Loading…
Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is superior to quick-look ultrasound and landmark methods among inexperienced operators: a prospective randomized study
Objective Quick-look ultrasound with a skin mark (UM) has been frequently used for central vein cannulation. The aim of this study is to compare this method with landmark (LM) and ultrasound-guided (UG) cannulation of jugular and femoral veins by inexperienced operators. Design Prospective randomize...
Saved in:
Published in: | Intensive care medicine 2013-11, Vol.39 (11), p.1938-1944 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a9d388752bb2d00e5540085419d8ffba6598135dda23987f33b4d4a58411775a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a9d388752bb2d00e5540085419d8ffba6598135dda23987f33b4d4a58411775a3 |
container_end_page | 1944 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1938 |
container_title | Intensive care medicine |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Airapetian, Norair Maizel, Julien Langelle, François Modeliar, Santhi Samy Karakitsos, Dimitrios Dupont, Herve Slama, Michel |
description | Objective
Quick-look ultrasound with a skin mark (UM) has been frequently used for central vein cannulation. The aim of this study is to compare this method with landmark (LM) and ultrasound-guided (UG) cannulation of jugular and femoral veins by inexperienced operators.
Design
Prospective randomized single-center study.
Setting
A medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a university medical center.
Patients
Patients requiring jugular or femoral central cannula placement.
Intervention
Each inexperienced resident randomly inserted a central venous line using the UM, LM or UG technique.
Measurements and findings
The primary outcome was the success rate, and secondary outcomes were the placement time, number of attempts, mechanical complication rate, and catheter colonization rate. A total of 118 patients were randomly assigned to the three groups. The mean age of patients included in the study was 65 ± 15 years, and the mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2 (SAPS2) was 57 ± 20. The success rate was higher in the UG group than in the LM and UM groups (100, 74, and 73 %, respectively;
p
= 0.01). The total number of mechanical complications was higher in the LM and UM groups than in the UG group (24 and 36 versus 0 %, respectively;
p
= 0.01). The number of attempts and the access time were higher in the LM group than in the UG group, but not compared with the UM group. No difference in terms of catheter colonization was observed between the three groups.
Conclusions
Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular or femoral vein by inexperienced residents appears to be more reliable than the LM or UM methods and was associated with a lower mechanical complication rate among ICU patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00134-013-3072-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1496882391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A724304254</galeid><sourcerecordid>A724304254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a9d388752bb2d00e5540085419d8ffba6598135dda23987f33b4d4a58411775a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhiMEokPhAdggS2zYuPiaOOyqikulSmzo2nJiJ7iT2FM7rtp5Hh6UM5q2KmiQkOVjy_7-Y59LVb2l5IQS0nzMhFAuMBjMScPw9lm1ooIzTBlXz6sV4YJhUQt2VL3K-Qroppb0ZXXEBGE1a-tV9etyWpLJsQSLx-Kts6h3AY4mdONCLBn1JoQymcXHgHxGuWxc8jGhJaLr4vs1nmJco_LoBhmYE5jZpDWa3fIz2ozMHMOIfHC3O7kLPTwUYWuWmPInZNAmxbxx_eJvHEqgjrPfApOXYu9eVy8GM2X35n49ri6_fP5x9g1ffP96fnZ6gXvZ1As2reVKNZJ1HbOEOCkFIUoK2lo1DJ2pZasol9YaxlvVDJx3wgojlaC0aaThx9WHvV_4zHVxedGzz72bIBoHqdBUtLVSIKb_gQrOFRVKAvr-L_QqlhQgEKC4IhRq8YQazeS0D0OEhPY7p_q0YYITwaQACh-gRhcgk1MMbvBw_Ad_coCHYd3s-4MCuhf0UI-c3KA3yUMl7zQletd0et90GozeNZ3egubdfYClm519VDx0GQBsD2S4CqNLTzLwT6-_ARiY4zQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1438010265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is superior to quick-look ultrasound and landmark methods among inexperienced operators: a prospective randomized study</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Airapetian, Norair ; Maizel, Julien ; Langelle, François ; Modeliar, Santhi Samy ; Karakitsos, Dimitrios ; Dupont, Herve ; Slama, Michel</creator><creatorcontrib>Airapetian, Norair ; Maizel, Julien ; Langelle, François ; Modeliar, Santhi Samy ; Karakitsos, Dimitrios ; Dupont, Herve ; Slama, Michel</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Quick-look ultrasound with a skin mark (UM) has been frequently used for central vein cannulation. The aim of this study is to compare this method with landmark (LM) and ultrasound-guided (UG) cannulation of jugular and femoral veins by inexperienced operators.
Design
Prospective randomized single-center study.
Setting
A medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a university medical center.
