Loading…

Determining the spectra of radiation belt electron losses: Fitting DEMETER electron flux observations for typical and storm times

The energy spectra of energetic electron precipitation from the radiation belts are studied in order to improve our understanding of the influence of radiation belt processes. The Detection of Electromagnetic Emissions Transmitted from Earthquake Regions (DEMETER) microsatellite electron flux instru...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2013-12, Vol.118 (12), p.7611-7623
Main Authors: Whittaker, Ian C., Gamble, Rory J., Rodger, Craig J., Clilverd, Mark A., Sauvaud, Jean-André
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5550-ac8bf67e7fefab6f2dbd4a5ed65623b363d413f196500745f9e1c7230b0c46643
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5550-ac8bf67e7fefab6f2dbd4a5ed65623b363d413f196500745f9e1c7230b0c46643
container_end_page 7623
container_issue 12
container_start_page 7611
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Space physics
container_volume 118
creator Whittaker, Ian C.
Gamble, Rory J.
Rodger, Craig J.
Clilverd, Mark A.
Sauvaud, Jean-André
description The energy spectra of energetic electron precipitation from the radiation belts are studied in order to improve our understanding of the influence of radiation belt processes. The Detection of Electromagnetic Emissions Transmitted from Earthquake Regions (DEMETER) microsatellite electron flux instrument is comparatively unusual in that it has very high energy resolution (128 channels with 17.9 keV widths in normal survey mode), which lends itself to this type of spectral analysis. Here electron spectra from DEMETER have been analyzed from all six years of its operation, and three fit types (power law, exponential, and kappa‐type) have been applied to the precipitating flux observations. We show that the power law fit consistently provides the best representation of the flux and that the kappa‐type is rarely valid. We also provide estimated uncertainties in the flux for this instrument as a function of energy. Average power law gradients for nontrapped particles have been determined for geomagnetically nondisturbed periods to get a typical global behavior of the spectra in the inner radiation belt, slot region, and outer radiation belt. Power law spectral gradients in the outer belt are typically −2.5 during quiet periods, changing to a softer spectrum of ∼−3.5 during geomagnetic storms. The inner belt does the opposite, hardening from −4 during quiet times to ∼−3 during storms. Typical outer belt e‐folding values are ∼200 keV, dropping to ∼150 keV during geomagnetic storms, while the inner belt e‐folding values change from ∼120 keV to >200 keV. Analysis of geomagnetic storm periods show that the precipitating flux enhancements evident from such storms take approximately 13 days to return to normal values for the outer belt and slot region and approximately 10 days for the inner belt. Key Points Gradient and flux changes from a storm last 13 and 10 days. Instrument uncertainties are calculated The best fit type to use for these spectra is the power law.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2013JA019228
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1496895472</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1496895472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5550-ac8bf67e7fefab6f2dbd4a5ed65623b363d413f196500745f9e1c7230b0c46643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtvEzEURkcIJKq0O36AJYTEgil-z5hd1KYpIS1SVRSpG8vjuQaXeQTboc2Sf45DSkEs8Ma-9jmfrHuL4gXBxwRj-pZiwhZTTBSl9ZPigBKpSsUxffr7zGr8vDiK8RbnVecrIg6KH6eQIPR-8MNnlL4AimuwKRg0OhRM603y44Aa6BKCbveSq26MEeI7dOZT2mmns4vZ9ezqD-C6zT0amwjh-y8_IjcGlLZrb02HzNCimMbQo-R7iIfFM2e6CEcP-6T4dDa7Pjkvlx_n70-my9IKIXBpbN04WUHlwJlGOto2LTcCWikkZQ2TrOWEOaKkwLjiwikgtqIMN9hyKTmbFK_3ueswfttATLr30ULXmQHGTdSEK1krwbMzKV7-g96OmzDk32kiWU0rhbHK1Js9ZUNuSACn18H3Jmw1wXo3Ev33SDL-6iHUxNwGF8xgfXx0aE24YHQXy_bcne9g-99MvZhfTQWWCmer3Fs-Jrh_tEz4qmXFKqFXl3N9s1zdrMgHrhfsJ52AqWM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1638279009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining the spectra of radiation belt electron losses: Fitting DEMETER electron flux observations for typical and storm times</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Whittaker, Ian C. ; Gamble, Rory J. ; Rodger, Craig J. ; Clilverd, Mark A. ; Sauvaud, Jean-André</creator><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Ian C. ; Gamble, Rory J. ; Rodger, Craig J. ; Clilverd, Mark A. ; Sauvaud, Jean-André</creatorcontrib><description>The energy spectra of energetic electron precipitation from the radiation belts are studied in order to improve our understanding of the influence of radiation belt processes. The Detection of Electromagnetic Emissions Transmitted from Earthquake Regions (DEMETER) microsatellite electron flux instrument is comparatively unusual in that it has very high energy resolution (128 channels with 17.9 keV widths in normal survey mode), which lends itself to this type of spectral analysis. Here electron spectra from DEMETER have been analyzed from all six years of its operation, and three fit types (power law, exponential, and kappa‐type) have been applied to the precipitating flux observations. We show that the power law fit consistently provides the best representation of the flux and that the kappa‐type is rarely valid. We also provide estimated uncertainties in the flux for this instrument as a function of energy. Average power law