Loading…

Anatomic versus nonanatomic resection in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma

Background Whether anatomic resection (AR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can really confer a survival advantage over non-AR (NAR), especially for cirrhotic patients, remains unclear. Methods Prospectively collected data of 543 cirrhotic patients in Child–Pugh class A submitted to AR ( n = 228)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Surgery 2014-03, Vol.155 (3), p.512-521
Main Authors: Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD, Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD, Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD, Li, Jun, MD, Xia, Yong, MD, Ercolani, Giorgio, MD, Shen, Feng, MD, Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bd8b357eaed418ec1a4c4ee0dea2c68b48007163560158398279b9c48818ddb73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bd8b357eaed418ec1a4c4ee0dea2c68b48007163560158398279b9c48818ddb73
container_end_page 521
container_issue 3
container_start_page 512
container_title Surgery
container_volume 155
creator Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD
Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD
Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD
Li, Jun, MD
Xia, Yong, MD
Ercolani, Giorgio, MD
Shen, Feng, MD
Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD
description Background Whether anatomic resection (AR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can really confer a survival advantage over non-AR (NAR), especially for cirrhotic patients, remains unclear. Methods Prospectively collected data of 543 cirrhotic patients in Child–Pugh class A submitted to AR ( n = 228) versus NAR ( n = 315) for early HCC in an Eastern ( n = 269) and a Western ( n = 274) surgical unit, were reviewed. To control for confounding variable distributions, a 1-to-1 propensity score match was applied to compare AR and NAR outcomes ( n = 298). Results The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survivals of the 543 patients were 32.3% and 60.0%, respectively, without differences between the 2 centers ( P = .635 and .479, respectively). AR conferred better overall and recurrence-free survival than NAR ( P = .009 and .041, respectively), but NAR patients suffered from significantly worse hepatic dysfunction. After 1-to-1 match, AR ( n = 149) and NAR ( n = 149) patients had similar covariate distributions. In this matched sample, AR still conferred better recurrence-free survival over NAR ( P = .044) but the beneficial effect of AR was limited to the reduction of early recurrence (
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499156378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0039606013005400</els_id><sourcerecordid>1499156378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bd8b357eaed418ec1a4c4ee0dea2c68b48007163560158398279b9c48818ddb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFP3DAQhS0Egi3lD_RQ5cgl25nYSRypqoRWQCshcYCeLccZWG8Te7ET0P57HC1w6IGT5af3nma-YewbwhIBqx-bZZzC47IA5ElYAjQHbIElL_KaV3jIFgC8ySuo4IR9iXEDySFQHrOTQgje1KJeMHXh9OgHa7JnCnGKmfNOv0uBIpnRepdZlxkbwtqPSd7q0ZIbY_Zix3VGOvS7bE1J9Yb6fup1yIwOxjo_6K_s6EH3kc7e3lP29-ryfvU7v7m9_rO6uMmNQBzztpMtL2vS1KUJyaAWRhBBR7owlWyFBKix4mUFWEreyKJu2sYIKVF2XVvzU3a-790G_zRRHNVg4zyOduSnqFA0DZYVr2WyFnurCT7GQA9qG-ygw04hqBms2qgZrJrBzlrClkLf3_qndqDuI_JOMhl-7g2Utny2FFQ0iZKhzoYEUXXeft7_67-46a2zRvf_aEdx46fgEj-FKhYK1N182vmyyAFKkX6vCX6gUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1499156378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anatomic versus nonanatomic resection in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD ; Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD ; Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD ; Li, Jun, MD ; Xia, Yong, MD ; Ercolani, Giorgio, MD ; Shen, Feng, MD ; Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD ; Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD ; Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD ; Li, Jun, MD ; Xia, Yong, MD ; Ercolani, Giorgio, MD ; Shen, Feng, MD ; Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Whether anatomic resection (AR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can really confer a survival advantage over non-AR (NAR), especially for cirrhotic patients, remains unclear. Methods Prospectively collected data of 543 cirrhotic patients in Child–Pugh class A submitted to AR ( n = 228) versus NAR ( n = 315) for early HCC in an Eastern ( n = 269) and a Western ( n = 274) surgical unit, were reviewed. To control for confounding variable distributions, a 1-to-1 propensity score match was applied to compare AR and NAR outcomes ( n = 298). Results The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survivals of the 543 patients were 32.3% and 60.0%, respectively, without differences between the 2 centers ( P = .635 and .479, respectively). AR conferred better overall and recurrence-free survival than NAR ( P = .009 and .041, respectively), but NAR patients suffered from significantly worse hepatic dysfunction. After 1-to-1 match, AR ( n = 149) and NAR ( n = 149) patients had similar covariate distributions. In this matched sample, AR still conferred better recurrence-free survival over NAR ( P = .044) but the beneficial effect of AR was limited to the reduction of early recurrence (&lt;2 years) of poorly differentiated tumors and of tumors with microvascular invasion ( P &lt; .05), resulting in better overall survival ( P = .018). Conclusion In cirrhotic patients, AR for early HCC can lead to a lower early recurrence rate in tumors with unfavorable tumor features, whereas NAR will not worsen the recurrence rate in well/moderately differentiated tumors or in the absence of microvascular invasion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24439747</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - complications ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hepatectomy - methods ; Humans ; Liver Cirrhosis - etiology ; Liver Neoplasms - complications ; Liver Neoplasms - mortality ; Liver Neoplasms - surgery ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Propensity Score ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Surgery, 2014-03, Vol.155 (3), p.512-521</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2014 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bd8b357eaed418ec1a4c4ee0dea2c68b48007163560158398279b9c48818ddb73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bd8b357eaed418ec1a4c4ee0dea2c68b48007163560158398279b9c48818ddb73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5269-1964</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24439747$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jun, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Yong, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ercolani, Giorgio, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Feng, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Anatomic versus nonanatomic resection in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma</title><title>Surgery</title><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><description>Background Whether anatomic resection (AR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can really confer a survival advantage over non-AR (NAR), especially for cirrhotic patients, remains unclear. Methods Prospectively collected data of 543 cirrhotic patients in Child–Pugh class A submitted to AR ( n = 228) versus NAR ( n = 315) for early HCC in an Eastern ( n = 269) and a Western ( n = 274) surgical unit, were reviewed. To control for confounding variable distributions, a 1-to-1 propensity score match was applied to compare AR and NAR outcomes ( n = 298). Results The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survivals of the 543 patients were 32.3% and 60.0%, respectively, without differences between the 2 centers ( P = .635 and .479, respectively). AR conferred better overall and recurrence-free survival than NAR ( P = .009 and .041, respectively), but NAR patients suffered from significantly worse hepatic dysfunction. After 1-to-1 match, AR ( n = 149) and NAR ( n = 149) patients had similar covariate distributions. In this matched sample, AR still conferred better recurrence-free survival over NAR ( P = .044) but the beneficial effect of AR was limited to the reduction of early recurrence (&lt;2 years) of poorly differentiated tumors and of tumors with microvascular invasion ( P &lt; .05), resulting in better overall survival ( P = .018). Conclusion In cirrhotic patients, AR for early HCC can lead to a lower early recurrence rate in tumors with unfavorable tumor features, whereas NAR will not worsen the recurrence rate in well/moderately differentiated tumors or in the absence of microvascular invasion.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - complications</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver Cirrhosis - etiology</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUFP3DAQhS0Egi3lD_RQ5cgl25nYSRypqoRWQCshcYCeLccZWG8Te7ET0P57HC1w6IGT5af3nma-YewbwhIBqx-bZZzC47IA5ElYAjQHbIElL_KaV3jIFgC8ySuo4IR9iXEDySFQHrOTQgje1KJeMHXh9OgHa7JnCnGKmfNOv0uBIpnRepdZlxkbwtqPSd7q0ZIbY_Zix3VGOvS7bE1J9Yb6fup1yIwOxjo_6K_s6EH3kc7e3lP29-ryfvU7v7m9_rO6uMmNQBzztpMtL2vS1KUJyaAWRhBBR7owlWyFBKix4mUFWEreyKJu2sYIKVF2XVvzU3a-790G_zRRHNVg4zyOduSnqFA0DZYVr2WyFnurCT7GQA9qG-ygw04hqBms2qgZrJrBzlrClkLf3_qndqDuI_JOMhl-7g2Utny2FFQ0iZKhzoYEUXXeft7_67-46a2zRvf_aEdx46fgEj-FKhYK1N182vmyyAFKkX6vCX6gUw</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD</creator><creator>Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD</creator><creator>Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Li, Jun, MD</creator><creator>Xia, Yong, MD</creator><creator>Ercolani, Giorgio, MD</creator><creator>Shen, Feng, MD</creator><creator>Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5269-1964</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Anatomic