Loading…
Conservation Program Participation and Adaptive Rangeland Decision-Making
This paper analyzes rancher participation in conservation programs in the context of a social-ecological framework for adaptive rangeland decision-making. We argue that conservation programs are best understood as one of many strategies of adaptively managing rangelands in ways that sustain liveliho...
Saved in:
Published in: | Rangeland ecology & management 2013-11, Vol.66 (6), p.609-620 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b491t-1b5d64dc3d82bfa9b0a1ce6c6b24f21ee945165850071a4dca1d030b3430d6043 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b491t-1b5d64dc3d82bfa9b0a1ce6c6b24f21ee945165850071a4dca1d030b3430d6043 |
container_end_page | 620 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 609 |
container_title | Rangeland ecology & management |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Lubell, M. N. Cutts, B. B. Roche, L. M. Hamilton, M. Derner, J. D. Kachergis, E. Tate, K. W. |
description | This paper analyzes rancher participation in conservation programs in the context of a social-ecological framework for adaptive rangeland decision-making. We argue that conservation programs are best understood as one of many strategies of adaptively managing rangelands in ways that sustain livelihoods and ecosystem services. The framework hypothesizes four categories of variables affecting conservation program participation: operation/operator characteristics, time horizon, social network connections, and social values. Based on a mail survey of California ranchers, multinomial logit models are used to estimate the impact of these variables on different levels of rancher involvement in conservation programs. The findings suggest that ranchers with larger amounts of land, an orientation towards the future, and who are opinion leaders with access to conservation information, are more likely to participate in conservation programs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2111/REM-D-13-00025.1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492616031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42569161</jstor_id><els_id>S1550742413500765</els_id><sourcerecordid>42569161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b491t-1b5d64dc3d82bfa9b0a1ce6c6b24f21ee945165850071a4dca1d030b3430d6043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1rGzEQxZfSQFOn914Chl56kTOjL3t7C3Y-DA4JIT0LrTQ2cu2VK60N-e-z6y055NDkNMO83xtGekXxHWHEEfHi8eqOzRgKBgBcjfBTcYpKIVPAJ5-PPbCx5PJL8TXnNYDQiOPTYj6NdaZ0sE2I9fAhxVWy2-GDTU1wYddPbe2Hl97umnCg4aOtV7TpRjNyIbc6u7N_Qr06K06WdpPp2786KH5fXz1Nb9ni_mY-vVywSpbYMKyU19I74Se8WtqyAouOtNMVl0uORKVUqNVEAYzRtqBFDwIqIQV4DVIMip_93l2Kf_eUG7MN2dGmvYniPhtUgELzUn0AlSXXqEFgi_54g67jPtXtQ1pKTxSXnHcU9JRLMedES7NLYWvTs0EwXQymjcHMDApzjMF0lvPess5NTK-85EqXqDv9V69T-2eHQMlkF6h25EMi1xgfw_-Wj3pzFWKs6f1rXgC3naQz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1468524221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conservation Program Participation and Adaptive Rangeland Decision-Making</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lubell, M. N. ; Cutts, B. B. ; Roche, L. M. ; Hamilton, M. ; Derner, J. D. ; Kachergis, E. ; Tate, K. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lubell, M. N. ; Cutts, B. B. ; Roche, L. M. ; Hamilton, M. ; Derner, J. D. ; Kachergis, E. ; Tate, K. W.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyzes rancher participation in conservation programs in the context of a social-ecological framework for adaptive rangeland decision-making. We argue that conservation programs are best understood as one of many strategies of adaptively managing rangelands in ways that sustain livelihoods and ecosystem services. The framework hypothesizes four categories of variables affecting conservation program participation: operation/operator characteristics, time horizon, social network connections, and social values. Based on a mail survey of California ranchers, multinomial logit models are used to estimate the impact of these variables on different levels of rancher involvement in conservation programs. The findings suggest that ranchers with larger amounts of land, an orientation towards the future, and who are opinion leaders with access to conservation information, are more likely to participate in conservation programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-7424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-5028</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2111/REM-D-13-00025.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence: the Society for Range Management</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; California ; citizen participation ; Conservation programs ; Decision making ; ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environmental protection ; Information resources ; livelihood ; logit analysis ; management ; Natural resources conservation ; Opinion leaders ; Participation ; public opinion ; ranchers ; Ranching ; Range management ; Rangeland ecology ; rangelands ; Research s ; social behavior ; Social networking ; social networks ; surveys ; Sustainability ; Sustainable agriculture ; Tax assessments</subject><ispartof>Rangeland ecology & management, 2013-11, Vol.66 (6), p.609-620</ispartof><rights>2013 The Society for Range Management</rights><rights>Copyright 2013 Society for Range Management</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Nov 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b491t-1b5d64dc3d82bfa9b0a1ce6c6b24f21ee945165850071a4dca1d030b3430d6043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b491t-1b5d64dc3d82bfa9b0a1ce6c6b24f21ee945165850071a4dca1d030b3430d6043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42569161$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42569161$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,58219,58452</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lubell, M. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutts, B. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, L. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derner, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachergis, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tate, K. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Conservation Program Participation and Adaptive Rangeland Decision-Making</title><title>Rangeland ecology & management</title><description>This paper analyzes rancher participation in conservation programs in the context of a social-ecological framework for adaptive rangeland decision-making. We argue that conservation programs are best understood as one of many strategies of adaptively managing rangelands in ways that sustain livelihoods and ecosystem services. The framework hypothesizes four categories of variables affecting conservation program participation: operation/operator characteristics, time horizon, social network connections, and social values. Based on a mail survey of California ranchers, multinomial logit models are used to estimate the impact of these variables on different levels of rancher involvement in conservation programs. The findings suggest that ranchers with larger amounts of land, an orientation towards the future, and who are opinion leaders with access to conservation information, are more likely to participate in conservation programs.