Loading…

Assessing Ecological Modernization in China: Stakeholder Demands and Corporate Environmental Management Practices in Guangdong Province

This paper compares the key arguments of ecological modernization theory (EMT) with the reality of recent environmental reform in China. Based on data gathered from a survey and in-depth interviews with executives from Hong Kong-based enterprises operating in Guangdong province, we examine the chang...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The China quarterly (London) 2013-03, Vol.213 (213), p.101-129
Main Authors: Yee, Wai-Hang, Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung, Tang, Shui-Yan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e4d80655a8d54819079ea4800dc2a65f25443126a7e10d468deef5f115d3426e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e4d80655a8d54819079ea4800dc2a65f25443126a7e10d468deef5f115d3426e3
container_end_page 129
container_issue 213
container_start_page 101
container_title The China quarterly (London)
container_volume 213
creator Yee, Wai-Hang
Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung
Tang, Shui-Yan
description This paper compares the key arguments of ecological modernization theory (EMT) with the reality of recent environmental reform in China. Based on data gathered from a survey and in-depth interviews with executives from Hong Kong-based enterprises operating in Guangdong province, we examine the changing roles of government, market, and civil society actors in the reform process, focusing on various types of pressures these actors have exerted on business enterprises. Compatible with Mol's (2006) conjectures, ecological concerns have gradually gained a foothold in existing political, economic, and to a lesser extent, social institutions. Yet, the relevant actors and their patterns of interactions differ from what EMT generalizes from Western European experiences. Specifically, local governments are assuming a more formalized relationship with firms in regulatory enforcement. Among market actors, organizational buyers along the supply chain have exerted more noticeable pressures on manufacturing firms than industrial associations and individual consumers. Civil society, while remaining less of an institutionalized actor in the environmental policy process, appears to pose a perceptible threat to at least some firms.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0305741012001543
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500790314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0305741012001543</cupid><jstor_id>23509568</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23509568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e4d80655a8d54819079ea4800dc2a65f25443126a7e10d468deef5f115d3426e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd9qFDEUxgdRcK0-gBdCwBtvpubk32S8K-vaCpUWWq-HmJyZZp1J1mS2oC_Q126GLSKK9CbJ4ft93-HkVNVroMdAoXl_RTmVjShvRilIwZ9UKxBK10wJ_bRaLXK96M-rFzlvC8MkqFV1d5Iz5uzDQDY2jnHw1ozkS3SYgv9lZh8D8YGsb3wwH8jVbL7jTRyLSj7iZILLpBxkHdMuJjMj2YRbn2KYMMxLjglmwKUgl8nY2VvMS9zp3oTBxdL0MsVbHyy-rJ71Zsz46uE-qr5-2lyvz-rzi9PP65Pz2ooG5hqF01RJabSTQkNLmxaN0JQ6y4ySPZNCcGDKNAjUlfkdYi97AOm4YAr5UfXukLtL8cce89xNPlscRxMw7nMHkpZMykE8jgrQ5bd5yx5HuRKqbVpJC_r2L3Qb9ymUmQsFWipFZVsoOFA2xZwT9t0u-cmknx3Qbll498_Ci-fNwbPNc0y_DYxL2kqli84fMs30LXk34B-t_5t6D8Zjtaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1318566059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Ecological Modernization in China: Stakeholder Demands and Corporate Environmental Management Practices in Guangdong Province</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Cambridge University Press journals</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><creator>Yee, Wai-Hang ; Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung ; Tang, Shui-Yan</creator><creatorcontrib>Yee, Wai-Hang ; Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung ; Tang, Shui-Yan</creatorcontrib><description>This paper compares the key arguments of ecological modernization theory (EMT) with the reality of recent environmental reform in China. Based on data gathered from a survey and in-depth interviews with executives from Hong Kong-based enterprises operating in Guangdong province, we examine the changing roles of government, market, and civil society actors in the reform process, focusing on various types of pressures these actors have exerted on business enterprises. Compatible with Mol's (2006) conjectures, ecological concerns have gradually gained a foothold in existing political, economic, and to a lesser extent, social institutions. Yet, the relevant actors and their patterns of interactions differ from what EMT generalizes from Western European experiences. Specifically, local governments are assuming a more formalized relationship with firms in regulatory enforcement. Among market actors, organizational buyers along the supply chain have exerted more noticeable pressures on manufacturing