Loading…

Different Propofol–Remifentanil or Sevoflurane–Remifentanil Bispectral Index Levels for Electrocorticographic Spike Identification during Epilepsy Surgery

BACKGROUND:Medical therapy, the cornerstone of managing epilepsy, still fails a substantial portion of patients. Little information is available regarding the potential impact of different bispectral index (BIS) levels on electrocorticographic spike identification for surgical epileptic foci resecti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) 2013-09, Vol.119 (3), p.582-592
Main Authors: Dahaba, Ashraf A., Yin, Jian, Xiao, Zhaoyang, Su, Jing, Bornemann, Helmar, Dong, Hailong, Xiong, Lize
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-ade6807ecfa8a8ab17a0751bc2db01d325cbc475e9b4f42849a7ded5e9d8627a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-ade6807ecfa8a8ab17a0751bc2db01d325cbc475e9b4f42849a7ded5e9d8627a3
container_end_page 592
container_issue 3
container_start_page 582
container_title Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)
container_volume 119
creator Dahaba, Ashraf A.
Yin, Jian
Xiao, Zhaoyang
Su, Jing
Bornemann, Helmar
Dong, Hailong
Xiong, Lize
description BACKGROUND:Medical therapy, the cornerstone of managing epilepsy, still fails a substantial portion of patients. Little information is available regarding the potential impact of different bispectral index (BIS) levels on electrocorticographic spike identification for surgical epileptic foci resection. METHODS:Twenty-two intractable epilepsy subjects were randomly allocated to the propofol–remifentanil or sevoflurane–remifentanil groups, and were further randomized to four BIS85 (BIS 71–85), BIS70 (BIS 56–70), BIS55 (BIS 41–55), and BIS40 (BIS ≤40) sequence order. RESULTS:Two-way ANOVA revealed no differences between groups in spike frequency (P = 0.720), spike amplitude (P = 0.647), or number of spiking leads (P = 0.653). In the propofol and sevoflurane groups, decreasing BIS levels increased mean ± SD spike/min frequency (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001) at BIS85 (10 ± 12 and 10 ± 8), BIS70 (19 ± 17 and 17 ± 15), BIS55 (22 ± 17 and 18 ± 8), and BIS40 (25 ± 15 and 23 ± 17). Furthermore, in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, decreasing BIS levels increased spike microvolt amplitude (P = 0.006 and P = 0.009) at BIS85 (1,100 ± 400 and 750 ± 400), BIS70 (1,200 ± 460 and 850 ± 490), BIS55 (1,300 ± 560 and 940 ± 700), and BIS40 (1,400 ± 570 and 1,300 ± 700). Whereas, in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, there was no difference in the location or number of spiking leads (P = 0.057 and P = 0.109) at the four BIS levels. Compared with BIS85, spike frequency in the propofol and sevoflurane groups increased 100 and 170% at BIS70, 116 and 180% at BIS55, and 132 and 230% at BIS40. Compared with BIS85, spike amplitude increased 108 and 113% at BIS70, 121 and 125% at BIS55, and 128 and 170% at BIS40. CONCLUSION:Decreasing BIS levels in the propofol and sevoflurane groups enhanced epileptogenic spike frequency and amplitude with the same location and number of spiking leads.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182976036
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492604432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1492604432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-ade6807ecfa8a8ab17a0751bc2db01d325cbc475e9b4f42849a7ded5e9d8627a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1v1DAQtRCILoV_gJAvSL2k-CuxcyxloSutALFwjhxnvGvqjYOdtN0b_4E7P66_BK-6UKknbFmj8bx5TzMPoZeUnFJSyzdny4-npCWUA6eK1bIivHqEZrRkqqBUlo_RjBDCC04YO0LPUvqeU1ly9RQdMV4JVVI1Q7_fOWshQj_izzEMwQZ_-_PXF9g6m_907zwOEa_gKlg_Rd3Dw-pblwYwY9QeL_oObvASrsAnbHPb3O8rwYQ4OhPWUQ8bZ_BqcJeAF11mcNYZPbrQ426Krl_j-eA8DGmHV1NcQ9w9R0-s9gleHOIx-vZ-_vX8olh--rA4P1sWRlRUFbqDShEJxmqVb0ulzqPS1rAub6jjrDStEbKEuhVWMCVqLTvoct6piknNj9HJHe8Qw48J0thsXTLgfZ44TKmhomYVEYKz_4AKLggnXGaouIOaGFKKYJshuq2Ou4aSZm9ik01sHpqY214dFKZ2C92_pr-uZcDrA0Ano73NvhiX7nEyL6Mq6b3-dfAjxHTpp2uIzQa0HzcN2Z9SsIJlfVLnpMgv0_8BqhK7MA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443403037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different Propofol–Remifentanil or Sevoflurane–Remifentanil Bispectral Index Levels for Electrocorticographic Spike Identification during Epilepsy Surgery</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</source><creator>Dahaba, Ashraf A. ; Yin, Jian ; Xiao, Zhaoyang ; Su, Jing ; Bornemann, Helmar ; Dong, Hailong ; Xiong, Lize</creator><creatorcontrib>Dahaba, Ashraf A. ; Yin, Jian ; Xiao, Zhaoyang ; Su, Jing ; Bornemann, Helmar ; Dong, Hailong ; Xiong, Lize</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Medical therapy, the cornerstone of managing epilepsy, still fails a substantial portion of patients. Little information is available regarding the potential impact of different bispectral index (BIS) levels on electrocorticographic spike identification for surgical epileptic foci resection. METHODS:Twenty-two intractable epilepsy subjects were randomly allocated to the propofol–remifentanil or sevoflurane–remifentanil groups, and were further randomized to four BIS85 (BIS 71–85), BIS70 (BIS 56–70), BIS55 (BIS 41–55), and BIS40 (BIS ≤40) sequence order. RESULTS:Two-way ANOVA revealed no differences between groups in spike frequency (P = 0.720), spike amplitude (P = 0.647), or number of spiking leads (P = 0.653). In the propofol and sevoflurane groups, decreasing BIS levels increased mean ± SD spike/min frequency (P &lt; 0.001 and P &lt; 0.001) at BIS85 (10 ± 12 and 10 ± 8), BIS70 (19 ± 17 and 17 ± 15), BIS55 (22 ± 17 and 18 ± 8), and BIS40 (25 ± 15 and 23 ± 17). Furthermore, in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, decreasing BIS levels increased spike microvolt amplitude (P = 0.006 and P = 0.009) at BIS85 (1,100 ± 400 and 750 ± 400), BIS70 (1,200 ± 460 and 850 ± 490), BIS55 (1,300 ± 560 and 940 ± 700), and BIS40 (1,400 ± 570 and 1,300 ± 700). Whereas, in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, there was no difference in the location or number of spiking leads (P = 0.057 and P = 0.109) at the four BIS levels. Compared with BIS85, spike frequency in the propofol and sevoflurane groups increased 100 and 170% at BIS70, 116 and 180% at BIS55, and 132 and 230% at BIS40. Compared with BIS85, spike amplitude increased 108 and 113% at BIS70, 121 and 125% at BIS55, and 128 and 170% at BIS40. CONCLUSION:Decreasing BIS levels in the propofol and sevoflurane groups enhanced epileptogenic spike frequency and amplitude with the same location and number of spiking leads.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182976036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23648518</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANESAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthetics - administration &amp; dosage ; Biological and medical sciences ; Electroencephalography - drug effects ; Epilepsy ; Epilepsy - physiopathology ; Epilepsy - surgery ; Female ; Headache. Facial pains. Syncopes. Epilepsia. Intracranial hypertension. Brain oedema. Cerebral palsy ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Methyl Ethers - administration &amp; dosage ; Methyl Ethers - pharmacology ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Piperidines - administration &amp; dosage ; Piperidines - pharmacology ; Propofol - administration &amp; dosage ; Propofol - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 2013-09, Vol.119 (3), p.582-592</ispartof><rights>2013 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-ade6807ecfa8a8ab17a0751bc2db01d325cbc475e9b4f42849a7ded5e9d8627a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-ade6807ecfa8a8ab17a0751bc2db01d325cbc475e9b4f42849a7ded5e9d8627a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27680651$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23648518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dahaba, Ashraf A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Zhaoyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bornemann, Helmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Hailong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Lize</creatorcontrib><title>Different Propofol–Remifentanil or Sevoflurane–Remifentanil Bispectral Index Levels for Electrocorticographic Spike Identification during Epilepsy Surgery</title><title>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</title><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Medical therapy, the cornerstone of managing epilepsy, still fails a substantial portion of patients. Little information is available regarding the potential impact of different bispectral index (BIS) levels on electrocorticographic spike identification for surgical epileptic foci resection. METHODS:Twenty-two intractable epilepsy subjects were randomly allocated to the propofol–remifentanil or sevoflurane–remifentanil groups, and were further randomized to four BIS85 (BIS 71–85), BIS70 (BIS 56–70), BIS55 (BIS 41–55), and BIS40 (BIS ≤40) sequence order. RESULTS:Two-way ANOVA revealed no differences between groups in spike frequency (P = 0.720), spike amplitude (P = 0.647), or number of