Loading…
Implications of geometric plasticity for maximizing photosynthesis in branching corals
Reef-building corals are an example of plastic photosynthetic organisms that occupy environments of high spatiotemporal variations in incident irradiance. Many phototrophs use a range of photoacclimatory mechanisms to optimize light levels reaching the photosynthetic units within the cells. In this...
Saved in:
Published in: | Marine biology 2014-02, Vol.161 (2), p.313-328 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-95089f4a09b4ea694068bf470883a58bfa8c9e141bc811fd4630074bfae7a9423 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-95089f4a09b4ea694068bf470883a58bfa8c9e141bc811fd4630074bfae7a9423 |
container_end_page | 328 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 313 |
container_title | Marine biology |
container_volume | 161 |
creator | Kaniewska, P. Anthony, K. R. N. Sampayo, E. M. Campbell, P. R. Hoegh-Guldberg, O. |
description | Reef-building corals are an example of plastic photosynthetic organisms that occupy environments of high spatiotemporal variations in incident irradiance. Many phototrophs use a range of photoacclimatory mechanisms to optimize light levels reaching the photosynthetic units within the cells. In this study, we set out to determine whether phenotypic plasticity in branching corals across light habitats optimizes potential light utilization and photosynthesis. In order to do this, we mapped incident light levels across coral surfaces in branching corals and measured the photosynthetic capacity across various within-colony surfaces. Based on the field data and modelled frequency distribution of within-colony surface light levels, our results show that branching corals are substantially self-shaded at both 5 and 18 m, and the modal light level for the within-colony surface is 50 μmol photons m
−2
s
−1
. Light profiles across different locations showed that the lowest attenuation at both depths was found on the inner surface of the outermost branches, while the most self-shading surface was on the bottom side of these branches. In contrast, vertically extended branches in the central part of the colony showed no differences between the sides of branches. The photosynthetic activity at these coral surfaces confirmed that the outermost branches had the greatest change in sun- and shade-adapted surfaces; the inner surfaces had a 50 % greater relative maximum electron transport rate compared to the outer side of the outermost branches. This was further confirmed by sensitivity analysis, showing that branch position was the most influential parameter in estimating whole-colony relative electron transport rate (rETR). As a whole, shallow colonies have double the photosynthetic capacity compared to deep colonies. In terms of phenotypic plasticity potentially optimizing photosynthetic capacity, we found that at 18 m, the present coral colony morphology increased the whole-colony rETR, while at 5 m, the colony morphology decreased potential light utilization and photosynthetic output. This result of potential energy acquisition being underutilized in shallow, highly lit waters due to the shallow type morphology present may represent a trade-off between optimizing light capture and reducing light damage, as this type morphology can perhaps decrease long-term costs of and effect of photoinhibition. This may be an important strategy as opposed to adopting a type morphology, |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00227-013-2336-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500765922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A363383635</galeid><sourcerecordid>A363383635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-95089f4a09b4ea694068bf470883a58bfa8c9e141bc811fd4630074bfae7a9423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9rHCEQx6W00EvaP6BvC6WQFxN_7a4-hpC0gUBe2r6KZ3TPsKtb9aB3f31mudA24Yrg6MxnRme-CH2i5JwS0l8UQhjrMaEcM847vH-DVlRwhmmv-Fu0gnCLOe3Ye3RSyiOBe8_4Cv28neYxWFNDiqVJvhlcmlzNwTbzaEoNNtRd41NuJvM7TGEf4tDMm1RT2cW6cSWUJsRmnU20myVmUzZj-YDeeTDu47M9RT9urr9ffcN3919vry7vsBVSVKxaIpUXhqi1cKZTgnRy7UVPpOSmhaORVjkq6NpKSv2D6Dg0K8DveqME46fo7FB3zunX1pWqp1CsG0cTXdoWTVvgu1axBf38Cn1M2xzhd5oKBW8w1sq_1GBGp0P0qWZjl6L6knecS9haoPARanDRQfMpOh_A_YI_P8LDenBTsEcT6CHB5lRKdl7POUwm7zQlehFcHwTXILheBNd7yPny3KAp1ox-kSSUP4lMtgpKL4NgB65AKA4u_zOI_xZ_Api7uWY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1491412258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implications of geometric plasticity for maximizing photosynthesis in branching corals</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Kaniewska, P. ; Anthony, K. R. N. ; Sampayo, E. M. ; Campbell, P. R. ; Hoegh-Guldberg, O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaniewska, P. ; Anthony, K. R. N. ; Sampayo, E. M. ; Campbell, P. R. ; Hoegh-Guldberg, O.</creatorcontrib><description>Reef-building corals are an example of plastic photosynthetic organisms that occupy environments of high spatiotemporal variations in incident irradiance. Many phototrophs use a range of photoacclimatory mechanisms to optimize light levels reaching the photosynthetic units within the cells. In this study, we set out to determine whether phenotypic plasticity in branching corals across light habitats optimizes potential light utilization and photosynthesis. In order to do this, we mapped incident light levels across coral surfaces in branching corals and measured the photosynthetic capacity across various within-colony surfaces. Based on the field data and modelled frequency distribution of within-colony surface light levels, our results show that branching corals are substantially self-shaded at both 5 and 18 m, and the modal light level for the within-colony surface is 50 μmol photons m
−2
s
−1
. Light profiles across different locations showed that the lowest attenuation at both depths was found on the inner surface of the outermost branches, while the most self-shading surface was on the bottom side of these branches. In contrast, vertically extended branches in the central part of the colony showed no differences between the sides of branches. The photosynthetic activity at these coral surfaces confirmed that the outermost branches had the greatest change in sun- and shade-adapted surfaces; the inner surfaces had a 50 % greater relative maximum electron transport rate compared to the outer side of the outermost branches. This was further confirmed by sensitivity analysis, showing that branch position was the most influential parameter in estimating whole-colony relative electron transport rate (rETR). As a whole, shallow colonies have double the photosynthetic capacity compared to deep colonies. In terms of phenotypic plasticity potentially optimizing photosynthetic capacity, we found that at 18 m, the present coral colony morphology increased the whole-colony rETR, while at 5 m, the colony morphology decreased potential light utilization and photosynthetic output. This result of potential energy acquisition being underutilized in shallow, highly lit waters due to the shallow type morphology present may represent a trade-off between optimizing light capture and reducing light damage, as this type morphology can perhaps decrease long-term costs of and effect of photoinhibition. This may be an important strategy as opposed to adopting a type morphology, which results in an overall higher energetic acquisition. Conversely, it could also be that maximizing light utilization and potential photosynthetic output is more important in low-light habitats for
Acropora humilis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-3162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00227-013-2336-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MBIOAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acropora humilis ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cnidaria. Ctenaria ; Coral reefs ; Corals ; Frequency distribution ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genotype & phenotype ; Invertebrates ; Life Sciences ; Marine ; Marine & Freshwater Sciences ; Marine biology ; Microbiology ; Morphology ; Oceanography ; Original Paper ; Phenotypic plasticity ; Photoreception ; Photosynthesis ; Plasticity ; Potential energy ; Sea water ecosystems ; Sensitivity analysis ; Synecology ; Underwater light ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Marine biology, 2014-02, Vol.161 (2), p.313-328</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-95089f4a09b4ea694068bf470883a58bfa8c9e141bc811fd4630074bfae7a9423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-95089f4a09b4ea694068bf470883a58bfa8c9e141bc811fd4630074bfae7a9423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27913,27914</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28596352$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaniewska, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, K. R. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampayo, E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, P. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoegh-Guldberg, O.</creatorcontrib><title>Implications of geometric plasticity for maximizing photosynthesis in branching corals</title><title>Marine biology</title><addtitle>Mar Biol</addtitle><description>Reef-building corals are an example of plastic photosynthetic organisms that occupy environments of high spatiotemporal variations in incident irradiance. Many phototrophs use a range of photoacclimatory mechanisms to optimize light levels reaching the photosynthetic units within the cells. In this study, we set out to determine whether phenotypic plasticity in branching corals across light habitats optimizes potential light utilization and photosynthesis. In order to do this, we mapped incident light levels across coral surfaces in branching corals and measured the photosynthetic capacity across various within-colony surfaces. Based on the field data and modelled frequency distribution of within-colony surface light levels, our results show that branching corals are substantially self-shaded at both 5 and 18 m, and the modal light level for the within-colony surface is 50 μmol photons m
