Loading…

Conservation Program Participation and Adaptive Rangeland Decision-Making

This paper analyzes rancher participation in conservation programs in the context of a social-ecological framework for adaptive rangeland decision-making. We argue that conservation programs are best understood as one of many strategies of adaptively managing rangelands in ways that sustain liveliho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rangeland ecology & management 2013-11, Vol.66 (6), p.609-620
Main Authors: Lubell, M. N., Cutts, B. B., Roche, L. M., Hamilton, M., Derner, J. D., Kachergis, E., Tate, K. W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b491t-1b5d64dc3d82bfa9b0a1ce6c6b24f21ee945165850071a4dca1d030b3430d6043
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b491t-1b5d64dc3d82bfa9b0a1ce6c6b24f21ee945165850071a4dca1d030b3430d6043
container_end_page 620
container_issue 6
container_start_page 609
container_title Rangeland ecology & management
container_volume 66
creator Lubell, M. N.
Cutts, B. B.
Roche, L. M.
Hamilton, M.
Derner, J. D.
Kachergis, E.
Tate, K. W.
description This paper analyzes rancher participation in conservation programs in the context of a social-ecological framework for adaptive rangeland decision-making. We argue that conservation programs are best understood as one of many strategies of adaptively managing rangelands in ways that sustain livelihoods and ecosystem services. The framework hypothesizes four categories of variables affecting conservation program participation: operation/operator characteristics, time horizon, social network connections, and social values. Based on a mail survey of California ranchers, multinomial logit models are used to estimate the impact of these variables on different levels of rancher involvement in conservation programs. The findings suggest that ranchers with larger amounts of land, an orientation towards the future, and who are opinion leaders with access to conservation information, are more likely to participate in conservation programs.
doi_str_mv 10.2111/REM-D-13-00025.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492616031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42569161</jstor_id><els_id>S1550742413500765</els_id><sourcerecordid>42569161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b491t-1b5d64dc3d82bfa9b0a1ce6c6b24f21ee945165850071a4dca1d030b3430d6043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1rGzEQxZfSQFOn914Chl56kTOjL3t7C3Y-DA4JIT0LrTQ2cu2VK60N-e-z6y055NDkNMO83xtGekXxHWHEEfHi8eqOzRgKBgBcjfBTcYpKIVPAJ5-PPbCx5PJL8TXnNYDQiOPTYj6NdaZ0sE2I9fAhxVWy2-GDTU1wYddPbe2Hl97umnCg4aOtV7TpRjNyIbc6u7N_Qr06K06WdpPp2786KH5fXz1Nb9ni_mY-vVywSpbYMKyU19I74Se8WtqyAouOtNMVl0uORKVUqNVEAYzRtqBFDwIqIQV4DVIMip_93l2Kf_eUG7MN2dGmvYniPhtUgELzUn0AlSXXqEFgi_54g67jPtXtQ1pKTxSXnHcU9JRLMedES7NLYWvTs0EwXQymjcHMDApzjMF0lvPess5NTK-85EqXqDv9V69T-2eHQMlkF6h25EMi1xgfw_-Wj3pzFWKs6f1rXgC3naQz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1468524221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conservation Program Participation and Adaptive Rangeland Decision-Making</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lubell, M. N. ; Cutts, B. B. ; Roche, L. M. ; Hamilton, M. ; Derner, J. D. ; Kachergis, E. ; Tate, K. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lubell, M. N. ; Cutts, B. B. ; Roche, L. M. ; Hamilton, M. ; Derner, J. D. ; Kachergis, E. ; Tate, K. W.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyzes rancher participation in conservation programs in the context of a social-ecological framework for adaptive rangeland decision-making. We argue that conservation programs are best understood as one of many strategies of adaptively managing rangelands in ways that sustain livelihoods and ecosystem services. The framework hypothesizes four categories of variables affecting conservation program participation: operation/operator characteristics, time horizon, social network connections, and social values. Based on a mail survey of California ranchers, multinomial logit models are used to estimate the impact of these variables on different levels of rancher involvement in conservation programs. The findings suggest that ranchers with larger amounts of land, an orientation towards the future, and who are opinion leaders with access to conservation information, are more likely to participate in conservation programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-7424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-5028</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2111/REM-D-13-00025.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence: the Society for Range Management</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; California ; citizen participation ; Conservation programs ; Decision making ; ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environmental protection ; Information resources ; livelihood ; logit analysis ; management ; Natural resources conservation ; Opinion leaders ; Participation ; public opinion ; ranchers ; Ranching ; Range management ; Rangeland ecology ; rangelands ; Research s ; social behavior ; Social networking ; social networks ; surveys ; Sustainability ; Sustainable agriculture ; Tax assessments</subject><ispartof>Rangeland ecology &amp; management, 2013-11, Vol.66 (6), p.609-620</ispartof><rights>2013 The Society for Range Management</rights><rights>Copyright 2013 Society for Range Management</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Nov 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b491t-1b5d64dc3d82bfa9b0a1ce6c6b24f21ee945165850071a4dca1d030b3430d6043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b491t-1b5d64dc3d82bfa9b0a1ce6c6b24f21ee945165850071a4dca1d030b3430d6043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42569161$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42569161$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,58219,58452</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lubell, M. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutts, B. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, L. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derner, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachergis, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tate, K. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Conservation Program Participation and Adaptive Rangeland Decision-Making</title><title>Rangeland ecology &amp; management</title><description>This paper analyzes rancher participation in conservation programs in the context of a social-ecological framework for adaptive rangeland decision-making. We argue that conservation programs are best understood as one of many strategies of adaptively managing rangelands in ways that sustain livelihoods and ecosystem services. The framework hypothesizes four categories of variables affecting conservation program participation: operation/operator characteristics, time horizon, social network connections, and social values. Based on a mail survey of California ranchers, multinomial logit models are used to estimate the impact of these variables on different levels of rancher involvement in conservation programs. The findings suggest that ranchers with larger amounts of land, an orientation towards the future, and who are opinion leaders with access to conservation information, are more likely to participate in conservation programs.