spiking leads (P = 0.653). In the propofol and sevoflurane groups, decreasing BIS levels increased mean ± SD spike/min frequency (P &lt; 0.001 and P &lt; 0.001) at BIS85 (10 ± 12 and 10 ± 8), BIS70 (19 ± 17 and 17 ± 15), BIS55 (22 ± 17 and 18 ± 8), and BIS40 (25 ± 15 and 23 ± 17). Furthermore, in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, decreasing BIS levels increased spike microvolt amplitude (P = 0.006 and P = 0.009) at BIS85 (1,100 ± 400 and 750 ± 400), BIS70 (1,200 ± 460 and 850 ± 490), BIS55 (1,300 ± 560 and 940 ± 700), and BIS40 (1,400 ± 570 and 1,300 ± 700). Whereas, in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, there was no difference in the location or number of spiking leads (P = 0.057 and P = 0.109) at the four BIS levels. Compared with BIS85, spike frequency in the propofol and sevoflurane groups increased 100 and 170% at BIS70, 116 and 180% at BIS55, and 132 and 230% at BIS40. Compared with BIS85, spike amplitude increased 108 and 113% at BIS70, 121 and 125% at BIS55, and 128 and 170% at BIS40. CONCLUSION:Decreasing BIS levels in the propofol and sevoflurane groups enhanced epileptogenic spike frequency and amplitude with the same location and number of spiking leads.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthetics - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - drug effects</subject><subject>Epilepsy</subject><subject>Epilepsy - physiopathology</subject><subject>Epilepsy - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Headache. Facial pains. Syncopes. Epilepsia. Intracranial hypertension. Brain oedema. Cerebral palsy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methyl Ethers - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Methyl Ethers - pharmacology</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Piperidines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Piperidines - pharmacology</subject><subject>Propofol - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Propofol - pharmacology</subject><issn>0003-3022</issn><issn>1528-1175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUU1v1DAQtRCILoV_gJAvSL2k-CuxcyxloSutALFwjhxnvGvqjYOdtN0b_4E7P66_BK-6UKknbFmj8bx5TzMPoZeUnFJSyzdny4-npCWUA6eK1bIivHqEZrRkqqBUlo_RjBDCC04YO0LPUvqeU1ly9RQdMV4JVVI1Q7_fOWshQj_izzEMwQZ_-_PXF9g6m_907zwOEa_gKlg_Rd3Dw-pblwYwY9QeL_oObvASrsAnbHPb3O8rwYQ4OhPWUQ8bZ_BqcJeAF11mcNYZPbrQ426Krl_j-eA8DGmHV1NcQ9w9R0-s9gleHOIx-vZ-_vX8olh--rA4P1sWRlRUFbqDShEJxmqVb0ulzqPS1rAub6jjrDStEbKEuhVWMCVqLTvoct6piknNj9HJHe8Qw48J0thsXTLgfZ44TKmhomYVEYKz_4AKLggnXGaouIOaGFKKYJshuq2Ou4aSZm9ik01sHpqY214dFKZ2C92_pr-uZcDrA0Ano73NvhiX7nEyL6Mq6b3-dfAjxHTpp2uIzQa0HzcN2Z9SsIJlfVLnpMgv0_8BqhK7MA</recordid><startdate>201309</startdate><enddate>201309</enddate><creator>Dahaba, Ashraf A.</creator><creator>Yin, Jian</creator><creator>Xiao, Zhaoyang</creator><creator>Su, Jing</creator><creator>Bornemann, Helmar</creator><creator>Dong, Hailong</creator><creator>Xiong, Lize</creator><general>American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201309</creationdate><title>Different Propofol–Remifentanil or Sevoflurane–Remifentanil Bispectral Index Levels for Electrocorticographic Spike Identification during Epilepsy Surgery</title><author>Dahaba, Ashraf A. ; Yin, Jian ; Xiao, Zhaoyang ; Su, Jing ; Bornemann, Helmar ; Dong, Hailong ; Xiong, Lize</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-ade6807ecfa8a8ab17a0751bc2db01d325cbc475e9b4f42849a7ded5e9d8627a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthetics - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - drug effects</topic><topic>Epilepsy</topic><topic>Epilepsy - physiopathology</topic><topic>Epilepsy - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Headache. Facial pains. Syncopes. Epilepsia. Intracranial hypertension. Brain oedema. Cerebral palsy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methyl Ethers - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Methyl Ethers - pharmacology</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Piperidines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Piperidines - pharmacology</topic><topic>Propofol - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Propofol - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dahaba, Ashraf A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Zhaoyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bornemann, Helmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Hailong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Lize</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dahaba, Ashraf A.