Allegation of ethnic minorities from 1993–2008: An equal employment opportunity commission (EEOC) study

• Published in: Work (Reading, Mass.) Mass.), 2014, Vol.47 (2), p.267-279
• Main Authors: Arango-Lasprilla, Juan Carlos, Ketchum, Jessica M., Hurley, Jessica, Getachew, Almaz. M., Gary, Kelli Williams
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cross-Sectional Studies; Disabled Persons - legislation & jurisprudence; Employment - legislation & jurisprudence; Employment - statistics & numerical data; Ethnic Groups - legislation & jurisprudence; Female; Government Agencies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Minority Groups - legislation & jurisprudence; Racism - ethnology; Racism - legislation & jurisprudence; Racism - trends; Retrospective Studies; United States; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1051-9815; 1875-9270
• DOI: 10.3233/WOR-121583

BACKGROUND: Approximately 25% of working-aged Americans with disabilities work full or part time, yet still face discrimination despite the passing of the American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) over 20 years ago. OBJECTIVES: To determine if the proportion of allegations of ADA Title I workplace discrimination with merit closed at any year between 1993 and 2008 differs among Whites, African Americans, Hispanics, and Asians; to determine if there was a change over time from 1993 to 2008 in merit closure rate within each race/ethnicity group; and to determine whether changes over time between 1993 and 2008 in the merit closure rate differ among the race/ethnicity groups. METHODS: Logistic regression was used for this cross-sectional panel study to model the merit closure rate for each ethnic group from 1993 to 2008 using 318,587 charging parties from the EEOC database. RESULTS: All ethnic groups exhibited significant changes over time in the merit closure rate. There were significant differences in the closure rates among the race/ethnicity groups specifically at closure years 1995–2000, 2002, 2003, and 2006. Finally, there was evidence that the trends in merit closure rates over time differed significantly among the race/ethnicity groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant evidence that the proportion of claims closed with merit was significantly different among the racial/ethnicity groups.