Do Designers Show Categorical Perception of Typefaces?

Readers need to easily discriminate between different letters, so typefaces are designed to make these differences distinctive. But there is also a uniformity of style within a typeface. These styles are recognized by typographic designers and may be categorized to enable more efficient discriminati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Visible language 2011-10, Vol.45 (3), p.193-220
Main Author: Dyson, Mary C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Auditory Perception
Cognitive Development
Color
Design
Learning Processes
Listening Comprehension
Perceptions
Reading
Semantics
Stimuli
Type fonts
Typefaces
Visual Aids
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Readers need to easily discriminate between different letters, so typefaces are designed to make these differences distinctive. But there is also a uniformity of style within a typeface. These styles are recognized by typographic designers and may be categorized to enable more efficient discrimination among typefaces. The manner in which designers perceive typefaces is explored using the paradigm of Categorical Perception (CP). A continuum of fonts is created by interpolating between two typefaces, and two tasks (identification and discrimination) are used to test for CP. As the application of CP to typefaces is a new approach, various methodological issues are pursued. The experiments reveal that the conditions required to demonstrate CP are quite specific and CP was only evident in Times and Helvetica and not Garamond and Bodoni. Possible reasons for this difference are the characteristics of the two typefaces and their context of use. Speculation as to the purpose of CP in non-designers raises the under-researched question of how we identify letters in different typefaces when reading. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0022-2224