Loading…

Implications of geometric plasticity for maximizing photosynthesis in branching corals

Reef-building corals are an example of plastic photosynthetic organisms that occupy environments of high spatiotemporal variations in incident irradiance. Many phototrophs use a range of photoacclimatory mechanisms to optimize light levels reaching the photosynthetic units within the cells. In this...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine biology 2014-02, Vol.161 (2), p.313-328
Main Authors: Kaniewska, P., Anthony, K. R. N., Sampayo, E. M., Campbell, P. R., Hoegh-Guldberg, O.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-95089f4a09b4ea694068bf470883a58bfa8c9e141bc811fd4630074bfae7a9423
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-95089f4a09b4ea694068bf470883a58bfa8c9e141bc811fd4630074bfae7a9423
container_end_page 328
container_issue 2
container_start_page 313
container_title Marine biology
container_volume 161
creator Kaniewska, P.
Anthony, K. R. N.
Sampayo, E. M.
Campbell, P. R.
Hoegh-Guldberg, O.
description Reef-building corals are an example of plastic photosynthetic organisms that occupy environments of high spatiotemporal variations in incident irradiance. Many phototrophs use a range of photoacclimatory mechanisms to optimize light levels reaching the photosynthetic units within the cells. In this study, we set out to determine whether phenotypic plasticity in branching corals across light habitats optimizes potential light utilization and photosynthesis. In order to do this, we mapped incident light levels across coral surfaces in branching corals and measured the photosynthetic capacity across various within-colony surfaces. Based on the field data and modelled frequency distribution of within-colony surface light levels, our results show that branching corals are substantially self-shaded at both 5 and 18 m, and the modal light level for the within-colony surface is 50 μmol photons m −2  s −1 . Light profiles across different locations showed that the lowest attenuation at both depths was found on the inner surface of the outermost branches, while the most self-shading surface was on the bottom side of these branches. In contrast, vertically extended branches in the central part of the colony showed no differences between the sides of branches. The photosynthetic activity at these coral surfaces confirmed that the outermost branches had the greatest change in sun- and shade-adapted surfaces; the inner surfaces had a 50 % greater relative maximum electron transport rate compared to the outer side of the outermost branches. This was further confirmed by sensitivity analysis, showing that branch position was the most influential parameter in estimating whole-colony relative electron transport rate (rETR). As a whole, shallow colonies have double the photosynthetic capacity compared to deep colonies. In terms of phenotypic plasticity potentially optimizing photosynthetic capacity, we found that at 18 m, the present coral colony morphology increased the whole-colony rETR, while at 5 m, the colony morphology decreased potential light utilization and photosynthetic output. This result of potential energy acquisition being underutilized in shallow, highly lit waters due to the shallow type morphology present may represent a trade-off between optimizing light capture and reducing light damage, as this type morphology can perhaps decrease long-term costs of and effect of photoinhibition. This may be an important strategy as opposed to adopting a type morphology,
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00227-013-2336-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500765922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A363383635</galeid><sourcerecordid>A363383635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-95089f4a09b4ea694068bf470883a58bfa8c9e141bc811fd4630074bfae7a9423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9rHCEQx6W00EvaP6BvC6WQFxN_7a4-hpC0gUBe2r6KZ3TPsKtb9aB3f31mudA24Yrg6MxnRme-CH2i5JwS0l8UQhjrMaEcM847vH-DVlRwhmmv-Fu0gnCLOe3Ye3RSyiOBe8_4Cv28neYxWFNDiqVJvhlcmlzNwTbzaEoNNtRd41NuJvM7TGEf4tDMm1RT2cW6cSWUJsRmnU20myVmUzZj-YDeeTDu47M9RT9urr9ffcN3919vry7vsBVSVKxaIpUXhqi1cKZTgnRy7UVPpOSmhaORVjkq6NpKSv2D6Dg0K8DveqME46fo7FB3zunX1pWqp1CsG0cTXdoWTVvgu1axBf38Cn1M2xzhd5oKBW8w1sq_1GBGp0P0qWZjl6L6knecS9haoPARanDRQfMpOh_A_YI_P8LDenBTsEcT6CHB5lRKdl7POUwm7zQlehFcHwTXILheBNd7yPny3KAp1ox-kSSUP4lMtgpKL4NgB65AKA4u_zOI_xZ_Api7uWY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1491412258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implications of geometric plasticity for maximizing photosynthesis in branching corals</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Kaniewska, P. ; Anthony, K. R. N. ; Sampayo, E. M. ; Campbell, P. R. ; Hoegh-Guldberg, O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaniewska, P. ; Anthony, K. R. N. ; Sampayo, E. M. ; Campbell, P. R. ; Hoegh-Guldberg, O.</creatorcontrib><description>Reef-building corals are an example of plastic photosynthetic organisms that occupy environments of high spatiotemporal variations in incident irradiance. Many phototrophs use a range of photoacclimatory mechanisms to optimize light levels reaching the photosynthetic units within the cells. In this study, we set out to determine whether phenotypic plasticity in branching corals across light habitats optimizes potential light utilization and photosynthesis. In order to do this, we mapped incident light levels across coral surfaces in branching corals and measured the photosynthetic capacity across various within-colony surfaces. Based on the field data and modelled frequency distribution of within-colony surface light levels, our results show that branching corals are substantially self-shaded at both 5 and 18 m, and the modal light level for the within-colony surface is 50 μmol photons m −2  s −1 . Light profiles across different locations showed that the lowest attenuation at both depths was found on the inner surface of the outermost branches, while the most self-shading surface was on the bottom side of these branches. In contrast, vertically extended branches in the central part of the colony showed no differences between the sides of branches. The photosynthetic activity at these coral surfaces confirmed that the outermost branches had the greatest change in sun- and shade-adapted surfaces; the inner surfaces had a 50 % greater relative maximum electron transport rate compared to the outer side of the outermost branches. This was further confirmed by sensitivity analysis, showing that branch position was the most influential parameter in estimating whole-colony relative electron transport rate (rETR). As a whole, shallow colonies have double the photosynthetic capacity compared to deep colonies. In terms of phenotypic plasticity potentially optimizing photosynthetic capacity, we found that at 18 m, the present coral colony morphology increased the whole-colony rETR, while at 5 m, the colony morphology decreased potential light utilization and photosynthetic output. This result of potential energy acquisition being underutilized in shallow, highly lit waters due to the shallow type morphology present may represent a trade-off between optimizing light capture and reducing light damage, as this type morphology can perhaps decrease long-term costs of and effect of photoinhibition. This may be an important strategy as opposed to adopting a type morphology, which results in an overall higher energetic acquisition. Conversely, it could also be that maximizing light utilization and potential photosynthetic output is more important in low-light habitats for Acropora humilis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-3162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00227-013-2336-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MBIOAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acropora humilis ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cnidaria. Ctenaria ; Coral reefs ; Corals ; Frequency distribution ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Invertebrates ; Life Sciences ; Marine ; Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences ; Marine biology ; Microbiology ; Morphology ; Oceanography ; Original Paper ; Phenotypic plasticity ; Photoreception ; Photosynthesis ; Plasticity ; Potential energy ; Sea water ecosystems ; Sensitivity analysis ; Synecology ; Underwater light ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Marine biology, 2014-02, Vol.161 (2), p.313-328</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-95089f4a09b4ea694068bf470883a58bfa8c9e141bc811fd4630074bfae7a9423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-95089f4a09b4ea694068bf470883a58bfa8c9e141bc811fd4630074bfae7a9423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27913,27914</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28596352$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaniewska, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, K. R. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampayo, E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, P. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoegh-Guldberg, O.