Loading…
Assessing Ecological Modernization in China: Stakeholder Demands and Corporate Environmental Management Practices in Guangdong Province
This paper compares the key arguments of ecological modernization theory (EMT) with the reality of recent environmental reform in China. Based on data gathered from a survey and in-depth interviews with executives from Hong Kong-based enterprises operating in Guangdong province, we examine the chang...
Saved in:
Published in: | The China quarterly (London) 2013-03, Vol.213 (213), p.101-129 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e4d80655a8d54819079ea4800dc2a65f25443126a7e10d468deef5f115d3426e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e4d80655a8d54819079ea4800dc2a65f25443126a7e10d468deef5f115d3426e3 |
container_end_page | 129 |
container_issue | 213 |
container_start_page | 101 |
container_title | The China quarterly (London) |
container_volume | 213 |
creator | Yee, Wai-Hang Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung Tang, Shui-Yan |
description | This paper compares the key arguments of ecological modernization theory (EMT) with the reality of recent environmental reform in China. Based on data gathered from a survey and in-depth interviews with executives from Hong Kong-based enterprises operating in Guangdong province, we examine the changing roles of government, market, and civil society actors in the reform process, focusing on various types of pressures these actors have exerted on business enterprises. Compatible with Mol's (2006) conjectures, ecological concerns have gradually gained a foothold in existing political, economic, and to a lesser extent, social institutions. Yet, the relevant actors and their patterns of interactions differ from what EMT generalizes from Western European experiences. Specifically, local governments are assuming a more formalized relationship with firms in regulatory enforcement. Among market actors, organizational buyers along the supply chain have exerted more noticeable pressures on manufacturing firms than industrial associations and individual consumers. Civil society, while remaining less of an institutionalized actor in the environmental policy process, appears to pose a perceptible threat to at least some firms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0305741012001543 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500790314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0305741012001543</cupid><jstor_id>23509568</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23509568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e4d80655a8d54819079ea4800dc2a65f25443126a7e10d468deef5f115d3426e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd9qFDEUxgdRcK0-gBdCwBtvpubk32S8K-vaCpUWWq-HmJyZZp1J1mS2oC_Q126GLSKK9CbJ4ft93-HkVNVroMdAoXl_RTmVjShvRilIwZ9UKxBK10wJ_bRaLXK96M-rFzlvC8MkqFV1d5Iz5uzDQDY2jnHw1ozkS3SYgv9lZh8D8YGsb3wwH8jVbL7jTRyLSj7iZILLpBxkHdMuJjMj2YRbn2KYMMxLjglmwKUgl8nY2VvMS9zp3oTBxdL0MsVbHyy-rJ71Zsz46uE-qr5-2lyvz-rzi9PP65Pz2ooG5hqF01RJabSTQkNLmxaN0JQ6y4ySPZNCcGDKNAjUlfkdYi97AOm4YAr5UfXukLtL8cce89xNPlscRxMw7nMHkpZMykE8jgrQ5bd5yx5HuRKqbVpJC_r2L3Qb9ymUmQsFWipFZVsoOFA2xZwT9t0u-cmknx3Qbll498_Ci-fNwbPNc0y_DYxL2kqli84fMs30LXk34B-t_5t6D8Zjtaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1318566059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Ecological Modernization in China: Stakeholder Demands and Corporate Environmental Management Practices in Guangdong Province</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Cambridge University Press journals</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><creator>Yee, Wai-Hang ; Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung ; Tang, Shui-Yan</creator><creatorcontrib>Yee, Wai-Hang ; Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung ; Tang, Shui-Yan</creatorcontrib><description>This paper compares the key arguments of ecological modernization theory (EMT) with the reality of recent environmental reform in China. Based on data gathered from a survey and in-depth interviews with executives from Hong Kong-based enterprises operating in Guangdong province, we examine the changing roles of government, market, and civil society actors in the reform process, focusing on various types of pressures these actors have exerted on business enterprises. Compatible with Mol's (2006) conjectures, ecological concerns have gradually gained a foothold in existing political, economic, and to a lesser extent, social institutions. Yet, the relevant actors and their patterns of interactions differ from what EMT generalizes from Western European experiences. Specifically, local governments are assuming a more formalized relationship with firms in regulatory enforcement. Among market actors, organizational buyers along the supply chain have exerted more noticeable pressures on manufacturing firms than industrial associations and individual consumers. Civil