</au><au>Yin, Jian</au><au>Xiao, Zhaoyang</au><au>Su, Jing</au><au>Bornemann, Helmar</au><au>Dong, Hailong</au><au>Xiong, Lize</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different Propofol–Remifentanil or Sevoflurane–Remifentanil Bispectral Index Levels for Electrocorticographic Spike Identification during Epilepsy Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><date>2013-09</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>582</spage><epage>592</epage><pages>582-592</pages><issn>0003-3022</issn><eissn>1528-1175</eissn><coden>ANESAV</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND:Medical therapy, the cornerstone of managing epilepsy, still fails a substantial portion of patients. Little information is available regarding the potential impact of different bispectral index (BIS) levels on electrocorticographic spike identification for surgical epileptic foci resection. METHODS:Twenty-two intractable epilepsy subjects were randomly allocated to the propofol–remifentanil or sevoflurane–remifentanil groups, and were further randomized to four BIS85 (BIS 71–85), BIS70 (BIS 56–70), BIS55 (BIS 41–55), and BIS40 (BIS ≤40) sequence order. RESULTS:Two-way ANOVA revealed no differences between groups in spike frequency (P = 0.720), spike amplitude (P = 0.647), or number of spiking leads (P = 0.653). In the propofol and sevoflurane groups, decreasing BIS levels increased mean ± SD spike/min frequency (P &lt; 0.001 and P &lt; 0.001) at BIS85 (10 ± 12 and 10 ± 8), BIS70 (19 ± 17 and 17 ± 15), BIS55 (22 ± 17 and 18 ± 8), and BIS40 (25 ± 15 and 23 ± 17). Furthermore, in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, decreasing BIS levels increased spike microvolt amplitude (P = 0.006 and P = 0.009) at BIS85 (1,100 ± 400 and 750 ± 400), BIS70 (1,200 ± 460 and 850 ± 490), BIS55 (1,300 ± 560 and 940 ± 700), and BIS40 (1,400 ± 570 and 1,300 ± 700). Whereas, in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, there was no difference in the location or number of spiking leads (P = 0.057 and P = 0.109) at the four BIS levels. Compared with BIS85, spike frequency in the propofol and sevoflurane groups increased 100 and 170% at BIS70, 116 and 180% at BIS55, and 132 and 230% at BIS40. Compared with BIS85, spike amplitude increased 108 and 113% at BIS70, 121 and 125% at BIS55, and 128 and 170% at BIS40. CONCLUSION:Decreasing BIS levels in the propofol and sevoflurane groups enhanced epileptogenic spike frequency and amplitude with the same location and number of spiking leads.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc</pub><pmid>23648518</pmid><doi>10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182976036</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3022
ispartof Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 2013-09, Vol.119 (3), p.582-592
issn 0003-3022
1528-1175
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492604432
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Anesthetics - administration & dosage
Biological and medical sciences
Electroencephalography - drug effects
Epilepsy
Epilepsy - physiopathology
Epilepsy - surgery
Female
Headache. Facial pains. Syncopes. Epilepsia. Intracranial hypertension. Brain oedema. Cerebral palsy
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Methyl Ethers - administration & dosage
Methyl Ethers - pharmacology
Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)
Neurology
Piperidines - administration & dosage
Piperidines - pharmacology
Propofol - administration & dosage
Propofol - pharmacology
title Different Propofol–Remifentanil or Sevoflurane–Remifentanil Bispectral Index Levels for Electrocorticographic Spike Identification during Epilepsy Surgery
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A33%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20Propofol%E2%80%93Remifentanil%20or%20Sevoflurane%E2%80%93Remifentanil%20Bispectral%20Index%20Levels%20for%20Electrocorticographic%20Spike%20Identification%20during%20Epilepsy%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Anesthesiology%20(Philadelphia)&rft.au=Dahaba,%20Ashraf%20A.&rft.date=2013-09&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=582&rft.epage=592&rft.pages=582-592&rft.issn=0003-3022&rft.eissn=1528-1175&rft.coden=ANESAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182976036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1492604432%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-ade6807ecfa8a8ab17a0751bc2db01d325cbc475e9b4f42849a7ded5e9d8627a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443403037&rft_id=info:pmid/23648518&rfr_iscdi=true