Loading…

The Taylor principle fights back, Part I

New Keynesian models with limited asset market participation assert that under plausible conditions higher real interest rates increase aggregate demand, the Taylor principle leads to indeterminacy, and passive policy ensures a unique equilibrium. These striking results stem from the assumption that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of economic dynamics & control 2013-12, Vol.37 (12), p.2771-2795
Main Author: Buffie, Edward F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4f1555db1fb401b7bedcaf3addcdda427df23d03440d59950ea356af6f93f803
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4f1555db1fb401b7bedcaf3addcdda427df23d03440d59950ea356af6f93f803
container_end_page 2795
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2771
container_title Journal of economic dynamics & control
container_volume 37
creator Buffie, Edward F.
description New Keynesian models with limited asset market participation assert that under plausible conditions higher real interest rates increase aggregate demand, the Taylor principle leads to indeterminacy, and passive policy ensures a unique equilibrium. These striking results stem from the assumption that the real wage is highly flexible. Relaxing this assumption slightly brings back the normal world where higher real interest rates reduce aggregate demand and where the Taylor principle is effectively necessary and sufficient for a unique, stable equilibrium.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jedc.2013.08.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1496959080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165188913001711</els_id><sourcerecordid>1496959080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4f1555db1fb401b7bedcaf3addcdda427df23d03440d59950ea356af6f93f803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqXwB5gisXQg4Tm2k1hiQVWBSpVgCLPl-IM6pEmxU6T-e1zKxMD0lnOf7j0IXWPIMODirs1ao1WWAyYZVBkAOUETXJU8xSUlp2gSIZbiquLn6CKEFgBYzvAEzeq1SWq57wafbL3rldt2JrHufT2GpJHq4zZ5lX5MlpfozMoumKvfO0Vvj4t6_pyuXp6W84dVqmjOxlRTixljusG2oYCbsom9pCVSa6W1pHmpbU40EEpBM84ZGElYIW1hObEVkCmaHf9u_fC5M2EUGxeU6TrZm2EXBKa84IzDD3rzB22Hne9ju0gxTgsgjEUqP1LKDyF4Y0XcuZF-LzCIgzzRioM8cZAnoBJRXgzdH0MmTv1yxougnOmV0c4bNQo9uP_i38PNddg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1459460355</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Taylor principle fights back, Part I</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Buffie, Edward F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buffie, Edward F.</creatorcontrib><description>New Keynesian models with limited asset market participation assert that under plausible conditions higher real interest rates increase aggregate demand, the Taylor principle leads to indeterminacy, and passive policy ensures a unique equilibrium. These striking results stem from the assumption that the real wage is highly flexible. Relaxing this assumption slightly brings back the normal world where higher real interest rates reduce aggregate demand and where the Taylor principle is effectively necessary and sufficient for a unique, stable equilibrium.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1743</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2013.08.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEDCDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Economic dynamics ; Economic equilibrium ; Economic theory ; Indeterminacy ; Inflation ; Interest rates ; Keynesian theory ; Keynesianism ; Limited asset market participation ; Monetary policy ; Real wages ; Studies ; Taylor principle ; Taylor rule</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic dynamics &amp; control, 2013-12, Vol.37 (12), p.2771-2795</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Dec 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4f1555db1fb401b7bedcaf3addcdda427df23d03440d59950ea356af6f93f803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4f1555db1fb401b7bedcaf3addcdda427df23d03440d59950ea356af6f93f803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buffie, Edward F.</creatorcontrib><title>The Taylor principle fights back, Part I</title><title>Journal of economic dynamics &amp; control</title><description>New Keynesian models with limited asset market participation assert that under plausible conditions higher real interest rates increase aggregate demand, the Taylor principle leads to indeterminacy, and passive policy ensures a unique equilibrium. These striking results stem from the assumption that the real wage is highly flexible. Relaxing this assumption slightly brings back the normal world where higher real interest rates reduce aggregate demand and where the Taylor principle is effectively necessary and sufficient for a unique, stable equilibrium.</description><subject>Economic dynamics</subject><subject>Economic equilibrium</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Indeterminacy</subject><subject>Inflation</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Keynesian theory</subject><subject>Keynesianism</subject><subject>Limited asset market participation</subject><subject>Monetary policy</subject><subject>Real wages</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Taylor principle</subject><subject>Taylor rule</subject><issn>0165-1889</issn><issn>1879-1743</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqXwB5gisXQg4Tm2k1hiQVWBSpVgCLPl-IM6pEmxU6T-e1zKxMD0lnOf7j0IXWPIMODirs1ao1WWAyYZVBkAOUETXJU8xSUlp2gSIZbiquLn6CKEFgBYzvAEzeq1SWq57wafbL3rldt2JrHufT2GpJHq4zZ5lX5MlpfozMoumKvfO0Vvj4t6_pyuXp6W84dVqmjOxlRTixljusG2oYCbsom9pCVSa6W1pHmpbU40EEpBM84ZGElYIW1hObEVkCmaHf9u_fC5M2EUGxeU6TrZm2EXBKa84IzDD3rzB22Hne9ju0gxTgsgjEUqP1LKDyF4Y0XcuZF-LzCIgzzRioM8cZAnoBJRXgzdH0MmTv1yxougnOmV0c4bNQo9uP_i38PNddg</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Buffie, Edward F.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>The Taylor principle fights back, Part I</title><author>Buffie, Edward F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4f1555db1fb401b7bedcaf3addcdda427df23d03440d59950ea356af6f93f803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Economic dynamics</topic><topic>Economic equilibrium</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Indeterminacy</topic><topic>Inflation</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Keynesian theory</topic><topic>Keynesianism</topic><topic>Limited asset market participation</topic><topic>Monetary policy</topic><topic>Real wages</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Taylor principle</topic><topic>Taylor rule</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buffie, Edward F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic dynamics &amp; control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buffie, Edward F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Taylor principle fights back, Part I</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic dynamics &amp; control</jtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2771</spage><epage>2795</epage><pages>2771-2795</pages><issn>0165-1889</issn><eissn>1879-1743</eissn><coden>JEDCDH</coden><abstract>New Keynesian models with limited asset market participation assert that under plausible conditions higher real interest rates increase aggregate demand, the Taylor principle leads to indeterminacy, and passive policy ensures a unique equilibrium. These striking results stem from the assumption that the real wage is highly flexible. Relaxing this assumption slightly brings back the normal world where higher real interest rates reduce aggregate demand and where the Taylor principle is effectively necessary and sufficient for a unique, stable equilibrium.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jedc.2013.08.003</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-1889
ispartof Journal of economic dynamics & control, 2013-12, Vol.37 (12), p.2771-2795
issn 0165-1889
1879-1743
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1496959080
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Economic dynamics
Economic equilibrium
Economic theory
Indeterminacy
Inflation
Interest rates
Keynesian theory
Keynesianism
Limited asset market participation
Monetary policy
Real wages
Studies
Taylor principle
Taylor rule
title The Taylor principle fights back, Part I
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A48%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Taylor%20principle%20fights%20back,%20Part%20I&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20dynamics%20&%20control&rft.au=Buffie,%20Edward%20F.&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2771&rft.epage=2795&rft.pages=2771-2795&rft.issn=0165-1889&rft.eissn=1879-1743&rft.coden=JEDCDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jedc.2013.08.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1496959080%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4f1555db1fb401b7bedcaf3addcdda427df23d03440d59950ea356af6f93f803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1459460355&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true