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>citizen participation</subject><subject>Conservation programs</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Information resources</subject><subject>livelihood</subject><subject>logit analysis</subject><subject>management</subject><subject>Natural resources conservation</subject><subject>Opinion leaders</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>public opinion</subject><subject>ranchers</subject><subject>Ranching</subject><subject>Range management</subject><subject>Rangeland ecology</subject><subject>rangelands</subject><subject>Research s</subject><subject>social behavior</subject><subject>Social networking</subject><subject>social networks</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Tax assessments</subject><issn>1550-7424</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1rGzEQxZfSQFOn914Chl56kTOjL3t7C3Y-DA4JIT0LrTQ2cu2VK60N-e-z6y055NDkNMO83xtGekXxHWHEEfHi8eqOzRgKBgBcjfBTcYpKIVPAJ5-PPbCx5PJL8TXnNYDQiOPTYj6NdaZ0sE2I9fAhxVWy2-GDTU1wYddPbe2Hl97umnCg4aOtV7TpRjNyIbc6u7N_Qr06K06WdpPp2786KH5fXz1Nb9ni_mY-vVywSpbYMKyU19I74Se8WtqyAouOtNMVl0uORKVUqNVEAYzRtqBFDwIqIQV4DVIMip_93l2Kf_eUG7MN2dGmvYniPhtUgELzUn0AlSXXqEFgi_54g67jPtXtQ1pKTxSXnHcU9JRLMedES7NLYWvTs0EwXQymjcHMDApzjMF0lvPess5NTK-85EqXqDv9V69T-2eHQMlkF6h25EMi1xgfw_-Wj3pzFWKs6f1rXgC3naQz</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Lubell, M. N.</creator><creator>Cutts, B. B.</creator><creator>Roche, L. M.</creator><creator>Hamilton, M.</creator><creator>Derner, J. D.</creator><creator>Kachergis, E.</creator><creator>Tate, K. W.</creator><general>the Society for Range Management</general><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Allen Press Publishing Services</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Conservation Program Participation and Adaptive Rangeland Decision-Making</title><author>Lubell, M. N. ; Cutts, B. B. ; Roche, L. M. ; Hamilton, M. ; Derner, J. D. ; Kachergis, E. ; Tate, K. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b491t-1b5d64dc3d82bfa9b0a1ce6c6b24f21ee945165850071a4dca1d030b3430d6043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>citizen participation</topic><topic>Conservation programs</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Information resources</topic><topic>livelihood</topic><topic>logit analysis</topic><topic>management</topic><topic>Natural resources conservation</topic><topic>Opinion leaders</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>public opinion</topic><topic>ranchers</topic><topic>Ranching</topic><topic>Range management</topic><topic>Rangeland ecology</topic><topic>rangelands</topic><topic>Research s</topic><topic>social behavior</topic><topic>Social networking</topic><topic>social networks</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Tax assessments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lubell, M. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutts, B. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, L. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derner, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachergis, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tate, K. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Rangeland ecology &amp; management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lubell, M. N.</au><au>Cutts, B. B.</au><au>Roche, L. M.</au><au>Hamilton, M.</au><au>Derner, J. D.</au><au>Kachergis, E.</au><au>Tate, K. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conservation Program Participation and Adaptive Rangeland Decision-Making</atitle><jtitle>Rangeland ecology &amp; management</jtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>609</spage><epage>620</epage><pages>609-620</pages><issn>1550-7424</issn><eissn>1551-5028</eissn><abstract>This paper analyzes rancher participation in conservation programs in the context of a social-ecological framework for adaptive rangeland decision-making. We argue that conservation programs are best understood as one of many strategies of adaptively managing rangelands in ways that sustain livelihoods and ecosystem services. The framework hypothesizes four categories of variables affecting conservation program participation: operation/operator characteristics, time horizon, social network connections, and social values. Based on a mail survey of California ranchers, multinomial logit models are used to estimate the impact of these variables on different levels of rancher involvement in conservation programs. The findings suggest that ranchers with larger amounts of land, an orientation towards the future, and who are opinion leaders with access to conservation information, are more likely to participate in conservation programs.</abstract><cop>Lawrence</cop><pub>the Society for Range Management</pub><doi>10.2111/REM-D-13-00025.1</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1550-7424
ispartof Rangeland ecology & management, 2013-11, Vol.66 (6), p.609-620
issn 1550-7424
1551-5028
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492616031
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agricultural management
California
citizen participation
Conservation programs
Decision making
ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Environmental protection
Information resources
livelihood
logit analysis
management
Natural resources conservation
Opinion leaders
Participation
public opinion
ranchers
Ranching
Range management
Rangeland ecology
rangelands
Research s
social behavior
Social networking
social networks
surveys
Sustainability
Sustainable agriculture
Tax assessments
title Conservation Program Participation and Adaptive Rangeland Decision-Making
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T20%3A51%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conservation%20Program%20Participation%20and%20Adaptive%20Rangeland%20Decision-Making&rft.jtitle=Rangeland%20ecology%20&%20management&rft.au=Lubell,%20M.%20N.&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=609&rft.epage=620&rft.pages=609-620&rft.issn=1550-7424&rft.eissn=1551-5028&rft_id=info:doi/10.2111/REM-D-13-00025.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42569161%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b491t-1b5d64dc3d82bfa9b0a1ce6c6b24f21ee945165850071a4dca1d030b3430d6043%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1468524221&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42569161&rfr_iscdi=true