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>citizen participation</subject><subject>Conservation programs</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Information resources</subject><subject>livelihood</subject><subject>logit analysis</subject><subject>management</subject><subject>Natural resources conservation</subject><subject>Opinion leaders</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>public opinion</subject><subject>ranchers</subject><subject>Ranching</subject><subject>Range management</subject><subject>Rangeland ecology</subject><subject>rangelands</subject><subject>Research s</subject><subject>social behavior</subject><subject>Social networking</subject><subject>social networks</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Tax assessments</subject><issn>1550-7424</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1rGzEQxZfSQFOn914Chl56kTOjL3t7C3Y-DA4JIT0LrTQ2cu2VK60N-e-z6y055NDkNMO83xtGekXxHWHEEfHi8eqOzRgKBgBcjfBTcYpKIVPAJ5-PPbCx5PJL8TXnNYDQiOPTYj6NdaZ0sE2I9fAhxVWy2-GDTU1wYddPbe2Hl97umnCg4aOtV7TpRjNyIbc6u7N_Qr06K06WdpPp2786KH5fXz1Nb9ni_mY-vVywSpbYMKyU19I74Se8WtqyAouOtNMVl0uORKVUqNVEAYzRtqBFDwIqIQV4DVIMip_93l2Kf_eUG7MN2dGmvYniPhtUgELzUn0AlSXXqEFgi_54g67jPtXtQ1pKTxSXnHcU9JRLMedES7NLYWvTs0EwXQymjcHMDApzjMF0lvPess5NTK-85EqXqDv9V69T-2eHQMlkF6h25EMi1xgfw_-Wj3pzFWKs6f1rXgC3naQz</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Lubell, M. N.</creator><creator>Cutts, B. B.</creator><creator>Roche, L. M.</creator><creator>Hamilton, M.</creator><creator>Derner, J. D.</creator><creator>Kachergis, E.</creator><creator>Tate, K. W.</creator><general>the Society for Range Management</general><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Allen Press Publishing Services</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Conservation Program Participation and Adaptive Rangeland Decision-Making</title><author>Lubell, M. N. ; Cutts, B. B. ; Roche, L. M. ; Hamilton, M. ; Derner, J. D. ; Kachergis, E. ; Tate, K. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b491t-1b5d64dc3d82bfa9b0a1ce6c6b24f21ee945165850071a4dca1d030b3430d6043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>citizen participation</topic><topic>Conservation programs</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Information resources</topic><topic>livelihood</topic><topic>logit analysis</topic><topic>management</topic><topic>Natural resources conservation</topic><topic>Opinion leaders</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>public opinion</topic><topic>ranchers</topic><topic>Ranching</topic><topic>Range management</topic><topic>Rangeland ecology</topic><topic>rangelands</topic><topic>Research s</topic><topic>social behavior</topic><topic>Social networking</topic><topic>social networks</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Tax assessments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lubell, M. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutts, B. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, L. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derner, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachergis, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tate, K. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Rangeland ecology & management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lubell, M. N.</au><au>Cutts, B. B.</au><au>Roche, L. M.</au><au>Hamilton, M.</au><au>Derner, J. D.</au><au>Kachergis, E.</au><au>Tate, K. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conservation Program Participation and Adaptive Rangeland Decision-Making</atitle><jtitle>Rangeland ecology & management</jtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>609</spage><epage>620</epage><pages>609-620</pages><issn>1550-7424</issn><eissn>1551-5028</eissn><abstract>This paper analyzes rancher participation in conservation programs in the context of a social-ecological framework for adaptive rangeland decision-making. We argue that conservation programs are best understood as one of many strategies of adaptively managing rangelands in ways that sustain livelihoods and ecosystem services. The framework hypothesizes four categories of variables affecting conservation program participation: operation/operator characteristics, time horizon, social network connections, and social values. Based on a mail survey of California ranchers, multinomial logit models are used to estimate the impact of these variables on different levels of rancher involvement in conservation programs. The findings suggest that ranchers with larger amounts of land, an orientation towards the future, and who are opinion leaders with access to conservation information, are more likely to participate in conservation programs.</abstract><cop>Lawrence</cop><pub>the Society for Range Management</pub><doi>10.2111/REM-D-13-00025.1</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1550-7424 |
ispartof | Rangeland ecology & management, 2013-11, Vol.66 (6), p.609-620 |
issn | 1550-7424 1551-5028 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492616031 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agricultural management California citizen participation Conservation programs Decision making ecosystem services Ecosystems Environmental protection Information resources livelihood logit analysis management Natural resources conservation Opinion leaders Participation public opinion ranchers Ranching Range management Rangeland ecology rangelands Research s social behavior Social networking social networks surveys Sustainability Sustainable agriculture Tax assessments |
title | Conservation Program Participation and Adaptive Rangeland Decision-Making |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T20%3A51%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conservation%20Program%20Participation%20and%20Adaptive%20Rangeland%20Decision-Making&rft.jtitle=Rangeland%20ecology%20&%20management&rft.au=Lubell,%20M.%20N.&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=609&rft.epage=620&rft.pages=609-620&rft.issn=1550-7424&rft.eissn=1551-5028&rft_id=info:doi/10.2111/REM-D-13-00025.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42569161%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b491t-1b5d64dc3d82bfa9b0a1ce6c6b24f21ee945165850071a4dca1d030b3430d6043%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1468524221&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42569161&rfr_iscdi=true |