Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury version II in acute spinal cord injury: reliability and reproducibility

Study design: Administration of the walking index for SCI (WISCI) II is recommended to assess walking in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Determining the reliability and reproducibility of the WISCI II in acute SCI would be invaluable. Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the relia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Spinal cord 2014-01, Vol.52 (1), p.65-69
Main Authors: Scivoletto, G, Tamburella, F, Laurenza, L, Torre, M, Molinari, M, Ditunno, J F
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
692/699/375/1824
692/700
Adolescent
Adult
Age
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anatomy
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Disability Evaluation
Female
Human Physiology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neurochemistry
Neuropsychology
Neurosciences
original-article
Recovery of Function
Reproducibility of Results
Severity of Illness Index
Spinal Cord Injuries - complications
Walking
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Study design: Administration of the walking index for SCI (WISCI) II is recommended to assess walking in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Determining the reliability and reproducibility of the WISCI II in acute SCI would be invaluable. Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the reliability and reproducibility of the WISCI II in patients with traumatic, acute SCI. Design: Test–retest analysis and calculation of reliability and smallest real difference (SRD). Setting: SCI unit of a rehabilitation hospital. Methods: Thirty-three patients, median age 44 years, median time since onset of SCI 40 days. Level: 20 cervical, 8 thoracic, 5 lumbar; ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) impairment scale (AIS) grade: 32 D/1 C. Assessment of maximum WISCI II levels by two trained, blinded raters to evaluate interrater (IRR) and intrarater reliability. Results: The intrarater reliability was 0.999 for therapists A and 0.979 for therapists B, for the maximum WISCI II level. The IRR for the maximum WISCI II score was 0.996 on day 1 and 0.975 on day 2. The SRD for the maximum WISCI II score was 1.147 for tetraplegics and 1.682 for paraplegics. These results suggest that a change of two WISCI II levels could be considered real. Conclusions: The WISCI II has high IRR and intrarater reliability and good reproducibility in the acute and subacute phase when administered by trained raters.
ISSN:1362-4393
1476-5624
DOI:10.1038/sc.2013.127