Loading…
Termination fees revisited
We reconsider the question of the optimal level of termination fees between communication networks in the context of heterogeneous usage and elastic participation. The interaction between these two features yields new insights; in our model: i) The profit maximizing reciprocal termination fee is abo...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of industrial organization 2013-11, Vol.31 (6), p.738-750 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-96349f80add84bbc0cbf6a710e0aa456a10acd637520800bacdc34d4cbcad9f93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-96349f80add84bbc0cbf6a710e0aa456a10acd637520800bacdc34d4cbcad9f93 |
container_end_page | 750 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 738 |
container_title | International journal of industrial organization |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Jullien, Bruno Rey, Patrick Sand-Zantman, Wilfried |
description | We reconsider the question of the optimal level of termination fees between communication networks in the context of heterogeneous usage and elastic participation. The interaction between these two features yields new insights; in our model: i) The profit maximizing reciprocal termination fee is above marginal cost; ii) the welfare maximizing termination fee is also above cost; iii) the welfare-maximizing termination fee is below the profit-maximizing one in the absence of termination-based price discrimination, but can be above it otherwise.
•The paper analyzes network reciprocal termination fees with heterogenous consumers.•The profit-maximizing (PM) level is above the marginal cost of termination.•The welfare-maximizing (WM) level is also above cost.•Without termination-based price discrimination, the WM level is below the PM level.•The conclusions are robust in considering endogenous utility for receiving calls. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2013.05.006 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1496956867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167718713000532</els_id><sourcerecordid>3157721921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-96349f80add84bbc0cbf6a710e0aa456a10acd637520800bacdc34d4cbcad9f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wIMUvHjZddLN500Rv6DgpZ5DNpmVLO2mJtuC_96U6sWLMDDM8LwvMy8hVxRqClTc9nXow-Bj-qjnQJsaeA0gjsiEKtlUUitxTCYFlJUsm1NylnMPAKzUhFwuMa3DYMcQh1mHmGcJdyGHEf05OensKuPFT5-S96fH5cNLtXh7fn24X1SOgxorLRqmOwXWe8Xa1oFrO2ElBQRrGReWgnVeNJLPQQG0ZXAN88y1znrd6WZKbg6-mxQ_t5hHsw7Z4WplB4zbbCjTQnOhhCzo9R-0j9s0lOsKJRQTwOm8UOJAuRRzTtiZTQprm74MBbOPzPTmNzKzj8wANyWyIrw7CLG8uwuYTHYBB4c-JHSj8TH8Z_ENDN93Bw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1468460512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Termination fees revisited</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Jullien, Bruno ; Rey, Patrick ; Sand-Zantman, Wilfried</creator><creatorcontrib>Jullien, Bruno ; Rey, Patrick ; Sand-Zantman, Wilfried</creatorcontrib><description>We reconsider the question of the optimal level of termination fees between communication networks in the context of heterogeneous usage and elastic participation. The interaction between these two features yields new insights; in our model: i) The profit maximizing reciprocal termination fee is above marginal cost; ii) the welfare maximizing termination fee is also above cost; iii) the welfare-maximizing termination fee is below the profit-maximizing one in the absence of termination-based price discrimination, but can be above it otherwise.
•The paper analyzes network reciprocal termination fees with heterogenous consumers.•The profit-maximizing (PM) level is above the marginal cost of termination.•The welfare-maximizing (WM) level is also above cost.•Without termination-based price discrimination, the WM level is below the PM level.•The conclusions are robust in considering endogenous utility for receiving calls.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-7187</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2013.05.006</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJIODY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Communication ; Communications networks ; Costs ; Economic theory ; Elasticity ; Fees & charges ; Mobile ; Network ; Networks ; Profit maximization ; Studies ; Termination fee ; Terminations ; Welfare ; Welfare economics</subject><ispartof>International journal of industrial organization, 2013-11, Vol.31 (6), p.738-750</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Nov 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-96349f80add84bbc0cbf6a710e0aa456a10acd637520800bacdc34d4cbcad9f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-96349f80add84bbc0cbf6a710e0aa456a10acd637520800bacdc34d4cbcad9f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912,33210,33211</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jullien, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rey, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sand-Zantman, Wilfried</creatorcontrib><title>Termination fees revisited</title><title>International journal of industrial organization</title><description>We reconsider the question of the optimal level of termination fees between communication networks in the context of heterogeneous usage and elastic participation. The interaction between these two features yields new insights; in our model: i) The profit maximizing reciprocal termination fee is above marginal cost; ii) the welfare maximizing termination fee is also above cost; iii) the welfare-maximizing termination fee is below the profit-maximizing one in the absence of termination-based price discrimination, but can be above it otherwise.
