Loading…
Anatomic versus nonanatomic resection in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma
Background Whether anatomic resection (AR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can really confer a survival advantage over non-AR (NAR), especially for cirrhotic patients, remains unclear. Methods Prospectively collected data of 543 cirrhotic patients in Child–Pugh class A submitted to AR ( n = 228)...
Saved in:
Published in: | Surgery 2014-03, Vol.155 (3), p.512-521 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bd8b357eaed418ec1a4c4ee0dea2c68b48007163560158398279b9c48818ddb73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bd8b357eaed418ec1a4c4ee0dea2c68b48007163560158398279b9c48818ddb73 |
container_end_page | 521 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 512 |
container_title | Surgery |
container_volume | 155 |
creator | Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD Li, Jun, MD Xia, Yong, MD Ercolani, Giorgio, MD Shen, Feng, MD Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD |
description | Background Whether anatomic resection (AR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can really confer a survival advantage over non-AR (NAR), especially for cirrhotic patients, remains unclear. Methods Prospectively collected data of 543 cirrhotic patients in Child–Pugh class A submitted to AR ( n = 228) versus NAR ( n = 315) for early HCC in an Eastern ( n = 269) and a Western ( n = 274) surgical unit, were reviewed. To control for confounding variable distributions, a 1-to-1 propensity score match was applied to compare AR and NAR outcomes ( n = 298). Results The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survivals of the 543 patients were 32.3% and 60.0%, respectively, without differences between the 2 centers ( P = .635 and .479, respectively). AR conferred better overall and recurrence-free survival than NAR ( P = .009 and .041, respectively), but NAR patients suffered from significantly worse hepatic dysfunction. After 1-to-1 match, AR ( n = 149) and NAR ( n = 149) patients had similar covariate distributions. In this matched sample, AR still conferred better recurrence-free survival over NAR ( P = .044) but the beneficial effect of AR was limited to the reduction of early recurrence ( |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.009 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499156378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0039606013005400</els_id><sourcerecordid>1499156378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bd8b357eaed418ec1a4c4ee0dea2c68b48007163560158398279b9c48818ddb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFP3DAQhS0Egi3lD_RQ5cgl25nYSRypqoRWQCshcYCeLccZWG8Te7ET0P57HC1w6IGT5af3nma-YewbwhIBqx-bZZzC47IA5ElYAjQHbIElL_KaV3jIFgC8ySuo4IR9iXEDySFQHrOTQgje1KJeMHXh9OgHa7JnCnGKmfNOv0uBIpnRepdZlxkbwtqPSd7q0ZIbY_Zix3VGOvS7bE1J9Yb6fup1yIwOxjo_6K_s6EH3kc7e3lP29-ryfvU7v7m9_rO6uMmNQBzztpMtL2vS1KUJyaAWRhBBR7owlWyFBKix4mUFWEreyKJu2sYIKVF2XVvzU3a-790G_zRRHNVg4zyOduSnqFA0DZYVr2WyFnurCT7GQA9qG-ygw04hqBms2qgZrJrBzlrClkLf3_qndqDuI_JOMhl-7g2Utny2FFQ0iZKhzoYEUXXeft7_67-46a2zRvf_aEdx46fgEj-FKhYK1N182vmyyAFKkX6vCX6gUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1499156378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anatomic versus nonanatomic resection in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD ; Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD ; Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD ; Li, Jun, MD ; Xia, Yong, MD ; Ercolani, Giorgio, MD ; Shen, Feng, MD ; Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD ; Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD ; Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD ; Li, Jun, MD ; Xia, Yong, MD ; Ercolani, Giorgio, MD ; Shen, Feng, MD ; Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Whether anatomic resection (AR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can really confer a survival advantage over non-AR (NAR), especially for cirrhotic patients, remains unclear. Methods Prospectively collected data of 543 cirrhotic patients in Child–Pugh class A submitted to AR ( n = 228) versus NAR ( n = 315) for early HCC in an Eastern ( n = 269) and a Western ( n = 274) surgical unit, were reviewed. To control for confounding variable distributions, a 1-to-1 propensity score match was applied to compare AR and NAR outcomes ( n = 298). Results The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survivals of the 543 patients were 32.3% and 60.0%, respectively, without differences between the 2 centers ( P = .635 and .479, respectively). AR conferred better overall and recurrence-free survival than NAR ( P = .009 and .041, respectively), but NAR patients suffered from significantly worse hepatic dysfunction. After 1-to-1 