Loading…
Garner interference and temporal information processing
The aim of the study was to explore whether temporal information processing can interfere with performance of a non-temporal task. A new methodology based on the Garner paradigm was employed. Participants were asked to classify two-dimensional stimuli according to either length or duration, with and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta psychologica 2014-03, Vol.147, p.143-146 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d923dc9dfef1839137fb038cc2b909732435bce2e3cb99f140bdd601a0b39fe13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d923dc9dfef1839137fb038cc2b909732435bce2e3cb99f140bdd601a0b39fe13 |
container_end_page | 146 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 143 |
container_title | Acta psychologica |
container_volume | 147 |
creator | Zakay, Dan Bibi, Arie Algom, Daniel |
description | The aim of the study was to explore whether temporal information processing can interfere with performance of a non-temporal task. A new methodology based on the Garner paradigm was employed. Participants were asked to classify two-dimensional stimuli according to either length or duration, with and without variation in the other (task-irrelevant) dimension. Garner interference was detected only with respect to classification by length when irrelevant variation in duration was present. Stroop interference was detected only in classification by length across compatible and non-compatible values of length and duration. Classification by length took more time when done with variation in duration than when duration was constant. Classification by length also took more time when length and duration were not compatible than when they were compatible. The findings indicate that the processing of duration is similar to the processing of other perceptual dimensions. The processing of duration consumes attentional resources and can interfere with the processing of other perceptual dimensions. The findings support attentional models of prospective duration judgment.
•Prospective timing consumes attentional resources•The use of the Garner paradigm is a new methodology suited for studying temporal information processing.•The asymmetrical interference found by Brown (1997) can be explained by methodological reasons.•The findings reported here support attentional models of prospective timing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.019 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1502329806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001691813001856</els_id><sourcerecordid>1502329806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d923dc9dfef1839137fb038cc2b909732435bce2e3cb99f140bdd601a0b39fe13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gUgvgpddZ5Lt7uYiSPELCl70HLLJRFL2y2Qr9N-7pVVvnoZhnpl3eBi7REgRML9dp9oMfdymHFCkUKSA8ohNsSxEknNZHLMpAGCSSywn7CzG9dhmKPGUTXgGi0xwmLLiSYeWwty3AwVHgVpDc93a-UBN3wVdjxPXhUYPvmvnfegMxejbj3N24nQd6eJQZ-z98eFt-ZysXp9elverxAjJh8RKLqyR1pHDUkgUhatAlMbwSoIsBM_EojLESZhKSocZVNbmgBoqIR2hmLGb_d0x-nNDcVCNj4bqWrfUbaLCBXDBZQn5iGZ71IQuxkBO9cE3OmwVgtopU2u1V6Z2yhQUalQ2rl0dEjZVQ_Z36cfRCFwfAB2Nrl3QrfHxjysFFJjv8u_2HI0-vjwFFY3f-bQ-kBmU7fz_n3wDWvOLzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1502329806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Garner interference and temporal information processing</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zakay, Dan ; Bibi, Arie ; Algom, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Zakay, Dan ; Bibi, Arie ; Algom, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the study was to explore whether temporal information processing can interfere with performance of a non-temporal task. A new methodology based on the Garner paradigm was employed. Participants were asked to classify two-dimensional stimuli according to either length or duration, with and without variation in the other (task-irrelevant) dimension. Garner interference was detected only with respect to classification by length when irrelevant variation in duration was present. Stroop interference was detected only in classification by length across compatible and non-compatible values of length and duration. Classification by length took more time when done with variation in duration than when duration was constant. Classification by length also took more time when length and duration were not compatible than when they were compatible. The findings indicate that the processing of duration is similar to the processing of other perceptual dimensions. The processing of duration consumes attentional resources and can interfere with the processing of other perceptual dimensions. The findings support attentional models of prospective duration judgment.
•Prospective timing consumes attentional resources•The use of the Garner paradigm is a new methodology suited for studying temporal information processing.•The asymmetrical interference found by Brown (1997) can be explained by methodological reasons.•The findings reported here support attentional models of prospective timing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24054320</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APSOAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Dual-Single-Task Method ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Garner interference ; Humans ; Male ; Perception ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Prospective timing ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Spatial perception. Time perception ; Stroop interference ; Time Factors ; Time Perception - physiology ; Vision ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Acta psychologica, 2014-03, Vol.147, p.143-146</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d923dc9dfef1839137fb038cc2b909732435bce2e3cb99f140bdd601a0b39fe13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d923dc9dfef1839137fb038cc2b909732435bce2e3cb99f140bdd601a0b39fe13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691813001856$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3536,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,45756</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28307166$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24054320$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zakay, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bibi, Arie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Algom, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Garner interference and temporal information processing</title><title>Acta psychologica</title><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><description>The aim of the study was to explore whether temporal information processing can interfere with performance of a non-temporal task. A new methodology based on the Garner paradigm was employed. Participants were asked to classify two-dimensional stimuli according to either length or duration, with and without variation in the other (task-irrelevant) dimension. Garner interference was detected only with respect to classification by length when irrelevant variation in duration was present. Stroop interference was detected only in classification by length across compatible and non-compatible values of length and duration. Classification by length took more time when done with variation in duration than when duration was constant. Classification by length also took more time when length and duration were not compatible than when they were compatible. The findings indicate that the processing of duration is similar to the processing of other perceptual dimensions. The processing of duration consumes attentional resources and can interfere with the processing of other perceptual dimensions. The findings support attentional models of prospective duration judgment.