Patients
Patients requiring jugular or femoral central cannula placement.
Intervention
Each inexperienced resident randomly inserted a central venous line using the UM, LM or UG technique.
Measurements and findings
The primary outcome was the success rate, and secondary outcomes were the placement time, number of attempts, mechanical complication rate, and catheter colonization rate. A total of 118 patients were randomly assigned to the three groups. The mean age of patients included in the study was 65 ± 15 years, and the mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2 (SAPS2) was 57 ± 20. The success rate was higher in the UG group than in the LM and UM groups (100, 74, and 73 %, respectively;
p
= 0.01). The total number of mechanical complications was higher in the LM and UM groups than in the UG group (24 and 36 versus 0 %, respectively;
p
= 0.01). The number of attempts and the access time were higher in the LM group than in the UG group, but not compared with the UM group. No difference in terms of catheter colonization was observed between the three groups.
Conclusions
Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular or femoral vein by inexperienced residents appears to be more reliable than the LM or UM methods and was associated with a lower mechanical complication rate among ICU patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0342-4642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-3072-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24026296</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Age ; Aged ; Analysis ; Anesthesiology ; Catheterization, Central Venous - methods ; Catheters ; Clinical Competence ; Consent ; Critical Care Medicine ; Emergency Medicine ; Female ; Femoral Vein ; Hospital patients ; Humans ; Intensive ; Intensive care ; Intensive Care Units ; Internship and Residency ; Intubation ; Jugular Veins ; Male ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Medicine, Experimental ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Patient safety ; Pediatrics ; Pneumology/Respiratory System ; Prospective Studies ; Skin ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Veins & arteries</subject><ispartof>Intensive care medicine, 2013-11, Vol.39 (11), p.1938-1944</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM 2013</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a9d388752bb2d00e5540085419d8ffba6598135dda23987f33b4d4a58411775a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a9d388752bb2d00e5540085419d8ffba6598135dda23987f33b4d4a58411775a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24026296$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Airapetian, Norair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maizel, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langelle, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modeliar, Santhi Samy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakitsos, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Herve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slama, Michel</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is superior to quick-look ultrasound and landmark methods among inexperienced operators: a prospective randomized study</title><title>Intensive care medicine</title><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><description>Objective
Quick-look ultrasound with a skin mark (UM) has been frequently used for central vein cannulation. The aim of this study is to compare this method with landmark (LM) and ultrasound-guided (UG) cannulation of jugular and femoral veins by inexperienced operators.
Design
Prospective randomized single-center study.
Setting
A medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a university medical center.
Patients
Patients requiring jugular or femoral central cannula placement.
Intervention
Each inexperienced resident randomly inserted a central venous line using the UM, LM or UG technique.
Measurements and findings
The primary outcome was the success rate, and secondary outcomes were the placement time, number of attempts, mechanical complication rate, and catheter colonization rate. A total of 118 patients were randomly assigned to the three groups. The mean age of patients included in the study was 65 ± 15 years, and the mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2 (SAPS2) was 57 ± 20. The success rate was higher in the UG group than in the LM and UM groups (100, 74, and 73 %, respectively;
p
= 0.01). The total number of mechanical complications was higher in the LM and UM groups than in the UG group (24 and 36 versus 0 %, respectively;
p
= 0.01). The number of attempts and the access time were higher in the LM group than in the UG group, but not compared with the UM group. No difference in terms of catheter colonization was observed between the three groups.
