Loading…
Interacting biocontrol programmes: invasive cane toads reduce rates of breakdown of cowpats by dung beetles
Ecological interactions among invasive species can affect not only the success of the invaders, but also their impact on ecosystems in the invaded range. In Australia, both dung beetles (subfamily Scarabaeinae) and cane toads (Rhinella marina) were introduced for biocontrol: the beetles to break dow...
Saved in:
Published in: | Austral ecology 2013-12, Vol.38 (8), p.891-895 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-859dfa5cf6686c831d1468da13f8c01124f0cecb74ea7e54db6c8f2d778c6bbc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-859dfa5cf6686c831d1468da13f8c01124f0cecb74ea7e54db6c8f2d778c6bbc3 |
container_end_page | 895 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 891 |
container_title | Austral ecology |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | González-Bernal, Edna Greenlees, Matthew J. Brown, Gregory P. Shine, Richard |
description | Ecological interactions among invasive species can affect not only the success of the invaders, but also their impact on ecosystems in the invaded range. In Australia, both dung beetles (subfamily Scarabaeinae) and cane toads (Rhinella marina) were introduced for biocontrol: the beetles to break down bovine faeces piles (cowpats) that otherwise accumulate and reduce pasture productivity, and the cane toad to consume scarab beetles that eat sugarcane and thus reduce sugar production. The dung beetles have been a success, whereas the toads have been a failure. Our experimental studies show that as well as impacting native fauna directly, cane toads reduce the rate of cowpat breakdown by consuming dung beetles. In the laboratory, dehydrated toads actively sought out cowpats based on scent cues, and in field enclosures, the presence of a cane toad significantly reduced rates of cowpat decomposition. Although toads have benefited from agricultural activities, their spread across Australia likely has reduced the effectiveness of one of the most successful biocontrol programmes ever conducted in that continent. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aec.12028 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492619581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3138269461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-859dfa5cf6686c831d1468da13f8c01124f0cecb74ea7e54db6c8f2d778c6bbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1v0zAUhiMEEmPsgn9gCSHBRTY7dhyHu6ka7aTxoWkD7qwT-2Tymsad7az03-PS0QskfGNbet5H57xF8YbRU5bPGaA5ZRWt1LPiiAlRlW3b8ueHt6pfFq9ivKeUKtmyo2J5OSYMYJIb70jnvPFjCn4g6-DvAqxWGD8SNz5CdI9IDIxIkgcbSUA7GSQBEkbie9IFhKX1m3H3MX6zhhRJtyV22nkR04DxdfGihyHiydN9XNx-uriZLcqrr_PL2flVaQTnqlR1a3uoTS-lkkZxZpmQygLjvTKUsUr01KDpGoHQYC1sl6m-sk2jjOw6w4-L93tvXuJhwpj0ykWDw5DH91PUTLSVZG2tWEbf_oPe-ymMebpMSaZqLhuRqQ97ygQfY8Ber4NbQdhqRvWudp1r139qz-y7JyNEA0MfYDQuHgKVohWTnGbubM9t3IDb_wv1-cXsr7ncJ1xM-OuQgLDUsuFNrX98mevPc7n4_m1xrX_y3-0loRE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1461853674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interacting biocontrol programmes: invasive cane toads reduce rates of breakdown of cowpats by dung beetles</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>González-Bernal, Edna ; Greenlees, Matthew J. ; Brown, Gregory P. ; Shine, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>González-Bernal, Edna ; Greenlees, Matthew J. ; Brown, Gregory P. ; Shine, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Ecological interactions among invasive species can affect not only the success of the invaders, but also their impact on ecosystems in the invaded range. In Australia, both dung beetles (subfamily Scarabaeinae) and cane toads (Rhinella marina) were introduced for biocontrol: the beetles to break down bovine faeces piles (cowpats) that otherwise accumulate and reduce pasture productivity, and the cane toad to consume scarab beetles that eat sugarcane and thus reduce sugar production. The dung beetles have been a success, whereas the toads have been a failure. Our experimental studies show that as well as impacting native fauna directly, cane toads reduce the rate of cowpat breakdown by consuming dung beetles. In the laboratory, dehydrated toads actively sought out cowpats based on scent cues, and in field enclosures, the presence of a cane toad significantly reduced rates of cowpat decomposition. Although toads have benefited from agricultural activities, their spread across Australia likely has reduced the effectiveness of one of the most successful biocontrol programmes ever conducted in that continent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1442-9985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-9993</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aec.12028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Carlton: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>alien species ; Amphibia ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological control ; Conservation biology ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; dung beetle ; Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Insects ; invasional meltdown ; livestock production ; Nonnative species ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Rhinella marina ; Toads</subject><ispartof>Austral ecology, 2013-12, Vol.38 (8), p.891-895</ispartof><rights>2013 The Authors. Austral Ecology © 2013 Ecological Society of Australia</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013 Ecological Society of Australia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-859dfa5cf6686c831d1468da13f8c01124f0cecb74ea7e54db6c8f2d778c6bbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-859dfa5cf6686c831d1468da13f8c01124f0cecb74ea7e54db6c8f2d778c6bbc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28021630$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>González-Bernal, Edna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenlees, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gregory P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shine, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Interacting biocontrol programmes: invasive cane toads reduce rates of breakdown of cowpats by dung beetles</title><title>Austral ecology</title><addtitle>Austral Ecology</addtitle><description>Ecological interactions among invasive species can affect not only the success of the invaders, but also their impact on ecosystems in the invaded range. In Australia, both dung beetles (subfamily Scarabaeinae) and cane toads (Rhinella marina) were introduced for biocontrol: the beetles to break down bovine faeces piles (cowpats) that otherwise accumulate and reduce pasture productivity, and the cane toad to consume scarab beetles that eat sugarcane and thus reduce sugar production. The dung beetles have been a success, whereas the toads have been a failure. Our experimental studies show that as well as impacting native fauna directly, cane toads reduce the rate of cowpat breakdown by consuming dung beetles. In the laboratory, dehydrated toads actively sought out cowpats based on scent cues, and in field enclosures, the presence of a cane toad significantly reduced rates of cowpat decomposition. Although toads have benefited from agricultural activities, their spread across Australia likely has reduced the effectiveness of one of the most successful biocontrol programmes ever conducted in that continent.