Loading…
Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of avian demineralized bone matrix in heterotopic beds
Objective To evaluate the osteogenic potential of avian demineralized bone matrix (DBM) in the context of implant geometry. Study Design Experimental. Animals Rock pigeons (n = 24). Methods Tubular and chipped forms of DBM were prepared by acid demineralization of long bones from healthy allogeneic...
Saved in:
Published in: | Veterinary surgery 2013-11, Vol.42 (8), p.963-970 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4867-892fbf2c875087de426ae80f4017087984eda8e8a1a0e5ce93fa5c945cd6e6d23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4867-892fbf2c875087de426ae80f4017087984eda8e8a1a0e5ce93fa5c945cd6e6d23 |
container_end_page | 970 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 963 |
container_title | Veterinary surgery |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Reza Sanaei, M. Abu, Jalila Nazari, Mojgan A.B., Mohd Zuki Allaudin, Zeenathul N. |
description | Objective
To evaluate the osteogenic potential of avian demineralized bone matrix (DBM) in the context of implant geometry.
Study Design
Experimental.
Animals
Rock pigeons (n = 24).
Methods
Tubular and chipped forms of DBM were prepared by acid demineralization of long bones from healthy allogeneic donors and implanted bilaterally into the pectoral region of 24 pigeons. After euthanasia at 1, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks, explants were evaluated histologically and compared by means of quantitative (bone area) and semi quantitative measures (scores).
Results
All explants had new bone at retrieval with the exception of tubular implants at the end of week 1. The most reactive part in both implants was the interior region between the periosteal and endosteal surfaces followed by the area at the implant‐muscle interface. Quantitative measurements demonstrated a significantly (P = .012) greater percentage of new bone formation induced by tubular implants (80.28 ± 8.94) compared with chip implants (57.64 ± 3.12). There was minimal inflammation.
Conclusions
Avian DBM initiates heterotopic bone formation in allogeneic recipients with low grades of immunogenicity. Implant geometry affects this phenomenon as osteoconduction appeared to augment the magnitude of the effects in larger tubular implants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12057.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490772677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1490772677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4867-892fbf2c875087de426ae80f4017087984eda8e8a1a0e5ce93fa5c945cd6e6d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhLyBLXLgk2I4d2xck1MKCtBQhKPSE5U0mwktib-1k2fLrcbrtHjjhi0fjb95Y7yGEKSlpPq82JRUVK7QgVyUjtCopI0KW-wdocXx4iBaE1rSouNYn6ElKG0KI5rx6jE4Yp1Qqzhfox-fJ9m60o9sBtr7F15P1430Ddrafchk8Dh22O2c9bmFwHmKe-gMtXgcPeLBjdHvsPP4JI8Qwhq1r8Bra9BQ96myf4NndfYou3739eva-WH1afjh7syoarmpZKM26dccaJQVRsgXOaguKdJxQmRtacWitAmWpJSAa0FVnRaO5aNoa6pZVp-jlQXcbw_UEaTSDSw30vfUQpmQo10RKVkuZ0Rf_oJswRZ9_lykupGZCzZQ6UE0MKUXozDa6wcYbQ4mZMzAbM1ttZqvNnIG5zcDs8-jzuwXTeoD2OHhvegZeH4Dfroeb_xY2375c3pZZoDgIuDTC_ihg4y9Ty0oK8_1iaZarc6k-XlyZuvoLVDalqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1445792587</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of avian demineralized bone matrix in heterotopic beds</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Reza Sanaei, M. ; Abu, Jalila ; Nazari, Mojgan ; A.B., Mohd Zuki ; Allaudin, Zeenathul N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reza Sanaei, M. ; Abu, Jalila ; Nazari, Mojgan ; A.B., Mohd Zuki ; Allaudin, Zeenathul N.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To evaluate the osteogenic potential of avian demineralized bone matrix (DBM) in the context of implant geometry.
Study Design
Experimental.
Animals
Rock pigeons (n = 24).
Methods
Tubular and chipped forms of DBM were prepared by acid demineralization of long bones from healthy allogeneic donors and implanted bilaterally into the pectoral region of 24 pigeons. After euthanasia at 1, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks, explants were evaluated histologically and compared by means of quantitative (bone area) and semi quantitative measures (scores).