match, AR ( n = 149) and NAR ( n = 149) patients had similar covariate distributions. In this matched sample, AR still conferred better recurrence-free survival over NAR ( P = .044) but the beneficial effect of AR was limited to the reduction of early recurrence (<2 years) of poorly differentiated tumors and of tumors with microvascular invasion ( P < .05), resulting in better overall survival ( P = .018). Conclusion In cirrhotic patients, AR for early HCC can lead to a lower early recurrence rate in tumors with unfavorable tumor features, whereas NAR will not worsen the recurrence rate in well/moderately differentiated tumors or in the absence of microvascular invasion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24439747</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - complications ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hepatectomy - methods ; Humans ; Liver Cirrhosis - etiology ; Liver Neoplasms - complications ; Liver Neoplasms - mortality ; Liver Neoplasms - surgery ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Propensity Score ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Surgery, 2014-03, Vol.155 (3), p.512-521</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2014 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bd8b357eaed418ec1a4c4ee0dea2c68b48007163560158398279b9c48818ddb73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bd8b357eaed418ec1a4c4ee0dea2c68b48007163560158398279b9c48818ddb73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5269-1964</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24439747$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jun, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Yong, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ercolani, Giorgio, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Feng, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Anatomic versus nonanatomic resection in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma</title><title>Surgery</title><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><description>Background Whether anatomic resection (AR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can really confer a survival advantage over non-AR (NAR), especially for cirrhotic patients, remains unclear. Methods Prospectively collected data of 543 cirrhotic patients in Child–Pugh class A submitted to AR ( n = 228) versus NAR ( n = 315) for early HCC in an Eastern ( n = 269) and a Western ( n = 274) surgical unit, were reviewed. To control for confounding variable distributions, a 1-to-1 propensity score match was applied to compare AR and NAR outcomes ( n = 298). Results The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survivals of the 543 patients were 32.3% and 60.0%, respectively, without differences between the 2 centers ( P = .635 and .479, respectively). AR conferred better overall and recurrence-free survival than NAR ( P = .009 and .041, respectively), but NAR patients suffered from significantly worse hepatic dysfunction. After 1-to-1 match, AR ( n = 149) and NAR ( n = 149) patients had similar covariate distributions. In this matched sample, AR still conferred better recurrence-free survival over NAR ( P = .044) but the beneficial effect of AR was limited to the reduction of early recurrence (<2 years) of poorly differentiated tumors and of tumors with microvascular invasion ( P < .05), resulting in better overall survival ( P = .018). Conclusion In cirrhotic patients, AR for early HCC can lead to a lower early recurrence rate in tumors with unfavorable tumor features, whereas NAR will not worsen the recurrence rate in well/moderately differentiated tumors or in the absence of microvascular invasion.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - complications</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver Cirrhosis - etiology</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUFP3DAQhS0Egi3lD_RQ5cgl25nYSRypqoRWQCshcYCeLccZWG8Te7ET0P57HC1w6IGT5af3nma-YewbwhIBqx-bZZzC47IA5ElYAjQHbIElL_KaV3jIFgC8ySuo4IR9iXEDySFQHrOTQgje1KJeMHXh9OgHa7JnCnGKmfNOv0uBIpnRepdZlxkbwtqPSd7q0ZIbY_Zix3VGOvS7bE1J9Yb6fup1yIwOxjo_6K_s6EH3kc7e3lP29-ryfvU7v7m9_rO6uMmNQBzztpMtL2vS1KUJyaAWRhBBR7owlWyFBKix4mUFWEreyKJu2sYIKVF2XVvzU3a-790G_zRRHNVg4zyOduSnqFA0DZYVr2WyFnurCT7GQA9qG-ygw04hqBms2qgZrJrBzlrClkLf3_qndqDuI_JOMhl-7g2Utny2FFQ0iZKhzoYEUXXeft7_67-46a2zRvf_aEdx46fgEj-FKhYK1N182vmyyAFKkX6vCX6gUw</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD</creator><creator>Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD</creator><creator>Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Li, Jun, MD</creator><creator>Xia, Yong, MD</creator><creator>Ercolani, Giorgio, MD</creator><creator>Shen, Feng, MD</creator><creator>Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5269-1964</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Anatomic