Loading…

Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is superior to quick-look ultrasound and landmark methods among inexperienced operators: a prospective randomized study

Objective Quick-look ultrasound with a skin mark (UM) has been frequently used for central vein cannulation. The aim of this study is to compare this method with landmark (LM) and ultrasound-guided (UG) cannulation of jugular and femoral veins by inexperienced operators. Design Prospective randomize...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Intensive care medicine 2013-11, Vol.39 (11), p.1938-1944
Main Authors: Airapetian, Norair, Maizel, Julien, Langelle, François, Modeliar, Santhi Samy, Karakitsos, Dimitrios, Dupont, Herve, Slama, Michel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a9d388752bb2d00e5540085419d8ffba6598135dda23987f33b4d4a58411775a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a9d388752bb2d00e5540085419d8ffba6598135dda23987f33b4d4a58411775a3
container_end_page 1944
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1938
container_title Intensive care medicine
container_volume 39
creator Airapetian, Norair
Maizel, Julien
Langelle, François
Modeliar, Santhi Samy
Karakitsos, Dimitrios
Dupont, Herve
Slama, Michel
description Objective Quick-look ultrasound with a skin mark (UM) has been frequently used for central vein cannulation. The aim of this study is to compare this method with landmark (LM) and ultrasound-guided (UG) cannulation of jugular and femoral veins by inexperienced operators. Design Prospective randomized single-center study. Setting A medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a university medical center. Patients Patients requiring jugular or femoral central cannula placement. Intervention Each inexperienced resident randomly inserted a central venous line using the UM, LM or UG technique. Measurements and findings The primary outcome was the success rate, and secondary outcomes were the placement time, number of attempts, mechanical complication rate, and catheter colonization rate. A total of 118 patients were randomly assigned to the three groups. The mean age of patients included in the study was 65 ± 15 years, and the mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2 (SAPS2) was 57 ± 20. The success rate was higher in the UG group than in the LM and UM groups (100, 74, and 73 %, respectively; p  = 0.01). The total number of mechanical complications was higher in the LM and UM groups than in the UG group (24 and 36 versus 0 %, respectively; p  = 0.01). The number of attempts and the access time were higher in the LM group than in the UG group, but not compared with the UM group. No difference in terms of catheter colonization was observed between the three groups. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular or femoral vein by inexperienced residents appears to be more reliable than the LM or UM methods and was associated with a lower mechanical complication rate among ICU patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00134-013-3072-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1496882391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A724304254</galeid><sourcerecordid>A724304254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a9d388752bb2d00e5540085419d8ffba6598135dda23987f33b4d4a58411775a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhiMEokPhAdggS2zYuPiaOOyqikulSmzo2nJiJ7iT2FM7rtp5Hh6UM5q2KmiQkOVjy_7-Y59LVb2l5IQS0nzMhFAuMBjMScPw9lm1ooIzTBlXz6sV4YJhUQt2VL3K-Qroppb0ZXXEBGE1a-tV9etyWpLJsQSLx-Kts6h3AY4mdONCLBn1JoQymcXHgHxGuWxc8jGhJaLr4vs1nmJco_LoBhmYE5jZpDWa3fIz2ozMHMOIfHC3O7kLPTwUYWuWmPInZNAmxbxx_eJvHEqgjrPfApOXYu9eVy8GM2X35n49ri6_fP5x9g1ffP96fnZ6gXvZ1As2reVKNZJ1HbOEOCkFIUoK2lo1DJ2pZasol9YaxlvVDJx3wgojlaC0aaThx9WHvV_4zHVxedGzz72bIBoHqdBUtLVSIKb_gQrOFRVKAvr-L_QqlhQgEKC4IhRq8YQazeS0D0OEhPY7p_q0YYITwaQACh-gRhcgk1MMbvBw_Ad_coCHYd3s-4MCuhf0UI-c3KA3yUMl7zQletd0et90GozeNZ3egubdfYClm519VDx0GQBsD2S4CqNLTzLwT6-_ARiY4zQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1438010265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is superior to quick-look ultrasound and landmark methods among inexperienced operators: a prospective randomized study</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Airapetian, Norair ; Maizel, Julien ; Langelle, François ; Modeliar, Santhi Samy ; Karakitsos, Dimitrios ; Dupont, Herve ; Slama, Michel</creator><creatorcontrib>Airapetian, Norair ; Maizel, Julien ; Langelle, François ; Modeliar, Santhi Samy ; Karakitsos, Dimitrios ; Dupont, Herve ; Slama, Michel</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Quick-look ultrasound with a skin mark (UM) has been frequently used for central vein cannulation. The aim of this study is to compare this method with landmark (LM) and ultrasound-guided (UG) cannulation of jugular and femoral veins by inexperienced operators. Design Prospective randomized single-center study. Setting A medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a university medical center. Patients Patients requiring jugular or femoral central cannula placement. Intervention Each inexperienced resident randomly inserted a central venous line using the UM, LM or UG technique. Measurements and findings The primary outcome was the success rate, and secondary outcomes were the placement time, number of attempts, mechanical complication rate, and catheter colonization rate. A total of 118 patients were randomly assigned to the three groups. The mean age of patients included in the study was 65 ± 15 years, and the mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2 (SAPS2) was 57 ± 20. The success rate was higher in the UG group than in the LM and UM groups (100, 74, and 73 %, respectively; p  = 0.01). The total number of mechanical complications was higher in the LM and UM groups than in the UG group (24 and 36 versus 0 %, respectively; p  = 0.01). The number of attempts and the access time were higher in the LM group than in the UG group, but not compared with the UM group. No difference in terms of catheter colonization was observed between the three groups. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular or femoral vein by inexperienced residents appears to be more reliable than the LM or UM methods and was associated with a lower mechanical complication rate among ICU patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0342-4642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-3072-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24026296</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Age ; Aged ; Analysis ; Anesthesiology ; Catheterization, Central Venous - methods ; Catheters ; Clinical Competence ; Consent ; Critical Care Medicine ; Emergency Medicine ; Female ; Femoral Vein ; Hospital patients ; Humans ; Intensive ; Intensive care ; Intensive Care Units ; Internship and Residency ; Intubation ; Jugular Veins ; Male ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Medicine, Experimental ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Patient safety ; Pediatrics ; Pneumology/Respiratory System ; Prospective Studies ; Skin ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Veins &amp; arteries</subject><ispartof>Intensive care medicine, 2013-11, Vol.39 (11), p.1938-1944</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM 2013</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a9d388752bb2d00e5540085419d8ffba6598135dda23987f33b4d4a58411775a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a9d388752bb2d00e5540085419d8ffba6598135dda23987f33b4d4a58411775a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24026296$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Airapetian, Norair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maizel, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langelle, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modeliar, Santhi Samy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakitsos, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Herve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slama, Michel</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is superior to quick-look ultrasound and landmark methods among inexperienced operators: a prospective randomized study</title><title>Intensive care medicine</title><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><description>Objective Quick-look ultrasound with a skin mark (UM) has been frequently used for central vein cannulation. The aim of this study is to compare this method with landmark (LM) and ultrasound-guided (UG) cannulation of jugular and femoral veins by inexperienced operators. Design Prospective randomized single-center study. Setting A medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a university medical center. Patients Patients requiring jugular or femoral central cannula placement. Intervention Each inexperienced resident randomly inserted a central venous line using the UM, LM or UG technique. Measurements and findings The primary outcome was the success rate, and secondary outcomes were the placement time, number of attempts, mechanical complication rate, and catheter colonization rate. A total of 118 patients were randomly assigned to the three groups. The mean age of patients included in the study was 65 ± 15 years, and the mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2 (SAPS2) was 57 ± 20. The success rate was higher in the UG group than in the LM and UM groups (100, 74, and 73 %, respectively; p  = 0.01). The total number of mechanical complications was higher in the LM and UM groups than in the UG group (24 and 36 versus 0 %, respectively; p  = 0.01). The number of attempts and the access time were higher in the LM group than in the UG group, but not compared with the UM group. No difference in terms of catheter colonization was observed between the three groups. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular or femoral vein by inexperienced residents appears to be more reliable than the LM or UM methods and was associated with a lower mechanical complication rate among ICU patients.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Vein</subject><subject>Hospital patients</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Jugular Veins</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pneumology/Respiratory System</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>Veins &amp; arteries</subject><issn>0342-4642</issn><issn>1432-1238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhiMEokPhAdggS2zYuPiaOOyqikulSmzo2nJiJ7iT2FM7rtp5Hh6UM5q2KmiQkOVjy_7-Y59LVb2l5IQS0nzMhFAuMBjMScPw9lm1ooIzTBlXz6sV4YJhUQt2VL3K-Qroppb0ZXXEBGE1a-tV9etyWpLJsQSLx-Kts6h3AY4mdONCLBn1JoQymcXHgHxGuWxc8jGhJaLr4vs1nmJco_LoBhmYE5jZpDWa3fIz2ozMHMOIfHC3O7kLPTwUYWuWmPInZNAmxbxx_eJvHEqgjrPfApOXYu9eVy8GM2X35n49ri6_fP5x9g1ffP96fnZ6gXvZ1As2reVKNZJ1HbOEOCkFIUoK2lo1DJ2pZasol9YaxlvVDJx3wgojlaC0aaThx9WHvV_4zHVxedGzz72bIBoHqdBUtLVSIKb_gQrOFRVKAvr-L_QqlhQgEKC4IhRq8YQazeS0D0OEhPY7p_q0YYITwaQACh-gRhcgk1MMbvBw_Ad_coCHYd3s-4MCuhf0UI-c3KA3yUMl7zQletd0et90GozeNZ3egubdfYClm519VDx0GQBsD2S4CqNLTzLwT6-_ARiY4zQ</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Airapetian, Norair</creator><creator>Maizel, Julien</creator><creator>Langelle, François</creator><creator>Modeliar, Santhi Samy</creator><creator>Karakitsos, Dimitrios</creator><creator>Dupont, Herve</creator><creator>Slama, Michel</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is