Loading…

Synthesis and activity of novel tetrazole compounds and their pyrazole-4-carbonitrile precursors against Leishmania spp

A series of 5-(1-aryl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1H-tetrazole derivatives (4a–m) and their 1-aryl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carbonitriles (3a–m) precursors were synthesized and evaluated for their antileishmanial activity. A new series of 5-(1-aryl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1H-tetrazole derivatives (4a–...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters 2013-12, Vol.23 (23), p.6310-6312
Main Authors: Faria, Jéssica V., dos Santos, Maurício S., Bernardino, Alice M.R., Becker, Klaus M., Machado, Gérzia M.C., Rodrigues, Raquel F., Canto-Cavalheiro, Marilene M., Leon, Leonor L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A series of 5-(1-aryl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1H-tetrazole derivatives (4a–m) and their 1-aryl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carbonitriles (3a–m) precursors were synthesized and evaluated for their antileishmanial activity. A new series of 5-(1-aryl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1H-tetrazole derivatives (4a–m) and their precursor 1-aryl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carbonitriles (3a–m) were synthesized and evaluated as antileishmanials against Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania amazonensis promastigotes in vitro. In parallel, the cytotoxicity of these compounds was evaluated on the RAW 264.7 cell line. The results showed that among the assayed compounds the substituted 3-chlorophenyl (4a) (IC50/24h=15±0.14μM) and 3,4-dichlorophenyl tetrazoles (4d) (IC50/24h=26±0.09μM) were the most potent against L. braziliensis promastigotes, as compared the reference drug pentamidine, which presented IC50=13±0.04μM. In addition, 4a and 4d derivatives were less cytotoxic than pentamidine. However, these tetrazole derivatives (4) and pyrazole-4-carbonitriles precursors (3) differ against each of the tested species and were more effective against L.braziliensis than on L. amazonensis.
ISSN:0960-894X
1464-3405
DOI:10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.09.062