</creatorcontrib><title>Implications of geometric plasticity for maximizing photosynthesis in branching corals</title><title>Marine biology</title><addtitle>Mar Biol</addtitle><description>Reef-building corals are an example of plastic photosynthetic organisms that occupy environments of high spatiotemporal variations in incident irradiance. Many phototrophs use a range of photoacclimatory mechanisms to optimize light levels reaching the photosynthetic units within the cells. In this study, we set out to determine whether phenotypic plasticity in branching corals across light habitats optimizes potential light utilization and photosynthesis. In order to do this, we mapped incident light levels across coral surfaces in branching corals and measured the photosynthetic capacity across various within-colony surfaces. Based on the field data and modelled frequency distribution of within-colony surface light levels, our results show that branching corals are substantially self-shaded at both 5 and 18 m, and the modal light level for the within-colony surface is 50 μmol photons m −2  s −1 . Light profiles across different locations showed that the lowest attenuation at both depths was found on the inner surface of the outermost branches, while the most self-shading surface was on the bottom side of these branches. In contrast, vertically extended branches in the central part of the colony showed no differences between the sides of branches. The photosynthetic activity at these coral surfaces confirmed that the outermost branches had the greatest change in sun- and shade-adapted surfaces; the inner surfaces had a 50 % greater relative maximum electron transport rate compared to the outer side of the outermost branches. This was further confirmed by sensitivity analysis, showing that branch position was the most influential parameter in estimating whole-colony relative electron transport rate (rETR). As a whole, shallow colonies have double the photosynthetic capacity compared to deep colonies. In terms of phenotypic plasticity potentially optimizing photosynthetic capacity, we found that at 18 m, the present coral colony morphology increased the whole-colony rETR, while at 5 m, the colony morphology decreased potential light utilization and photosynthetic output. This result of potential energy acquisition being underutilized in shallow, highly lit waters due to the shallow type morphology present may represent a trade-off between optimizing light capture and reducing light damage, as this type morphology can perhaps decrease long-term costs of and effect of photoinhibition. This may be an important strategy as opposed to adopting a type morphology, which results in an overall higher energetic acquisition. Conversely, it could also be that maximizing light utilization and potential photosynthetic output is more important in low-light habitats for Acropora humilis.</description><subject>Acropora humilis</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cnidaria. Ctenaria</subject><subject>Coral reefs</subject><subject>Corals</subject><subject>Frequency distribution</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Phenotypic plasticity</subject><subject>Photoreception</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Potential energy</subject><subject>Sea water ecosystems</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Underwater light</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0025-3162</issn><issn>1432-1793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd9rHCEQx6W00EvaP6BvC6WQFxN_7a4-hpC0gUBe2r6KZ3TPsKtb9aB3f31mudA24Yrg6MxnRme-CH2i5JwS0l8UQhjrMaEcM847vH-DVlRwhmmv-Fu0gnCLOe3Ye3RSyiOBe8_4Cv28neYxWFNDiqVJvhlcmlzNwTbzaEoNNtRd41NuJvM7TGEf4tDMm1RT2cW6cSWUJsRmnU20myVmUzZj-YDeeTDu47M9RT9urr9ffcN3919vry7vsBVSVKxaIpUXhqi1cKZTgnRy7UVPpOSmhaORVjkq6NpKSv2D6Dg0K8DveqME46fo7FB3zunX1pWqp1CsG0cTXdoWTVvgu1axBf38Cn1M2xzhd5oKBW8w1sq_1GBGp0P0qWZjl6L6knecS9haoPARanDRQfMpOh_A_YI_P8LDenBTsEcT6CHB5lRKdl7POUwm7zQlehFcHwTXILheBNd7yPny3KAp1ox-kSSUP4lMtgpKL4NgB65AKA4u_zOI_xZ_Api7uWY</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Kaniewska, P.</creator><creator>Anthony, K. R. N.</creator><creator>Sampayo, E. M.</creator><creator>Campbell, P. R.</creator><creator>Hoegh-Guldberg, O.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Implications of geometric plasticity for maximizing photosynthesis in branching corals</title><author>Kaniewska, P. ; Anthony, K. R. N. ; Sampayo, E. M. ; Campbell, P. R. ; Hoegh-Guldberg, O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-95089f4a09b4ea694068bf470883a58bfa8c9e141bc811fd4630074bfae7a9423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acropora humilis</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cnidaria. Ctenaria</topic><topic>Coral reefs</topic><topic>Corals</topic><topic>Frequency distribution</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Phenotypic plasticity</topic><topic>Photoreception</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Potential energy</topic><topic>Sea water ecosystems</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Underwater light</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaniewska, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, K. R. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampayo, E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, P. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoegh-Guldberg, O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaniewska, P.