Loading…
The Taylor principle fights back, Part I
New Keynesian models with limited asset market participation assert that under plausible conditions higher real interest rates increase aggregate demand, the Taylor principle leads to indeterminacy, and passive policy ensures a unique equilibrium. These striking results stem from the assumption that...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of economic dynamics & control 2013-12, Vol.37 (12), p.2771-2795 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4f1555db1fb401b7bedcaf3addcdda427df23d03440d59950ea356af6f93f803 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4f1555db1fb401b7bedcaf3addcdda427df23d03440d59950ea356af6f93f803 |
container_end_page | 2795 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2771 |
container_title | Journal of economic dynamics & control |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Buffie, Edward F. |
description | New Keynesian models with limited asset market participation assert that under plausible conditions higher real interest rates increase aggregate demand, the Taylor principle leads to indeterminacy, and passive policy ensures a unique equilibrium. These striking results stem from the assumption that the real wage is highly flexible. Relaxing this assumption slightly brings back the normal world where higher real interest rates reduce aggregate demand and where the Taylor principle is effectively necessary and sufficient for a unique, stable equilibrium. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jedc.2013.08.003 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1496959080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165188913001711</els_id><sourcerecordid>1496959080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4f1555db1fb401b7bedcaf3addcdda427df23d03440d59950ea356af6f93f803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqXwB5gisXQg4Tm2k1hiQVWBSpVgCLPl-IM6pEmxU6T-e1zKxMD0lnOf7j0IXWPIMODirs1ao1WWAyYZVBkAOUETXJU8xSUlp2gSIZbiquLn6CKEFgBYzvAEzeq1SWq57wafbL3rldt2JrHufT2GpJHq4zZ5lX5MlpfozMoumKvfO0Vvj4t6_pyuXp6W84dVqmjOxlRTixljusG2oYCbsom9pCVSa6W1pHmpbU40EEpBM84ZGElYIW1hObEVkCmaHf9u_fC5M2EUGxeU6TrZm2EXBKa84IzDD3rzB22Hne9ju0gxTgsgjEUqP1LKDyF4Y0XcuZF-LzCIgzzRioM8cZAnoBJRXgzdH0MmTv1yxougnOmV0c4bNQo9uP_i38PNddg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1459460355</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Taylor principle fights back, Part I</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Buffie, Edward F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buffie, Edward F.</creatorcontrib><description>New Keynesian models with limited asset market participation assert that under plausible conditions higher real interest rates increase aggregate demand, the Taylor principle leads to indeterminacy, and passive policy ensures a unique equilibrium. These striking results stem from the assumption that the real wage is highly flexible. Relaxing this assumption slightly brings back the normal world where higher real interest rates reduce aggregate demand and where the Taylor principle is effectively necessary and sufficient for a unique, stable equilibrium.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1743</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2013.08.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEDCDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Economic dynamics ; Economic equilibrium ; Economic theory ; Indeterminacy ; Inflation ; Interest rates ; Keynesian theory ; Keynesianism ; Limited asset market participation ; Monetary policy ; Real wages ; Studies ; Taylor principle ; Taylor rule</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic dynamics & control, 2013-12, Vol.37 (12), p.2771-2795</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Dec 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4f1555db1fb401b7bedcaf3addcdda427df23d03440d59950ea356af6f93f803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4f1555db1fb401b7bedcaf3addcdda427df23d03440d59950ea356af6f93f803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buffie, Edward F.</creatorcontrib><title>The Taylor principle fights back, Part I</title><title>Journal of economic dynamics & control</title><description>New Keynesian models with limited asset market participation assert that under plausible conditions higher real interest rates increase aggregate demand, the Taylor principle leads to indeterminacy, and passive policy ensures a unique equilibrium. These striking results stem from the assumption that the real wage is highly flexible. Relaxing this assumption slightly brings back the normal world where higher real interest rates reduce aggregate demand and where the Taylor principle is effectively necessary and sufficient for a unique, stable equilibrium.</description><subject>Economic dynamics</subject><subject>Economic equilibrium</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Indeterminacy</subject><subject>Inflation</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Keynesian theory</subject><subject>Keynesianism</subject><subject>Limited asset market participation</subject><subject>Monetary policy</subject><subject>Real wages</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Taylor principle</subject><subject>Taylor rule</subject><issn>0165-1889</issn><issn>1879-1743</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqXwB5gisXQg4Tm2k1hiQVWBSpVgCLPl-IM6pEmxU6T-e1zKxMD0lnOf7j0IXWPIMODirs1ao1WWAyYZVBkAOUETXJU8xSUlp2gSIZbiquLn6CKEFgBYzvAEzeq1SWq57wafbL3rldt2JrHufT2GpJHq4zZ5lX5MlpfozMoumKvfO0Vvj4t6_pyuXp6W84dVqmjOxlRTixljusG2oYCbsom9pCVSa6W1pHmpbU40EEpBM84ZGElYIW1hObEVkCmaHf9u_fC5M2EUGxeU6TrZm2EXBKa84IzDD3rzB22Hne9ju0gxTgsgjEUqP1LKDyF4Y0XcuZF-LzCIgzzRioM8cZAnoBJRXgzdH0MmTv1yxougnOmV0c4bNQo9uP_i38PNddg</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Buffie, Edward F.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>The Taylor principle fights back, Part I</title><author>Buffie, Edward F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4f1555db1fb401b7bedcaf3addcdda427df23d03440d59950ea356af6f93f803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Economic dynamics</topic><topic>Economic equilibrium</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Indeterminacy</topic><topic>Inflation</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Keynesian theory</topic><topic>Keynesianism</topic><topic>Limited asset market participation</topic><topic>Monetary policy</topic><topic>Real wages</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Taylor principle</topic><topic>Taylor rule</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buffie, Edward F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic dynamics & control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buffie, Edward F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Taylor principle fights back, Part I</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic dynamics & control</jtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2771</spage><epage>2795</epage><pages>2771-2795</pages><issn>0165-1889</issn><eissn>1879-1743</eissn><coden>JEDCDH</coden><abstract>New Keynesian models with limited asset market participation assert that under plausible conditions higher real interest rates increase aggregate demand, the Taylor principle leads to indeterminacy, and passive policy ensures a unique equilibrium. These striking results stem from the assumption that the real wage is highly flexible. Relaxing this assumption slightly brings back the normal world where higher real interest rates reduce aggregate demand and where the Taylor principle is effectively necessary and sufficient for a unique, stable equilibrium.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jedc.2013.08.003</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-1889 |
ispartof | Journal of economic dynamics & control, 2013-12, Vol.37 (12), p.2771-2795 |
issn | 0165-1889 1879-1743 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1496959080 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Economic dynamics Economic equilibrium Economic theory Indeterminacy Inflation Interest rates Keynesian theory Keynesianism Limited asset market participation Monetary policy Real wages Studies Taylor principle Taylor rule |
title | The Taylor principle fights back, Part I |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A48%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Taylor%20principle%20fights%20back,%20Part%20I&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20dynamics%20&%20control&rft.au=Buffie,%20Edward%20F.&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2771&rft.epage=2795&rft.pages=2771-2795&rft.issn=0165-1889&rft.eissn=1879-1743&rft.coden=JEDCDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jedc.2013.08.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1496959080%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4f1555db1fb401b7bedcaf3addcdda427df23d03440d59950ea356af6f93f803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1459460355&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |