Loading…
Comparative study of treatment efficacy and the incidence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation with different degrees of irradiation using two different quality-switched lasers for removing solar lentigines on Asian skin
Background Quality‐switched (QS) lasers are well‐known effective treatment for removing solar lentigines. However, the high incidence of post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) raises concern in darker skin types. This is the first study comparing efficacies and incidences of PIH in Asian skin wi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2013-03, Vol.27 (3), p.307-312 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background Quality‐switched (QS) lasers are well‐known effective treatment for removing solar lentigines. However, the high incidence of post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) raises concern in darker skin types. This is the first study comparing efficacies and incidences of PIH in Asian skin with different degrees of irradiation between two QS lasers.
Method In total, 355 solar lentigines in 193 cases, skin types III–V, were randomly divided into four groups. All cases received single laser treatment. Clinical results were evaluated after 4 weeks. Groups 1 and 3 were treated ‘aggressively’ with endpoints of very obvious immediate whitening (IW) of the lesion. Groups 2 and 4 were treated ‘mildly’ with endpoints of slight IW of the lesion. Groups 1 and 2 were irradiated with the QS ruby, and groups 3 and 4 with the QS frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser.
Results There were no statistically significant differences in degrees of clearance among the four groups. However, PIH incidences were very different: 33.33%, 7.47%, 23.18% and 8.47% in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The difference between aggressively and mildly irradiated groups (1 and 3 vs. 2 and 4) was statistically significant (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0926-9959 1468-3083 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04385.x |