</au><au>Anthony, K. R. N.</au><au>Sampayo, E. M.</au><au>Campbell, P. R.</au><au>Hoegh-Guldberg, O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implications of geometric plasticity for maximizing photosynthesis in branching corals</atitle><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle><stitle>Mar Biol</stitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>313</spage><epage>328</epage><pages>313-328</pages><issn>0025-3162</issn><eissn>1432-1793</eissn><coden>MBIOAJ</coden><abstract>Reef-building corals are an example of plastic photosynthetic organisms that occupy environments of high spatiotemporal variations in incident irradiance. Many phototrophs use a range of photoacclimatory mechanisms to optimize light levels reaching the photosynthetic units within the cells. In this study, we set out to determine whether phenotypic plasticity in branching corals across light habitats optimizes potential light utilization and photosynthesis. In order to do this, we mapped incident light levels across coral surfaces in branching corals and measured the photosynthetic capacity across various within-colony surfaces. Based on the field data and modelled frequency distribution of within-colony surface light levels, our results show that branching corals are substantially self-shaded at both 5 and 18 m, and the modal light level for the within-colony surface is 50 μmol photons m −2  s −1 . Light profiles across different locations showed that the lowest attenuation at both depths was found on the inner surface of the outermost branches, while the most self-shading surface was on the bottom side of these branches. In contrast, vertically extended branches in the central part of the colony showed no differences between the sides of branches. The photosynthetic activity at these coral surfaces confirmed that the outermost branches had the greatest change in sun- and shade-adapted surfaces; the inner surfaces had a 50 % greater relative maximum electron transport rate compared to the outer side of the outermost branches. This was further confirmed by sensitivity analysis, showing that branch position was the most influential parameter in estimating whole-colony relative electron transport rate (rETR). As a whole, shallow colonies have double the photosynthetic capacity compared to deep colonies. In terms of phenotypic plasticity potentially optimizing photosynthetic capacity, we found that at 18 m, the present coral colony morphology increased the whole-colony rETR, while at 5 m, the colony morphology decreased potential light utilization and photosynthetic output. This result of potential energy acquisition being underutilized in shallow, highly lit waters due to the shallow type morphology present may represent a trade-off between optimizing light capture and reducing light damage, as this type morphology can perhaps decrease long-term costs of and effect of photoinhibition. This may be an important strategy as opposed to adopting a type morphology, which results in an overall higher energetic acquisition. Conversely, it could also be that maximizing light utilization and potential photosynthetic output is more important in low-light habitats for Acropora humilis.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00227-013-2336-z</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-3162
ispartof Marine biology, 2014-02, Vol.161 (2), p.313-328
issn 0025-3162
1432-1793
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500765922
source Springer Nature
subjects Acropora humilis
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cnidaria. Ctenaria
Coral reefs
Corals
Frequency distribution
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genotype & phenotype
Invertebrates
Life Sciences
Marine
Marine & Freshwater Sciences
Marine biology
Microbiology
Morphology
Oceanography
Original Paper
Phenotypic plasticity
Photoreception
Photosynthesis
Plasticity
Potential energy
Sea water ecosystems
Sensitivity analysis
Synecology
Underwater light
Zoology
title Implications of geometric plasticity for maximizing photosynthesis in branching corals
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A47%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implications%20of%20geometric%20plasticity%20for%20maximizing%20photosynthesis%20in%20branching%20corals&rft.jtitle=Marine%20biology&rft.au=Kaniewska,%20P.&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=313&rft.epage=328&rft.pages=313-328&rft.issn=0025-3162&rft.eissn=1432-1793&rft.coden=MBIOAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00227-013-2336-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA363383635%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-95089f4a09b4ea694068bf470883a58bfa8c9e141bc811fd4630074bfae7a9423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1491412258&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A363383635&rfr_iscdi=true