Clinical markers of endometriosis: Have we been too quick to judge?

Abstract Numerous biochemical differences have been documented in women with endometriosis compared to controls; however, identification of a clinically useful marker of endometriosis remains elusive. We postulate that the diversity of clinical presentations, patient objectives, and complexity of th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical hypotheses 2014-04, Vol.82 (4), p.493-501
Main Authors: Toor, K, Wessels, J.M, Agarwal, S.K, Leyland, N, Foster, W.G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biomarkers - metabolism
Endometriosis - blood
Endometriosis - diagnosis
Female
Humans
Inflammation
Internal Medicine
Models, Theoretical
Pain Measurement
Pelvic Pain - diagnosis
Quality of Life
Research Design
Surveys and Questionnaires
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Numerous biochemical differences have been documented in women with endometriosis compared to controls; however, identification of a clinically useful marker of endometriosis remains elusive. We postulate that the diversity of clinical presentations, patient objectives, and complexity of the pathophysiology of endometriosis mandates rigorous attention to study design and standardization of procedures and questionnaires that has heretofore been overlooked in the pursuit of clinical markers of this enigmatic disease. We further propose that it is premature to conclude that clinical markers of endometriosis brought forward in the literature lack clinical value in the diagnosis of endometriosis. To address this hypothesis we reviewed the literature and assessed papers according to a modified version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) criteria from which 55 high quality papers were reviewed. While pelvic inflammation and pain is a known significant component of endometriosis, control group definitions were widely divergent and included healthy women through to women with other inflammatory conditions. Although pain is a common presenting complaint in women with endometriosis, it was assessed in only 4 of 55 studies (7.3%) whereas infertility was documented in 34/55 studies (61.8%). Disease severity was assessed in 44 of 55 studies (80%) whilst the association between active vs. inactive disease was attempted in only 2 of the studies reviewed (3.6%). We conclude that experimental design criteria are inconsistently applied making comparisons across studies difficult. Thus, the clinical utility of previously described diagnostic markers of endometriosis remains uncertain.
ISSN:0306-9877
1532-2777
DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2014.02.007