Results
All explants had new bone at retrieval with the exception of tubular implants at the end of week 1. The most reactive part in both implants was the interior region between the periosteal and endosteal surfaces followed by the area at the implant‐muscle interface. Quantitative measurements demonstrated a significantly (P = .012) greater percentage of new bone formation induced by tubular implants (80.28 ± 8.94) compared with chip implants (57.64 ± 3.12). There was minimal inflammation.
Conclusions
Avian DBM initiates heterotopic bone formation in allogeneic recipients with low grades of immunogenicity. Implant geometry affects this phenomenon as osteoconduction appeared to augment the magnitude of the effects in larger tubular implants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-3499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-950X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12057.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24117844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Birds ; Bone Demineralization Technique - veterinary ; Bone Matrix - physiology ; Bones ; Columbidae - physiology ; Columbidae - surgery ; Decalcification Technique ; Osteogenesis - physiology ; Prostheses and Implants - standards ; Prostheses and Implants - veterinary ; Transplantation, Heterotopic - veterinary ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Veterinary surgery, 2013-11, Vol.42 (8), p.963-970</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2013 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright 2013 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4867-892fbf2c875087de426ae80f4017087984eda8e8a1a0e5ce93fa5c945cd6e6d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4867-892fbf2c875087de426ae80f4017087984eda8e8a1a0e5ce93fa5c945cd6e6d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24117844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reza Sanaei, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abu, Jalila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazari, Mojgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A.B., Mohd Zuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allaudin, Zeenathul N.</creatorcontrib><title>Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of avian demineralized bone matrix in heterotopic beds</title><title>Veterinary surgery</title><addtitle>Veterinary Surgery</addtitle><description>Objective
To evaluate the osteogenic potential of avian demineralized bone matrix (DBM) in the context of implant geometry.
Study Design
Experimental.
Animals
Rock pigeons (n = 24).
Methods
Tubular and chipped forms of DBM were prepared by acid demineralization of long bones from healthy allogeneic donors and implanted bilaterally into the pectoral region of 24 pigeons. After euthanasia at 1, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks, explants were evaluated histologically and compared by means of quantitative (bone area) and semi quantitative measures (scores).
Results
All explants had new bone at retrieval with the exception of tubular implants at the end of week 1. The most reactive part in both implants was the interior region between the periosteal and endosteal surfaces followed by the area at the implant‐muscle interface. Quantitative measurements demonstrated a significantly (P = .012) greater percentage of new bone formation induced by tubular implants (80.28 ± 8.94) compared with chip implants (57.64 ± 3.12). There was minimal inflammation.
Conclusions
Avian DBM initiates heterotopic bone formation in allogeneic recipients with low grades of immunogenicity. Implant geometry affects this phenomenon as osteoconduction appeared to augment the magnitude of the effects in larger tubular implants.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Bone Demineralization Technique - veterinary</subject><subject>Bone Matrix - physiology</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Columbidae - physiology</subject><subject>Columbidae - surgery</subject><subject>Decalcification Technique</subject><subject>Osteogenesis - physiology</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants - standards</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants - veterinary</subject><subject>Transplantation, Heterotopic - veterinary</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>0161-3499</issn><issn>1532-950X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhLyBLXLgk2I4d2xck1MKCtBQhKPSE5U0mwktib-1k2fLrcbrtHjjhi0fjb95Y7yGEKSlpPq82JRUVK7QgVyUjtCopI0KW-wdocXx4iBaE1rSouNYn6ElKG0KI5rx6jE4Yp1Qqzhfox-fJ9m60o9sBtr7F15P1430Ddrafchk8Dh22O2c9bmFwHmKe-gMtXgcPeLBjdHvsPP4JI8Qwhq1r8Bra9BQ96myf4NndfYou3739eva-WH1afjh7syoarmpZKM26dccaJQVRsgXOaguKdJxQmRtacWitAmWpJSAa0FVnRaO5aNoa6pZVp-jlQXcbw_UEaTSDSw30vfUQpmQo10RKVkuZ0Rf_oJswRZ9_lykupGZCzZQ6UE0MKUXozDa6wcYbQ4mZMzAbM1ttZqvNnIG5zcDs8-jzuwXTeoD2OHhvegZeH4Dfroeb_xY2375c3pZZoDgIuDTC_ihg4y9Ty0oK8_1iaZarc6k-XlyZuvoLVDalqw</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Reza Sanaei, M.