firms than industrial associations and individual consumers. Civil society, while remaining less of an institutionalized actor in the environmental policy process, appears to pose a perceptible threat to at least some firms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7410</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0305741012001543</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Business ; Business community ; Capitalism ; China ; Civil Society ; Companies ; Consumers ; Ecology ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Economics ; Enterprises ; Environment and politics ; Environmental management ; Environmental policy ; Environmental protection ; Europe ; Government ; Governmental reform ; Interaction ; Local government ; Manufacturing ; Markets ; Modernization ; Peoples Republic of China ; Policy making ; Political institutions ; Politics ; Reform ; Reforms ; Resource Management ; Social Institutions ; Stakeholder ; Stakeholders ; State role</subject><ispartof>The China quarterly (London), 2013-03, Vol.213 (213), p.101-129</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The China Quarterly 2013</rights><rights>School of Oriental and African Studies, 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e4d80655a8d54819079ea4800dc2a65f25443126a7e10d468deef5f115d3426e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e4d80655a8d54819079ea4800dc2a65f25443126a7e10d468deef5f115d3426e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1318566059/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1318566059?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11668,12825,12827,21367,21374,27903,27904,33202,33203,33590,33591,33964,33965,36039,36040,43712,43927,44342,58216,58449,62637,62638,62640,62653,72706,73942,73967,74214,74641</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yee, Wai-Hang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Shui-Yan</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Ecological Modernization in China: Stakeholder Demands and Corporate Environmental Management Practices in Guangdong Province</title><title>The China quarterly (London)</title><addtitle>The China Quarterly</addtitle><description>This paper compares the key arguments of ecological modernization theory (EMT) with the reality of recent environmental reform in China. Based on data gathered from a survey and in-depth interviews with executives from Hong Kong-based enterprises operating in Guangdong province, we examine the changing roles of government, market, and civil society actors in the reform process, focusing on various types of pressures these actors have exerted on business enterprises. Compatible with Mol's (2006) conjectures, ecological concerns have gradually gained a foothold in existing political, economic, and to a lesser extent, social institutions. Yet, the relevant actors and their patterns of interactions differ from what EMT generalizes from Western European experiences. Specifically, local governments are assuming a more formalized relationship with firms in regulatory enforcement. Among market actors, organizational buyers along the supply chain have exerted more noticeable pressures on manufacturing firms than industrial associations and individual consumers. Civil society, while remaining less of an institutionalized actor in the environmental policy process, appears to pose a perceptible threat to at least some firms.</description><subject>Business</subject><subject>Business community</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Civil Society</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Enterprises</subject><subject>Environment and politics</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Governmental reform</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political institutions</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Resource Management</subject><subject>Social Institutions</subject><subject>Stakeholder</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>State role</subject><issn>0305-7410</issn><issn>1468-2648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd9qFDEUxgdRcK0-gBdCwBtvpubk32S8K-vaCpUWWq-HmJyZZp1J1mS2oC_Q126GLSKK9CbJ4ft93-HkVNVroMdAoXl_RTmVjShvRilIwZ9UKxBK10wJ_bRaLXK96M-rFzlvC8MkqFV1d5Iz5uzDQDY2jnHw1ozkS3SYgv9lZh8D8YGsb3wwH8jVbL7jTRyLSj7iZILLpBxkHdMuJjMj2YRbn2KYMMxLjglmwKUgl8nY2VvMS9zp3oTBxdL0MsVbHyy-rJ71Zsz46uE-qr5-2lyvz-rzi9PP65Pz2ooG5hqF01RJabSTQkNLmxaN0JQ6y4ySPZNCcGDKNAjUlfkdYi97AOm4YAr5UfXukLtL8cce89xNPlscRxMw7nMHkpZMykE8jgrQ5bd5yx5HuRKqbVpJC_r2L3Qb9ymUmQsFWipFZVsoOFA2xZwT9t0u-cmknx3Qbll498_Ci-fNwbPNc0y_DYxL2kqli84fMs30LXk34B-t_5t6D8Zjtaw</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Yee, Wai-Hang</creator><creator>Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</creator><creator>Tang, Shui-Yan</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Assessing Ecological Modernization in China: Stakeholder Demands and Corporate Environmental