society, while remaining less of an institutionalized actor in the environmental policy process, appears to pose a perceptible threat to at least some firms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7410</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0305741012001543</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Business ; Business community ; Capitalism ; China ; Civil Society ; Companies ; Consumers ; Ecology ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Economics ; Enterprises ; Environment and politics ; Environmental management ; Environmental policy ; Environmental protection ; Europe ; Government ; Governmental reform ; Interaction ; Local government ; Manufacturing ; Markets ; Modernization ; Peoples Republic of China ; Policy making ; Political institutions ; Politics ; Reform ; Reforms ; Resource Management ; Social Institutions ; Stakeholder ; Stakeholders ; State role</subject><ispartof>The China quarterly (London), 2013-03, Vol.213 (213), p.101-129</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The China Quarterly 2013</rights><rights>School of Oriental and African Studies, 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e4d80655a8d54819079ea4800dc2a65f25443126a7e10d468deef5f115d3426e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e4d80655a8d54819079ea4800dc2a65f25443126a7e10d468deef5f115d3426e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1318566059/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1318566059?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11668,12825,12827,21367,21374,27903,27904,33202,33203,33590,33591,33964,33965,36039,36040,43712,43927,44342,58216,58449,62637,62638,62640,62653,72706,73942,73967,74214,74641</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yee, Wai-Hang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Shui-Yan</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Ecological Modernization in China: Stakeholder Demands and Corporate Environmental Management Practices in Guangdong Province</title><title>The China quarterly (London)</title><addtitle>The China Quarterly</addtitle><description>This paper compares the key arguments of ecological modernization theory (EMT) with the reality of recent environmental reform in China. Based on data gathered from a survey and in-depth interviews with executives from Hong Kong-based enterprises operating in Guangdong province, we examine the changing roles of government, market, and civil society actors in the reform process, focusing on various types of pressures these actors have exerted on business enterprises. Compatible with Mol's (2006) conjectures, ecological concerns have gradually gained a foothold in existing political, economic, and to a lesser extent, social institutions. Yet, the relevant actors and their patterns of interactions differ from what EMT generalizes from Western European experiences. Specifically, local governments are assuming a more formalized relationship with firms in regulatory enforcement. Among market actors, organizational buyers along the supply chain have exerted more noticeable pressures on manufacturing firms than industrial associations and individual consumers. Civil society, while remaining less of an institutionalized actor in the environmental policy process, appears to pose a perceptible threat to at least some firms.</description><subject>Business</subject><subject>Business community</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Civil Society</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Enterprises</subject><subject>Environment and politics</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Governmental reform</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political institutions</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Resource Management</subject><subject>Social Institutions</subject><subject>Stakeholder</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>State role</subject><issn>0305-7410</issn><issn>1468-2648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd9qFDEUxgdRcK0-gBdCwBtvpubk32S8K-vaCpUWWq-HmJyZZp1J1mS2oC_Q126GLSKK9CbJ4ft93-HkVNVroMdAoXl_RTmVjShvRilIwZ9UKxBK10wJ_bRaLXK96M-rFzlvC8MkqFV1d5Iz5uzDQDY2jnHw1ozkS3SYgv9lZh8D8YGsb3wwH8jVbL7jTRyLSj7iZILLpBxkHdMuJjMj2YRbn2KYMMxLjglmwKUgl8nY2VvMS9zp3oTBxdL0MsVbHyy-rJ71Zsz46uE-qr5-2lyvz-rzi9PP65Pz2ooG5hqF01RJabSTQkNLmxaN0JQ6y4ySPZNCcGDKNAjUlfkdYi97AOm4YAr5UfXukLtL8cce89xNPlscRxMw7nMHkpZMykE8jgrQ5bd5yx5HuRKqbVpJC_r2L3Qb9ymUmQsFWipFZVsoOFA2xZwT9t0u-cmknx3Qbll498_Ci-fNwbPNc0y_DYxL2kqli84fMs30LXk34B-t_5t6D8Zjtaw</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Yee, Wai-Hang</creator><creator>Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</creator><creator>Tang, Shui-Yan</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Assessing Ecological Modernization in China: Stakeholder Demands and Corporate Environmental Management Practices in Guangdong