</creator><creator>Abu, Jalila</creator><creator>Nazari, Mojgan</creator><creator>A.B., Mohd Zuki</creator><creator>Allaudin, Zeenathul N.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of avian demineralized bone matrix in heterotopic beds</title><author>Reza Sanaei, M. ; Abu, Jalila ; Nazari, Mojgan ; A.B., Mohd Zuki ; Allaudin, Zeenathul N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4867-892fbf2c875087de426ae80f4017087984eda8e8a1a0e5ce93fa5c945cd6e6d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Bone Demineralization Technique - veterinary</topic><topic>Bone Matrix - physiology</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Columbidae - physiology</topic><topic>Columbidae - surgery</topic><topic>Decalcification Technique</topic><topic>Osteogenesis - physiology</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants - standards</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants - veterinary</topic><topic>Transplantation, Heterotopic - veterinary</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reza Sanaei, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abu, Jalila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazari, Mojgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A.B., Mohd Zuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allaudin, Zeenathul N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reza Sanaei, M.</au><au>Abu, Jalila</au><au>Nazari, Mojgan</au><au>A.B., Mohd Zuki</au><au>Allaudin, Zeenathul N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of avian demineralized bone matrix in heterotopic beds</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Veterinary Surgery</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>963</spage><epage>970</epage><pages>963-970</pages><issn>0161-3499</issn><eissn>1532-950X</eissn><abstract>Objective
To evaluate the osteogenic potential of avian demineralized bone matrix (DBM) in the context of implant geometry.
Study Design
Experimental.
Animals
Rock pigeons (n = 24).
Methods
Tubular and chipped forms of DBM were prepared by acid demineralization of long bones from healthy allogeneic donors and implanted bilaterally into the pectoral region of 24 pigeons. After euthanasia at 1, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks, explants were evaluated histologically and compared by means of quantitative (bone area) and semi quantitative measures (scores).
Results
All explants had new bone at retrieval with the exception of tubular implants at the end of week 1. The most reactive part in both implants was the interior region between the periosteal and endosteal surfaces followed by the area at the implant‐muscle interface. Quantitative measurements demonstrated a significantly (P = .012) greater percentage of new bone formation induced by tubular implants (80.28 ± 8.94) compared with chip implants (57.64 ± 3.12). There was minimal inflammation.
Conclusions
Avian DBM initiates heterotopic bone formation in allogeneic recipients with low grades of immunogenicity. Implant geometry affects this phenomenon as osteoconduction appeared to augment the magnitude of the effects in larger tubular implants.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24117844</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12057.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-3499 |
ispartof | Veterinary surgery, 2013-11, Vol.42 (8), p.963-970 |
issn | 0161-3499 1532-950X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490772677 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Animals Birds Bone Demineralization Technique - veterinary Bone Matrix - physiology Bones Columbidae - physiology Columbidae - surgery Decalcification Technique Osteogenesis - physiology Prostheses and Implants - standards Prostheses and Implants - veterinary Transplantation, Heterotopic - veterinary Transplants & implants |
title | Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of avian demineralized bone matrix in heterotopic beds |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A18%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Qualitative%20and%20quantitative%20evaluation%20of%20avian%20demineralized%20bone%20matrix%20in%20heterotopic%20beds&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20surgery&rft.au=Reza%20Sanaei,%20M.&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=963&rft.epage=970&rft.pages=963-970&rft.issn=0161-3499&rft.eissn=1532-950X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12057.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1490772677%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4867-892fbf2c875087de426ae80f4017087984eda8e8a1a0e5ce93fa5c945cd6e6d23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1445792587&rft_id=info:pmid/24117844&rfr_iscdi=true |