Management Practices in Guangdong Province</title><author>Yee, Wai-Hang ; Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung ; Tang, Shui-Yan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e4d80655a8d54819079ea4800dc2a65f25443126a7e10d468deef5f115d3426e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Business</topic><topic>Business community</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Civil Society</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Enterprises</topic><topic>Environment and politics</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Governmental reform</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political institutions</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Resource Management</topic><topic>Social Institutions</topic><topic>Stakeholder</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>State role</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yee, Wai-Hang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Shui-Yan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The China quarterly (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yee, Wai-Hang</au><au>Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</au><au>Tang, Shui-Yan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Ecological Modernization in China: Stakeholder Demands and Corporate Environmental Management Practices in Guangdong Province</atitle><jtitle>The China quarterly (London)</jtitle><addtitle>The China Quarterly</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>213</volume><issue>213</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>101-129</pages><issn>0305-7410</issn><eissn>1468-2648</eissn><abstract>This paper compares the key arguments of ecological modernization theory (EMT) with the reality of recent environmental reform in China. Based on data gathered from a survey and in-depth interviews with executives from Hong Kong-based enterprises operating in Guangdong province, we examine the changing roles of government, market, and civil society actors in the reform process, focusing on various types of pressures these actors have exerted on business enterprises. Compatible with Mol's (2006) conjectures, ecological concerns have gradually gained a foothold in existing political, economic, and to a lesser extent, social institutions. Yet, the relevant actors and their patterns of interactions differ from what EMT generalizes from Western European experiences. Specifically, local governments are assuming a more formalized relationship with firms in regulatory enforcement. Among market actors, organizational buyers along the supply chain have exerted more noticeable pressures on manufacturing firms than industrial associations and individual consumers. Civil society, while remaining less of an institutionalized actor in the environmental policy process, appears to pose a perceptible threat to at least some firms.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0305741012001543</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-7410
ispartof The China quarterly (London), 2013-03, Vol.213 (213), p.101-129
issn 0305-7410
1468-2648
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500790314
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Cambridge University Press journals; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; ProQuest One Literature
subjects Business
Business community
Capitalism
China
Civil Society
Companies
Consumers
Ecology
Economic development
Economic growth
Economics
Enterprises
Environment and politics
Environmental management
Environmental policy
Environmental protection
Europe
Government
Governmental reform
Interaction
Local government
Manufacturing
Markets
Modernization
Peoples Republic of China
Policy making
Political institutions
Politics
Reform
Reforms
Resource Management
Social Institutions
Stakeholder
Stakeholders
State role
title Assessing Ecological Modernization in China: Stakeholder Demands and Corporate Environmental Management Practices in Guangdong Province
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A55%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Ecological%20Modernization%20in%20China:%20Stakeholder%20Demands%20and%20Corporate%20Environmental%20Management%20Practices%20in%20Guangdong%20Province&rft.jtitle=The%20China%20quarterly%20(London)&rft.au=Yee,%20Wai-Hang&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=213&rft.issue=213&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=101-129&rft.issn=0305-7410&rft.eissn=1468-2648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0305741012001543&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23509568%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e4d80655a8d54819079ea4800dc2a65f25443126a7e10d468deef5f115d3426e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1318566059&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0305741012001543&rft_jstor_id=23509568&rfr_iscdi=true