Atropine for the Treatment of Childhood Myopia: Changes after Stopping Atropine 0.01%, 0.1% and 0.5

• Published in: American journal of ophthalmology 2014-02, Vol.157 (2), p.451-457.e1
• Main Authors: Chia, Audrey, Chua, Wei-Han, Wen, Li, Fong, Allan, Goon, Yar Yen, Tan, Donald
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accommodation, Ocular - physiology; Administration, Topical; Age; Atropine - administration & dosage; Axial Length, Eye - physiology; Child; Diabetic retinopathy; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gender; Humans; Male; Mydriatics - administration & dosage; Myopia; Myopia - diagnosis; Myopia - drug therapy; Myopia - physiopathology; Ophthalmic Solutions; Ophthalmology; Prospective Studies; Pupil - physiology; Variance analysis; Visual Acuity - physiology; Withholding Treatment
• ISSN: 0002-9394; 1879-1891
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.09.020

Purpose To study the change in spherical equivalent and other ocular parameters 1 year after stopping the administration of atropine. Design Prospective randomized double-masked clinical trial. Methods We assigned 400 myopic children, 6 to 12 years of age, to receive atropine 0.5%, 0.1% or 0.01% for 24 months, after which medication was stopped. Parents and children gave informed consent to participate in the research. Children were reviewed at 26, 32 and 36 months, and changes in cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE), axial length (AL), visual acuity, pupil size, and accommodation were assessed. Results Of the children, 356 (89%) entered into the washout phase. At entry, there was no significant difference in age, gender, SE, or AL among the children in the various atropine groups. Over the following 12 months, myopic progression was greater in the 0.5% eyes (−0.87 ± 0.52 D), compared to the 0.1% (−0.68 ± 0.45 D) and 0.01% eyes (−0.28 ± 0.33 D, P < 0.001). AL growth was also greater in the 0.5% (0.35 ± 0.20 mm) and 0.1% (0.33 ± 0.18 mm) eyes, compared to the 0.01% eyes (0.19 ± 0.13 mm, P < 0.001). Pupil size and near visual acuity returned to pre-atropine levels in all groups, but accommodation at 36 months was less in the 0.5% eyes (13.24 ± 2.72 D) compared to the 0.1% (14.45 ± 2.61 D) and 0.01% eyes (14.04 ± 2.90 D, P < 0.001). The overall increase in SE over the entire 36 months in the 0.5%, 0.1% and 0.01% groups was −1.15 ± 0.81 D, −1.04 ± 0.83 D and −0.72 ± 0.72 D, respectively ( P < 0.001). Conclusion There was a myopic rebound after atropine was stopped, and it was greater in eyes that had received 0.5% and 0.1% atropine. The 0.01% atropine effect, however, was more modulated and sustained.