part of the ammonium-N applied in manures and a portion of that added as urea was volatilized or immobilized shortly after application and was not recovered as soil mineral N at planting. Across all treatments, soil mineral N in the top 30 cm on Jun. 10 in each year gave a better relationship to corn grain yield than soil mineral N measured at planting or on Jul. 10. Inclusion of data for plant N content on Jun. 10 or Jul. 10 did not improve the regressions. With remarkable consistency across all manure types, across manure rates, and over the three years, similar values for soil mineral N on Jun. 10 in plots given manure at planting had yields typically 0.5-1.0 t ha -1 greater than those in plots given urea at planting. This result indicates that mineralization of N from manure after the time of sidedress N and undetected as soil mineral N on Jun. 10 can contribute to yield increases of corn. Recent manure history should be considered when using soil tests for mineral N that are taken 3-4 wk after planting to calculate sidedress N fertilization. Key words: Sidedress, soil test, slurry, solid, cattle, swine, poultry</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1918-1841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4141/S03-062</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>cattle manure ; chemical constituents of plants ; corn ; fertilizer application ; fertilizer requirements ; grain yield ; liquid cattle manure ; liquid manure ; liquid pig manure ; manure spreading ; mineralization ; nitrogen ; pig manure ; poultry manure ; shoots ; sidedressing ; soil fertility ; soil nutrients ; solid cattle manure ; straw-bedded poultry manure ; urea fertilizers ; wood-bedded poultry manure ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of soil science, 2004-11, Vol.84 (4), p.481-490</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-feda951215da7c849e522a960b03487debbfeffd2689b3b32abcfb4ab40a21843</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGonigle, T.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauchamp, E.G</creatorcontrib><title>Relation of yield of corn (Zea mays L.) to nitrogen in shoot and soil during the early-season following manure application to field plots</title><title>Canadian journal of soil science</title><description>We investigated corn grain yield responses to early-season soil mineral N and plant N content following application of a variety of manures in Eastern Canada. Liquid cattle, liquid swine, straw-bedded poultry, wood-bedded poultry, and solid cattle manures were each applied at 100, 200, and 300 kg N ha -1 prior to planting corn in a field experiment repeated 3 consecutive years. Additional treatments were urea applied at 50, 100, and 150 kg N ha -1 , and liquid cattle and solid cattle manures at 200 kg N ha -1 with bedding amendments added to the field before manure spreading. Control plots received no manure, no urea, and no bedding amendment. Part of the ammonium-N applied in manures and a portion of that added as urea was volatilized or immobilized shortly after application and was not recovered as soil mineral N at planting. Across all treatments, soil mineral N in the top 30 cm on Jun. 10 in each year gave a better relationship to corn grain yield than soil mineral N measured at planting or on Jul. 10. Inclusion of data for plant N content on Jun. 10 or Jul. 10 did not improve the regressions. With remarkable consistency across all manure types, across manure rates, and over the three years, similar values for soil mineral N on Jun. 10 in plots given manure at planting had yields typically 0.5-1.0 t ha -1 greater than those in plots given urea at planting. This result indicates that mineralization of N from manure after the time of sidedress N and undetected as soil mineral N on Jun. 10 can contribute to yield increases of corn. Recent manure history should be considered when using soil tests for mineral N that are taken 3-4 wk after planting to calculate sidedress N fertilization. Key words: Sidedress, soil test, slurry, solid, cattle, swine, poultry</description><subject>cattle manure</subject><subject>chemical constituents of plants</subject><subject>corn</subject><subject>fertilizer application</subject><subject>fertilizer requirements</subject><subject>grain yield</subject><subject>liquid cattle manure</subject><subject>liquid manure</subject><subject>liquid pig manure</subject><subject>manure spreading</subject><subject>mineralization</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>pig manure</subject><subject>poultry manure</subject><subject>shoots</subject><subject>sidedressing</subject><subject>soil fertility</subject><subject>soil nutrients</subject><subject>solid cattle manure</subject><subject>straw-bedded poultry manure</subject><subject>urea fertilizers</subject><subject>wood-bedded poultry manure</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0008-4271</issn><issn>1918-1841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkMtOwzAQRS0EEqUgPgGveCxSbMfNY4kqXlIlJEo3bKxJMi5Gjh3sVKifwF-TElYzozm6VzqEnHM2k1zy2xVLE5aJAzLhJS8SXkh-SCaMsSKRIufH5CTGz-HMJS8n5OcVLfTGO-o13Rm0zX6pfXD0-h2BtrCLdDm7ob2nzvTBb9BR42j88L6n4BoavbG02QbjNrT_QIoQ7C6JCHEI1d5a_71_teC2ASl0nTX12DhE6r_Gzvo-npIjDTbi2f-ckvXD_dviKVm-PD4v7pZJLQrWJxobKOdc8HkDeV3IEudCQJmxiqWyyBusKo1aNyIryiqtUgFVrSsJlWQgBhnplFyOuV3wX1uMvWpNrNFacOi3UXGZC87ybACvRrAOPsaAWnXBtBB2ijO1V60G1WpQPZAXI6nBK9gEE9V6JRhPGSvzPCuL9Beh_Xu2</recordid><startdate>20041101</startdate><enddate>20041101</enddate><creator>McGonigle, T.P</creator><creator>Beauchamp, E.G</creator><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041101</creationdate><title>Relation