Loading…

Clinical evaluation of sustained-release metronidazole gel versus metronidazole solution as an intracanal medicament in abscessed primary molars

Aim To evaluate the efficacy of metronidazole gel versus metronidazole solution against Enterococcus   faecalis in abscessed primary molars. Study design A clinical trial. Method Twenty pulpally involved non-vital carious human primary mandibular second molars with furcal abscess were randomly alloc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European archives of paediatric dentistry 2014-02, Vol.15 (1), p.19-26
Main Authors: Bhangdia, M. B., Nandlal, B., Vijaykumar, G. S., Kulkarni, P. K., Shanbhog, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim To evaluate the efficacy of metronidazole gel versus metronidazole solution against Enterococcus   faecalis in abscessed primary molars. Study design A clinical trial. Method Twenty pulpally involved non-vital carious human primary mandibular second molars with furcal abscess were randomly allocated into two groups to evaluate the efficacy of metronidazole gel (3 % w/v) and metronidazole solution (0.5 % w/v) against E.   faecalis . Subjects in the first experimental group were subjected to treatment with metronidazole gel (3 % w/v) and subjects in the second experimental group were treated with metronidazole solution (0.5 % w/v). Two microbial samples (pre-operative and post-operative samples) were obtained from the root canals of each subject from both the groups; sub cultured and efficacy of both the groups were evaluated. Results Overall percentage reduction of the mean colony forming unit (CFU) count of metronidazole gel (3 % w/v) group was 96.39 % and metronidazole solution (0.5 % w/v) was 90.90 %. Results of intergroup t test of the percentage difference of mean CFU counts between both the groups revealed a statistically highly significant difference, i.e. p value—0.008 ( p  
ISSN:1818-6300
1996-9805
DOI:10.1007/s40368-013-0047-2