Shedding light on junior doctors' work practices after hours

• Published in: Internal medicine journal 2013-12, Vol.43 (12), p.1321-1326
• Main Authors: Arabadzhiyska, P. N., Baysari, M. T., Walter, S., Day, R. O., Westbrook, J. I.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Hospitals, Teaching - methods; Hospitals, Teaching - statistics & numerical data; Humans; junior doctor; Medical Staff, Hospital - psychology; Medical Staff, Hospital - statistics & numerical data; night-shift; time and motion; Time and Motion Studies; Time Factors; work practice; Work Schedule Tolerance - psychology
• ISSN: 1444-0903; 1445-5994
• DOI: 10.1111/imj.12223

Background It is imperative to understand the current work practices of hospital personnel to inform efforts and secure resources towards the improvement of hospital systems. Research examining doctors' work during night‐shifts is limited. Aim To describe and quantify the night‐shift work practices of junior doctors. Methods An observational time and motion study was conducted. Eight resident doctors in four general wards were observed for 96 h during night shifts (Monday–Friday, 2200–0800). Results Doctors spent the highest proportion (28%; 95% CI 21–35) of their time performing social/personal tasks (e.g. sleeping, eating) and indirect care (24%; 95% CI 22–25) (e.g. reviewing notes, ordering tests). Work‐related discussion comprised 15% (95% CI 13–17), and most took place at the beginning of the night. Medication‐related tasks consumed a small proportion of time (4%; 95% CI 3–4) but attracted a higher level of multitasking and interruptions than most other tasks. On average, 2 h of every shift were spent at a computer and 1.3 h with patient notes. Doctors spent 72% of the night‐shift alone, multitasked 6.4% of the time and were interrupted, on average, once every 46 min. Conclusions This study provides new data about junior doctors' work at night. Relative to doctors during the day, greater proportions of time were devoted to social/personal tasks (including sleep) and indirect care, but a similar proportion to direct care. Multitasking and interruptions were minimal. Computer activities were an integral part of work. Handovers were observed at the beginning but not the completion of the night shift, which may have implications for patient safety.