Loading…

The Use of Likert Scales With Children

We investigated elementary school children's ability to use a variety of Likert response formats to respond to concrete and abstract items. 111 children, aged 6-13 years, responded to 2 physical tasks that required them to make objectively verifiable judgments, using a 5-point response format....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pediatric psychology 2014-04, Vol.39 (3), p.369-379
Main Authors: MELLOR, David, MOORE, Kathleen A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-61c698dbf6e6d83eaa82dc84dd4fec31f7f7eadd0b2c78bf4eabc6462a2d446a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-61c698dbf6e6d83eaa82dc84dd4fec31f7f7eadd0b2c78bf4eabc6462a2d446a3
container_end_page 379
container_issue 3
container_start_page 369
container_title Journal of pediatric psychology
container_volume 39
creator MELLOR, David
MOORE, Kathleen A
description We investigated elementary school children's ability to use a variety of Likert response formats to respond to concrete and abstract items. 111 children, aged 6-13 years, responded to 2 physical tasks that required them to make objectively verifiable judgments, using a 5-point response format. Then, using 25 items, we ascertained the consistency between responses using a "gold standard" yes/no format and responses using 5-point Likert formats including numeric values, as well as word-based frequencies, similarities to self, and agreeability. All groups responded similarly to the physical tasks. For the 25 items, the use of numbers to signify agreement yielded low concordance with the yes/no answer format across age-groups. Formats based on words provided higher, but not perfect, concordance for all groups. Researchers and clinicians need to be aware of the limited understanding that children have of Likert response formats.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jpepsy/jst079
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1509413949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1509413949</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-61c698dbf6e6d83eaa82dc84dd4fec31f7f7eadd0b2c78bf4eabc6462a2d446a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0D9PwzAQhnELgWgpjKwoC4gl1I4dxx5RxT-pEgOtYLMc-6ympE3wpUO_PUEpMJ1O-ukdHkIuGb1jVPPpuoUW99M1drTQR2TMhMzTgucfx2RM-ydVUvMROUNcU0qF4PKUjDLBJBdcjcnNYgXJEiFpQjKvPiF2yZuzNWDyXnWrZLaqah9he05Ogq0RLg53QpaPD4vZczp_fXqZ3c9Tx2XWpZI5qZUvgwTpFQdrVeadEt6LAI6zUIQCrPe0zFyhyiDAlk4KmdnMCyEtn5DbYbeNzdcOsDObCh3Utd1Cs0PDcqoF41ronqYDdbFBjBBMG6uNjXvDqPlJY4Y0ZkjT-6vD9K7cgP_Tvy16cH0AFvsEIdqtq_DfKZEzWSj-Db8Xbf8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1509413949</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Use of Likert Scales With Children</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>MELLOR, David ; MOORE, Kathleen A</creator><creatorcontrib>MELLOR, David ; MOORE, Kathleen A</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated elementary school children's ability to use a variety of Likert response formats to respond to concrete and abstract items. 111 children, aged 6-13 years, responded to 2 physical tasks that required them to make objectively verifiable judgments, using a 5-point response format. Then, using 25 items, we ascertained the consistency between responses using a "gold standard" yes/no format and responses using 5-point Likert formats including numeric values, as well as word-based frequencies, similarities to self, and agreeability. All groups responded similarly to the physical tasks. For the 25 items, the use of numbers to signify agreement yielded low concordance with the yes/no answer format across age-groups. Formats based on words provided higher, but not perfect, concordance for all groups. Researchers and clinicians need to be aware of the limited understanding that children have of Likert response formats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-8693</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-735X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jst079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24163438</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPPSDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta, GA: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child clinical studies ; Female ; Humans ; Judgment ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric psychology, 2014-04, Vol.39 (3), p.369-379</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-61c698dbf6e6d83eaa82dc84dd4fec31f7f7eadd0b2c78bf4eabc6462a2d446a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-61c698dbf6e6d83eaa82dc84dd4fec31f7f7eadd0b2c78bf4eabc6462a2d446a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28451678$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24163438$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MELLOR, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOORE, Kathleen A</creatorcontrib><title>The Use of Likert Scales With Children</title><title>Journal of pediatric psychology</title><addtitle>J Pediatr Psychol</addtitle><description>We investigated elementary school children's ability to use a variety of Likert response formats to respond to concrete and abstract items. 111 children, aged 6-13 years, responded to 2 physical tasks that required them to make objectively verifiable judgments, using a 5-point response format. Then, using 25 items, we ascertained the consistency between responses using a "gold standard" yes/no format and responses using 5-point Likert formats including numeric values, as well as word-based frequencies, similarities to self, and agreeability. All groups responded similarly to the physical tasks. For the 25 items, the use of numbers to signify agreement yielded low concordance with the yes/no answer format across age-groups. Formats based on words provided higher, but not perfect, concordance for all groups. Researchers and clinicians need to be aware of the limited understanding that children have of Likert response formats.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child clinical studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0146-8693</issn><issn>1465-735X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpF0D9PwzAQhnELgWgpjKwoC4gl1I4dxx5RxT-pEgOtYLMc-6ympE3wpUO_PUEpMJ1O-ukdHkIuGb1jVPPpuoUW99M1drTQR2TMhMzTgucfx2RM-ydVUvMROUNcU0qF4PKUjDLBJBdcjcnNYgXJEiFpQjKvPiF2yZuzNWDyXnWrZLaqah9he05Ogq0RLg53QpaPD4vZczp_fXqZ3c9Tx2XWpZI5qZUvgwTpFQdrVeadEt6LAI6zUIQCrPe0zFyhyiDAlk4KmdnMCyEtn5DbYbeNzdcOsDObCh3Utd1Cs0PDcqoF41ronqYDdbFBjBBMG6uNjXvDqPlJY4Y0ZkjT-6vD9K7cgP_Tvy16cH0AFvsEIdqtq_DfKZEzWSj-Db8Xbf8</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>MELLOR, David</creator><creator>MOORE, Kathleen A</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>The Use of Likert Scales With Children</title><author>MELLOR, David ; MOORE, Kathleen A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-61c698dbf6e6d83eaa82dc84dd4fec31f7f7eadd0b2c78bf4eabc6462a2d446a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child clinical studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MELLOR, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOORE, Kathleen A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MELLOR, David</au><au>MOORE, Kathleen A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Use of Likert Scales With Children</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr Psychol</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>369</spage><epage>379</epage><pages>369-379</pages><issn>0146-8693</issn><eissn>1465-735X</eissn><coden>JPPSDW</coden><abstract>We investigated elementary school children's ability to use a variety of Likert response formats to respond to concrete and abstract items. 111 children, aged 6-13 years, responded to 2 physical tasks that required them to make objectively verifiable judgments, using a 5-point response format. Then, using 25 items, we ascertained the consistency between responses using a "gold standard" yes/no format and responses using 5-point Likert formats including numeric values, as well as word-based frequencies, similarities to self, and agreeability. All groups responded similarly to the physical tasks. For the 25 items, the use of numbers to signify agreement yielded low concordance with the yes/no answer format across age-groups. Formats based on words provided higher, but not perfect, concordance for all groups. Researchers and clinicians need to be aware of the limited understanding that children have of Likert response formats.</abstract><cop>Atlanta, GA</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>24163438</pmid><doi>10.1093/jpepsy/jst079</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-8693
ispartof Journal of pediatric psychology, 2014-04, Vol.39 (3), p.369-379
issn 0146-8693
1465-735X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1509413949
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Adolescent
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child clinical studies
Female
Humans
Judgment
Male
Medical sciences
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychometrics
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Surveys and Questionnaires
title The Use of Likert Scales With Children
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A02%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Use%20of%20Likert%20Scales%20With%20Children&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20psychology&rft.au=MELLOR,%20David&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=379&rft.pages=369-379&rft.issn=0146-8693&rft.eissn=1465-735X&rft.coden=JPPSDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jpepsy/jst079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1509413949%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-61c698dbf6e6d83eaa82dc84dd4fec31f7f7eadd0b2c78bf4eabc6462a2d446a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1509413949&rft_id=info:pmid/24163438&rfr_iscdi=true