Co-producing addiction aftercare

• Published in: Drugs and alcohol today 2013-11, Vol.13 (4), p.225-233
• Main Authors: Tober, Gillian, Raistrick, Duncan, Fiona Crosby, Helen, Sweetman, Jennifer, Unsworth, Sally, Suna, Leah, Copello, Alex
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Addictions; Criminology & forensic psychology; Health & social care; Interviews; Medical research; Studies; Substance misuse
• ISSN: 1745-9265; 2752-6739; 2042-8359; 2752-6747
• DOI: 10.1108/DAT-05-2013-0024

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and delivery of an aftercare programme called Learning To Live Again, which was co-produced between service users and clinic staff. Design/methodology/approach – In total, 37 semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 project stakeholders who were service users, mentors, university and clinical staff. The data were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings – Four overarching themes were identified in the analysis of interview data as characterising the process of co-producing an aftercare programme. These were: achieving common ground, roles and responsibilities, the activities programme and the road to recovery. Interdependence of service users and clinicians was given strong emphasis. Practical implications – A number of challenges arise in co-producing an aftercare programme which is largely service user led and adds to the local recovery capital. The benefits of co-producing aftercare outweigh the difficulties and the programme can be set up within existing resources. Given the study's focus on the process of setting up and maintaining an aftercare programme, no attempt was made to evaluate the improvement in outcomes or cost-effectiveness. Originality/value – Many peer-mentor-led aftercare programmes have been set up and this paper describes stakeholders’ thoughts about the challenges and benefits of co-producing an aftercare programme.