Loading…

Procedural transparency in rural Romania: linking implementation with administrative capacity?

The article discusses the concept of procedural administrative transparency and aims to investigate the extent to which the legal provisions of Law no. 52/2003 on transparency in decision-making are actually implemented by the local administrations from the rural communities in the Transylvania regi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International review of administrative sciences 2012-03, Vol.78 (1), p.134-157
Main Authors: Dragos, Dacian C, Neamtu, Bogdana, Cobârzan, Bianca V
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-d1aacf5af028b60e289f778caa7b0f020afbff8908d28ac79da9ebc0eb64fff33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-d1aacf5af028b60e289f778caa7b0f020afbff8908d28ac79da9ebc0eb64fff33
container_end_page 157
container_issue 1
container_start_page 134
container_title International review of administrative sciences
container_volume 78
creator Dragos, Dacian C
Neamtu, Bogdana
Cobârzan, Bianca V
description The article discusses the concept of procedural administrative transparency and aims to investigate the extent to which the legal provisions of Law no. 52/2003 on transparency in decision-making are actually implemented by the local administrations from the rural communities in the Transylvania region, Romania. The main research questions are: Where are the weaknesses in the implementation of Law no. 52/2003 in the rural settings in Romania? Why do they occur? What could be changed to alleviate these weaknesses? Based on a mixed method approach – surveys followed by direct observation and informal interviews – we determined that the implementation of procedural transparency requirements is low and in many cases local public authorities comply only ‘for the record’ with the provisions of the law. The main challenge with regard to implementation is the existence of universal provisions for all local public authorities, irrespective of their administrative capacity, existing cultural and social characteristics of public participation and communication in rural communities as well as the relationship between central and local tiers of the government. In conclusion, the authors argue that the implementation level of these requirements could be enhanced by their inclusion in a general procedural administrative law. Points for practitioners Very often, countries from Eastern Europe adopt state-of-the-art legislation which is then difficult to implement due to factors such as limited administrative capacity at the local level coupled with differences between urban and rural areas, resistance to change within the bureaucratic machinery, passiveness on behalf of the citizens, etc. In 2003, Romania adopted the law on transparency in the decision-making process of public authorities in an attempt to create a more open, transparent, accountable, and predictable government. Since its adoption, studies conducted by NGOs have proved that the implementation level is relatively low. This research assesses how the legal provisions of Law no. 52/2003 are implemented in the rural areas of Transylvania, one of the most significant regions of the country from an economic and cultural standpoint. Based on their findings, the authors argue that implementation in rural areas could be enhanced provided that local authorities are given more discretion with regard to how to implement certain provisions (flexibility in the choice of policy tools); and more discretion should be compleme
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0020852311430283
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1497674189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0020852311430283</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2648943791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-d1aacf5af028b60e289f778caa7b0f020afbff8908d28ac79da9ebc0eb64fff33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1LxDAQxYMouK7ePRa8eKkm6UcSLyLiFywoolfLNE3WrG1ak1TZ_96s60EWxNPAe7_3mGEQOiT4hBDGTjGmmBc0IyTPMOXZFpqQvCQpo7TcRpOVna78XbTn_QJjknPCJ-jlwfVSNaODNgkOrB_AKSuXibGJ-1Yf-w6sgbOkNfbN2HliuqFVnbIBgult8mnCawJNZ6zxsSGYD5VIGECasDzfRzsaWq8OfuYUPV9fPV3eprP7m7vLi1kqM1aEtCEAUheg4-Z1iRXlQjPGJQCrcRQx6FprLjBvKAfJRANC1RKrusy11lk2Rcfr3sH176PyoeqMl6ptwap-9BXJBStZTrj4H8VYEMqIIBE92kAX_ehsPCRSBBdZXpQrCq8p6XrvndLV4EwHbhmhavWbavM3MZKuIx7m6nfpH_wXcbOPmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1010534561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Procedural transparency in rural Romania: linking implementation with administrative capacity?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Dragos, Dacian C ; Neamtu, Bogdana ; Cobârzan, Bianca V</creator><creatorcontrib>Dragos, Dacian C ; Neamtu, Bogdana ; Cobârzan, Bianca V</creatorcontrib><description>The article discusses the concept of procedural administrative transparency and aims to investigate the extent to which the legal provisions of Law no. 52/2003 on transparency in decision-making are actually implemented by the local administrations from the rural communities in the Transylvania region, Romania. The main research questions are: Where are the weaknesses in the implementation of Law no. 52/2003 in the rural settings in Romania? Why do they occur? What could be changed to alleviate these weaknesses? Based on a mixed method approach – surveys followed by direct observation and informal interviews – we determined that the implementation of procedural transparency requirements is low and in many cases local public authorities comply only ‘for the record’ with the provisions of the law. The main challenge with regard to implementation is the existence of universal provisions for all local public authorities, irrespective of their administrative capacity, existing cultural and social characteristics of public participation and communication in rural communities as well as the relationship between central and local tiers of the government. In conclusion, the authors argue that the implementation level of these requirements could be enhanced by their inclusion in a general procedural administrative law. Points for practitioners