gradients for nontrapped particles have been determined for geomagnetically nondisturbed periods to get a typical global behavior of the spectra in the inner radiation belt, slot region, and outer radiation belt. Power law spectral gradients in the outer belt are typically −2.5 during quiet periods, changing to a softer spectrum of ∼−3.5 during geomagnetic storms. The inner belt does the opposite, hardening from −4 during quiet times to ∼−3 during storms. Typical outer belt e‐folding values are ∼200 keV, dropping to ∼150 keV during geomagnetic storms, while the inner belt e‐folding values change from ∼120 keV to &gt;200 keV. Analysis of geomagnetic storm periods show that the precipitating flux enhancements evident from such storms take approximately 13 days to return to normal values for the outer belt and slot region and approximately 10 days for the inner belt. Key Points Gradient and flux changes from a storm last 13 and 10 days. Instrument uncertainties are calculated The best fit type to use for these spectra is the power law.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2013JA019228</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Astronomy ; DEMETER ; Earth, ocean, space ; Earthquakes ; electron spectral fit ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Fluctuations ; Geophysics ; Interplanetary space ; Physics of the ionosphere ; Physics of the magnetosphere ; radiation belt ; Seismic activity ; Solar system ; Spectral analysis ; Storms</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2013-12, Vol.118 (12), p.7611-7623</ispartof><rights>2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5550-ac8bf67e7fefab6f2dbd4a5ed65623b363d413f196500745f9e1c7230b0c46643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5550-ac8bf67e7fefab6f2dbd4a5ed65623b363d413f196500745f9e1c7230b0c46643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28145329$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Ian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamble, Rory J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodger, Craig J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clilverd, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauvaud, Jean-André</creatorcontrib><title>Determining the spectra of radiation belt electron losses: Fitting DEMETER electron flux observations for typical and storm times</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics</addtitle><description>The energy spectra of energetic electron precipitation from the radiation belts are studied in order to improve our understanding of the influence of radiation belt processes. The Detection of Electromagnetic Emissions Transmitted from Earthquake Regions (DEMETER) microsatellite electron flux instrument is comparatively unusual in that it has very high energy resolution (128 channels with 17.9 keV widths in normal survey mode), which lends itself to this type of spectral analysis. Here electron spectra from DEMETER have been analyzed from all six years of its operation, and three fit types (power law, exponential, and kappa‐type) have been applied to the precipitating flux observations. We show that the power law fit consistently provides the best representation of the flux and that the kappa‐type is rarely valid. We also provide estimated uncertainties in the flux for this instrument as a function of energy. Average power law gradients for nontrapped particles have been determined for geomagnetically nondisturbed periods to get a typical global behavior of the spectra in the inner radiation belt, slot region, and outer radiation belt. Power law spectral gradients in the outer belt are typically −2.5 during quiet periods, changing to a softer spectrum of ∼−3.5 during geomagnetic storms. The inner belt does the opposite, hardening from −4 during quiet times to ∼−3 during storms. Typical outer belt e‐folding values are ∼200 keV, dropping to ∼150 keV during geomagnetic storms, while the inner belt e‐folding values change from ∼120 keV to &gt;200 keV. Analysis of geomagnetic storm periods show that the precipitating flux enhancements evident from such storms take approximately 13 days to return to normal values for the outer belt and slot region and approximately 10 days for the inner belt. Key Points Gradient and flux changes from a storm last 13 and 10 days. Instrument uncertainties are calculated The best fit type to use for these spectra is the power law.</description><subject>Astronomy</subject><subject>DEMETER</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>electron spectral fit</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Interplanetary space</subject><subject>Physics of the ionosphere</subject><subject>Physics of the magnetosphere</subject><subject>radiation belt</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Solar system</subject><subject>Spectral analysis</subject><subject>Storms</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtvEzEURkcIJKq0O36AJYTEgil-z5hd1KYpIS1SVRSpG8vjuQaXeQTboc2Sf45DSkEs8Ma-9jmfrHuL4gXBxwRj-pZiwhZTTBSl9ZPigBKpSsUxffr7zGr8vDiK8RbnVecrIg6KH6eQIPR-8MNnlL4AimuwKRg0OhRM603y44Aa6BKCbveSq26MEeI7dOZT2mmns4vZ9ezqD-C6zT0amwjh-y8_IjcGlLZrb02HzNCimMbQo-R7iIfFM2e6CEcP-6T4dDa7Pjkvlx_n70-my9IKIXBpbN04WUHlwJlGOto2LTcCWikkZQ2TrOWEOaKkwLjiwikgtqIMN9hyKTmbFK_3ueswfttATLr30ULXmQHGTdSEK1krwbMzKV7-g96OmzDk32kiWU0rhbHK1Js9ZUNuSACn18H3Jmw1wXo3Ev33SDL-6iHUxNwGF8xgfXx0aE24YHQXy_bcne9g-99MvZhfTQWWCmer3Fs-Jrh_tEz4qmXFKqFXl3N9s1zdrMgHrhfsJ52AqWM</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>Whittaker, Ian C.