Evolution and speciation in the Eocene planktonic foraminifer Turborotalia

Marine planktonic microfossils have provided some of the best examples of evolutionary rates and patterns on multi-million-year time scales, including many instances of gradual evolution. Lineage splitting as a result of speciation has also been claimed, but all such studies have used subjective vis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Paleobiology 2014-01, Vol.40 (1), p.130-143
Main Authors: Pearson, Paul N, Ezard, Thomas H. G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
biologic evolution
biometry
Cenozoic
East Pacific
Eocene
Evolution
Foraminifera
Invertebrata
invertebrate
Leg 143
microfossils
Mid-Pacific Mountains
morphology
North Pacific
Northeast Pacific
Ocean Drilling Program
ODP Site 865
Pacific Ocean
Paleogene
Paleontology
planktonic taxa
Protista
s
Speciation
statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Studies
Tertiary
tests
Turborotalia cerroazulensis
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Marine planktonic microfossils have provided some of the best examples of evolutionary rates and patterns on multi-million-year time scales, including many instances of gradual evolution. Lineage splitting as a result of speciation has also been claimed, but all such studies have used subjective visual species discrimination, and interpretation has often been complicated by relatively small sample sizes and oceanographic complexity at the study sites. Here we analyze measurements on a collection of 10,200 individual tests of the Eocene planktonic foraminifer Turborotalia in 51 stratigraphically ordered samples from a site within the oceanographically stable tropical North Pacific gyre. We use novel multivariate statistical clustering methods to test the hypothesis that a single evolutionary species was present from 45 Ma to its extinction ca. 34 Ma. After identification of a set of biologically relevant traits, the protocol we apply does not require a prior assignment of individuals to species. We find that for most of the record, contemporaneous specimens form one morphological cluster, which we interpret as an evolving species that shows quasi-continuous but non-directional gradual evolutionary change (anagenesis). However, in the upper Eocene from ca. 36 to ca. 34 Ma there are two clusters that persistently occupy distinct areas of morphospace, from which we infer that speciation (cladogenesis) must have occurred.
ISSN:0094-8373
1938-5331
DOI:10.1666/13004