Loading…

Renal Function After Nephron-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephrectomy: Results from EORTC Randomized Trial 30904

Abstract Background In the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized trial 30904, nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) was associated with reduced overall survival compared with radical nephrectomy (RN) over a median follow-up of 9.3 yr (hazard ratio: 1.50; 95% confidenc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European urology 2014-02, Vol.65 (2), p.372-377
Main Authors: Scosyrev, Emil, Messing, Edward M, Sylvester, Richard, Campbell, Steven, Van Poppel, Hendrik
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background In the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized trial 30904, nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) was associated with reduced overall survival compared with radical nephrectomy (RN) over a median follow-up of 9.3 yr (hazard ratio: 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03–2.16). Objective To examine the impact of NSS relative to RN on kidney function in EORTC 30904. Design, setting, and participants This phase 3 international randomized trial was conducted in patients with a small (≤5 cm) renal mass and normal contralateral kidney who were enrolled from March 1992 to January 2003. Intervention Patients were randomized to RN ( n = 273) or NSS ( n = 268). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Follow-up estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR; milliliters per minute per 1.73 m2 ) were recorded for 259 subjects in the RN arm and 255 subjects in the NSS arm. Percentages of subjects developing at least moderate renal dysfunction (eGFR
ISSN:0302-2838
1873-7560
DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.044