Very often, countries from Eastern Europe adopt state-of-the-art legislation which is then difficult to implement due to factors such as limited administrative capacity at the local level coupled with differences between urban and rural areas, resistance to change within the bureaucratic machinery, passiveness on behalf of the citizens, etc. In 2003, Romania adopted the law on transparency in the decision-making process of public authorities in an attempt to create a more open, transparent, accountable, and predictable government. Since its adoption, studies conducted by NGOs have proved that the implementation level is relatively low. This research assesses how the legal provisions of Law no. 52/2003 are implemented in the rural areas of Transylvania, one of the most significant regions of the country from an economic and cultural standpoint. Based on their findings, the authors argue that implementation in rural areas could be enhanced provided that local authorities are given more discretion with regard to how to implement certain provisions (flexibility in the choice of policy tools); and more discretion should be complemented by increased sanctions for non-compliance and their enforcement. These two goals can be achieved by including the procedural transparency requirements in a general administrative procedure law/administrative code.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-8523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0020852311430283</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Administrative efficiency ; Administrative Law ; Central-local government relations ; Citizen Participation ; Communication ; Compliance ; Decision making ; Implementation ; Law ; Local government ; Management ; NGOs ; Nongovernmental organizations ; Public administration ; Romania ; Rural Areas ; Rural Communities ; Studies ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>International review of administrative sciences, 2012-03, Vol.78 (1), p.134-157</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Mar 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-d1aacf5af028b60e289f778caa7b0f020afbff8908d28ac79da9ebc0eb64fff33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-d1aacf5af028b60e289f778caa7b0f020afbff8908d28ac79da9ebc0eb64fff33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,33202,33203,79110</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dragos, Dacian C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neamtu, Bogdana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cobârzan, Bianca V</creatorcontrib><title>Procedural transparency in rural Romania: linking implementation with administrative capacity?</title><title>International review of administrative sciences</title><description>The article discusses the concept of procedural administrative transparency and aims to investigate the extent to which the legal provisions of Law no. 52/2003 on transparency in decision-making are actually implemented by the local administrations from the rural communities in the Transylvania region, Romania. The main research questions are: Where are the weaknesses in the implementation of Law no. 52/2003 in the rural settings in Romania? Why do they occur? What could be changed to alleviate these weaknesses? Based on a mixed method approach – surveys followed by direct observation and informal interviews – we determined that the implementation of procedural transparency requirements is low and in many cases local public authorities comply only ‘for the record’ with the provisions of the law. The main challenge with regard to implementation is the existence of universal provisions for all local public authorities, irrespective of their administrative capacity, existing cultural and social characteristics of public participation and communication in rural communities as well as the relationship between central and local tiers of the government. In conclusion, the authors argue that the implementation level of these requirements could be enhanced by their inclusion in a general procedural administrative law. Points for practitioners Very often, countries from Eastern Europe adopt state-of-the-art legislation which is then difficult to implement due to factors such as limited administrative capacity at the local level coupled with differences between urban and rural areas, resistance to change within the bureaucratic machinery, passiveness on behalf of the citizens, etc. In 2003, Romania adopted the law on transparency in the decision-making process of public authorities in an attempt to create a more open, transparent, accountable, and predictable government. Since its adoption, studies conducted by NGOs have proved that the implementation level is relatively low. This research assesses how the legal provisions of Law no. 52/2003 are implemented in the rural areas of Transylvania, one of the most significant regions of the country from an economic and cultural standpoint. Based on their findings, the authors argue that implementation in rural areas could be enhanced provided that local authorities are given more discretion with regard to how to implement certain provisions (flexibility in the choice of policy tools); and more discretion should be complemented by increased sanctions for non-compliance and their enforcement. These two goals can be achieved by including the procedural transparency requirements in a general administrative procedure law/administrative code.</description><subject>Administrative efficiency</subject><subject>Administrative Law</subject><subject>Central-local government relations</subject><subject>Citizen Participation</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>NGOs</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Romania</subject><subject>Rural Areas</subject><subject>Rural Communities</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>0020-8523</issn><issn>1461-7226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1LxDAQxYMouK7ePRa8eKkm6UcSLyLiFywoolfLNE3WrG1ak1TZ_96s60EWxNPAe7_3mGEQOiT4hBDGTjGmmBc0IyTPMOXZFpqQvCQpo7TcRpOVna78XbTn_QJjknPCJ-jlwfVSNaODNgkOrB_AKSuXibGJ-1Yf-w6sgbOkNfbN2HliuqFVnbIBgult8mnCawJNZ6zxsSGYD5VIGECasDzfRzsaWq8OfuYUPV9fPV3eprP7m7vLi1kqM1aEtCEAUheg4-Z1iRXlQjPGJQCrcRQx6FprLjBvKAfJRANC1RKrusy11lk2Rcfr3sH176PyoeqMl6ptwap-9BXJBStZTrj4H8VYEMqIIBE92kAX_ehsPCRSBBdZXpQrCq8p6XrvndLV4EwHbhmhavWbavM3MZKuIx7m6nfpH_wXcbOPmQ</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>Dragos, Dacian C</creator><creator>Neamtu, Bogdana</creator><creator>Cobârzan, Bianca V</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>Procedural transparency in rural Romania: linking implementation with administrative capacity?