versus nonanatomic resection in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma</title><author>Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD ; Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD ; Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD ; Li, Jun, MD ; Xia, Yong, MD ; Ercolani, Giorgio, MD ; Shen, Feng, MD ; Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bd8b357eaed418ec1a4c4ee0dea2c68b48007163560158398279b9c48818ddb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - complications</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver Cirrhosis - etiology</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jun, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Yong, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ercolani, Giorgio, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Feng, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cucchetti, Alessandro, MD</au><au>Qiao, Guo-Liang, MD</au><au>Cescon, Matteo, MD, PhD</au><au>Li, Jun, MD</au><au>Xia, Yong, MD</au><au>Ercolani, Giorgio, MD</au><au>Shen, Feng, MD</au><au>Pinna, Antonio Daniele, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anatomic versus nonanatomic resection in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>155</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>512</spage><epage>521</epage><pages>512-521</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><abstract>Background Whether anatomic resection (AR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can really confer a survival advantage over non-AR (NAR), especially for cirrhotic patients, remains unclear. Methods Prospectively collected data of 543 cirrhotic patients in Child–Pugh class A submitted to AR ( n = 228) versus NAR ( n = 315) for early HCC in an Eastern ( n = 269) and a Western ( n = 274) surgical unit, were reviewed. To control for confounding variable distributions, a 1-to-1 propensity score match was applied to compare AR and NAR outcomes ( n = 298). Results The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survivals of the 543 patients were 32.3% and 60.0%, respectively, without differences between the 2 centers ( P = .635 and .479, respectively). AR conferred better overall and recurrence-free survival than NAR ( P = .009 and .041, respectively), but NAR patients suffered from significantly worse hepatic dysfunction. After 1-to-1 match, AR ( n = 149) and NAR ( n = 149) patients had similar covariate distributions. In this matched sample, AR still conferred better recurrence-free survival over NAR ( P = .044) but the beneficial effect of AR was limited to the reduction of early recurrence (&lt;2 years) of poorly differentiated tumors and of tumors with microvascular invasion ( P &lt; .05), resulting in better overall survival ( P = .018). Conclusion In cirrhotic patients, AR for early HCC can lead to a lower early recurrence rate in tumors with unfavorable tumor features, whereas NAR will not worsen the recurrence rate in well/moderately differentiated tumors or in the absence of microvascular invasion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>24439747</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.009</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5269-1964</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-6060
ispartof Surgery, 2014-03, Vol.155 (3), p.512-521
issn 0039-6060
1532-7361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499156378
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - complications
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hepatectomy - methods
Humans
Liver Cirrhosis - etiology
Liver Neoplasms - complications
Liver Neoplasms - mortality
Liver Neoplasms - surgery
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Propensity Score
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
title Anatomic versus nonanatomic resection in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A00%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anatomic%20versus%20nonanatomic%20resection%20in%20cirrhotic%20patients%20with%20early%20hepatocellular%20carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Cucchetti,%20Alessandro,%20MD&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=155&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=512&rft.epage=521&rft.pages=512-521&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1499156378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bd8b357eaed418ec1a4c4ee0dea2c68b48007163560158398279b9c48818ddb73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1499156378&rft_id=info:pmid/24439747&rfr_iscdi=true