•The paper analyzes network reciprocal termination fees with heterogenous consumers.•The profit-maximizing (PM) level is above the marginal cost of termination.•The welfare-maximizing (WM) level is also above cost.•Without termination-based price discrimination, the WM level is below the PM level.•The conclusions are robust in considering endogenous utility for receiving calls.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communications networks</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Fees & charges</subject><subject>Mobile</subject><subject>Network</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Profit maximization</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Termination fee</subject><subject>Terminations</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><subject>Welfare economics</subject><issn>0167-7187</issn><issn>1873-7986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wIMUvHjZddLN500Rv6DgpZ5DNpmVLO2mJtuC_96U6sWLMDDM8LwvMy8hVxRqClTc9nXow-Bj-qjnQJsaeA0gjsiEKtlUUitxTCYFlJUsm1NylnMPAKzUhFwuMa3DYMcQh1mHmGcJdyGHEf05OensKuPFT5-S96fH5cNLtXh7fn24X1SOgxorLRqmOwXWe8Xa1oFrO2ElBQRrGReWgnVeNJLPQQG0ZXAN88y1znrd6WZKbg6-mxQ_t5hHsw7Z4WplB4zbbCjTQnOhhCzo9R-0j9s0lOsKJRQTwOm8UOJAuRRzTtiZTQprm74MBbOPzPTmNzKzj8wANyWyIrw7CLG8uwuYTHYBB4c-JHSj8TH8Z_ENDN93Bw</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Jullien, Bruno</creator><creator>Rey, Patrick</creator><creator>Sand-Zantman, Wilfried</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>Termination fees revisited</title><author>Jullien, Bruno ; Rey, Patrick ; Sand-Zantman, Wilfried</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-96349f80add84bbc0cbf6a710e0aa456a10acd637520800bacdc34d4cbcad9f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communications networks</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Fees & charges</topic><topic>Mobile</topic><topic>Network</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Profit maximization</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Termination fee</topic><topic>Terminations</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><topic>Welfare economics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jullien, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rey, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sand-Zantman, Wilfried</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of industrial organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jullien, Bruno</au><au>Rey, Patrick</au><au>Sand-Zantman, Wilfried</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Termination fees revisited</atitle><jtitle>International journal of industrial organization</jtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>738</spage><epage>750</epage><pages>738-750</pages><issn>0167-7187</issn><eissn>1873-7986</eissn><coden>IJIODY</coden><abstract>We reconsider the question of the optimal level of termination fees between communication networks in the context of heterogeneous usage and elastic participation. The interaction between these two features yields new insights; in our model: i) The profit maximizing reciprocal termination fee is above marginal cost; ii) the welfare maximizing termination fee is also above cost; iii) the welfare-maximizing termination fee is below the profit-maximizing one in the absence of termination-based price discrimination, but can be above it otherwise.
•The paper analyzes network reciprocal termination fees with heterogenous consumers.•The profit-maximizing (PM) level is above the marginal cost of termination.•The welfare-maximizing (WM) level is also above cost.•Without termination-based price discrimination, the WM level is below the PM level.•The conclusions are robust in considering endogenous utility for receiving calls.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijindorg.2013.05.006</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-7187 |
ispartof | International journal of industrial organization, 2013-11, Vol.31 (6), p.738-750 |
issn | 0167-7187 1873-7986 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1496956867 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Elsevier |
subjects | Communication Communications networks Costs Economic theory Elasticity Fees & charges Mobile Network Networks Profit maximization Studies Termination fee Terminations Welfare Welfare economics |
title | Termination fees revisited |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T19%3A03%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Termination%20fees%20revisited&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20industrial%20organization&rft.au=Jullien,%20Bruno&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=738&rft.epage=750&rft.pages=738-750&rft.issn=0167-7187&rft.eissn=1873-7986&rft.coden=IJIODY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2013.05.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3157721921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-96349f80add84bbc0cbf6a710e0aa456a10acd637520800bacdc34d4cbcad9f93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1468460512&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |