Loading…

Garner interference and temporal information processing

The aim of the study was to explore whether temporal information processing can interfere with performance of a non-temporal task. A new methodology based on the Garner paradigm was employed. Participants were asked to classify two-dimensional stimuli according to either length or duration, with and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta psychologica 2014-03, Vol.147, p.143-146
Main Authors: Zakay, Dan, Bibi, Arie, Algom, Daniel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d923dc9dfef1839137fb038cc2b909732435bce2e3cb99f140bdd601a0b39fe13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d923dc9dfef1839137fb038cc2b909732435bce2e3cb99f140bdd601a0b39fe13
container_end_page 146
container_issue
container_start_page 143
container_title Acta psychologica
container_volume 147
creator Zakay, Dan
Bibi, Arie
Algom, Daniel
description The aim of the study was to explore whether temporal information processing can interfere with performance of a non-temporal task. A new methodology based on the Garner paradigm was employed. Participants were asked to classify two-dimensional stimuli according to either length or duration, with and without variation in the other (task-irrelevant) dimension. Garner interference was detected only with respect to classification by length when irrelevant variation in duration was present. Stroop interference was detected only in classification by length across compatible and non-compatible values of length and duration. Classification by length took more time when done with variation in duration than when duration was constant. Classification by length also took more time when length and duration were not compatible than when they were compatible. The findings indicate that the processing of duration is similar to the processing of other perceptual dimensions. The processing of duration consumes attentional resources and can interfere with the processing of other perceptual dimensions. The findings support attentional models of prospective duration judgment. •Prospective timing consumes attentional resources•The use of the Garner paradigm is a new methodology suited for studying temporal information processing.•The asymmetrical interference found by Brown (1997) can be explained by methodological reasons.•The findings reported here support attentional models of prospective timing.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.019
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1502329806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001691813001856</els_id><sourcerecordid>1502329806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d923dc9dfef1839137fb038cc2b909732435bce2e3cb99f140bdd601a0b39fe13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gUgvgpddZ5Lt7uYiSPELCl70HLLJRFL2y2Qr9N-7pVVvnoZhnpl3eBi7REgRML9dp9oMfdymHFCkUKSA8ohNsSxEknNZHLMpAGCSSywn7CzG9dhmKPGUTXgGi0xwmLLiSYeWwty3AwVHgVpDc93a-UBN3wVdjxPXhUYPvmvnfegMxejbj3N24nQd6eJQZ-z98eFt-ZysXp9elverxAjJh8RKLqyR1pHDUkgUhatAlMbwSoIsBM_EojLESZhKSocZVNbmgBoqIR2hmLGb_d0x-nNDcVCNj4bqWrfUbaLCBXDBZQn5iGZ71IQuxkBO9cE3OmwVgtopU2u1V6Z2yhQUalQ2rl0dEjZVQ_Z36cfRCFwfAB2Nrl3QrfHxjysFFJjv8u_2HI0-vjwFFY3f-bQ-kBmU7fz_n3wDWvOLzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1502329806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Garner interference and temporal information processing</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zakay, Dan ; Bibi, Arie ; Algom, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Zakay, Dan ; Bibi, Arie ; Algom, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the study was to explore whether temporal information processing can interfere with performance of a non-temporal task. A new methodology based on the Garner paradigm was employed. Participants were asked to classify two-dimensional stimuli according to either length or duration, with and without variation in the other (task-irrelevant) dimension. Garner interference was detected only with respect to classification by length when irrelevant variation in duration was present. Stroop interference was detected only in classification by length across compatible and non-compatible values of length and duration. Classification by length took more time when done with variation in duration than when duration was constant. Classification by length also took more time when length and duration were not compatible than when they were compatible. The findings indicate that the processing of duration is similar to the processing of other perceptual dimensions. The processing of duration consumes attentional resources and can interfere with the processing of other perceptual dimensions. The findings support attentional models of prospective duration judgment. •Prospective timing consumes attentional resources•The use of the Garner paradigm is a new methodology suited for studying temporal information processing.•The asymmetrical interference found by Brown (1997) can be explained by methodological reasons.•The findings reported here support attentional models of prospective timing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24054320</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APSOAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Dual-Single-Task Method ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Garner interference ; Humans ; Male ; Perception ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Prospective timing ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Spatial perception. Time perception ; Stroop interference ; Time Factors ; Time Perception - physiology ; Vision ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Acta psychologica, 2014-03, Vol.147, p.143-146</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d923dc9dfef1839137fb038cc2b909732435bce2e3cb99f140bdd601a0b39fe13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d923dc9dfef1839137fb038cc2b909732435bce2e3cb99f140bdd601a0b39fe13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691813001856$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3536,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,45756</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28307166$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24054320$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zakay, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bibi, Arie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Algom, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Garner interference and temporal information processing</title><title>Acta psychologica</title><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><description>The aim of the study was to explore whether temporal information processing can interfere with performance