</title><author>Dragos, Dacian C ; Neamtu, Bogdana ; Cobârzan, Bianca V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-d1aacf5af028b60e289f778caa7b0f020afbff8908d28ac79da9ebc0eb64fff33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Administrative efficiency</topic><topic>Administrative Law</topic><topic>Central-local government relations</topic><topic>Citizen Participation</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>NGOs</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Romania</topic><topic>Rural Areas</topic><topic>Rural Communities</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dragos, Dacian C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neamtu, Bogdana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cobârzan, Bianca V</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International review of administrative sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dragos, Dacian C</au><au>Neamtu, Bogdana</au><au>Cobârzan, Bianca V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Procedural transparency in rural Romania: linking implementation with administrative capacity?</atitle><jtitle>International review of administrative sciences</jtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>157</epage><pages>134-157</pages><issn>0020-8523</issn><eissn>1461-7226</eissn><abstract>The article discusses the concept of procedural administrative transparency and aims to investigate the extent to which the legal provisions of Law no. 52/2003 on transparency in decision-making are actually implemented by the local administrations from the rural communities in the Transylvania region, Romania. The main research questions are: Where are the weaknesses in the implementation of Law no. 52/2003 in the rural settings in Romania? Why do they occur? What could be changed to alleviate these weaknesses? Based on a mixed method approach – surveys followed by direct observation and informal interviews – we determined that the implementation of procedural transparency requirements is low and in many cases local public authorities comply only ‘for the record’ with the provisions of the law. The main challenge with regard to implementation is the existence of universal provisions for all local public authorities, irrespective of their administrative capacity, existing cultural and social characteristics of public participation and communication in rural communities as well as the relationship between central and local tiers of the government. In conclusion, the authors argue that the implementation level of these requirements could be enhanced by their inclusion in a general procedural administrative law. Points for practitioners Very often, countries from Eastern Europe adopt state-of-the-art legislation which is then difficult to implement due to factors such as limited administrative capacity at the local level coupled with differences between urban and rural areas, resistance to change within the bureaucratic machinery, passiveness on behalf of the citizens, etc. In 2003, Romania adopted the law on transparency in the decision-making process of public authorities in an attempt to create a more open, transparent, accountable, and predictable government. Since its adoption, studies conducted by NGOs have proved that the implementation level is relatively low. This research assesses how the legal provisions of Law no. 52/2003 are implemented in the rural areas of Transylvania, one of the most significant regions of the country from an economic and cultural standpoint. Based on their findings, the authors argue that implementation in rural areas could be enhanced provided that local authorities are given more discretion with regard to how to implement certain provisions (flexibility in the choice of policy tools); and more discretion should be complemented by increased sanctions for non-compliance and their enforcement. These two goals can be achieved by including the procedural transparency requirements in a general administrative procedure law/administrative code.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0020852311430283</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-8523
ispartof International review of administrative sciences, 2012-03, Vol.78 (1), p.134-157
issn 0020-8523
1461-7226
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1497674189
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE
subjects Administrative efficiency
Administrative Law
Central-local government relations
Citizen Participation
Communication
Compliance
Decision making
Implementation
Law
Local government
Management
NGOs
Nongovernmental organizations
Public administration
Romania
Rural Areas
Rural Communities
Studies
Transparency
title Procedural transparency in rural Romania: linking implementation with administrative capacity?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T11%3A04%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Procedural%20transparency%20in%20rural%20Romania:%20linking%20implementation%20with%20administrative%20capacity?&rft.jtitle=International%20review%20of%20administrative%20sciences&rft.au=Dragos,%20Dacian%20C&rft.date=2012-03&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=157&rft.pages=134-157&rft.issn=0020-8523&rft.eissn=1461-7226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0020852311430283&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2648943791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-d1aacf5af028b60e289f778caa7b0f020afbff8908d28ac79da9ebc0eb64fff33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1010534561&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0020852311430283&rfr_iscdi=true