superior to quick-look ultrasound and landmark methods among inexperienced operators: a prospective randomized study</title><author>Airapetian, Norair ; Maizel, Julien ; Langelle, François ; Modeliar, Santhi Samy ; Karakitsos, Dimitrios ; Dupont, Herve ; Slama, Michel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a9d388752bb2d00e5540085419d8ffba6598135dda23987f33b4d4a58411775a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Vein</topic><topic>Hospital patients</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Jugular Veins</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pneumology/Respiratory System</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>Veins &amp; arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Airapetian, Norair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maizel, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langelle, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modeliar, Santhi Samy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakitsos, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Herve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slama, Michel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Airapetian, Norair</au><au>Maizel, Julien</au><au>Langelle, François</au><au>Modeliar, Santhi Samy</au><au>Karakitsos, Dimitrios</au><au>Dupont, Herve</au><au>Slama, Michel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is superior to quick-look ultrasound and landmark methods among inexperienced operators: a prospective randomized study</atitle><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle><stitle>Intensive Care Med</stitle><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1938</spage><epage>1944</epage><pages>1938-1944</pages><issn>0342-4642</issn><eissn>1432-1238</eissn><abstract>Objective Quick-look ultrasound with a skin mark (UM) has been frequently used for central vein cannulation. The aim of this study is to compare this method with landmark (LM) and ultrasound-guided (UG) cannulation of jugular and femoral veins by inexperienced operators. Design Prospective randomized single-center study. Setting A medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a university medical center. Patients Patients requiring jugular or femoral central cannula placement. Intervention Each inexperienced resident randomly inserted a central venous line using the UM, LM or UG technique. Measurements and findings The primary outcome was the success rate, and secondary outcomes were the placement time, number of attempts, mechanical complication rate, and catheter colonization rate. A total of 118 patients were randomly assigned to the three groups. The mean age of patients included in the study was 65 ± 15 years, and the mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2 (SAPS2) was 57 ± 20. The success rate was higher in the UG group than in the LM and UM groups (100, 74, and 73 %, respectively; p  = 0.01). The total number of mechanical complications was higher in the LM and UM groups than in the UG group (24 and 36 versus 0 %, respectively; p  = 0.01). The number of attempts and the access time were higher in the LM group than in the UG group, but not compared with the UM group. No difference in terms of catheter colonization was observed between the three groups. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular or femoral vein by inexperienced residents appears to be more reliable than the LM or UM methods and was associated with a lower mechanical complication rate among ICU patients.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>24026296</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00134-013-3072-z</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0342-4642
ispartof Intensive care medicine, 2013-11, Vol.39 (11), p.1938-1944
issn 0342-4642
1432-1238
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1496882391
source Springer Link
subjects Age
Aged
Analysis
Anesthesiology
Catheterization, Central Venous - methods
Catheters
Clinical Competence
Consent
Critical Care Medicine
Emergency Medicine
Female
Femoral Vein
Hospital patients
Humans
Intensive
Intensive care
Intensive Care Units
Internship and Residency
Intubation
Jugular Veins
Male
Medical research
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Medicine, Experimental
Methods
Middle Aged
Original Article
Pain Medicine
Patient safety
Pediatrics
Pneumology/Respiratory System
Prospective Studies
Skin
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography, Interventional
Veins & arteries
title Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is superior to quick-look ultrasound and landmark methods among inexperienced operators: a prospective randomized study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A36%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasound-guided%20central%20venous%20cannulation%20is%20superior%20to%20quick-look%20ultrasound%20and%20landmark%20methods%20among%20inexperienced%20operators:%20a%20prospective%20randomized%20study&rft.jtitle=Intensive%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Airapetian,%20Norair&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1938&rft.epage=1944&rft.pages=1938-1944&rft.issn=0342-4642&rft.eissn=1432-1238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00134-013-3072-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA724304254%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a9d388752bb2d00e5540085419d8ffba6598135dda23987f33b4d4a58411775a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1438010265&rft_id=info:pmid/24026296&rft_galeid=A724304254&rfr_iscdi=true