Conclusions
Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular or femoral vein by inexperienced residents appears to be more reliable than the LM or UM methods and was associated with a lower mechanical complication rate among ICU patients.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Vein</subject><subject>Hospital patients</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Jugular Veins</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pneumology/Respiratory System</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>Veins & arteries</subject><issn>0342-4642</issn><issn>1432-1238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhiMEokPhAdggS2zYuPiaOOyqikulSmzo2nJiJ7iT2FM7rtp5Hh6UM5q2KmiQkOVjy_7-Y59LVb2l5IQS0nzMhFAuMBjMScPw9lm1ooIzTBlXz6sV4YJhUQt2VL3K-Qroppb0ZXXEBGE1a-tV9etyWpLJsQSLx-Kts6h3AY4mdONCLBn1JoQymcXHgHxGuWxc8jGhJaLr4vs1nmJco_LoBhmYE5jZpDWa3fIz2ozMHMOIfHC3O7kLPTwUYWuWmPInZNAmxbxx_eJvHEqgjrPfApOXYu9eVy8GM2X35n49ri6_fP5x9g1ffP96fnZ6gXvZ1As2reVKNZJ1HbOEOCkFIUoK2lo1DJ2pZasol9YaxlvVDJx3wgojlaC0aaThx9WHvV_4zHVxedGzz72bIBoHqdBUtLVSIKb_gQrOFRVKAvr-L_QqlhQgEKC4IhRq8YQazeS0D0OEhPY7p_q0YYITwaQACh-gRhcgk1MMbvBw_Ad_coCHYd3s-4MCuhf0UI-c3KA3yUMl7zQletd0et90GozeNZ3egubdfYClm519VDx0GQBsD2S4CqNLTzLwT6-_ARiY4zQ</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Airapetian, Norair</creator><creator>Maizel, Julien</creator><creator>Langelle, François</creator><creator>Modeliar, Santhi Samy</creator><creator>Karakitsos, Dimitrios</creator><creator>Dupont, Herve</creator><creator>Slama, Michel</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is superior to quick-look ultrasound and landmark methods among inexperienced operators: a prospective randomized study</title><author>Airapetian, Norair ; Maizel, Julien ; Langelle, François ; Modeliar, Santhi Samy ; Karakitsos, Dimitrios ; Dupont, Herve ; Slama, Michel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a9d388752bb2d00e5540085419d8ffba6598135dda23987f33b4d4a58411775a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Vein</topic><topic>Hospital patients</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Jugular Veins</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pneumology/Respiratory System</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>Veins & arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Airapetian, Norair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maizel, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langelle, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modeliar, Santhi Samy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakitsos, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Herve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slama, Michel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Airapetian, Norair</au><au>Maizel, Julien</au><au>Langelle, François</au><au>Modeliar, Santhi Samy</au><au>Karakitsos, Dimitrios</au><au>Dupont, Herve</au><au>Slama, Michel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is superior to quick-look ultrasound and landmark methods among inexperienced operators: a prospective randomized study</atitle><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle><stitle>Intensive Care Med</stitle><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1938</spage><epage>1944</epage><pages>1938-1944</pages><issn>0342-4642</issn><eissn>1432-1238</eissn><abstract>Objective
Quick-look ultrasound with a skin mark (UM) has been frequently used for central vein cannulation. The aim of this study is to compare this method with landmark (LM) and ultrasound-guided (UG) cannulation of jugular and femoral veins by inexperienced operators.
Design
Prospective randomized single-center study.
Setting
A medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a university medical center.
Patients
Patients requiring jugular or femoral central cannula placement.
Intervention
Each inexperienced resident randomly inserted a central venous line using the UM, LM or UG technique.
Measurements and findings
The primary outcome was the success rate, and secondary outcomes were the placement time, number of attempts, mechanical complication rate, and catheter colonization rate. A total of 118 patients were randomly assigned to the three groups. The mean age of patients included in the study was 65 ± 15 years, and the mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2 (SAPS2) was 57 ± 20. The success rate was higher in the UG group than in the LM and UM groups (100, 74, and 73 %, respectively;
p
= 0.01). The total number of mechanical complications was higher in the LM and UM groups than in the UG group (24 and 36 versus 0 %, respectively;
p
= 0.01). The number of attempts and the access time were higher in the LM group than in the UG group, but not compared with the UM group. No difference in terms of catheter colonization was observed between the three groups.
Conclusions
Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular or femoral vein by inexperienced residents appears to be more reliable than the LM or UM methods and was associated with a lower mechanical complication rate among ICU patients.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>24026296</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00134-013-3072-z</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0342-4642 |
ispartof | Intensive care medicine, 2013-11, Vol.39 (11), p.1938-1944 |
issn | 0342-4642 1432-1238 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1496882391 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Age Aged Analysis Anesthesiology Catheterization, Central Venous - methods Catheters Clinical Competence Consent Critical Care Medicine Emergency Medicine Female Femoral Vein Hospital patients Humans Intensive Intensive care Intensive Care Units Internship and Residency Intubation Jugular Veins Male Medical research Medicine Medicine & Public Health Medicine, Experimental Methods Middle Aged Original Article Pain Medicine Patient safety Pediatrics Pneumology/Respiratory System Prospective Studies Skin Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonography, Interventional Veins & arteries |
title | Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is superior to quick-look ultrasound and landmark methods among inexperienced operators: a prospective randomized study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A36%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasound-guided%20central%20venous%20cannulation%20is%20superior%20to%20quick-look%20ultrasound%20and%20landmark%20methods%20among%20inexperienced%20operators:%20a%20prospective%20randomized%20study&rft.jtitle=Intensive%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Airapetian,%20Norair&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1938&rft.epage=1944&rft.pages=1938-1944&rft.issn=0342-4642&rft.eissn=1432-1238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00134-013-3072-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA724304254%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a9d388752bb2d00e5540085419d8ffba6598135dda23987f33b4d4a58411775a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1438010265&rft_id=info:pmid/24026296&rft_galeid=A724304254&rfr_iscdi=true |