</description><subject>alien species</subject><subject>Amphibia</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>dung beetle</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>invasional meltdown</subject><subject>livestock production</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Rhinella marina</subject><subject>Toads</subject><issn>1442-9985</issn><issn>1442-9993</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1v0zAUhiMEEmPsgn9gCSHBRTY7dhyHu6ka7aTxoWkD7qwT-2Tymsad7az03-PS0QskfGNbet5H57xF8YbRU5bPGaA5ZRWt1LPiiAlRlW3b8ueHt6pfFq9ivKeUKtmyo2J5OSYMYJIb70jnvPFjCn4g6-DvAqxWGD8SNz5CdI9IDIxIkgcbSUA7GSQBEkbie9IFhKX1m3H3MX6zhhRJtyV22nkR04DxdfGihyHiydN9XNx-uriZLcqrr_PL2flVaQTnqlR1a3uoTS-lkkZxZpmQygLjvTKUsUr01KDpGoHQYC1sl6m-sk2jjOw6w4-L93tvXuJhwpj0ykWDw5DH91PUTLSVZG2tWEbf_oPe-ymMebpMSaZqLhuRqQ97ygQfY8Ber4NbQdhqRvWudp1r139qz-y7JyNEA0MfYDQuHgKVohWTnGbubM9t3IDb_wv1-cXsr7ncJ1xM-OuQgLDUsuFNrX98mevPc7n4_m1xrX_y3-0loRE</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>González-Bernal, Edna</creator><creator>Greenlees, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Brown, Gregory P.</creator><creator>Shine, Richard</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>Interacting biocontrol programmes: invasive cane toads reduce rates of breakdown of cowpats by dung beetles</title><author>González-Bernal, Edna ; Greenlees, Matthew J. ; Brown, Gregory P. ; Shine, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-859dfa5cf6686c831d1468da13f8c01124f0cecb74ea7e54db6c8f2d778c6bbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>alien species</topic><topic>Amphibia</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>dung beetle</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>invasional meltdown</topic><topic>livestock production</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Rhinella marina</topic><topic>Toads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>González-Bernal, Edna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenlees, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gregory P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shine, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Austral ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>González-Bernal, Edna</au><au>Greenlees, Matthew J.</au><au>Brown, Gregory P.</au><au>Shine, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interacting biocontrol programmes: invasive cane toads reduce rates of breakdown of cowpats by dung beetles</atitle><jtitle>Austral ecology</jtitle><addtitle>Austral Ecology</addtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>891</spage><epage>895</epage><pages>891-895</pages><issn>1442-9985</issn><eissn>1442-9993</eissn><abstract>Ecological interactions among invasive species can affect not only the success of the invaders, but also their impact on ecosystems in the invaded range. In Australia, both dung beetles (subfamily Scarabaeinae) and cane toads (Rhinella marina) were introduced for biocontrol: the beetles to break down bovine faeces piles (cowpats) that otherwise accumulate and reduce pasture productivity, and the cane toad to consume scarab beetles that eat sugarcane and thus reduce sugar production. The dung beetles have been a success, whereas the toads have been a failure. Our experimental studies show that as well as impacting native fauna directly, cane toads reduce the rate of cowpat breakdown by consuming dung beetles. In the laboratory, dehydrated toads actively sought out cowpats based on scent cues, and in field enclosures, the presence of a cane toad significantly reduced rates of cowpat decomposition. Although toads have benefited from agricultural activities, their spread across Australia likely has reduced the effectiveness of one of the most successful biocontrol programmes ever conducted in that continent.</abstract><cop>Carlton</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/aec.12028</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1442-9985 |
ispartof | Austral ecology, 2013-12, Vol.38 (8), p.891-895 |
issn | 1442-9985 1442-9993 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492619581 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | alien species Amphibia Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biodiversity Biological and medical sciences Biological control Conservation biology Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife dung beetle Ecology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Insects invasional meltdown livestock production Nonnative species Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking Rhinella marina Toads |
title | Interacting biocontrol programmes: invasive cane toads reduce rates of breakdown of cowpats by dung beetles |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T07%3A48%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interacting%20biocontrol%20programmes:%20invasive%20cane%20toads%20reduce%20rates%20of%20breakdown%20of%20cowpats%20by%20dung%20beetles&rft.jtitle=Austral%20ecology&rft.au=Gonz%C3%A1lez-Bernal,%20Edna&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=891&rft.epage=895&rft.pages=891-895&rft.issn=1442-9985&rft.eissn=1442-9993&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aec.12028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3138269461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-859dfa5cf6686c831d1468da13f8c01124f0cecb74ea7e54db6c8f2d778c6bbc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1461853674&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |