Loading…

Interacting biocontrol programmes: invasive cane toads reduce rates of breakdown of cowpats by dung beetles

Ecological interactions among invasive species can affect not only the success of the invaders, but also their impact on ecosystems in the invaded range. In Australia, both dung beetles (subfamily Scarabaeinae) and cane toads (Rhinella marina) were introduced for biocontrol: the beetles to break dow...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Austral ecology 2013-12, Vol.38 (8), p.891-895
Main Authors: González-Bernal, Edna, Greenlees, Matthew J., Brown, Gregory P., Shine, Richard
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-859dfa5cf6686c831d1468da13f8c01124f0cecb74ea7e54db6c8f2d778c6bbc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-859dfa5cf6686c831d1468da13f8c01124f0cecb74ea7e54db6c8f2d778c6bbc3
container_end_page 895
container_issue 8
container_start_page 891
container_title Austral ecology
container_volume 38
creator González-Bernal, Edna
Greenlees, Matthew J.
Brown, Gregory P.
Shine, Richard
description Ecological interactions among invasive species can affect not only the success of the invaders, but also their impact on ecosystems in the invaded range. In Australia, both dung beetles (subfamily Scarabaeinae) and cane toads (Rhinella marina) were introduced for biocontrol: the beetles to break down bovine faeces piles (cowpats) that otherwise accumulate and reduce pasture productivity, and the cane toad to consume scarab beetles that eat sugarcane and thus reduce sugar production. The dung beetles have been a success, whereas the toads have been a failure. Our experimental studies show that as well as impacting native fauna directly, cane toads reduce the rate of cowpat breakdown by consuming dung beetles. In the laboratory, dehydrated toads actively sought out cowpats based on scent cues, and in field enclosures, the presence of a cane toad significantly reduced rates of cowpat decomposition. Although toads have benefited from agricultural activities, their spread across Australia likely has reduced the effectiveness of one of the most successful biocontrol programmes ever conducted in that continent.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aec.12028
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492619581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3138269461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-859dfa5cf6686c831d1468da13f8c01124f0cecb74ea7e54db6c8f2d778c6bbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1v0zAUhiMEEmPsgn9gCSHBRTY7dhyHu6ka7aTxoWkD7qwT-2Tymsad7az03-PS0QskfGNbet5H57xF8YbRU5bPGaA5ZRWt1LPiiAlRlW3b8ueHt6pfFq9ivKeUKtmyo2J5OSYMYJIb70jnvPFjCn4g6-DvAqxWGD8SNz5CdI9IDIxIkgcbSUA7GSQBEkbie9IFhKX1m3H3MX6zhhRJtyV22nkR04DxdfGihyHiydN9XNx-uriZLcqrr_PL2flVaQTnqlR1a3uoTS-lkkZxZpmQygLjvTKUsUr01KDpGoHQYC1sl6m-sk2jjOw6w4-L93tvXuJhwpj0ykWDw5DH91PUTLSVZG2tWEbf_oPe-ymMebpMSaZqLhuRqQ97ygQfY8Ber4NbQdhqRvWudp1r139qz-y7JyNEA0MfYDQuHgKVohWTnGbubM9t3IDb_wv1-cXsr7ncJ1xM-OuQgLDUsuFNrX98mevPc7n4_m1xrX_y3-0loRE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1461853674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interacting biocontrol programmes: invasive cane toads reduce rates of breakdown of cowpats by dung beetles</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>González-Bernal, Edna ; Greenlees, Matthew J. ; Brown, Gregory P. ; Shine, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>González-Bernal, Edna ; Greenlees, Matthew J. ; Brown, Gregory P. ; Shine, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Ecological interactions among invasive species can affect not only the success of the invaders, but also their impact on ecosystems in the invaded range. In Australia, both dung beetles (subfamily Scarabaeinae) and cane toads (Rhinella marina) were introduced for biocontrol: the beetles to break down bovine faeces piles (cowpats) that otherwise accumulate and reduce pasture productivity, and the cane toad to consume scarab beetles that eat sugarcane and thus reduce sugar production. The dung beetles have been a success, whereas the toads have been a failure. Our experimental studies show that as well as impacting native fauna directly, cane toads reduce the rate of cowpat breakdown by consuming dung beetles. In the laboratory, dehydrated toads actively sought out cowpats based on scent cues, and in field enclosures, the presence of a cane toad significantly reduced rates of cowpat decomposition. Although toads have benefited from agricultural activities, their spread across Australia likely has reduced the effectiveness of one of the most successful biocontrol programmes ever conducted in that continent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1442-9985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-9993</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aec.12028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Carlton: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>alien species ; Amphibia ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological control ; Conservation biology ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; dung beetle ; Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Insects ; invasional meltdown ; livestock production ; Nonnative species ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Rhinella marina ; Toads</subject><ispartof>Austral ecology, 2013-12, Vol.38 (8), p.891-895</ispartof><rights>2013 The Authors. Austral Ecology © 2013 Ecological Society of Australia</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013 Ecological Society of Australia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-859dfa5cf6686c831d1468da13f8c01124f0cecb74ea7e54db6c8f2d778c6bbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-859dfa5cf6686c831d1468da13f8c01124f0cecb74ea7e54db6c8f2d778c6bbc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28021630$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>González-Bernal, Edna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenlees, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gregory P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shine, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Interacting biocontrol programmes: invasive cane toads reduce rates of breakdown of cowpats by dung beetles</title><title>Austral ecology</title><addtitle>Austral Ecology</addtitle><description>Ecological interactions among invasive species can affect not only the success of the invaders, but also their impact on ecosystems in the invaded range. In Australia, both dung beetles (subfamily Scarabaeinae) and cane toads (Rhinella marina) were introduced for biocontrol: the beetles to break down bovine faeces piles (cowpats) that otherwise accumulate and reduce pasture productivity, and the cane toad to consume scarab beetles that eat sugarcane and thus reduce sugar production. The dung beetles have been a success, whereas the toads have been a failure. Our experimental studies show that as well as impacting native fauna directly, cane toads reduce the rate of cowpat breakdown by consuming dung beetles. In the laboratory, dehydrated toads actively sought out cowpats based on scent cues, and in field enclosures, the presence of a cane toad significantly reduced rates of cowpat decomposition. Although toads have benefited from agricultural activities, their spread across Australia likely has reduced the effectiveness of one of the most successful biocontrol programmes ever conducted in that continent.</description><subject>alien species</subject><subject>Amphibia</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>dung beetle</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>invasional meltdown</subject><subject>livestock production</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Rhinella marina</subject><subject>Toads</subject><issn>1442-9985</issn><issn>1442-9993</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1v0zAUhiMEEmPsgn9gCSHBRTY7dhyHu6ka7aTxoWkD7qwT-2Tymsad7az03-PS0QskfGNbet5H57xF8YbRU5bPGaA5ZRWt1LPiiAlRlW3b8ueHt6pfFq9ivKeUKtmyo2J5OSYMYJIb70jnvPFjCn4g6-DvAqxWGD8SNz5CdI9IDIxIkgcbSUA7GSQBEkbie9IFhKX1m3H3MX6zhhRJtyV22nkR04DxdfGihyHiydN9XNx-uriZLcqrr_PL2flVaQTnqlR1a3uoTS-lkkZxZpmQygLjvTKUsUr01KDpGoHQYC1sl6m-sk2jjOw6w4-L93tvXuJhwpj0ykWDw5DH91PUTLSVZG2tWEbf_oPe-ymMebpMSaZqLhuRqQ97ygQfY8Ber4NbQdhqRvWudp1r139qz-y7JyNEA0MfYDQuHgKVohWTnGbubM9t3IDb_wv1-cXsr7ncJ1xM-OuQgLDUsuFNrX98mevPc7n4_m1xrX_y3-0loRE</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>González-Bernal, Edna</creator><creator>Greenlees, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Brown, Gregory P.</creator><creator>Shine, Richard</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>Interacting biocontrol programmes: invasive cane toads reduce rates of breakdown of cowpats by dung beetles</title><author>González-Bernal, Edna ; Greenlees, Matthew J. ; Brown, Gregory P. ; Shine, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-859dfa5cf6686c831d1468da13f8c01124f0cecb74ea7e54db6c8f2d778c6bbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>alien species</topic><topic>Amphibia</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>dung beetle</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>invasional meltdown</topic><topic>livestock production</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Rhinella marina</topic><topic>Toads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>González-Bernal, Edna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenlees, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gregory P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shine, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Austral ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>González-Bernal, Edna</au><au>Greenlees, Matthew J.</au><au>Brown, Gregory P.</au><au>Shine, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interacting biocontrol programmes: invasive cane toads reduce rates of breakdown of cowpats by dung beetles</atitle><jtitle>Austral ecology</jtitle><addtitle>Austral Ecology</addtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>891</spage><epage>895</epage><pages>891-895</pages><issn>1442-9985</issn><eissn>1442-9993</eissn><abstract>Ecological interactions among invasive species can affect not only the success of the invaders, but also their impact on ecosystems in the invaded range. In Australia, both dung beetles (subfamily Scarabaeinae) and cane toads (Rhinella marina) were introduced for biocontrol: the beetles to break down bovine faeces piles (cowpats) that otherwise accumulate and reduce pasture productivity, and the cane toad to consume scarab beetles that eat sugarcane and thus reduce sugar production. The dung beetles have been a success, whereas the toads have been a failure. Our experimental studies show that as well as impacting native fauna directly, cane toads reduce the rate of cowpat breakdown by consuming dung beetles. In the laboratory, dehydrated toads actively sought out cowpats based on scent cues, and in field enclosures, the presence of a cane toad significantly reduced rates of cowpat decomposition. Although toads have benefited from agricultural activities, their spread across Australia likely has reduced the effectiveness of one of the most successful biocontrol programmes ever conducted in that continent.</abstract><cop>Carlton</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/aec.12028</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1442-9985
ispartof Austral ecology, 2013-12, Vol.38 (8), p.891-895
issn 1442-9985
1442-9993
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492619581
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects alien species
Amphibia
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biodiversity
Biological and medical sciences
Biological control
Conservation biology
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
dung beetle
Ecology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Insects
invasional meltdown
livestock production
Nonnative species
Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking
Rhinella marina
Toads
title Interacting biocontrol programmes: invasive cane toads reduce rates of breakdown of cowpats by dung beetles
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T07%3A48%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interacting%20biocontrol%20programmes:%20invasive%20cane%20toads%20reduce%20rates%20of%20breakdown%20of%20cowpats%20by%20dung%20beetles&rft.jtitle=Austral%20ecology&rft.au=Gonz%C3%A1lez-Bernal,%20Edna&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=891&rft.epage=895&rft.pages=891-895&rft.issn=1442-9985&rft.eissn=1442-9993&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aec.12028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3138269461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-859dfa5cf6686c831d1468da13f8c01124f0cecb74ea7e54db6c8f2d778c6bbc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1461853674&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true