Ultrasound‐guided needle handling using a guidance positioning system in a phantom

Summary The SonixGPS™ needle guidance positioning system provides navigation assistance to facilitate needle handling during ultrasound‐guided procedures. Each of 20 inexperienced nurse anaesthetists performed 12 different ultrasound‐guided tasks in a porcine phantom. Using both in‐plane and out‐of‐...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anaesthesia 2014-01, Vol.69 (1), p.24-31
Main Authors: Tielens, L. K. P., Damen, R. B. C. C., Lerou, J. G. C., Scheffer, G.‐J., Bruhn, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anesthesiology
Animals
Clinical Competence
Humans
Hypodermic needles
Medical personnel
Needles
Nerve Block - instrumentation
Nerve Block - methods
Nerve Block - standards
Nurse Anesthetists - standards
Phantoms, Imaging
Sus scrofa
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3901-5063932b9c73e84ab71570810b45ff60336dcb2a9bc7960a857b92646d04de543
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3901-5063932b9c73e84ab71570810b45ff60336dcb2a9bc7960a857b92646d04de543
container_end_page 31
container_issue 1
container_start_page 24
container_title Anaesthesia
container_volume 69
creator Tielens, L. K. P.
Damen, R. B. C. C.
Lerou, J. G. C.
Scheffer, G.‐J.
Bruhn, J.
description Summary The SonixGPS™ needle guidance positioning system provides navigation assistance to facilitate needle handling during ultrasound‐guided procedures. Each of 20 inexperienced nurse anaesthetists performed 12 different ultrasound‐guided tasks in a porcine phantom. Using both in‐plane and out‐of‐plane approaches, they inserted a needle and made contact with metal rods at depths of 2, 4 and 6 cm. We compared their performances without and with navigation as paired observations. Using the out‐of‐plane approach, navigation yielded shorter execution times (26 s vs 14 s, respectively; p = 0.01) and fewer needle repositionings (8 vs 3, respectively; p = 0.001). Using the in‐plane approach, the needle was more visible with navigation assistance: 24% vs 52% of execution time, respectively (95% CI: 44%–12%; p = 0.0025). Better needle visibility was associated with shorter execution times and fewer needle repositionings. Combining ultrasound‐guided techniques with the needle guidance positioning system may reduce tissue manipulation, thus improving patient comfort and safety.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/anae.12461
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1496884982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1496884982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3901-5063932b9c73e84ab71570810b45ff60336dcb2a9bc7960a857b92646d04de543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ctKxDAYBeAgio6XjQ8gBTciVP9cmyyHYbyA6GZmXdIm1Uqb1qZFZucj-Iw-iakzunAhZpFA8uWQcBA6xnCBw7jUTtsLTJjAW2iCqeAxAca20QQAaEwYqD207_0zACYSy120RxglIDmfoMWy6jvtm8GZj7f3x6E01kTOWlPZ6Ek7U5XuMRr8OOtoPNYut1Hb-LIvGzdu-5XvbR2VLoA2XOmb-hDtFLry9mizHqDl1Xwxu4nvHq5vZ9O7OKcKcMxBUEVJpvKEWsl0lmCegMSQMV4UAigVJs-IVlmeKAFa8iRTRDBhgBnLGT1AZ-vctmteBuv7tC59bqtKO9sMPsVMCSmZkuQfVCThOSDG1NNf9LkZOhc-ElRCgABXKqjztcq7xvvOFmnblbXuVimGdKwlHWtJv2oJ-GQTOWS1NT_0u4cA8Bq8lpVd_RGVTu-n83XoJ9XwllA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1472020599</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasound‐guided needle handling using a guidance positioning system in a phantom</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Tielens, L. K. P. ; Damen, R. B. C. C. ; Lerou, J. G. C. ; Scheffer, G.‐J. ; Bruhn, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tielens, L. K. P. ; Damen, R. B. C. C. ; Lerou, J. G. C. ; Scheffer, G.‐J. ; Bruhn, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary The SonixGPS™ needle guidance positioning system provides navigation assistance to facilitate needle handling during ultrasound‐guided procedures. Each of 20 inexperienced nurse anaesthetists performed 12 different ultrasound‐guided tasks in a porcine phantom. Using both in‐plane and out‐of‐plane approaches, they inserted a needle and made contact with metal rods at depths of 2, 4 and 6 cm. We compared their performances without and with navigation as paired observations. Using the out‐of‐plane approach, navigation yielded shorter execution times (26 s vs 14 s, respectively; p = 0.01) and fewer needle repositionings (8 vs 3, respectively; p = 0.001). Using the in‐plane approach, the needle was more visible with navigation assistance: 24% vs 52% of execution time, respectively (95% CI: 44%–12%; p = 0.0025). Better needle visibility was associated with shorter execution times and fewer needle repositionings. Combining ultrasound‐guided techniques with the needle guidance positioning system may reduce tissue manipulation, thus improving patient comfort and safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/anae.12461</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24320855</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anesthesiology ; Animals ; Clinical Competence ; Humans ; Hypodermic needles ; Medical personnel ; Needles ; Nerve Block - instrumentation ; Nerve Block - methods ; Nerve Block - standards ; Nurse Anesthetists - standards ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Sus scrofa ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia, 2014-01, Vol.69 (1), p.24-31</ispartof><rights>2013 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland</rights><rights>2013 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3901-5063932b9c73e84ab71570810b45ff60336dcb2a9bc7960a857b92646d04de543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3901-5063932b9c73e84ab71570810b45ff60336dcb2a9bc7960a857b92646d04de543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24320855$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tielens, L. K. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damen, R. B. C. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerou, J. G. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheffer, G.