Province</title><author>Yee, Wai-Hang ; Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung ; Tang, Shui-Yan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e4d80655a8d54819079ea4800dc2a65f25443126a7e10d468deef5f115d3426e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Business</topic><topic>Business community</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Civil Society</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Enterprises</topic><topic>Environment and politics</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Governmental reform</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political institutions</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Resource Management</topic><topic>Social Institutions</topic><topic>Stakeholder</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>State role</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yee, Wai-Hang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Shui-Yan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The China quarterly (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yee, Wai-Hang</au><au>Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</au><au>Tang, Shui-Yan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Ecological Modernization in China: Stakeholder Demands and Corporate Environmental Management Practices in Guangdong Province</atitle><jtitle>The China quarterly (London)</jtitle><addtitle>The China Quarterly</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>213</volume><issue>213</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>101-129</pages><issn>0305-7410</issn><eissn>1468-2648</eissn><abstract>This paper compares the key arguments of ecological modernization theory (EMT) with the reality of recent environmental reform in China. Based on data gathered from a survey and in-depth interviews with executives from Hong Kong-based enterprises operating in Guangdong province, we examine the changing roles of government, market, and civil society actors in the reform process, focusing on various types of pressures these actors have exerted on business enterprises. Compatible with Mol's (2006) conjectures, ecological concerns have gradually gained a foothold in existing political, economic, and to a lesser extent, social institutions. Yet, the relevant actors and their patterns of interactions differ from what EMT generalizes from Western European experiences. Specifically, local governments are assuming a more formalized relationship with firms in regulatory enforcement. Among market actors, organizational buyers along the supply chain have exerted more noticeable pressures on manufacturing firms than industrial associations and individual consumers. Civil society, while remaining less of an institutionalized actor in the environmental policy process, appears to pose a perceptible threat to at least some firms.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0305741012001543</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-7410 |
ispartof | The China quarterly (London), 2013-03, Vol.213 (213), p.101-129 |
issn | 0305-7410 1468-2648 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500790314 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Cambridge University Press journals; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; ProQuest One Literature |
subjects | Business Business community Capitalism China Civil Society Companies Consumers Ecology Economic development Economic growth Economics Enterprises Environment and politics Environmental management Environmental policy Environmental protection Europe Government Governmental reform Interaction Local government Manufacturing Markets Modernization Peoples Republic of China Policy making Political institutions Politics Reform Reforms Resource Management Social Institutions Stakeholder Stakeholders State role |
title | Assessing Ecological Modernization in China: Stakeholder Demands and Corporate Environmental Management Practices in Guangdong Province |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A55%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Ecological%20Modernization%20in%20China:%20Stakeholder%20Demands%20and%20Corporate%20Environmental%20Management%20Practices%20in%20Guangdong%20Province&rft.jtitle=The%20China%20quarterly%20(London)&rft.au=Yee,%20Wai-Hang&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=213&rft.issue=213&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=101-129&rft.issn=0305-7410&rft.eissn=1468-2648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0305741012001543&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23509568%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e4d80655a8d54819079ea4800dc2a65f25443126a7e10d468deef5f115d3426e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1318566059&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0305741012001543&rft_jstor_id=23509568&rfr_iscdi=true |