versus nonanatomic resection in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma</title><author>Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD ; Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD ; Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD ; Li, Jun, MD ; Xia, Yong, MD ; Ercolani, Giorgio, MD ; Shen, Feng, MD ; Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bd8b357eaed418ec1a4c4ee0dea2c68b48007163560158398279b9c48818ddb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - complications</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver Cirrhosis - etiology</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jun, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Yong, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ercolani, Giorgio, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Feng, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD</au><au>Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD</au><au>Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD</au><au>Li, Jun, MD</au><au>Xia, Yong, MD</au><au>Ercolani, Giorgio, MD</au><au>Shen, Feng, MD</au><au>Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anatomic versus nonanatomic resection in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>155</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>512</spage><epage>521</epage><pages>512-521</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><abstract>Background Whether anatomic resection (AR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can really confer a survival advantage over non-AR (NAR), especially for cirrhotic patients, remains unclear. Methods Prospectively collected data of 543 cirrhotic patients in Child–Pugh class A submitted to AR ( n = 228) versus NAR ( n = 315) for early HCC in an Eastern ( n = 269) and a Western ( n = 274) surgical unit, were reviewed. To control for confounding variable distributions, a 1-to-1 propensity score match was applied to compare AR and NAR outcomes ( n = 298). Results The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survivals of the 543 patients were 32.3% and 60.0%, respectively, without differences between the 2 centers ( P = .635 and .479, respectively). AR conferred better overall and recurrence-free survival than NAR ( P = .009 and .041, respectively), but NAR patients suffered from significantly worse hepatic dysfunction. After 1-to-1 match, AR ( n = 149) and NAR ( n = 149) patients had similar covariate distributions. In this matched sample, AR still conferred better recurrence-free survival over NAR ( P = .044) but the beneficial effect of AR was limited to the reduction of early recurrence (<2 years) of poorly differentiated tumors and of tumors with microvascular invasion ( P < .05), resulting in better overall survival ( P = .018). Conclusion In cirrhotic patients, AR for early HCC can lead to a lower early recurrence rate in tumors with unfavorable tumor features, whereas NAR will not worsen the recurrence rate in well/moderately differentiated tumors or in the absence of microvascular invasion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>24439747</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.009</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5269-1964</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-6060 |
ispartof | Surgery, 2014-03, Vol.155 (3), p.512-521 |
issn | 0039-6060 1532-7361 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499156378 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - complications Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery Female Follow-Up Studies Hepatectomy - methods Humans Liver Cirrhosis - etiology Liver Neoplasms - complications Liver Neoplasms - mortality Liver Neoplasms - surgery Logistic Models Male Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Propensity Score Retrospective Studies Surgery Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome |
title | Anatomic versus nonanatomic resection in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A00%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anatomic%20versus%20nonanatomic%20resection%20in%20cirrhotic%20patients%20with%20early%20hepatocellular%20carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Cucchetti,%20Alessandro,%20MD&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=155&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=512&rft.epage=521&rft.pages=512-521&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1499156378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bd8b357eaed418ec1a4c4ee0dea2c68b48007163560158398279b9c48818ddb73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1499156378&rft_id=info:pmid/24439747&rfr_iscdi=true |