−2
s
−1
. Light profiles across different locations showed that the lowest attenuation at both depths was found on the inner surface of the outermost branches, while the most self-shading surface was on the bottom side of these branches. In contrast, vertically extended branches in the central part of the colony showed no differences between the sides of branches. The photosynthetic activity at these coral surfaces confirmed that the outermost branches had the greatest change in sun- and shade-adapted surfaces; the inner surfaces had a 50 % greater relative maximum electron transport rate compared to the outer side of the outermost branches. This was further confirmed by sensitivity analysis, showing that branch position was the most influential parameter in estimating whole-colony relative electron transport rate (rETR). As a whole, shallow colonies have double the photosynthetic capacity compared to deep colonies. In terms of phenotypic plasticity potentially optimizing photosynthetic capacity, we found that at 18 m, the present coral colony morphology increased the whole-colony rETR, while at 5 m, the colony morphology decreased potential light utilization and photosynthetic output. This result of potential energy acquisition being underutilized in shallow, highly lit waters due to the shallow type morphology present may represent a trade-off between optimizing light capture and reducing light damage, as this type morphology can perhaps decrease long-term costs of and effect of photoinhibition. This may be an important strategy as opposed to adopting a type morphology, which results in an overall higher energetic acquisition. Conversely, it could also be that maximizing light utilization and potential photosynthetic output is more important in low-light habitats for
Acropora humilis.</description><subject>Acropora humilis</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cnidaria. Ctenaria</subject><subject>Coral reefs</subject><subject>Corals</subject><subject>Frequency distribution</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genotype & phenotype</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Phenotypic plasticity</subject><subject>Photoreception</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Potential energy</subject><subject>Sea water ecosystems</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Underwater light</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0025-3162</issn><issn>1432-1793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd9rHCEQx6W00EvaP6BvC6WQFxN_7a4-hpC0gUBe2r6KZ3TPsKtb9aB3f31mudA24Yrg6MxnRme-CH2i5JwS0l8UQhjrMaEcM847vH-DVlRwhmmv-Fu0gnCLOe3Ye3RSyiOBe8_4Cv28neYxWFNDiqVJvhlcmlzNwTbzaEoNNtRd41NuJvM7TGEf4tDMm1RT2cW6cSWUJsRmnU20myVmUzZj-YDeeTDu47M9RT9urr9ffcN3919vry7vsBVSVKxaIpUXhqi1cKZTgnRy7UVPpOSmhaORVjkq6NpKSv2D6Dg0K8DveqME46fo7FB3zunX1pWqp1CsG0cTXdoWTVvgu1axBf38Cn1M2xzhd5oKBW8w1sq_1GBGp0P0qWZjl6L6knecS9haoPARanDRQfMpOh_A_YI_P8LDenBTsEcT6CHB5lRKdl7POUwm7zQlehFcHwTXILheBNd7yPny3KAp1ox-kSSUP4lMtgpKL4NgB65AKA4u_zOI_xZ_Api7uWY</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Kaniewska, P.</creator><creator>Anthony, K. R. N.</creator><creator>Sampayo, E. M.</creator><creator>Campbell, P. R.</creator><creator>Hoegh-Guldberg, O.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Implications of geometric plasticity for maximizing photosynthesis in branching corals</title><author>Kaniewska, P. ; Anthony, K. R. N. ; Sampayo, E. M. ; Campbell, P. R. ; Hoegh-Guldberg, O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-95089f4a09b4ea694068bf470883a58bfa8c9e141bc811fd4630074bfae7a9423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acropora humilis</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cnidaria. Ctenaria</topic><topic>Coral reefs</topic><topic>Corals</topic><topic>Frequency distribution</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genotype & phenotype</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Phenotypic plasticity</topic><topic>Photoreception</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Potential energy</topic><topic>Sea water ecosystems</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Underwater light</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaniewska, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, K. R. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampayo, E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, P. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoegh-Guldberg, O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaniewska, P.</au><au>Anthony, K. R. N.</au><au>Sampayo, E. M.</au><au>Campbell, P. R.</au><au>Hoegh-Guldberg, O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implications of geometric plasticity for maximizing photosynthesis in branching corals</atitle><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle><stitle>Mar Biol</stitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>313</spage><epage>328</epage><pages>313-328</pages><issn>0025-3162</issn><eissn>1432-1793</eissn><coden>MBIOAJ</coden><abstract>Reef-building corals are an example of plastic photosynthetic organisms that occupy environments of high spatiotemporal variations in incident irradiance. Many phototrophs use a range of photoacclimatory mechanisms to optimize light levels reaching the photosynthetic units within the cells. In this study, we set out to determine whether phenotypic plasticity in branching corals across light habitats optimizes potential light utilization and photosynthesis. In order to do this, we mapped incident light levels across coral surfaces in branching corals and measured the photosynthetic capacity across various within-colony surfaces. Based on the field data and modelled frequency distribution of within-colony surface light levels, our results show that branching corals are substantially self-shaded at both 5 and 18 m, and the modal light level for the within-colony surface is 50 μmol photons m
−2
s
−1
. Light profiles across different locations showed that the lowest attenuation at both depths was found on the inner surface of the outermost branches, while the most self-shading surface was on the bottom side of these branches. In contrast, vertically extended branches in the central part of the colony showed no differences between the sides of branches. The photosynthetic activity at these coral surfaces confirmed that the outermost branches had the greatest change in sun- and shade-adapted surfaces; the inner surfaces had a 50 % greater relative maximum electron transport rate compared to the outer side of the outermost branches. This was further confirmed by sensitivity analysis, showing that branch position was the most influential parameter in estimating whole-colony relative electron transport rate (rETR). As a whole, shallow colonies have double the photosynthetic capacity compared to deep colonies. In terms of phenotypic plasticity potentially optimizing photosynthetic capacity, we found that at 18 m, the present coral colony morphology increased the whole-colony rETR, while at 5 m, the colony morphology decreased potential light utilization and photosynthetic output. This result of potential energy acquisition being underutilized in shallow, highly lit waters due to the shallow type morphology present may represent a trade-off between optimizing light capture and reducing light damage, as this type morphology can perhaps decrease long-term costs of and effect of photoinhibition. This may be an important strategy as opposed to adopting a type morphology, which results in an overall higher energetic acquisition. Conversely, it could also be that maximizing light utilization and potential photosynthetic output is more important in low-light habitats for
Acropora humilis.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00227-013-2336-z</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-3162 |
ispartof | Marine biology, 2014-02, Vol.161 (2), p.313-328 |
issn | 0025-3162 1432-1793 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500765922 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Acropora humilis Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Cnidaria. Ctenaria Coral reefs Corals Frequency distribution Freshwater & Marine Ecology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genotype & phenotype Invertebrates Life Sciences Marine Marine & Freshwater Sciences Marine biology Microbiology Morphology Oceanography Original Paper Phenotypic plasticity Photoreception Photosynthesis Plasticity Potential energy Sea water ecosystems Sensitivity analysis Synecology Underwater light Zoology |
title | Implications of geometric plasticity for maximizing photosynthesis in branching corals |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A47%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implications%20of%20geometric%20plasticity%20for%20maximizing%20photosynthesis%20in%20branching%20corals&rft.jtitle=Marine%20biology&rft.au=Kaniewska,%20P.&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=313&rft.epage=328&rft.pages=313-328&rft.issn=0025-3162&rft.eissn=1432-1793&rft.coden=MBIOAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00227-013-2336-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA363383635%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-95089f4a09b4ea694068bf470883a58bfa8c9e141bc811fd4630074bfae7a9423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1491412258&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A363383635&rfr_iscdi=true |