of a non-temporal task. A new methodology based on the Garner paradigm was employed. Participants were asked to classify two-dimensional stimuli according to either length or duration, with and without variation in the other (task-irrelevant) dimension. Garner interference was detected only with respect to classification by length when irrelevant variation in duration was present. Stroop interference was detected only in classification by length across compatible and non-compatible values of length and duration. Classification by length took more time when done with variation in duration than when duration was constant. Classification by length also took more time when length and duration were not compatible than when they were compatible. The findings indicate that the processing of duration is similar to the processing of other perceptual dimensions. The processing of duration consumes attentional resources and can interfere with the processing of other perceptual dimensions. The findings support attentional models of prospective duration judgment. •Prospective timing consumes attentional resources•The use of the Garner paradigm is a new methodology suited for studying temporal information processing.•The asymmetrical interference found by Brown (1997) can be explained by methodological reasons.•The findings reported here support attentional models of prospective timing.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Dual-Single-Task Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Garner interference</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prospective timing</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Spatial perception. Time perception</subject><subject>Stroop interference</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-6918</issn><issn>1873-6297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gUgvgpddZ5Lt7uYiSPELCl70HLLJRFL2y2Qr9N-7pVVvnoZhnpl3eBi7REgRML9dp9oMfdymHFCkUKSA8ohNsSxEknNZHLMpAGCSSywn7CzG9dhmKPGUTXgGi0xwmLLiSYeWwty3AwVHgVpDc93a-UBN3wVdjxPXhUYPvmvnfegMxejbj3N24nQd6eJQZ-z98eFt-ZysXp9elverxAjJh8RKLqyR1pHDUkgUhatAlMbwSoIsBM_EojLESZhKSocZVNbmgBoqIR2hmLGb_d0x-nNDcVCNj4bqWrfUbaLCBXDBZQn5iGZ71IQuxkBO9cE3OmwVgtopU2u1V6Z2yhQUalQ2rl0dEjZVQ_Z36cfRCFwfAB2Nrl3QrfHxjysFFJjv8u_2HI0-vjwFFY3f-bQ-kBmU7fz_n3wDWvOLzw</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Zakay, Dan</creator><creator>Bibi, Arie</creator><creator>Algom, Daniel</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Garner interference and temporal information processing</title><author>Zakay, Dan ; Bibi, Arie ; Algom, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d923dc9dfef1839137fb038cc2b909732435bce2e3cb99f140bdd601a0b39fe13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Dual-Single-Task Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Garner interference</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prospective timing</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Spatial perception. Time perception</topic><topic>Stroop interference</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zakay, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bibi, Arie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Algom, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zakay, Dan</au><au>Bibi, Arie</au><au>Algom, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Garner interference and temporal information processing</atitle><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>147</volume><spage>143</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>143-146</pages><issn>0001-6918</issn><eissn>1873-6297</eissn><coden>APSOAZ</coden><abstract>The aim of the study was to explore whether temporal information processing can interfere with performance of a non-temporal task. A new methodology based on the Garner paradigm was employed. Participants were asked to classify two-dimensional stimuli according to either length or duration, with and without variation in the other (task-irrelevant) dimension. Garner interference was detected only with respect to classification by length when irrelevant variation in duration was present. Stroop interference was detected only in classification by length across compatible and non-compatible values of length and duration. Classification by length took more time when done with variation in duration than when duration was constant. Classification by length also took more time when length and duration were not compatible than when they were compatible. The findings indicate that the processing of duration is similar to the processing of other perceptual dimensions. The processing of duration consumes attentional resources and can interfere with the processing of other perceptual dimensions. The findings support attentional models of prospective duration judgment. •Prospective timing consumes attentional resources•The use of the Garner paradigm is a new methodology suited for studying temporal information processing.•The asymmetrical interference found by Brown (1997) can be explained by methodological reasons.•The findings reported here support attentional models of prospective timing.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24054320</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.019</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-6918
ispartof Acta psychologica, 2014-03, Vol.147, p.143-146
issn 0001-6918
1873-6297
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1502329806
source ScienceDirect Journals; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Attention - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition. Intelligence
Dual-Single-Task Method
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Garner interference
Humans
Male
Perception
Photic Stimulation - methods
Prospective Studies
Prospective timing
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reaction Time - physiology
Spatial perception. Time perception
Stroop interference
Time Factors
Time Perception - physiology
Vision
Visual Perception - physiology
Young Adult
title Garner interference and temporal information processing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T19%3A53%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Garner%20interference%20and%20temporal%20information%20processing&rft.jtitle=Acta%20psychologica&rft.au=Zakay,%20Dan&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=147&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=143-146&rft.issn=0001-6918&rft.eissn=1873-6297&rft.coden=APSOAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1502329806%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d923dc9dfef1839137fb038cc2b909732435bce2e3cb99f140bdd601a0b39fe13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1502329806&rft_id=info:pmid/24054320&rfr_iscdi=true