of yield of corn (Zea mays L.) to nitrogen in shoot and soil during the early-season following manure application to field plots</title><author>McGonigle, T.P ; Beauchamp, E.G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-feda951215da7c849e522a960b03487debbfeffd2689b3b32abcfb4ab40a21843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>cattle manure</topic><topic>chemical constituents of plants</topic><topic>corn</topic><topic>fertilizer application</topic><topic>fertilizer requirements</topic><topic>grain yield</topic><topic>liquid cattle manure</topic><topic>liquid manure</topic><topic>liquid pig manure</topic><topic>manure spreading</topic><topic>mineralization</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>pig manure</topic><topic>poultry manure</topic><topic>shoots</topic><topic>sidedressing</topic><topic>soil fertility</topic><topic>soil nutrients</topic><topic>solid cattle manure</topic><topic>straw-bedded poultry manure</topic><topic>urea fertilizers</topic><topic>wood-bedded poultry manure</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGonigle, T.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauchamp, E.G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of soil science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGonigle, T.P</au><au>Beauchamp, E.G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relation of yield of corn (Zea mays L.) to nitrogen in shoot and soil during the early-season following manure application to field plots</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of soil science</jtitle><date>2004-11-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>481</spage><epage>490</epage><pages>481-490</pages><issn>0008-4271</issn><eissn>1918-1841</eissn><abstract>We investigated corn grain yield responses to early-season soil mineral N and plant N content following application of a variety of manures in Eastern Canada. Liquid cattle, liquid swine, straw-bedded poultry, wood-bedded poultry, and solid cattle manures were each applied at 100, 200, and 300 kg N ha -1 prior to planting corn in a field experiment repeated 3 consecutive years. Additional treatments were urea applied at 50, 100, and 150 kg N ha -1 , and liquid cattle and solid cattle manures at 200 kg N ha -1 with bedding amendments added to the field before manure spreading. Control plots received no manure, no urea, and no bedding amendment. Part of the ammonium-N applied in manures and a portion of that added as urea was volatilized or immobilized shortly after application and was not recovered as soil mineral N at planting. Across all treatments, soil mineral N in the top 30 cm on Jun. 10 in each year gave a better relationship to corn grain yield than soil mineral N measured at planting or on Jul. 10. Inclusion of data for plant N content on Jun. 10 or Jul. 10 did not improve the regressions. With remarkable consistency across all manure types, across manure rates, and over the three years, similar values for soil mineral N on Jun. 10 in plots given manure at planting had yields typically 0.5-1.0 t ha -1 greater than those in plots given urea at planting. This result indicates that mineralization of N from manure after the time of sidedress N and undetected as soil mineral N on Jun. 10 can contribute to yield increases of corn. Recent manure history should be considered when using soil tests for mineral N that are taken 3-4 wk after planting to calculate sidedress N fertilization. Key words: Sidedress, soil test, slurry, solid, cattle, swine, poultry</abstract><doi>10.4141/S03-062</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-4271
ispartof Canadian journal of soil science, 2004-11, Vol.84 (4), p.481-490
issn 0008-4271
1918-1841
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14721076
source Freely Accessible Journals
subjects cattle manure
chemical constituents of plants
corn
fertilizer application
fertilizer requirements
grain yield
liquid cattle manure
liquid manure
liquid pig manure
manure spreading
mineralization
nitrogen
pig manure
poultry manure
shoots
sidedressing
soil fertility
soil nutrients
solid cattle manure
straw-bedded poultry manure
urea fertilizers
wood-bedded poultry manure
Zea mays
title Relation of yield of corn (Zea mays L.) to nitrogen in shoot and soil during the early-season following manure application to field plots
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A01%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relation%20of%20yield%20of%20corn%20(Zea%20mays%20L.)%20to%20nitrogen%20in%20shoot%20and%20soil%20during%20the%20early-season%20following%20manure%20application%20to%20field%20plots&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20soil%20science&rft.au=McGonigle,%20T.P&rft.date=2004-11-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=481&rft.epage=490&rft.pages=481-490&rft.issn=0008-4271&rft.eissn=1918-1841&rft_id=info:doi/10.4141/S03-062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14721076%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-feda951215da7c849e522a960b03487debbfeffd2689b3b32abcfb4ab40a21843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14721076&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true