</creator><creator>Gamble, Rory J.</creator><creator>Rodger, Craig J.</creator><creator>Clilverd, Mark A.</creator><creator>Sauvaud, Jean-André</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>Determining the spectra of radiation belt electron losses: Fitting DEMETER electron flux observations for typical and storm times</title><author>Whittaker, Ian C. ; Gamble, Rory J. ; Rodger, Craig J. ; Clilverd, Mark A. ; Sauvaud, Jean-André</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5550-ac8bf67e7fefab6f2dbd4a5ed65623b363d413f196500745f9e1c7230b0c46643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Astronomy</topic><topic>DEMETER</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>electron spectral fit</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Interplanetary space</topic><topic>Physics of the ionosphere</topic><topic>Physics of the magnetosphere</topic><topic>radiation belt</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Solar system</topic><topic>Spectral analysis</topic><topic>Storms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Ian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamble, Rory J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodger, Craig J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clilverd, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauvaud, Jean-André</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whittaker, Ian C.</au><au>Gamble, Rory J.</au><au>Rodger, Craig J.</au><au>Clilverd, Mark A.</au><au>Sauvaud, Jean-André</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining the spectra of radiation belt electron losses: Fitting DEMETER electron flux observations for typical and storm times</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics</addtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>7611</spage><epage>7623</epage><pages>7611-7623</pages><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>The energy spectra of energetic electron precipitation from the radiation belts are studied in order to improve our understanding of the influence of radiation belt processes. The Detection of Electromagnetic Emissions Transmitted from Earthquake Regions (DEMETER) microsatellite electron flux instrument is comparatively unusual in that it has very high energy resolution (128 channels with 17.9 keV widths in normal survey mode), which lends itself to this type of spectral analysis. Here electron spectra from DEMETER have been analyzed from all six years of its operation, and three fit types (power law, exponential, and kappa‐type) have been applied to the precipitating flux observations. We show that the power law fit consistently provides the best representation of the flux and that the kappa‐type is rarely valid. We also provide estimated uncertainties in the flux for this instrument as a function of energy. Average power law gradients for nontrapped particles have been determined for geomagnetically nondisturbed periods to get a typical global behavior of the spectra in the inner radiation belt, slot region, and outer radiation belt. Power law spectral gradients in the outer belt are typically −2.5 during quiet periods, changing to a softer spectrum of ∼−3.5 during geomagnetic storms. The inner belt does the opposite, hardening from −4 during quiet times to ∼−3 during storms. Typical outer belt e‐folding values are ∼200 keV, dropping to ∼150 keV during geomagnetic storms, while the inner belt e‐folding values change from ∼120 keV to &gt;200 keV. Analysis of geomagnetic storm periods show that the precipitating flux enhancements evident from such storms take approximately 13 days to return to normal values for the outer belt and slot region and approximately 10 days for the inner belt. Key Points Gradient and flux changes from a storm last 13 and 10 days. Instrument uncertainties are calculated The best fit type to use for these spectra is the power law.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2013JA019228</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9380
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2013-12, Vol.118 (12), p.7611-7623
issn 2169-9380
2169-9402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1496895472
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Astronomy
DEMETER
Earth, ocean, space
Earthquakes
electron spectral fit
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Fluctuations
Geophysics
Interplanetary space
Physics of the ionosphere
Physics of the magnetosphere
radiation belt
Seismic activity
Solar system
Spectral analysis
Storms
title Determining the spectra of radiation belt electron losses: Fitting DEMETER electron flux observations for typical and storm times
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T11%3A57%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20the%20spectra%20of%20radiation%20belt%20electron%20losses:%20Fitting%20DEMETER%20electron%20flux%20observations%20for%20typical%20and%20storm%20times&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Whittaker,%20Ian%20C.&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=7611&rft.epage=7623&rft.pages=7611-7623&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2013JA019228&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1496895472%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5550-ac8bf67e7fefab6f2dbd4a5ed65623b363d413f196500745f9e1c7230b0c46643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1638279009&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true