•Prospective timing consumes attentional resources•The use of the Garner paradigm is a new methodology suited for studying temporal information processing.•The asymmetrical interference found by Brown (1997) can be explained by methodological reasons.•The findings reported here support attentional models of prospective timing.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Dual-Single-Task Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Garner interference</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prospective timing</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Spatial perception. Time perception</subject><subject>Stroop interference</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-6918</issn><issn>1873-6297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gUgvgpddZ5Lt7uYiSPELCl70HLLJRFL2y2Qr9N-7pVVvnoZhnpl3eBi7REgRML9dp9oMfdymHFCkUKSA8ohNsSxEknNZHLMpAGCSSywn7CzG9dhmKPGUTXgGi0xwmLLiSYeWwty3AwVHgVpDc93a-UBN3wVdjxPXhUYPvmvnfegMxejbj3N24nQd6eJQZ-z98eFt-ZysXp9elverxAjJh8RKLqyR1pHDUkgUhatAlMbwSoIsBM_EojLESZhKSocZVNbmgBoqIR2hmLGb_d0x-nNDcVCNj4bqWrfUbaLCBXDBZQn5iGZ71IQuxkBO9cE3OmwVgtopU2u1V6Z2yhQUalQ2rl0dEjZVQ_Z36cfRCFwfAB2Nrl3QrfHxjysFFJjv8u_2HI0-vjwFFY3f-bQ-kBmU7fz_n3wDWvOLzw</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Zakay, Dan</creator><creator>Bibi, Arie</creator><creator>Algom, Daniel</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Garner interference and temporal information processing</title><author>Zakay, Dan ; Bibi, Arie ; Algom, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d923dc9dfef1839137fb038cc2b909732435bce2e3cb99f140bdd601a0b39fe13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Dual-Single-Task Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Garner interference</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prospective timing</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Spatial perception. Time perception</topic><topic>Stroop interference</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zakay, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bibi, Arie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Algom, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zakay, Dan</au><au>Bibi, Arie</au><au>Algom, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Garner interference and temporal information processing</atitle><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>147</volume><spage>143</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>143-146</pages><issn>0001-6918</issn><eissn>1873-6297</eissn><coden>APSOAZ</coden><abstract>The aim of the study was to explore whether temporal information processing can interfere with performance of a non-temporal task. A new methodology based on the Garner paradigm was employed. Participants were asked to classify two-dimensional stimuli according to either length or duration, with and without variation in the other (task-irrelevant) dimension. Garner interference was detected only with respect to classification by length when irrelevant variation in duration was present. Stroop interference was detected only in classification by length across compatible and non-compatible values of length and duration. Classification by length took more time when done with variation in duration than when duration was constant. Classification by length also took more time when length and duration were not compatible than when they were compatible. The findings indicate that the processing of duration is similar to the processing of other perceptual dimensions. The processing of duration consumes attentional resources and can interfere with the processing of other perceptual dimensions. The findings support attentional models of prospective duration judgment.
•Prospective timing consumes attentional resources•The use of the Garner paradigm is a new methodology suited for studying temporal information processing.•The asymmetrical interference found by Brown (1997) can be explained by methodological reasons.•The findings reported here support attentional models of prospective timing.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24054320</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.019</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-6918 |
ispartof | Acta psychologica, 2014-03, Vol.147, p.143-146 |
issn | 0001-6918 1873-6297 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1502329806 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Attention - physiology Biological and medical sciences Cognition. Intelligence Dual-Single-Task Method Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Garner interference Humans Male Perception Photic Stimulation - methods Prospective Studies Prospective timing Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time - physiology Spatial perception. Time perception Stroop interference Time Factors Time Perception - physiology Vision Visual Perception - physiology Young Adult |
title | Garner interference and temporal information processing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T19%3A53%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Garner%20interference%20and%20temporal%20information%20processing&rft.jtitle=Acta%20psychologica&rft.au=Zakay,%20Dan&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=147&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=143-146&rft.issn=0001-6918&rft.eissn=1873-6297&rft.coden=APSOAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1502329806%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d923dc9dfef1839137fb038cc2b909732435bce2e3cb99f140bdd601a0b39fe13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1502329806&rft_id=info:pmid/24054320&rfr_iscdi=true |