‐J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruhn, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound‐guided needle handling using a guidance positioning system in a phantom</title><title>Anaesthesia</title><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><description>Summary The SonixGPS™ needle guidance positioning system provides navigation assistance to facilitate needle handling during ultrasound‐guided procedures. Each of 20 inexperienced nurse anaesthetists performed 12 different ultrasound‐guided tasks in a porcine phantom. Using both in‐plane and out‐of‐plane approaches, they inserted a needle and made contact with metal rods at depths of 2, 4 and 6 cm. We compared their performances without and with navigation as paired observations. Using the out‐of‐plane approach, navigation yielded shorter execution times (26 s vs 14 s, respectively; p = 0.01) and fewer needle repositionings (8 vs 3, respectively; p = 0.001). Using the in‐plane approach, the needle was more visible with navigation assistance: 24% vs 52% of execution time, respectively (95% CI: 44%–12%; p = 0.0025). Better needle visibility was associated with shorter execution times and fewer needle repositionings. Combining ultrasound‐guided techniques with the needle guidance positioning system may reduce tissue manipulation, thus improving patient comfort and safety.</description><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypodermic needles</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Needles</subject><subject>Nerve Block - instrumentation</subject><subject>Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Nerve Block - standards</subject><subject>Nurse Anesthetists - standards</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Sus scrofa</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</subject><issn>0003-2409</issn><issn>1365-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0ctKxDAYBeAgio6XjQ8gBTciVP9cmyyHYbyA6GZmXdIm1Uqb1qZFZucj-Iw-iakzunAhZpFA8uWQcBA6xnCBw7jUTtsLTJjAW2iCqeAxAca20QQAaEwYqD207_0zACYSy120RxglIDmfoMWy6jvtm8GZj7f3x6E01kTOWlPZ6Ek7U5XuMRr8OOtoPNYut1Hb-LIvGzdu-5XvbR2VLoA2XOmb-hDtFLry9mizHqDl1Xwxu4nvHq5vZ9O7OKcKcMxBUEVJpvKEWsl0lmCegMSQMV4UAigVJs-IVlmeKAFa8iRTRDBhgBnLGT1AZ-vctmteBuv7tC59bqtKO9sMPsVMCSmZkuQfVCThOSDG1NNf9LkZOhc-ElRCgABXKqjztcq7xvvOFmnblbXuVimGdKwlHWtJv2oJ-GQTOWS1NT_0u4cA8Bq8lpVd_RGVTu-n83XoJ9XwllA</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Tielens, L. K. P.</creator><creator>Damen, R. B. C. C.</creator><creator>Lerou, J. G. C.</creator><creator>Scheffer, G.‐J.</creator><creator>Bruhn, J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>Ultrasound‐guided needle handling using a guidance positioning system in a phantom</title><author>Tielens, L. K. P. ; Damen, R. B. C. C. ; Lerou, J. G. C. ; Scheffer, G.‐J. ; Bruhn, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3901-5063932b9c73e84ab71570810b45ff60336dcb2a9bc7960a857b92646d04de543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypodermic needles</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Needles</topic><topic>Nerve Block - instrumentation</topic><topic>Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Nerve Block - standards</topic><topic>Nurse Anesthetists - standards</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Sus scrofa</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tielens, L. K. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damen, R. B. C. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerou, J. G. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheffer, G.‐J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruhn, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tielens, L. K. P.</au><au>Damen, R. B. C. C.</au><au>Lerou, J. G. C.</au><au>Scheffer, G.‐J.</au><au>Bruhn, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound‐guided needle handling using a guidance positioning system in a phantom</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>24-31</pages><issn>0003-2409</issn><eissn>1365-2044</eissn><abstract>Summary The SonixGPS™ needle guidance positioning system provides navigation assistance to facilitate needle handling during ultrasound‐guided procedures. Each of 20 inexperienced nurse anaesthetists performed 12 different ultrasound‐guided tasks in a porcine phantom. Using both in‐plane and out‐of‐plane approaches, they inserted a needle and made contact with metal rods at depths of 2, 4 and 6 cm. We compared their performances without and with navigation as paired observations. Using the out‐of‐plane approach, navigation yielded shorter execution times (26 s vs 14 s, respectively; p = 0.01) and fewer needle repositionings (8 vs 3, respectively; p = 0.001). Using the in‐plane approach, the needle was more visible with navigation assistance: 24% vs 52% of execution time, respectively (95% CI: 44%–12%; p = 0.0025). Better needle visibility was associated with shorter execution times and fewer needle repositionings. Combining ultrasound‐guided techniques with the needle guidance positioning system may reduce tissue manipulation, thus improving patient comfort and safety.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24320855</pmid><doi>10.1111/anae.12461</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2409
ispartof Anaesthesia, 2014-01, Vol.69 (1), p.24-31
issn 0003-2409
1365-2044
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1496884982
source Wiley
subjects Anesthesiology
Animals
Clinical Competence
Humans
Hypodermic needles
Medical personnel
Needles
Nerve Block - instrumentation
Nerve Block - methods
Nerve Block - standards
Nurse Anesthetists - standards
Phantoms, Imaging
Sus scrofa
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods
title Ultrasound‐guided needle handling using a guidance positioning system in a phantom
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T12%3A06%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasound%E2%80%90guided%20needle%20handling%20using%20a%20guidance%20positioning%20system%20in%20a%20phantom&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia&rft.au=Tielens,%20L.%20K.%20P.&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=24-31&rft.issn=0003-2409&rft.eissn=1365-2044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/anae.12461&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1496884982%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3901-5063932b9c73e84ab71570810b45ff60336dcb2a9bc7960a857b92646d04de543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1472020599&rft_id=info:pmid/24320855&rfr_iscdi=true